Bill Text: MI SB0398 | 2009-2010 | 95th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: State financing and management; purchasing; certain rule-making authority; eliminate, and lower ownership threshold attached to debarment. Amends secs. 131 & 264 of 1984 PA 431 (MCL 18.1131 & 18.1264).
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2009-03-19 - Referred To Committee On Commerce And Tourism [SB0398 Detail]
Download: Michigan-2009-SB0398-Introduced.html
SENATE BILL No. 398
March 19, 2009, Introduced by Senator ALLEN and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Tourism.
A bill to amend 1984 PA 431, entitled
"The management and budget act,"
by amending sections 131 and 264 (MCL 18.1131 and 18.1264), section
131 as amended by 1999 PA 8 and section 264 as added by 1988 PA
504.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
Sec.
131. (1) The director may issue, alter, or rescind
administrative and procedural directives as determined to be
necessary for the effective administration of this act. The
directives are exempt from the definition of a rule pursuant to
section 7 of the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA
306, MCL 24.207. The directives shall be placed in the appropriate
manual and distributed to each principal department, autonomous
entity within state government, the senate and house appropriations
committees, and the fiscal agencies. The directives shall take
effect upon written approval of the director unless a later date is
specified. Before a directive may become effective, the department
shall give the affected principal departments reasonable time, as
determined by the department of management and budget, to respond.
(2)
The department may promulgate rules as necessary to
implement
this act. The rules shall be promulgated pursuant to the
administrative
procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to
24.328.
Sec. 264. The department may debar a vendor from participation
in the bid process and from contract award upon notice and a
finding that the vendor is not able to perform responsibly, or that
the
vendor, or an officer or an owner of a 25% 20% or
greater share
of the vendor, has demonstrated a lack of integrity that could
jeopardize the state's interest if the state were to contract with
the vendor.