Bill Text: IL HB5593 | 2017-2018 | 100th General Assembly | Enrolled
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Creates the Design-Build for Public Schools Act. Defines terms. Provides that a school district shall, for each public project, make a written determination as to whether it is in the best interests of the school district to enter into a design-build contract for that project. Specifies factors to be considered in making the determination. Provides that if a school district elects to use a design-build delivery method under the Act, it must issue a notice of intent to receive proposals for a project no less than 14 days before issuing the request for proposals. Specifies requirements for the request for proposals. Requires a school district that elects to use the design-build delivery method to establish a committee to evaluate and select the design-build entity, which shall consist of no less than 5 members but no more than 7 members and shall include no less than one licensed design professional. Requires a school district to use a 2-phase procedure for the selection of a design-build entity; specifies the criteria for each phase. Provides that a school district may award the contract to the highest overall ranked entity. Repeals the Act on July 1, 2023. Effective immediately.
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Democrat 5-3)
Status: (Passed) 2018-12-20 - Public Act . . . . . . . . . 100-1159 [HB5593 Detail]
Download: Illinois-2017-HB5593-Enrolled.html
Bill Title: Creates the Design-Build for Public Schools Act. Defines terms. Provides that a school district shall, for each public project, make a written determination as to whether it is in the best interests of the school district to enter into a design-build contract for that project. Specifies factors to be considered in making the determination. Provides that if a school district elects to use a design-build delivery method under the Act, it must issue a notice of intent to receive proposals for a project no less than 14 days before issuing the request for proposals. Specifies requirements for the request for proposals. Requires a school district that elects to use the design-build delivery method to establish a committee to evaluate and select the design-build entity, which shall consist of no less than 5 members but no more than 7 members and shall include no less than one licensed design professional. Requires a school district to use a 2-phase procedure for the selection of a design-build entity; specifies the criteria for each phase. Provides that a school district may award the contract to the highest overall ranked entity. Repeals the Act on July 1, 2023. Effective immediately.
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Democrat 5-3)
Status: (Passed) 2018-12-20 - Public Act . . . . . . . . . 100-1159 [HB5593 Detail]
Download: Illinois-2017-HB5593-Enrolled.html
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | AN ACT concerning education.
| ||||||
2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| ||||||
3 | represented in the General Assembly:
| ||||||
4 | Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the | ||||||
5 | Design-Build for Public Schools Act.
| ||||||
6 | Section 5. Legislative intent. It is the intent of the | ||||||
7 | General Assembly to authorize up to 5 design-build | ||||||
8 | demonstration projects statewide where it is shown to be in a | ||||||
9 | school district's best interest, as determined by the State | ||||||
10 | Board of Education. All projects procured using this delivery | ||||||
11 | system shall comply with Section 2-3.12 of the School Code and | ||||||
12 | shall be subject to review and approval by the State Board of | ||||||
13 | Education.
| ||||||
14 | Section 10. Scope. This Act shall not apply to entities | ||||||
15 | subject to the Public Building Commission Act.
| ||||||
16 | Section 15. Definitions. In this Act: | ||||||
17 | "Delivery system" means the design and construction | ||||||
18 | approach used to develop and construct a project. | ||||||
19 | "Design-bid-build" means the traditional delivery system | ||||||
20 | used on public projects in this State that incorporates the | ||||||
21 | Architectural, Engineering, and Land Surveying Qualifications |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | Based Selection Act and the principles of competitive selection | ||||||
2 | in the Illinois Procurement Code. | ||||||
3 | "Design-build" means a delivery system that is responsible | ||||||
4 | within a single contract for the furnishing of architecture, | ||||||
5 | engineering, land surveying, and related services, as | ||||||
6 | required, and the labor, materials, equipment, and other | ||||||
7 | construction services for the project. | ||||||
8 | "Design-build contract" means a contract for a project | ||||||
9 | between a school district and a design-build entity to furnish | ||||||
10 | architecture, engineering, land surveying, and related | ||||||
11 | services, as required, and to furnish the labor, materials, | ||||||
12 | equipment, and other construction services for the project. | ||||||
13 | "Design-build entity" means any individual, sole | ||||||
14 | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | ||||||
15 | professional corporation, or other entity that proposes to | ||||||
16 | design and construct any public project under this Act. A | ||||||
17 | design-build entity and any associated design-build | ||||||
18 | professionals shall conduct themselves in accordance with the | ||||||
19 | laws of this State and the related provisions of the Illinois | ||||||
20 | Administrative Code, as referenced by the licensed design | ||||||
21 | professionals Acts of this State. | ||||||
22 | "Design professional" means any individual, sole | ||||||
23 | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | ||||||
24 | professional corporation, or other entity that offers services | ||||||
25 | under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of 1989, | ||||||
26 | Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, Structural |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | Engineering Practice Act of 1989, or Illinois Professional Land | ||||||
2 | Surveyor Act of 1989. | ||||||
3 | "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the | ||||||
4 | separate phases of the selection process and may include | ||||||
5 | specialized experience, technical qualifications and | ||||||
6 | competence, capacity to perform, past performance, experience | ||||||
7 | with similar projects, assignment of personnel to the project, | ||||||
8 | and other appropriate factors. Price may not be used as a | ||||||
9 | factor in the evaluation of Phase I proposals. | ||||||
10 | "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build | ||||||
11 | contract as submitted by a design-build entity in accordance | ||||||
12 | with this Act. | ||||||
13 | "Request for proposals" means the document used by a school | ||||||
14 | district to solicit proposals for a design-build contract. | ||||||
15 | "School district" means a public school district that | ||||||
16 | operates under the authority of the School Code, except for a | ||||||
17 | school district organized under Article 34 of that Code. | ||||||
18 | "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements | ||||||
19 | for the project, including, but not limited to, the intended | ||||||
20 | usage, capacity, size, scope, quality and performance | ||||||
21 | standards, life-cycle costs, and other programmatic criteria | ||||||
22 | that are expressed in performance-oriented and quantifiable | ||||||
23 | specifications and drawings that can be reasonably inferred and | ||||||
24 | are suited to allow a design-build entity to develop a | ||||||
25 | proposal.
|
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | Section 20. Procedures. | ||||||
2 | (a) It shall be the policy of a school district in the | ||||||
3 | procurement of design-build services to publicly announce all | ||||||
4 | requirements for design-build services and to procure these | ||||||
5 | services on the basis of demonstrated competence and | ||||||
6 | qualifications, with due regard for the principles of | ||||||
7 | competitive selection. A school district shall, prior to | ||||||
8 | issuing a request for proposals, promulgate and publish | ||||||
9 | procedures for the solicitation and award of contracts pursuant | ||||||
10 | to this Act. | ||||||
11 | (b) A school district shall, for each project or projects | ||||||
12 | permitted under this Act, make a written determination, | ||||||
13 | including a description as to the particular advantages of the | ||||||
14 | design-build procurement method, that it is in the best | ||||||
15 | interests of the school district to enter into a design-build | ||||||
16 | contract for the project or projects. In making that | ||||||
17 | determination, a school district shall consider all of the | ||||||
18 | following factors: | ||||||
19 | (1) The probability that the design-build procurement | ||||||
20 | method will be in the best interests of the school district | ||||||
21 | by providing a material savings of time or cost over the | ||||||
22 | design-bid-build or other delivery system. | ||||||
23 | (2) The type and size of the project and its | ||||||
24 | suitability to the design-build procurement method. | ||||||
25 | (3) The ability of the design-build entity to define | ||||||
26 | and provide comprehensive scope and performance criteria |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | for the project.
| ||||||
2 | Section 25. Solicitation of proposals. | ||||||
3 | (a) If a school district elects to use the design-build | ||||||
4 | delivery method under this Act, it must issue a notice of | ||||||
5 | intent to receive proposals for the project no less than 14 | ||||||
6 | days before issuing the request for proposals. A school | ||||||
7 | district must publish the advance notice in a daily newspaper | ||||||
8 | of general circulation in the area where the school district is | ||||||
9 | located. A school district may publish the notice in related | ||||||
10 | construction-industry service publications. A brief | ||||||
11 | description of the proposed procurement must be included in the | ||||||
12 | notice. A school district must provide a copy of the request | ||||||
13 | for proposals to any party requesting a copy. | ||||||
14 | (b) A request for proposals under subsection (a) of this | ||||||
15 | Section shall be prepared for each project and must include, | ||||||
16 | but is not limited to, all of the following: | ||||||
17 | (1) The name of the school district. | ||||||
18 | (2) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the | ||||||
19 | contract. | ||||||
20 | (3) The proposed budget for the project, the source of | ||||||
21 | the required funds, and the currently available funds at | ||||||
22 | the time the request for proposals is submitted. | ||||||
23 | (4) Prequalification criteria for the design-build | ||||||
24 | entities that submit proposals. A school district shall | ||||||
25 | include, at a minimum, its normal prequalification, |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | licensing, and registration requirements. Nothing | ||||||
2 | contained in this paragraph (4) shall preclude the use of | ||||||
3 | additional prequalification criteria by a school district. | ||||||
4 | (5) Material requirements of the contract, including, | ||||||
5 | but not limited to, the proposed terms and conditions, | ||||||
6 | required performance and payment bonds, insurance, and the | ||||||
7 | design-build entity's plan to comply with the utilization | ||||||
8 | goals established by the corporate authorities of the | ||||||
9 | school district for minority-owned and women-owned | ||||||
10 | business enterprises and to comply with Section 2-105 of | ||||||
11 | the Illinois Human Rights Act. | ||||||
12 | (6) The performance criteria. | ||||||
13 | (7) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the | ||||||
14 | solicitation. Price may not be used as a factor in the | ||||||
15 | evaluation of Phase I proposals. | ||||||
16 | (8) The number of entities that shall be considered for | ||||||
17 | the technical and cost evaluation phase. | ||||||
18 | (c) A school district may include any other relevant | ||||||
19 | information in the request for proposals. The design-build | ||||||
20 | entity shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of this | ||||||
21 | documentation in the development of its proposal. | ||||||
22 | (d) The date that proposals are due must be no less than 21 | ||||||
23 | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | ||||||
24 | proposals. If the cost of the project is estimated to exceed | ||||||
25 | $10,000,000, then the proposal's due date must be no less than | ||||||
26 | 28 calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | for proposals. A school district shall include in the request | ||||||
2 | for proposals a minimum of 30 days to develop the Phase II | ||||||
3 | submissions after the selection of entities from the Phase I | ||||||
4 | evaluation is completed.
| ||||||
5 | Section 30. Development of scope and performance criteria. | ||||||
6 | (a) A request for proposals under this Act shall be | ||||||
7 | developed with the assistance of a licensed design professional | ||||||
8 | and shall include scope and performance criteria. The scope and | ||||||
9 | performance criteria must be in sufficient detail and contain | ||||||
10 | adequate information to reasonably apprise the qualified | ||||||
11 | design-build entities of the school district's overall | ||||||
12 | programmatic needs and goals, including criteria and | ||||||
13 | preliminary design plans, general budget parameters, schedule, | ||||||
14 | and delivery requirements. Each request for proposals shall | ||||||
15 | also include a description of the level of design to be | ||||||
16 | provided in the proposals. This description must include the | ||||||
17 | scope and type of renderings, drawings, and specifications | ||||||
18 | that, at a minimum, shall be required by the school district to | ||||||
19 | be produced by the design-build entities. | ||||||
20 | (b) The scope and performance criteria shall be prepared by | ||||||
21 | a design professional who is an employee of the school district | ||||||
22 | or by an independent design professional selected under the | ||||||
23 | Architectural, Engineering, and Land Surveying Qualifications | ||||||
24 | Based Selection Act contracted by the school district to | ||||||
25 | provide these services. |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (c) The design professional that prepares the scope and | ||||||
2 | performance criteria is prohibited from participating in any | ||||||
3 | design-build entity proposal for the project. | ||||||
4 | (d) The design-build contract may be conditioned upon | ||||||
5 | subsequent refinements in scope and price and may allow the | ||||||
6 | school district to make modifications in the project scope | ||||||
7 | without invalidating the design-build contract.
| ||||||
8 | Section 35. Selection committee. | ||||||
9 | (a) A school district that elects to use the design-build | ||||||
10 | delivery method under this Act shall establish a committee to | ||||||
11 | evaluate and select the design-build entity. The committee, | ||||||
12 | under the discretion of the school district, shall consist of | ||||||
13 | no less than 5 members and no more than 7 members and shall | ||||||
14 | include no less than one licensed design professional. | ||||||
15 | (b) Each member of the selection committee must certify for | ||||||
16 | each request for proposals that no conflict of interest exists | ||||||
17 | between the member and the design-build entities submitting | ||||||
18 | proposals. If a conflict is discovered before proposals are | ||||||
19 | reviewed, the member must be replaced before any review of | ||||||
20 | proposals. If a conflict is discovered after proposals are | ||||||
21 | reviewed, the member with the conflict shall be removed and, if | ||||||
22 | no less than 5 members remain, the remaining committee members | ||||||
23 | may complete the selection process.
| ||||||
24 | Section 40. Procedures for selection. |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (a) A school district electing to use the design-build | ||||||
2 | delivery method must use a 2-phase procedure for the selection | ||||||
3 | of the successful design-build entity. Phase I of the procedure | ||||||
4 | shall evaluate and shortlist the design-build entities based on | ||||||
5 | qualifications and Phase II of the procedure shall evaluate the | ||||||
6 | technical and cost proposals. | ||||||
7 | (b) A school district shall include in the request for | ||||||
8 | proposal the evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. These | ||||||
9 | factors are in addition to any prequalification requirements of | ||||||
10 | design-build entities that the school district has set forth. | ||||||
11 | Each request for proposals shall establish the relative | ||||||
12 | importance assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, | ||||||
13 | including any weighing of criteria to be employed by the school | ||||||
14 | district. A school district must maintain a record of the | ||||||
15 | evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest | ||||||
16 | regarding the solicitation. | ||||||
17 | (c) A school district shall include the following criteria | ||||||
18 | in every Phase I evaluation of design-build entities: (i) | ||||||
19 | experience of personnel; (ii) successful experience with | ||||||
20 | similar project types; (iii) financial capability; (iv) | ||||||
21 | timeliness of past performance; (v) experience with | ||||||
22 | similarly-sized projects; (vi) successful reference checks of | ||||||
23 | the entity; (vii) commitment to assign personnel for the | ||||||
24 | duration of the project and qualifications of the entity's | ||||||
25 | consultants; and (viii) ability or past performance in meeting | ||||||
26 | or exhausting good faith efforts to meet the utilization goals |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | for minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises | ||||||
2 | established by the corporate authorities of the school district | ||||||
3 | and in complying with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human | ||||||
4 | Rights Act. A school district may include any additional | ||||||
5 | relevant criteria in Phase I that it deems necessary for a | ||||||
6 | proper qualification review. The school district may not | ||||||
7 | consider any design-build
entity for evaluation or award if the | ||||||
8 | entity has any pecuniary
interest in the project or has other | ||||||
9 | relationships or
circumstances, including, but not limited to, | ||||||
10 | a long-term
leasehold, mutual performance, or development | ||||||
11 | contracts with
the school district that may give the | ||||||
12 | design-build entity a
financial or tangible advantage over | ||||||
13 | other design-build
entities in the preparation, evaluation, or | ||||||
14 | performance of the
design-build contract or that create the | ||||||
15 | appearance of
impropriety. No design-build proposal shall be | ||||||
16 | considered that does not include a design-build entity's plan | ||||||
17 | to comply with the utilization goals established by the | ||||||
18 | corporate authorities of the school district for | ||||||
19 | minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises and with | ||||||
20 | Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
| ||||||
21 | (d) Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation, a | ||||||
22 | school district shall create a shortlist of the most highly | ||||||
23 | qualified design-build entities. A school district is not | ||||||
24 | required to shortlist the maximum number of entities as | ||||||
25 | identified for Phase II evaluation, provided that no less than | ||||||
26 | 2 and no more than 6 design-build entities are selected to |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | submit Phase II proposals. A school district shall provide | ||||||
2 | written notification to the entities selected for the | ||||||
3 | shortlist. This notification shall commence the period for the | ||||||
4 | preparation of the Phase II technical and cost evaluations. A | ||||||
5 | school district must allow sufficient time for the shortlist | ||||||
6 | entities to prepare their Phase II submittals considering the | ||||||
7 | scope and detail requested by the school district. | ||||||
8 | (e) A school district shall include in the request for | ||||||
9 | proposals the evaluating factors to be used in the technical | ||||||
10 | and cost submission components of Phase II. Each request for | ||||||
11 | proposals shall establish, for both the technical and cost | ||||||
12 | submission components of Phase II, the relative importance | ||||||
13 | assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including any | ||||||
14 | weighing of criteria to be employed by the school district. The | ||||||
15 | school district must maintain a record of the evaluation | ||||||
16 | scoring, to be disclosed in the event of a protest regarding | ||||||
17 | the solicitation. | ||||||
18 | (f) A school district shall include the following criteria | ||||||
19 | in every Phase II technical evaluation of design-build | ||||||
20 | entities: (i) compliance with objectives of the project; (ii) | ||||||
21 | compliance of proposed services to the request for proposals | ||||||
22 | requirements; (iii) quality of products or materials proposed; | ||||||
23 | (iv) quality of design parameters; (v) design concepts; (vi) | ||||||
24 | innovation in meeting the scope and performance criteria; and | ||||||
25 | (vii) constructability of the proposed project. A school | ||||||
26 | district may include any additional relevant technical |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection. A | ||||||
2 | school district shall include the following criteria in every | ||||||
3 | Phase II cost evaluation: (I) the total project cost; (II) the | ||||||
4 | construction costs; and (III) the time of completion. A school | ||||||
5 | district may include any additional relevant evaluation | ||||||
6 | factors it deems necessary for proper selection. The total | ||||||
7 | project cost criteria weighing factor shall not exceed 30%. | ||||||
8 | (g) A school district shall directly employ or retain a | ||||||
9 | licensed design professional to evaluate the technical and cost | ||||||
10 | submissions to determine if the technical submissions are in | ||||||
11 | accordance with generally accepted industry standards. Upon | ||||||
12 | completion of the technical submissions and cost submissions | ||||||
13 | evaluation, a school district may award the design-build | ||||||
14 | contract to the highest overall ranked entity.
| ||||||
15 | Section 45. Small projects. In any case where the total | ||||||
16 | overall cost of the project is estimated to be less than | ||||||
17 | $10,000,000, a school district may combine the 2-phase | ||||||
18 | procedure for selection under Section 40 of this Act into one | ||||||
19 | combined step; provided that all the requirements of evaluation | ||||||
20 | are performed in accordance with Section 40 of this Act.
| ||||||
21 | Section 50. Submission of proposals. | ||||||
22 | (a) Proposals under this Act must be properly identified | ||||||
23 | and sealed. Proposals may not be reviewed until after the | ||||||
24 | deadline for submission has passed as set forth in the request |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | for proposals. All design-build entities submitting proposals | ||||||
2 | shall be disclosed after the deadline for submission, and all | ||||||
3 | design-build entities who are selected for Phase II evaluation | ||||||
4 | shall be disclosed at the time of that determination. | ||||||
5 | (b) Proposals shall include a bid bond in the form and | ||||||
6 | security as designated in the request for proposals. Proposals | ||||||
7 | shall also contain a separate sealed envelope with the cost | ||||||
8 | information within the overall proposal submission. Proposals | ||||||
9 | shall include a list of all design professionals and other | ||||||
10 | entities, in accordance with Section 30-30 of the Illinois | ||||||
11 | Procurement Code, to which any work may be subcontracted during | ||||||
12 | the performance of the contract. | ||||||
13 | (c) Proposals must meet all material requirements of the | ||||||
14 | request for proposals, or they may be rejected as | ||||||
15 | non-responsive. A school district shall have the right to | ||||||
16 | reject any and all proposals. The drawings and specifications | ||||||
17 | of the proposal shall remain the property of the design-build | ||||||
18 | entity. A school district shall review the proposals for | ||||||
19 | compliance with the performance criteria and evaluation | ||||||
20 | factors. Proposals may be withdrawn prior to evaluation for any | ||||||
21 | cause. After evaluation begins by a school district, clear and | ||||||
22 | convincing evidence of error is required for withdrawal. | ||||||
23 | (d) After a proposal has been submitted in accordance with | ||||||
24 | this Act, a design-build entity may not replace, remove, or | ||||||
25 | otherwise modify any firm identified as a member of the | ||||||
26 | design-build team unless one of the following criteria is met: |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (1) The firm is no longer in business. | ||||||
2 | (2) The firm is unable to fulfill its legal, financial, | ||||||
3 | or business obligations. | ||||||
4 | (3) The firm no longer meets the terms of the agreement | ||||||
5 | with the design-build entity. | ||||||
6 | (4) The firm voluntarily removes itself from the | ||||||
7 | design-build entity. | ||||||
8 | (5) The firm fails to provide a sufficient number of | ||||||
9 | qualified personnel to fulfill the duties identified in the | ||||||
10 | proposal. | ||||||
11 | (6) The firm fails to negotiate in good faith and in a | ||||||
12 | timely manner in accordance with the provisions | ||||||
13 | established in the agreement with the design-build entity. | ||||||
14 | If the design-build entity modifies the team, any cost | ||||||
15 | savings shall accrue to the school district and not to the | ||||||
16 | design-build entity. If a design-build entity is modified at | ||||||
17 | any time during the term of a design-build contract, the | ||||||
18 | design-build entity shall notify the State Board of Education | ||||||
19 | and the school district in writing within 15 calendar days of | ||||||
20 | making the change.
| ||||||
21 | Section 55. Award. A school district may award the contract | ||||||
22 | to the highest overall ranked entity. A school district shall | ||||||
23 | provide a written notification to the awarded entity and all | ||||||
24 | unsuccessful entities of its decision. A school district may | ||||||
25 | not request a best and final offer after the receipt of |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | proposals. A school district may negotiate with the selected | ||||||
2 | design-build entity after the award, but prior to contract | ||||||
3 | execution, for the purpose of securing better terms than | ||||||
4 | originally proposed; provided that the salient features of the | ||||||
5 | request for proposal are not diminished.
| ||||||
6 | Section 60. Reports. The design-build entity, regional | ||||||
7 | superintendent of schools, and State Board of Education shall | ||||||
8 | annually submit a detailed report to the General Assembly on | ||||||
9 | the status of projects procured under this Act, including | ||||||
10 | estimated and actual project costs, estimated and actual | ||||||
11 | project delivery schedules, estimated cost differences | ||||||
12 | resulting from the design-build delivery system over the | ||||||
13 | traditional design-bid-build delivery system, and any other | ||||||
14 | impacts resulting from the use of the design-build delivery | ||||||
15 | system. The report shall also document the design-build | ||||||
16 | entity's success in complying with the utilization goals | ||||||
17 | established by the corporate authorities of the school district | ||||||
18 | for minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises and | ||||||
19 | Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. The report | ||||||
20 | shall be filed with the Clerk of the House of Representatives | ||||||
21 | and the Secretary of the Senate in electronic form only, in the | ||||||
22 | manner that the Clerk and the Secretary shall direct.
| ||||||
23 | Section 65. Compliance. All projects procured under this | ||||||
24 | Act using the design-build delivery method shall comply with |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | Section 2-3.12 of the School Code and shall be subject to | ||||||
2 | review and approval by the State Board of Education.
| ||||||
3 | Section 90. Repeal. This Act is repealed on July 1, 2023.
| ||||||
4 | Section 97. Severability. The provisions of this Act are | ||||||
5 | severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes.
| ||||||
6 | Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon | ||||||
7 | becoming law.
|