Bill Text: IN SB0369 | 2012 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Vote fraud and employment.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2012-01-09 - First reading: referred to Committee on Pensions and Labor [SB0369 Detail]
Download: Indiana-2012-SB0369-Introduced.html
Citations Affected: IC 3-14-2-31.
Synopsis: Vote fraud and employment. Provides that a person who is
convicted of any of certain offenses relating to voting is prohibited
from being employed by the state or a county, municipality, or
township for three years, unless the sentencing court finds that the
person committed the offense because the person reasonably feared
employment related retaliation.
Effective: July 1, 2012.
January 9, 2012, read first time and referred to Committee on Pensions and Labor.
PRINTING CODE. Amendments: Whenever an existing statute (or a section of the Indiana Constitution) is being amended, the text of the existing provision will appear in this style type, additions will appear in this style type, and deletions will appear in
Additions: Whenever a new statutory provision is being enacted (or a new constitutional provision adopted), the text of the new provision will appear in this style type. Also, the word NEW will appear in that style type in the introductory clause of each SECTION that adds a new provision to the Indiana Code or the Indiana Constitution.
Conflict reconciliation: Text in a statute in this style type or
A BILL FOR AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning
criminal law and procedure.
(1) the court sentencing the person for the offense shall prohibit the person from being employed by the state or a unit (as defined in IC 36-1-2-23) for a period of three (3) years; and
(2) if the person is employed by the state or a unit on the date of sentencing, the person's employment is terminated as a matter of law on the date of sentencing.
(b) The court sentencing a person convicted of an offense under this chapter may suspend or modify the prohibition under subsection (a)(1) or the termination under subsection (a)(2), or both, if the court finds that the person committed the offense because the person reasonably feared employment related
retaliation.