Bill Text: IL SB2829 | 2013-2014 | 98th General Assembly | Enrolled

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Amends the Code of Civil Procedure. Provides that in a successful appeal under the Administrative Review Law of an adverse decision by a unit of local government, the court shall award the plaintiff all reasonable costs, including court costs and attorney's fees, associated with the appeal. Provides that if the court finds the decision by the unit of local government was clearly erroneous or that the plaintiff's rights to due process were abridged, the court may award the plaintiff all reasonable costs associated with the entire case dating back to the inception of the administrative proceeding.

Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Democrat 8)

Status: (Passed) 2014-08-26 - Public Act . . . . . . . . . 98-1105 [SB2829 Detail]

Download: Illinois-2013-SB2829-Enrolled.html



SB2829 EnrolledLRB098 17209 HEP 52301 b
1 AN ACT concerning civil law.
2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3represented in the General Assembly:
4 Section 5. The Code of Civil Procedure is amended by adding
5Section 5-120.5 as follows:
6 (735 ILCS 5/5-120.5 new)
7 Sec. 5-120.5. Administrative review, code compliance.
8 (a) In an administrative review action under Article III of
9this Code, if the court reverses the decision of a municipal
10code hearing officer in an action set forth under subsection
11(c) of this Section, then the court may award the plaintiff all
12reasonable costs, including court costs and attorney's fees,
13associated with the action if the court finds that: (i) the
14decision of the hearing officer was arbitrary and capricious;
15or (ii) the defendant failed to file a record under Section
163-108 of this Code that is sufficient to allow the court to
17determine whether the decision of the hearing officer was
18arbitrary and capricious.
19 (b) The court may award the municipality reasonable costs,
20including court costs and attorney's fees, if the court finds
21that the plaintiff's action under Article III of this Code for
22administrative review of a decision by the municipal code
23hearing officer is not reasonably well grounded in fact, is not

SB2829 Enrolled- 2 -LRB098 17209 HEP 52301 b
1warranted by existing law, or is not accompanied by a
2reasonable argument for the extension, modification, or
3reversal of existing law.
4 (c) This Section applies only to the decision of a code
5hearing officer that imposes a fine or penalty against the
6owner of a single-family or multi-family residential dwelling
7for a violation related to the condition or use of that
8residential property. This Section does not apply to any
9administrative decision of a municipality with a population of
10more than 500,000.
11 (d) The provisions of this Section are mutually dependent
12and inseverable; if any provision is held invalid, then the
13entire Section is invalid.
feedback