Bill Text: NY S03497 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: Provides for the use of binding arbitration for employee organizations represented by the Ninth judicial district negotiating unit, Nassau county negotiating unit, Suffolk county negotiating unit, New York city senior court officers negotiating unit, New York city court officers negotiating unit and New York city court clerks negotiating unit; the parties shall refer the dispute to a three member public arbitration panel; requires the arbitration panel to hold hearings on all matters within the scope of negotiations related to the dispute; determinations of the panel are final and binding on all parties.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 8-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2010-01-06 - REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSIONS [S03497 Detail]
Download: New_York-2009-S03497-Introduced.html
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3497 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E March 20, 2009 ___________ Introduced by Sens. ADDABBO, DILAN, HUNTLEY, C. JOHNSON, MONSERRATE, ONORATO, SAVINO, THOMPSON -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Civil Service and Pensions AN ACT to amend the civil service law, in relation to binding arbi- tration for court clerks and uniformed court officers of the unified court system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Section 209 of the civil service law is amended by adding a 2 new subdivision 6 to read as follows: 3 6. (A) IN THE EVENT THAT THE BOARD CERTIFIES THAT A VOLUNTARY RESOL- 4 UTION OF THE CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM AND 5 THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION CERTIFIED OR RECOGNIZED TO REPRESENT 6 THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NEGOTIATING UNIT, NASSAU COUNTY NEGOTIATING 7 UNIT, SUFFOLK COUNTY NEGOTIATING UNIT, NEW YORK CITY SENIOR COURT OFFI- 8 CERS NEGOTIATING UNIT, NEW YORK CITY COURT REPORTERS NEGOTIATING UNIT, 9 NEW YORK CITY COURT OFFICERS NEGOTIATING UNIT AND NEW YORK CITY COURT 10 CLERKS NEGOTIATING UNIT SUCH BOARD SHALL REFER THE DISPUTE TO A PUBLIC 11 ARBITRATION PANEL, CONSISTING OF ONE MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE UNIFIED 12 COURT SYSTEM, ONE MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION AND ONE 13 PUBLIC MEMBER APPOINTED JOINTLY BY THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM AND THE 14 EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION WHO SHALL BE SELECTED WITHIN TEN DAYS AFTER 15 RECEIPT BY THE BOARD OF A PETITION FOR CREATION OF THE ARBITRATION 16 PANEL. IF EITHER PARTY FAILS TO DESIGNATE ITS MEMBER TO THE PUBLIC ARBI- 17 TRATION PANEL, THE BOARD SHALL PROMPTLY, UPON RECEIPT OF A REQUEST BY 18 EITHER PARTY, DESIGNATE A MEMBER ASSOCIATED IN INTEREST WITH THE UNIFIED 19 COURT SYSTEM OR EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION HE OR SHE IS TO REPRESENT. EACH OF 20 THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES IS TO BEAR THE COST OF ITS MEMBER APPOINTED OR 21 DESIGNATED TO THE ARBITRATION PANEL AND EACH OF THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES 22 IS TO SHARE EQUALLY THE COST OF THE PUBLIC MEMBER. IF, WITHIN SEVEN DAYS 23 AFTER THE MAILING DATE, THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO AGREE UPON THE ONE EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD07377-01-9 S. 3497 2 1 PUBLIC MEMBER, THE BOARD SHALL SUBMIT TO THE PARTIES A LIST OF QUALI- 2 FIED, DISINTERESTED PERSONS FOR THE SELECTION OF THE PUBLIC MEMBER. EACH 3 PARTY SHALL ALTERNATELY STRIKE FROM THE LIST ONE OF THE NAMES WITH THE 4 ORDER OF STRIKING DETERMINED BY LOT, UNTIL THE REMAINING ONE PERSON 5 SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC MEMBER. THIS PROCESS SHALL BE COMPLETED 6 WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS LIST. THE PARTIES SHALL NOTIFY THE 7 BOARD OF THE DESIGNATED PUBLIC MEMBER. THE PUBLIC MEMBER SHALL BE CHOSEN 8 AS CHAIRPERSON. 9 (B) THE ARBITRATION PANEL SHALL HOLD HEARINGS ON ALL MATTERS WITHIN 10 THE SCOPE OF NEGOTIATIONS RELATED TO THE DISPUTE FOR WHICH THE PANEL WAS 11 APPOINTED. THE PARTIES MAY BE HEARD EITHER IN PERSON, BY COUNSEL OR BY 12 OTHER REPRESENTATIVES AS THEY MAY RESPECTIVELY DESIGNATE. THE PARTIES 13 MAY PRESENT, EITHER ORALLY OR IN WRITING OR BOTH, STATEMENT OF FACT, 14 SUPPORTING WITNESSES AND OTHER EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT OF THEIR RESPECTIVE 15 POSITION WITH RESPECT TO EACH CASE. THE PANEL SHALL HAVE AUTHORITY TO 16 REQUIRE THE PRODUCTION OF SUCH ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE, EITHER ORAL OR WRIT- 17 TEN, AS IT MAY DESIRE FROM THE PARTIES AND SHALL PROVIDE AT THE REQUEST 18 OF EITHER PARTY THAT A FULL AND COMPLETE RECORD BE KEPT OF ANY SUCH 19 HEARINGS, THE COST OF SUCH RECORD TO BE SHARED EQUALLY BY THE PARTIES. 20 (C) ALL MATTERS PRESENTED TO SUCH PANEL FOR ITS DETERMINATION SHALL BE 21 DECIDED BY A MAJORITY VOTE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE PANEL. THE PANEL, PRIOR 22 TO A VOTE ON ANY ISSUE IN DISPUTE BEFORE IT, MAY REFER THE ISSUE BACK TO 23 THE PARTIES FOR FURTHER NEGOTIATIONS. 24 (D) SUCH PANEL SHALL MAKE A JUST AND REASONABLE DETERMINATION OF 25 MATTERS IN DISPUTE. IN ARRIVING AT SUCH DETERMINATION, THE PANEL SHALL 26 SPECIFY THE BASIS FOR ITS FINDINGS, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION, IN ADDI- 27 TION TO ANY OTHER RELEVANT FACTORS, THE FOLLOWING: (I) COMPARISON OF THE 28 WAGES, HOURS, FRINGE BENEFITS, CONDITIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EMPLOY- 29 MENT OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES INVOLVED IN THE IMPASSE PROCEEDING WITH THE 30 WAGES, HOURS, FRINGE BENEFITS, CONDITIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EMPLOY- 31 MENT OF OTHER EMPLOYEES PERFORMING SIMILAR WORK AND OTHER EMPLOYEES 32 GENERALLY IN PUBLIC OR PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT IN NEW YORK CITY OR COMPARABLE 33 COMMUNITIES; (II) THE OVERALL COMPENSATION PAID TO THE EMPLOYEES 34 INVOLVED IN THE IMPASSE PROCEEDING, INCLUDING DIRECT WAGE COMPENSATION, 35 OVERTIME AND PREMIUM PAY, VACATIONS, HOLIDAYS AND OTHER EXCUSED TIME, 36 INSURANCE, PENSIONS, MEDICAL AND HOSPITALIZATION BENEFITS, FOOD AND 37 APPAREL FURNISHED, AND ALL OTHER BENEFITS RECEIVED; (III) THE IMPACT OF 38 THE PANEL'S AWARD ON THE FINANCIAL ABILITY OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM 39 TO PAY, ON THE PRESENT FARES AND ON THE CONTINUED PROVISION OF SERVICES 40 TO THE PUBLIC; (IV) CHANGES IN THE AVERAGE CONSUMER PRICES FOR GOODS AND 41 SERVICES, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE COST OF LIVING; (V) THE INTEREST AND 42 WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC; AND (VI) SUCH OTHER FACTORS AS ARE NORMALLY AND 43 CUSTOMARILY CONSIDERED IN THE DETERMINATION OF WAGES, HOURS, FRINGE 44 BENEFITS AND OTHER WORKING CONDITIONS IN COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS OR 45 IMPASSE PANEL PROCEEDINGS. 46 (E) THE PANEL SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO RESOLVE THE MATTERS IN 47 DISPUTE BEFORE IT AND ISSUE A DETERMINATION WHICH SHALL BE FINAL AND 48 BINDING UPON THE PARTIES, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS 49 ARTICLE. EXCEPT FOR THE PURPOSES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, ANY PROVISION OF A 50 DETERMINATION OF THE ARBITRATION PANEL, THE IMPLEMENTATION OF WHICH 51 REQUIRES AN ENACTMENT OF LAW, SHALL NOT BECOME BINDING UNTIL THE APPRO- 52 PRIATE LEGISLATIVE BODY ENACTS SUCH LAW. 53 S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.