Bill Text: NY A02029 | 2015-2016 | General Assembly | Amended
Bill Title: Requires state agencies to provide unsuccessful bidders with reasons why the winning bid was selected and provide advice or guidance on methods for improving future bids during the debriefing process.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 4-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2015-06-18 - substituted by s3450c [A02029 Detail]
Download: New_York-2015-A02029-Amended.html
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 2029--D 2015-2016 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 15, 2015 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. HEVESI, McDONALD -- read once and referred to the Committee on Governmental Operations -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said commit- tee -- again reported from said committee with amendments, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- again reported from said committee with amendments, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- again reported from said committee with amendments, ordered reprinted as amended and recommit- ted to said committee AN ACT to amend the state finance law, in relation to requiring state agencies to provide certain information to unsuccessful bidders during the debriefing process THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Paragraph c of subdivision 9 of section 163 of the state 2 finance law, as amended by chapter 137 of the laws of 2008, is amended 3 to read as follows: 4 c. (I) Where provided in the solicitation, state agencies may require 5 clarification from offerers for purposes of assuring a full understand- 6 ing of responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. Where provided 7 for in the solicitation, revisions may be permitted from all offerers 8 determined to be susceptible of being selected for contract award, prior 9 to award. Offerers shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with 10 respect to their opportunity for discussion and revision of offers. [A] 11 (II) WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS OF THE SELECTION OF A WINNING BID BY A STATE 12 AGENCY AND PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION FOR APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT TO THE 13 OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER, ALL BIDDERS SHALL BE ADVISED OF THE 14 COMPLETION OF THE SELECTION PROCESS. 15 (III) FOR ANY CONTRACT ESTABLISHED AS A CENTRALIZED CONTRACT BY THE 16 OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES, WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS OF SELECTION OF THE EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD03939-05-5 A. 2029--D 2 1 WINNING BID BY THE OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES, ALL BIDDERS SHALL BE 2 ADVISED OF THE COMPLETION OF THE SELECTION PROCESS. 3 (IV) THE OPPORTUNITY FOR AN UNSUCCESSFUL BIDDER TO SEEK A DEBRIEFING 4 SHALL BE STATED IN THE SOLICITATION, WHICH SHALL PROVIDE A REASONABLE 5 TIME FOR REQUESTING A DEBRIEFING. 6 (V) IN RELATION TO THE AWARD OF ANY CONTRACT WITH A TOTAL VALUE OF 7 LESS THAN FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS, A state agency shall, upon 8 request, provide [a] AN IN-PERSON OR, IF NECESSARY, A VIDEO-CONFERENCED 9 debriefing to any unsuccessful offerer that responded to a request for 10 proposal or an invitation for bids, regarding the reasons that the 11 proposal or bid submitted by the unsuccessful offerer was not selected 12 for an award. [The opportunity for an unsuccessful offerer to seek a 13 debriefing shall be stated in the solicitation, which shall provide a 14 reasonable time for requesting a debriefing.] 15 (VI) IN RELATION TO THE AWARD OF A CONTRACT WITH A TOTAL VALUE OF FIVE 16 HUNDRED THOUSAND OR MORE DOLLARS, A STATE AGENCY SHALL, UPON REQUEST, 17 PROVIDE AN IN-PERSON OR, IF NECESSARY, A VIDEO-CONFERENCED DEBRIEFING TO 18 ANY UNSUCCESSFUL OFFERER THAT RESPONDED TO A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL OR 19 INVITATION FOR BIDS. SUCH DEBRIEFING, SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NEED NOT BE 20 LIMITED TO, THOROUGH WRITTEN EXPLANATIONS OF: (A) THE REASONS THAT THE 21 PROPOSAL OR BID SUBMITTED BY THE UNSUCCESSFUL OFFERER WAS NOT SELECTED 22 FOR AWARD; (B) THE QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS EMPLOYED BY THE 23 AGENCY IN ASSESSING THE RELATIVE MERITS OF EACH BID; (C) THE APPLICATION 24 OF EACH OF THE SELECTION CRITERIA TO EACH BID; AND (D) WHY THE WINNING 25 BID WAS SELECTED. 26 (VII) AFTER THE WRITTEN EXPLANATIONS DESCRIBED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (VI) OF 27 THIS PARAGRAPH HAVE BEEN PROVIDED, THE STATE AGENCY, UPON THE WRITTEN 28 REQUEST OF AN UNSUCCESSFUL OFFERER, AND WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS OF THE WRIT- 29 TEN EXPLANATION, SHALL PROVIDE A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY FOR SUCH UNSUC- 30 CESSFUL BIDDER TO DISCUSS WITH AGENCY PERSONNEL WHO WERE INVOLVED IN AND 31 ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE BID EVALUATION PROCESS CONCERNING THE WRIT- 32 TEN EXPLANATIONS. SUCH PERSONNEL SHALL ALSO PROVIDE, TO THE EXTENT PRAC- 33 TICABLE, ADVICE AND GUIDANCE TO THE UNSUCCESSFUL OFFERER CONCERNING 34 METHODS OF IMPROVING BIDS BY SUCH OFFERER. 35 S 2. This act shall take effect immediately; provided that the amend- 36 ments to section 163 of the state finance law made by section one of 37 this act shall not affect the repeal of such section and shall be deemed 38 repealed therewith.