Bill Text: NY S01513 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Allows a court to issue an order precluding the disclosure of jurors' names and addresses upon a showing by the people that such an order is necessary to prevent bribery, jury tampering or physical injury to, or harassment of, the jurors or prospective jurors.

Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2014-03-10 - referred to codes [S01513 Detail]

Download: New_York-2013-S01513-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         1513
                              2013-2014 Regular Sessions
                                   I N  S E N A T E
                                      (PREFILED)
                                    January 9, 2013
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  Sen.  MARCELLINO  -- read twice and ordered printed, and
         when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
       AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law,  in  relation  to  anonymous
         juries  and  to  repeal  subdivision 1-a of section 270.15 of such law
         relating thereto
         THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section  1.  Paragraph  (a)  of subdivision 1 of section 270.15 of the
    2  criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 467 of the laws  of  1985,
    3  is amended to read as follows:
    4    (a)  If  no  challenge  to  the panel is made as prescribed by section
    5  270.10, or if such challenge is made and  disallowed,  the  court  shall
    6  direct  that  the  names of not less than twelve members of the panel be
    7  drawn and called as prescribed by the judiciary law, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE
    8  REQUIRED BY SECTION 270.17 OF THIS  ARTICLE.  Such  persons  shall  take
    9  their  places  in  the jury box and shall be immediately sworn to answer
   10  truthfully questions asked them  relative  to  their  qualifications  to
   11  serve  as jurors in the action. In its discretion, the court may require
   12  prospective jurors to complete a questionnaire concerning their  ability
   13  to  serve  as  fair  and  impartial jurors, including but not limited to
   14  place of birth,  current  address,  education,  occupation,  prior  jury
   15  service,  knowledge  of, relationship to, or contact with the court, any
   16  party, witness or attorney in the action and any other fact relevant  to
   17  his  or her service on the jury. An official form for such questionnaire
   18  shall be developed by the chief administrator of the courts in consulta-
   19  tion with the administrative board of the courts. A  copy  of  question-
   20  naires completed by the members of the panel shall be given to the court
   21  and each attorney prior to examination of prospective jurors.
   22    S  2.  Subdivision 1-a of section 270.15 of the criminal procedure law
   23  is REPEALED.
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD03264-01-3
       S. 1513                             2
    1    S 3. The criminal procedure law is amended by  adding  a  new  section
    2  270.17 to read as follows:
    3  S 270.17 TRIAL JURY; ANONYMOUS PANEL.
    4    1.  THE PEOPLE MAY MAKE A MOTION FOR AN ORDER PROTECTING THE NAMES AND
    5  RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS ADDRESSES OF JURORS AND PROSPECTIVE JURORS FROM
    6  DISCLOSURE TO ANY PERSON. SUCH A MOTION SHALL  BE  MADE  NO  LATER  THAN
    7  THREE  DAYS,  EXCLUDING  SATURDAYS,  SUNDAYS  AND HOLIDAYS, PRIOR TO THE
    8  COMMENCEMENT OF JURY SELECTION, BUT FOR GOOD CAUSE  SHOWN  MAY  BE  MADE
    9  THEREAFTER.  THE COURT SHALL CONDUCT A HEARING UPON SUCH MOTION AND MAKE
   10  FINDINGS  OF  FACT  ESSENTIAL  TO THE DETERMINATION THEREOF. ALL PERSONS
   11  GIVING FACTUAL INFORMATION AT SUCH  HEARING  MUST  TESTIFY  UNDER  OATH,
   12  EXCEPT  THAT  UNSWORN  EVIDENCE  PURSUANT  TO SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION
   13  60.20 OF THIS CHAPTER ALSO MAY BE RECEIVED. UPON SUCH  HEARING,  HEARSAY
   14  EVIDENCE SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE TO ESTABLISH ANY MATERIAL FACT.
   15    2.  AT  THE  HEARING,  THE  PEOPLE SHALL BEAR THE BURDEN OF PROVING BY
   16  CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT A PROTECTIVE ORDER  IS  NECESSARY  TO
   17  PROTECT  AGAINST  THE  LIKELIHOOD OF BRIBERY, JURY TAMPERING OR PHYSICAL
   18  INJURY  TO OR HARASSMENT OF THE JURORS OR PROSPECTIVE JURORS. IN  DETER-
   19  MINING  WHETHER  THE  PEOPLE  HAVE  SUSTAINED THIS BURDEN, THE COURT MAY
   20  CONSIDER ANY RELEVANT FACTORS, INCLUDING:
   21    (A) WHETHER DEFENDANT OR PERSONS ACTING  ON  DEFENDANT'S  BEHALF  HAVE
   22  BRIBED,  TAMPERED  WITH, OR CAUSED OR ATTEMPTED TO CAUSE PHYSICAL INJURY
   23  TO OR HARASSMENT OF A JUROR  OR  PROSPECTIVE  JUROR,  OR  A  WITNESS  OR
   24  PROSPECTIVE  WITNESS, IN ANOTHER CRIMINAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING OR IN THE
   25  INSTANT CRIMINAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING;
   26    (B) WHETHER DEFENDANT IS A MEMBER OF  AN  ENTERPRISE,  AS  DEFINED  IN
   27  SUBDIVISION  TWO  OF  SECTION 460.10 OF THE PENAL LAW, THAT BY ITSELF OR
   28  THROUGH ANY OF ITS MEMBERS HAS MANIFESTED AN INTENTION TO BRIBE,  TAMPER
   29  WITH, OR CAUSE OR ATTEMPT TO CAUSE PHYSICAL INJURY TO OR HARASSMENT OF A
   30  JUROR  OR PROSPECTIVE JUROR, OR A WITNESS OR PROSPECTIVE WITNESS, IN THE
   31  INSTANT CRIMINAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING;
   32    (C) THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGES AGAINST DEFENDANT;
   33    (D) THE EXTENT OF PRETRIAL PUBLICITY CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL ACTION OR
   34  PROCEEDING.
   35    3. IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT A PROTECTIVE ORDER SHOULD BE ISSUED IT
   36  SHALL DIRECT THAT ALL JURORS AND PROSPECTIVE JURORS THEREAFTER SHALL  BE
   37  IDENTIFIED  BY  SOME  MEANS OTHER THAN THEIR NAMES AND THEIR RESIDENTIAL
   38  AND BUSINESS ADDRESSES. THE COURT MAY ENLARGE THE SCOPE AND DURATION  OF
   39  THE  PARTIES'  EXAMINATION  OF  PROSPECTIVE  JURORS  TO  ASSURE THAT THE
   40  PARTIES HAVE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION UPON WHICH TO BASE THE  EXERCISE  OF
   41  PEREMPTORY  CHALLENGES  AND  CHALLENGES  FOR  CAUSE PURSUANT TO SECTIONS
   42  270.20 AND 270.25 OF THIS ARTICLE.
   43    4. UPON REQUEST BY A DEFENDANT, BUT NOT  OTHERWISE,  THE  COURT  SHALL
   44  INSTRUCT  THE JURY THAT THE FACT THAT THE JURY WAS SELECTED ON AN ANONY-
   45  MOUS BASIS IS NOT A FACTOR FROM WHICH ANY INFERENCE UNFAVORABLE  TO  THE
   46  DEFENDANT MAY BE DRAWN.
   47    S  4.  This  act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
   48  have become a law.
feedback