Bill Text: NY A02015 | 2025-2026 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Relates to actions or practices that establish or maintain a monopoly, monopsony or restraint of trade; authorizes a class action lawsuit in the state anti-trust law.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 3-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2025-01-14 - referred to economic development [A02015 Detail]

Download: New_York-2025-A02015-Introduced.html



                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________

                                          2015

                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions

                   IN ASSEMBLY

                                    January 14, 2025
                                       ___________

        Introduced by M. of A. PEOPLES-STOKES, SHRESTHA, KELLES -- read once and
          referred to the Committee on Economic Development

        AN  ACT  to  amend  the  general business law, in relation to actions or
          practices  that  establish  or  maintain  a  monopoly,  monopsony   or
          restraint  of  trade,  and  in  relation to authorizing a class action
          lawsuit in the state anti-trust law

          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section  1.  This  act shall be known and may be cited as the "Twenty-
     2  First Century Anti-Trust Act".
     3    § 2. Legislative findings. The legislature hereby finds  and  declares
     4  New  York's  great concern with the growing accumulation of power in the
     5  hands of dominant corporations that harms our marketplace, our  democra-
     6  cy, and that undermines the power of workers, consumers, and small busi-
     7  nesses.  It  is time to update, expand, and clarify our laws, consistent
     8  with the purposes of the  anti-trust  reforms  of  the  early  Twentieth
     9  Century,  to  police abuses of power by dominant firms.  The legislature
    10  further finds and declares that unilateral actions which seek to  create
    11  a  monopoly  or  monopsony  are as harmful as contracts or agreements of
    12  multiple parties to do the same and should be  treated  similarly  under
    13  the  law.  Firms  with  monopoly  or monopsony power are contrary to the
    14  public interest. The legislature further finds and  declares  that  laws
    15  governing  multi-firm  conduct  should  be  updated, consistent with the
    16  purposes of anti-trust law, to adequately address  abuses  of  power  by
    17  dominant  firms  embodied in coercive vertical restraints on small busi-
    18  nesses, workers,  and  consumers.  The  legislature  further  finds  and
    19  declares  that  effective  enforcement against unfair competition, espe-
    20  cially on the part of dominant firms, has been impeded  by  courts,  for
    21  example,  applying  narrow definitions of monopolies and monopolization,
    22  limiting the scope of unilateral conduct, making it  excessively  diffi-
    23  cult  to  challenge  unfair competition and unreasonably heightening the

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD00787-01-5

        A. 2015                             2

     1  legal standards that plaintiffs and government enforcers  must  overcome
     2  to establish violations of those laws. The legislature further finds and
     3  declares  that  one of the purposes of the state's anti-trust laws is to
     4  ensure that our labor markets are open and fair. The legislature further
     5  finds and declares that anti-competitive practices harm great numbers of
     6  citizens  and  therefore  must ensure that those harmed by monopolies or
     7  monopsonies may seek redress through private enforcement.
     8    § 3. Section 340 of the general business law, as amended by chapter 12
     9  of the laws of 1935, subdivision 1 as amended by chapter 893 of the laws
    10  of 1957, subdivision 2 as amended by chapter 805 of the  laws  of  1984,
    11  subdivisions  3  and 4 as renumbered by chapter 502 of the laws of 1948,
    12  subdivision 5 as amended by chapter 333 of the laws of 1975 and subdivi-
    13  sion 6 as amended by chapter 31 of the laws of 1999, is amended to  read
    14  as follows:
    15    §  340.  Contracts  or  agreements  for  monopoly,  monopsony,  or  in
    16  restraint of trade illegal  and  void.  1.  Every  contract,  agreement,
    17  arrangement or combination whereby
    18    A  monopoly  or  monopsony  in  the  conduct of any business, trade or
    19  commerce or in the furnishing of any service in this state, is or may be
    20  established or maintained, or whereby
    21    Competition or the free exercise of any activity in the conduct of any
    22  business, trade or commerce or in the furnishing of any service in  this
    23  state is or may be restrained or whereby
    24    For  the  purpose  of  establishing  or maintaining any such monopoly,
    25  monopsony, or unlawfully interfering  with  the  free  exercise  of  any
    26  activity  in  the  conduct  of any business, trade or commerce or in the
    27  furnishing of any service in this state any business, trade or  commerce
    28  or  the  furnishing  of  any  service is or may be restrained, is hereby
    29  declared to be against public policy, illegal and void.
    30    2. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person or persons to monopolize or
    31  monopsonize, or attempt to monopolize  or  monopsonize,  or  combine  or
    32  conspire  with  any other person or persons to monopolize or monopsonize
    33  any business, trade or commerce or the furnishing of any service in this
    34  state.
    35    (b) It shall be unlawful for any person or  persons  with  a  dominant
    36  position in the conduct of any business, trade or commerce, in any labor
    37  market,  or in the furnishing of any service in this state to abuse that
    38  dominant position.   This paragraph shall  not  apply  to  a  person  or
    39  persons that are independently owned and operated and employ one hundred
    40  or fewer persons.
    41    (i)  In  any  action brought under this paragraph, a person's dominant
    42  position may be established by direct evidence, indirect evidence, or  a
    43  combination of the two.
    44    (1)  Examples  of  direct  evidence  include,  but are not limited to,
    45  reduction in output or in quality of goods or services,  the  imposition
    46  of  supracompetitive  prices, or the ability to force, induce, or other-
    47  wise coerce a supplier to offer a  lower  price,  discount,  advertising
    48  allowance,  or  other  service  than what the supplier offers others. In
    49  labor markets, examples  of  direct  evidence  of  a  dominant  position
    50  include,  but are not limited to, the imposition of subcompetitive wages
    51  or working conditions; the repeated violation of laws protecting workers
    52  such as labor laws, wage-and-hour laws, and workplace health and  safety
    53  laws;  or the interference with, restraint of, or coercion of workers in
    54  the exercise of their full freedom of association to  obtain  acceptable
    55  terms and conditions of employment, including through self-organization,
    56  designation  of  workplace  representatives, and engagement in concerted

        A. 2015                             3

     1  activities for the purposes of collective bargaining or other mutual aid
     2  or protection. Direct evidence of  dominant  position  includes  conduct
     3  that  is  carried  out  directly or indirectly through another entity or
     4  person such as an independent contractor or other intermediary.
     5    (2)  A  person's dominant position may also be established by indirect
     6  evidence such as the person's share of a relevant market. A  person  who
     7  has a share of forty percent or greater of a relevant market as a seller
     8  shall  be presumed to have a dominant position in that market under this
     9  paragraph. A person who has a share of thirty percent or  greater  of  a
    10  relevant market as a buyer shall be presumed to have a dominant position
    11  in that market under this paragraph. When determining a relevant market,
    12  courts  shall examine factors including, but not limited to, industry or
    13  public recognition of the market as separate and distinct, the product's
    14  peculiar  characteristics  and  uses,  unique   protection   facilities,
    15  distinct  customers,  distinct prices, sensitivity to price changes, and
    16  specialized vendors.
    17    (3) If direct evidence is sufficient to demonstrate that a person  has
    18  a  dominant  position  or  has abused such a dominant position, no court
    19  shall require definition of a relevant market in order to  evaluate  the
    20  evidence,  find  liability,  or  find that a claim has been stated under
    21  this paragraph.
    22    (ii) In any action brought under this paragraph, abuse of  a  dominant
    23  position may include, but is not limited to, conduct that tends to fore-
    24  close  or limit the ability or incentive of one or more actual or poten-
    25  tial competitors to compete, such as leveraging a dominant  position  in
    26  one  market  to limit competition in a separate market; refusing to deal
    27  with another person with the effect of unnecessarily excluding or handi-
    28  capping actual or potential competitors; coercing the purchaser  of  one
    29  product,  service,  or  contract into purchasing or obtaining a separate
    30  and distinct product, service, or contract; or engaging in, or  coercing
    31  a  third  party  into, an exclusive agreement or contract that serves to
    32  foreclose or increase costs for a competitor. In  labor  markets,  abuse
    33  may include, but is not limited to, imposing restraints, direct or indi-
    34  rect,  on the mobility of workers between employers or on the ability of
    35  workers to seek employment  from  multiple  employers;  restricting  the
    36  freedom  of  workers  and  independent  contractors to disclose wage and
    37  benefit information; and wage discrimination based on any undisclosed or
    38  hidden considerations.
    39    (c) (i) Except as provided in subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph, the
    40  following restraints are presumed to be illegal when engaged in by domi-
    41  nant firms:
    42    (1) Any restraint that requires another person to deal exclusively  or
    43  primarily  with the firm imposing the restraint or another person speci-
    44  fied by that firm or any restraint that  has  the  necessary  effect  of
    45  requiring  another person to deal exclusively or primarily with the firm
    46  imposing the restraint or another person specified by that firm;
    47    (2) Any restraint that conditions the sale or purchase of any  product
    48  or  services  on  an  agreement  to  sell or purchase another product or
    49  service;
    50    (3) Any restraint on a person's ability to  engage  in  a  profession,
    51  trade,  or  business  of any kind, including any restraint on a person's
    52  ability to employ another person;
    53    (4) Any restraint on the prices or wages offered by another firm;
    54    (5) Any restraint on another  firm's  right  to  independently  decide
    55  whether  to  recognize a union of its employees or to otherwise agree to

        A. 2015                             4

     1  negotiate with its employees collectively over terms and  conditions  of
     2  employment;
     3    (6)  Any  restraint  that  the  attorney  general, through rulemaking,
     4  determines poses a substantial risk of harming competition that  is  not
     5  already presumed illegal;
     6    (7)  Any  additional  restraint  that the attorney general determines,
     7  through rulemaking, generally serves no legitimate business purpose that
     8  cannot be achieved in some less restrictive way.
     9    (ii) Subparagraph (i) of this paragraph shall not apply if the defend-
    10  ant establishes, by clear and convincing evidence, that the pro-competi-
    11  tive benefits of the challenged conduct (1) are achievable only  through
    12  that  conduct  and  (2) outweigh that conduct's harm to competition. The
    13  harm to competition in one market from the challenged conduct may not be
    14  offset by purported benefits in a separate market; and  the  harm  to  a
    15  person  or  persons  from  the  challenged  conduct may not be offset by
    16  purported benefits to another person or persons.
    17    (d) (i) The attorney general is hereby empowered to adopt, promulgate,
    18  amend, and repeal rules, as such term is defined  in  paragraph  (a)  of
    19  subdivision  two  of section one hundred two of the state administrative
    20  procedure act, to carry out the purposes of paragraph (b) of this subdi-
    21  vision, including those considerations specified  in  the  findings  and
    22  declarations of the legislature for this act.
    23    (ii)  Before  any  such  rule shall take effect, at such time that the
    24  attorney general is prepared to file a notice of  adoption  pursuant  to
    25  subdivision  five of section two hundred two of the state administrative
    26  procedure act, the attorney general shall transmit a copy of the rule in
    27  its final form to the temporary president of the senate and the  speaker
    28  of the assembly and, in addition, shall provide any relevant information
    29  regarding the need for such rule. Such proposed rule, or proposed repeal
    30  of  a  rule,  is subject to the denial by both houses of the legislature
    31  and shall take the form of a resolution. Each house of  the  legislature
    32  shall  have  sixty days following the transmission of such rule to issue
    33  denial by resolution or take no action. Such rule shall not take  effect
    34  if  both  houses pass a resolution denying such proposed rule within the
    35  time prescribed by this subparagraph.
    36    (iii) The attorney general shall issue guidance on how it will achieve
    37  the purposes of paragraph (b) of this subdivision.  The attorney general
    38  may issue other guidance with respect to paragraph (b) of this  subdivi-
    39  sion.
    40    (iv) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to diminish the jurisdic-
    41  tion of the public service commission.
    42    3. Subject to the exceptions hereinafter provided in this section, the
    43  provisions  of  this  article shall apply to licensed insurers, licensed
    44  insurance  agents,  licensed  insurance  brokers,  licensed  independent
    45  adjusters  and other persons and organizations subject to the provisions
    46  of the insurance law, to the extent not regulated by provisions of arti-
    47  cle twenty-three of the insurance law; and further provided, that  noth-
    48  ing  in  this  section  shall  apply to the marine insurances, including
    49  marine  protection  and  indemnity  insurance  and  marine  reinsurance,
    50  exempted  from  the  operation  of article twenty-three of the insurance
    51  law.
    52    [3.] 4. The provisions of this article shall not apply to  cooperative
    53  associations,  corporate  or otherwise, of farmers, gardeners, or dairy-
    54  men, including live stock farmers and fruit growers, nor  to  contracts,
    55  agreements  or  arrangements made by such associations, nor to bona fide
    56  labor unions, nor to the creation, production, and  dissemination  of  a

        A. 2015                             5

     1  single  expressive  work  that is copyrighted, including but not limited
     2  to, a streaming series, television programs and/or motion pictures.
     3    [4.]  5. The labor of human beings shall not be deemed or held to be a
     4  commodity or article of commerce as such terms are used in this  section
     5  and nothing herein contained shall be deemed to prohibit or restrict the
     6  right of workingmen, including employees and independent contractors, to
     7  combine in unions, organizations and associations, not organized for the
     8  purpose  of  profit,  to  establish  or maintain union apprenticeship or
     9  training programs that may lead to any government-issued trade  license,
    10  or  to  bargain  collectively  concerning  their wages and the terms and
    11  conditions of their employment. Nothing in this section shall be  deemed
    12  to  prevent  or  create  liability with respect to any actions to comply
    13  with article eight or nine of the labor  law.  A  bona  fide  collective
    14  bargaining  agreement,  project  labor  agreement or any other agreement
    15  lawful under 29 U.S.C. 158(f), as amended, or any  term  therein,  shall
    16  not  be  considered  evidence  of  a  violation  or dominance under this
    17  section.  Project labor agreement shall have the  meaning  specified  in
    18  section  two hundred twenty-two of the labor law.
    19    [5.]  6.  An  action  to recover damages caused by a violation of this
    20  section must be commenced within four years after the  cause  of  action
    21  has accrued. The state, or any political subdivision or public authority
    22  of  the  state, or any person who shall sustain damages by reason of any
    23  violation of this section, shall recover three-fold the  actual  damages
    24  sustained  thereby, as well as costs not exceeding ten thousand dollars,
    25  and reasonable attorneys' fees. At or before  the  commencement  of  any
    26  civil  action by a party other than the attorney-general for a violation
    27  of this section, notice thereof shall be served upon the attorney-gener-
    28  al. Where the aggrieved party  is  a  political  subdivision  or  public
    29  authority  of the state, notice of intention to commence an action under
    30  this section must be served upon the attorney-general at least ten  days
    31  prior  to  the commencement of such action. This section shall not apply
    32  to any action commenced prior to the effective date of this act.
    33    [6.] 7. In any action pursuant to this  section,  the  fact  that  the
    34  state, or any political subdivision or public authority of the state, or
    35  any  person  who  has  sustained  damages by reason of violation of this
    36  section has not dealt directly with  the  defendant  shall  not  bar  or
    37  otherwise limit recovery; provided, however, that in any action in which
    38  claims  are  asserted  against  a  defendant by both direct and indirect
    39  purchasers, the court shall take all steps necessary to avoid  duplicate
    40  liability,  including  but not limited to the transfer and consolidation
    41  of all related actions.  In  actions  where  both  direct  and  indirect
    42  purchasers  are  involved,  a  defendant shall be entitled to prove as a
    43  partial or complete defense to a claim  for  damages  that  the  illegal
    44  overcharge  has  been passed on to others who are themselves entitled to
    45  recover so as to avoid duplication of recovery of damages.
    46    8.  Any person harmed by this  section,  whether  harmed  directly  or
    47  indirectly by the purported violation, shall be entitled to bring suit.
    48    9.  Any  damages recoverable pursuant to this section may be recovered
    49  in any action which a court may authorize  to  be  brought  as  a  class
    50  action pursuant to article nine of the civil practice law and rules.
    51    10.  An  arrangement,  as this term is used in this article, includes,
    52  but is not limited to, a contract, combination, agreement or conspiracy.
    53    11. (a) Any person conducting business in the state which is  required
    54  to  file the Notification and Report Form for Certain Mergers and Acqui-
    55  sitions pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino  Antitrust Improvements Act of
    56  1976, 15 U.S.C. s. 18a (a), shall provide the same notice and documenta-

        A. 2015                             6

     1  tion in its entirety to the attorney  general  at  the  same  time  that
     2  notice  is  filed  with  the  Federal Trade Commission and the assistant
     3  attorney general in charge of the Antitrust Division of  the  Department
     4  of Justice.
     5    (b)    The  following  classes  of  transactions  are  exempt from the
     6  requirements of this section:
     7    (i) acquisitions of goods or realty transferred in the ordinary course
     8  of business;
     9    (ii) the creation, production, and dissemination of a  single  expres-
    10  sive work that is copyrighted, including but not limited to, a streaming
    11  series, television programs and/or motion pictures;
    12    (iii) acquisitions of bonds, mortgages, deeds of trust, or other obli-
    13  gations which are not voting securities;
    14    (iv)  transfers  to  or  from a federal agency or a state or political
    15  subdivision thereof;
    16    (v) transactions specifically exempted from  the  provisions  of  this
    17  article;
    18    (vi)  transactions  by, between, or among manufacturing, importing, or
    19  wholesale businesses that are directly regulated by the New  York  state
    20  liquor authority; and
    21    (vii)  such  other acquisitions, transfers, or transactions, as may be
    22  exempted under paragraph (f) of this subdivision hereunder.
    23    (c) Any information or documentary material filed  with  the  attorney
    24  general  pursuant  to  this  subdivision shall be exempt from disclosure
    25  under article six of the public officers law, and no such information or
    26  documentary material may be made public, except as may  be  relevant  to
    27  any administrative or judicial action or proceeding.
    28    (d)  Any  person,  or  any  officer, director, or partner thereof, who
    29  fails to comply with any provision of this subdivision shall  be  liable
    30  to  the  state for a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars
    31  for each day during which such person is in violation of  this  section.
    32  Such  penalty may be recovered in a civil action brought by the attorney
    33  general.
    34    (e) In considering any transaction under this subdivision, the  attor-
    35  ney  general shall consider such transaction's effects on labor markets,
    36  including but not limited to effects on workers'  countervailing  lever-
    37  age,  by  establishing a process for affected workers or representatives
    38  designated by affected workers to meaningfully comment  on  such  trans-
    39  actions within ten days following the filing of the transacting parties'
    40  notice and documentation of their intended transaction pursuant to para-
    41  graph  (a)  of  subdivision eleven of this section. The attorney general
    42  shall establish this new process within ninety days following the effec-
    43  tive date of the chapter of the laws of two  thousand  twenty-four  that
    44  amended this section.
    45    (f) The attorney general is hereby empowered to:
    46    (i) define the terms used in this subdivision;
    47    (ii)  exempt,  from  the  requirements of this subdivision, classes of
    48  persons, acquisitions, transfers, or transactions which are  not  likely
    49  to violate the provisions of this article; and
    50    (iii)  adopt,  promulgate,  amend,  and  rescind other rules and regu-
    51  lations to carry out the purposes of this subdivision.
    52    § 4. Section 341 of the general business law, as  amended  by  chapter
    53  333 of the laws of 1975, is amended to read as follows:
    54    §  341.  Penalty. Every person or corporation, or any officer or agent
    55  thereof, who shall [make or attempt to  make  or  enter  into  any  such
    56  contract, agreement, arrangement or combination or who within this state

        A. 2015                             7

     1  shall]  do or attempt to do, within this state, any act [pursuant there-
     2  to] declared unlawful under subdivision one and paragraph (a) of  subdi-
     3  vision two of section three hundred forty of this article, or in, toward
     4  or for the consummation thereof[, wherever the same may have been made],
     5  is guilty of a class [E] D felony, and on conviction thereof shall, if a
     6  natural  person,  be punished by a fine not exceeding one [hundred thou-
     7  sand] million dollars, or by  imprisonment  for  not  longer  than  four
     8  years, or by both such fine and imprisonment; and if a corporation, by a
     9  fine  of  not  exceeding  one  hundred million dollars. An indictment or
    10  information based on a violation  of  any  of  the  provisions  of  this
    11  section must be found within [three] five years after its commission. No
    12  criminal  proceeding barred by prior limitation shall be revived by this
    13  act.
    14    § 5. Section 342-a of the general business law, as amended by  chapter
    15  275 of the laws of 1962, is amended to read as follows:
    16    § 342-a. Recovery of civil penalty by attorney-general. In lieu of any
    17  penalty  otherwise  prescribed  for  a  violation of a provision of this
    18  article and in addition to an action pursuant to section  three  hundred
    19  forty-two  of  this article, the attorney-general may bring an action in
    20  the name and in behalf of the people of the state  against  any  person,
    21  trustee,  director,  manager or other officer or agent of a corporation,
    22  or against a corporation, foreign or domestic, to recover a  penalty  in
    23  the sum specified in section three hundred forty-one of this article for
    24  the  doing  in  this state of any act [herein] declared to be illegal in
    25  this article, or any act in, toward or for the making or consummation of
    26  any contract, agreement, arrangement or combination [herein]  prohibited
    27  by  this  article, wherever the same may have been made. The action must
    28  be brought within [three] five years after the  commission  of  the  act
    29  upon which it is based.
    30    §  6. Section 342-b of the general business law, as amended by chapter
    31  420 of the laws of 1975, is amended to read as follows:
    32    § 342-b. Recovery of damages  by  attorney  general.  In  addition  to
    33  existing  statutory  and  common  law authority to bring such actions on
    34  behalf of the state, [and] public authorities, and resident persons  and
    35  entities,  the  attorney  general may also bring action on behalf of any
    36  political subdivision or public authority of the state upon the  request
    37  of such political subdivision or public authority, or in the name of the
    38  state, as parens patriae, on behalf of persons and other entities resid-
    39  ing  in  the  state  of  New  York, to recover damages for violations of
    40  section three hundred forty of  this  article,  or  to  recover  damages
    41  provided  for  by  federal  law  for violations of the federal antitrust
    42  laws. In any class action the attorney general may bring  on  behalf  of
    43  [these  or  other  subordinate]  governmental entities, any governmental
    44  entity that does not affirmatively exclude itself from the action,  upon
    45  due notice thereof, shall be deemed to have requested to be treated as a
    46  member  of  the class represented in that action.  The attorney general,
    47  on behalf of the state of New York, shall be entitled to retain from any
    48  moneys recovered  in  such  actions  the  costs  and  expenses  of  such
    49  services.
    50    § 7. The general business law is amended by adding a new section 342-d
    51  to read as follows:
    52    §  342-d.  Recovery  of  expert  witnesses' fees and costs by attorney
    53  general and private litigants. In any action alleging a violation  of  a
    54  provision  of  this article, including actions brought under subdivision
    55  twelve of section sixty-three of the executive law, the attorney general
    56  and private litigants shall recover reasonable fees and  costs  for  its

        A. 2015                             8

     1  expert  witnesses  and  consultants  if  the attorney general or private
     2  litigants prevail in such action.
     3    §  8.  The general business law is amended by adding a new section 348
     4  to read as follows:
     5    § 348. Prohibition on unfair methods of competition. 1. Unfair methods
     6  of competition are hereby declared unlawful. As used  in  this  section,
     7  "unfair  methods of competition" shall mean and include any act or prac-
     8  tice that threatens an incipient violation  of  an  anti-trust  law,  or
     9  violates  the  policy or spirit of an anti-trust law because its effects
    10  are comparable to or the same as a violation of the  law,  or  otherwise
    11  significantly threatens or harms competition.
    12    2. The attorney general shall have the authority through rulemaking to
    13  declare certain conduct or practices as unfair methods of competition.
    14    §  9.  Severability.  If any provision of this act, or the application
    15  thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid  or  unconstitu-
    16  tional,  that  invalidity  or unconstitutionality shall not affect other
    17  provisions or applications of this act that can be given effect  without
    18  the  invalid  or  unconstitutional provision or application, and to this
    19  end the provisions of this act are severable.
    20    § 10. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback