Bill Text: NJ S581 | 2024-2025 | Regular Session | Introduced


Bill Title: Establishes offense of reckless trespass involving wild animals; establishes penalties; establishes liability for resulting harm to wild animal.

Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill

Status: (Introduced) 2024-01-09 - Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Judiciary Committee [S581 Detail]

Download: New_Jersey-2024-S581-Introduced.html

SENATE, No. 581

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

221st LEGISLATURE

 

PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2024 SESSION

 


 

Sponsored by:

Senator  JON M. BRAMNICK

District 21 (Middlesex, Morris, Somerset and Union)

 

Co-Sponsored by:

Senator Stack

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Establishes offense of reckless trespass involving wild animal; establishes penalties; establishes liability for resulting harm to wild animal.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel.

  


An Act concerning harassment of wild animals in captivity, and supplementing Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.  a.  A person commits the offense of reckless trespass involving a wild animal if the person enters a cage, enclosure, or other area where a wild animal is housed or otherwise contained, into which the person knows the person has no legal authority, license, or permission to enter, and intentionally or unintentionally harasses the wild animal, or is attacked by the wild animal.

     b.  The offense of reckless trespass involving a wild animal, as established in subsection a. of this section, is a disorderly persons offense if the trespass results in no harm to the wild animal, a crime of the fourth degree if bodily injury is caused to the wild animal, and a crime of the third degree if the wild animal is killed.

     c.  A person who is convicted of an offense pursuant to this section, in addition to any other fine, penalty, or restitution which may be imposed by law, shall be liable for the cost of any damage to, and loss of, property connected to the reckless trespass, including, but not limited to, the injury or death of the wild animal.  If the person committing the offense is a juvenile, the parents or legal guardian of the juvenile shall be liable if it is shown that the parents or legal guardian of the juvenile recklessly or negligently allowed the juvenile to commit the reckless trespass involving a wild animal.

     d.  It shall not be an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that:

     (1)   entry into the cage, enclosure, or other area where the wild animal was housed or otherwise contained was not sufficiently guarded, locked, or otherwise made inaccessible so as to prevent entry into the cage, enclosure, or other area;

     (2)   the wild animal was not provoked by any other means than the presence of the person in the cage, enclosure, or other area; or

     (3) injury to the animal was necessary to protect the person from injury or death.

     e.  Subsection a. of this section shall not apply to a person who enters a cage, enclosure, or other area for the purpose of aiding another person or a wild animal in the cage, enclosure, or other area.

     f.  As used in this section, "wild animal" means any land or sea animal currently or historically found in the wild, other than a domestic companion animal as defined pursuant to subsection u. of N.J.S.2C:20-1 or domestic livestock as defined pursuant to subsection c. of section 1 of P.L.1995, c.311 (C.4:22-16.1), and shall include an animal kept or exhibited at a zoo.

     2.  This act shall take effect immediately.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

     This bill would establish the offense of reckless trespass involving a wild animal, and establish liability for any resulting harm to the wild animal.  "Wild animal" is defined to mean any land or sea animal currently or historically found in the wild, other than a domestic companion animal as defined pursuant to subsection u. of N.J.S.2C:20-1 or domestic livestock as defined pursuant to subsection c. of section 1 of P.L.1995, c.311 (C.4:22-16.1), and would include an animal kept or exhibited at a zoo.

      Under the bill, a person commits reckless trespass involving a wild animal if the person enters a cage, enclosure, or other area where a wild animal is housed or otherwise contained, which the person knows he has no legal authority, license, or permission to enter, and intentionally or unintentionally harasses the wild animal, or is attacked by the wild animal.

      The offense of reckless trespass involving a wild animal would be classified as follows:

      (1) a disorderly persons offense if the trespass results in no harm to the wild animal, punishable by a term of imprisonment of up to six months, a fine of up to $1,000, or both;

      (2) a crime of the fourth degree if injury is caused to the wild animal, punishable by a term of imprisonment of up to 18 months, a fine of up to $10,000, or both; or

      (3) a crime of the third degree if the wild animal is killed, punishable by a term of imprisonment of three to five years, a fine of up to $15,000, or both.

      The bill also provides that a person convicted of committing the offense, in addition to any other fine, penalty, or restitution which may be imposed by law, would be liable for the cost of any damage to, and loss of, property connected to the reckless trespass, including, but not limited to, the injury or death of the wild animal.  If a juvenile committed the offense, the parents or legal guardian of the juvenile would be liable if it was shown that the parents or legal guardian of the juvenile recklessly or negligently allowed the juvenile to commit the reckless trespass.

      Additionally, the bill provides that the following would not be affirmative defenses to prosecution under the bill:

      (1)  the entry into the cage, enclosure, or other area where the wild animal was housed or otherwise contained was not sufficiently guarded, locked, or otherwise made inaccessible so as to prevent entry into the cage, enclosure, or other area;

      (2)  the wild animal was not provoked by any other means than the presence of the person in the cage, enclosure, or other area; or

      (3) injury to the animal was necessary to protect the person from injury or death.

      Finally, the bill indicates that the newly established offense of reckless trespass involving a wild animal would not apply to a person who enters a cage, enclosure, or other area for the purpose of aiding another person or a wild animal in the cage, enclosure, or other area.

feedback