Bill Text: NC S15 | 2017-2018 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: ISD Changes and Capital Grant Clarification
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 3-0)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2018-06-15 - Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate [S15 Detail]
Download: North_Carolina-2017-S15-Amended.html
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2017
S 5
SENATE BILL 15*
Education/Higher Education Committee Substitute Adopted 4/24/17
House Committee Substitute Favorable 6/5/18
House Committee Substitute #2 Favorable 6/14/18
Fifth Edition Engrossed 6/14/18
|
Short Title: ISD Changes and Capital Grant Clarification. |
(Public) |
|
|
Sponsors: |
|
|
|
Referred to: |
|
|
January 30, 2017
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT to modify the innovative school district statuteS; to CLARIFY ELIGIBILITY FOR NEEDS‑BASED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL FUND GRANTS; AND TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS TO THE TRIANGLE LITERACY COUNCIL.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
PART I. CHANGES TO THE INNOVATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATUTES
SECTION 1.(a) G.S. 115C‑75.5(5) reads as rewritten:
"(5) Qualifying school. – A low‑performing school, as defined in G.S. 115C‑105.37, that meets one of the following criteria:
a. The school earned an overall school performance score in the lowest five percent (5%) of all schools in the prior school year that meet all of the following requirements:
1. The school includes all or part of grades kindergarten through fifth.
2. The school did not exceed growth in at least one of the prior three school years and did not meet growth in at least one of the prior three school years.
3. One of the models established in G.S. 115C‑105.37B
for continually low‑performing schools had not been adopted for that
school for the immediately prior school year.
b. The school received a school performance score in the lowest ten percent (10%) of all schools that include all or part of grades kindergarten through fifth in the prior school year and has been designated by the local board of education for consideration by the State Board of Education as an innovative school."
SECTION 1.(b) G.S. 115C‑75.7(a) reads as rewritten:
"(a) State Board
Selection. – The State Board of Education is authorized to select, upon the
recommendation of the ISD Superintendent, no more than five qualifying
elementary schools to transfer to the ISD as innovative schools. schools
through the 2019‑2020 school year. The five qualifying schools
selected for inclusion in the ISD should represent geographic diversity,
including urban and rural schools. The State Board of Education shall select no
more than one qualifying school per local school administrative unit, unless
the local board of education consents. Beginning with the 2021‑2022
school year, provided that schools that have been in the ISD for three or more
school years have earned a grade of C or higher under G.S. 115C‑12(9)c1.,
the ISD Superintendent may recommend up to two additional qualifying schools
per school year for State Board approval."
SECTION 1.(c) G.S. 115C‑75.7(b) reads as rewritten:
"(b) Selection Process. –
The selection of qualifying schools shall be based on an analysis of
performance over the most recent three‑year period. Prior to
recommendation of selection of a qualifying school, the ISD Superintendent
shall conduct an evaluation of the school to determine the factors contributing
to the school's performance and shall confer with the school principal, local board
of education members, the local school superintendent, and the local board of
county commissioners to share the findings of the evaluation. The school
selection process shall also include a public hearing to allow for parent and
community input. The ISD Superintendent shall evaluate and identify the
qualifying schools to recommend for selection as prospective innovative schools
no later than October 15 prior to the initial school year in which the school
may operate as an innovative school and shall notify the local boards of
education where prospective innovative schools are located by that date. The
State Board of Education shall select the prospective innovative schools no
later than December 15.November 15."
SECTION 1.(d) G.S. 115C‑75.7(c) reads as rewritten:
"(c) Local Board
Response. – Upon notification by the ISD Superintendent of selection by the
State Board of Education of the qualifying school as a prospective innovative
school, the local board of education shall determine whether to (i) close the
selected qualifying school or (ii) transfer the school into the ISD. The local
board shall not be required to undertake the study required by G.S. 115C‑72
before closing the school. school but shall submit a plan to the
State Board of Education that outlines the impact of closure, including information
addressing at least the following: reassignment of students and staff, school
bus travel time, and alternative enrollment options for students. Before
the adoption of a resolution, the local board of education shall provide for a
public hearing in regard to the proposed transfer or closure, at which hearing
the public shall be afforded an opportunity to express their views. No later
than February 1,December 15, the local board of education shall
adopt a resolution either (i) consenting to transfer of the selected qualifying
school to the ISD as an innovative school or (ii) closing that school at the
conclusion of that school year. The State Board of Education may delay the
transfer of a selected school to the ISD for one year only upon the
recommendation of the ISD Superintendent."
SECTION 1.(e) G.S. 115C‑75.9(d) reads as rewritten:
"(d) Facility and Capital Expenditures. – Facility and capital expenditures shall be provided as follows:
(1) In addition to the transfer of funds as provided in G.S. 115C‑75.10, the local board of education shall be responsible for facility and capital expenditures at the qualifying school.
(2) All IS operators and local boards of education shall enter into an occupancy agreement establishing the terms of occupancy for the IS operator not otherwise addressed in statute. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, either party may petition the State Board of Education to resolve any issues in dispute.
(3) The IS operator shall have first priority in use of the facility and capital expenditures at the school for any purpose related to the operation of the innovative school. The local board of education may allow use of the facility by governmental, charitable, civic, or other organizations for activities within the community and may retain any funds received for such use for any time the IS operator has not provided written notice to the local board of its use of the facility during that time for a purpose related to the operation of the innovative school.
For the purposes of this
subsection, facility and capital expenditures include routine maintenance and
repair, and capital expenditures include building repair and maintenance,
furniture, furnishings, and equipment.equipment, and any existing IT
network, hardware, computers, instructional technology, phones, and related
cabling."
SECTION 1.(f) G.S. 115C‑75.9(f) reads as rewritten:
"(f) Memorandums of Understanding for Alternate Arrangements. – Notwithstanding this section, the IS operator, in consultation with the ISD Superintendent, may elect to enter into a memorandum of understanding for alternate arrangements with the local board of education to address any of the following:
(1) Facility and capital expenditures.
(2) Transportation services.
(3) Services for Children with Disabilities.
If the IS operator elects to use a
memorandum of understanding for alternate arrangements, the IS operator and
local board of education shall finalize the memorandum of understanding within 3045
days of the initial request by the IS operator. If the parties have not
completed the memorandum of understanding within 3045 days, the
State Board of Education shall resolve any issues in dispute."
SECTION 1.(g) G.S. 115C‑75.9(h) reads as rewritten:
"(h) Innovative School
Employees. – The IS operator shall select and hire the school principal for an
innovative school.school with input and approval from the ISD
Superintendent. Within the limits of the school budget, the IS operator or
its designee shall select staff members in accordance with guidance from the
ISD Superintendent. Before finalizing staffing recommendations, the IS operator
and the ISD Superintendent or the Superintendent's designee shall interview all
existing staff members at the qualifying school and review student growth and
performance data for those staff members for whom it is available.
Notwithstanding Article 21A of this Chapter, the IS operator and the ISD
Superintendent shall be permitted to examine personnel files of existing staff
members for the qualifying school. The IS operator shall have the authority to
decide whether any administrator, teacher, or staff member previously assigned
to a qualifying school selected to become an innovative school shall continue
as an employee of the innovative school. Any such employees retained shall
become employees of the ISD. An employee hired to work in an innovative school
shall be an employee of the ISD, and the employees shall be under the exclusive
control of the ISD. All employees of the ISD shall be eligible for enrollment
in the Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System of North Carolina, the
State Health Plan, and other benefits available to State employees. The IS operator
shall provide funds to the ISD in an amount sufficient to provide salary and
benefits for employees of the ISD working in the innovative school based on the
terms of employment established by the IS operator. A teacher employed with
career status under G.S. 115C‑325 and assigned to a school
transferred to the ISD who accepts employment at that ISD school may return to
the local school administrative unit with career status upon the end of
employment at the ISD school."
SECTION 1.(h) G.S. 115C‑75.13(d) reads as rewritten:
"(d) A low‑performing
school in an innovation zone, created as provided in clause (ii) of subsection
(a) of this section, shallmay become an innovative school if that
low‑performing school does not exceed expected growth in the last two
years of the five consecutive years in the innovation zone."
PART II. CLARIFY ELIGIBILITY FOR NEEDS‑BASED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL FUND GRANTS
SECTION 2.(a) Section 5.3(e) of S.L. 2017‑57, as amended by Section 1.1(a) of S.L. 2017‑187, Section 1.1 of S.L. 2017‑212, and Section 5.3(a) of S.L. 2018‑5, reads as rewritten:
"SECTION 5.3.(e) Grant funds awarded under this section shall be subject to a matching requirement from the recipient county as follows:
(1) For a county designated as a development tier one area, the grant shall not exceed three dollars ($3.00) in grant funds for every one dollar ($1.00) provided by the county. Grant funds awarded to a county designated as a development tier one area shall not exceed fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000).
(2) For a county designated as a development tier two area, the grant shall not exceed one dollar ($1.00) for every one dollar ($1.00) in grant funds provided by the county. Grant funds awarded to a county designated as a tier two area shall not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000).
Grant funds shall be used for the construction of new school buildings only. Grant funds shall not be used for real property acquisition. Grant funds shall be disbursed in a series of payments based on the progress of the project. To obtain a payment, the grantee shall submit a request for payment along with documentation of the expenditures for which the payment is requested and evidence that the matching requirement contained in subsection (b) of this section has been met. Grant funds shall not be awarded to any county that has received an aggregate amount exceeding eight million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($8,750,000) in funds from the Public School Building Capital Fund from the 2012‑2013 fiscal year to the 2016‑2017 fiscal year. No county may receive grant funds under this section more than once every five years. No portion of grant funds may be used to acquire a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification. For fiscal year 2018‑2019, for the purposes of this section, a county shall be considered to be designated as a development tier one area if (i) it was so designated by the Department of Commerce in 2017 or 2018 and (ii) the county filed a grant application under this section in 2017."
SECTION 2.(b) This section becomes effective July 1, 2018.
SECTION 2.5.(a) Of the funds appropriated to the Department of Public Instruction for the 2018-2019 fiscal year by S.L. 2018-5, the sum of seven hundred forty thousand dollars ($740,000) in nonrecurring funds for the 2018‑2019 fiscal year shall be provided to the nonprofit organization known as the Triangle Literacy Council to be used to support juvenile literacy centers that serve court‑involved or otherwise at‑risk youth.
SECTION 2.5.(b) The Triangle Literacy Council, in consultation with the Department of Public Instruction, shall submit a report by September 1 of each year following the fiscal year in which the Triangle Literacy Council spends State funds made available pursuant to this section. The report shall be submitted to the Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee and the Fiscal Research Division on the activities described by this section and the use of State funds.
SECTION 2.5.(c) This section becomes effective July 1, 2018.
PART III. EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 3. Except as otherwise provided, this act is effective when it becomes law.
