Bill Text: IL HB0802 | 2013-2014 | 98th General Assembly | Enrolled

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft

---

Bill Title: Amends the Cannabis Control Act. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 4-0)

Status: (Passed) 2014-08-22 - Public Act . . . . . . . . . 98-1014 [HB0802 Detail]

Download: Illinois-2013-HB0802-Enrolled.html

---

HB0802 Enrolled LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
AN ACT concerning criminal law.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:
Section 5. The Criminal Code of 2012 is amended by changing
Section 14-3 as follows:
(720 ILCS 5/14-3)
Sec. 14-3. Exemptions. The following activities shall be
exempt from the provisions of this Article:
(a) Listening to radio, wireless and television
communications of any sort where the same are publicly made;
(b) Hearing conversation when heard by employees of any
common carrier by wire incidental to the normal course of their
employment in the operation, maintenance or repair of the
equipment of such common carrier by wire so long as no
information obtained thereby is used or divulged by the hearer;
(c) Any broadcast by radio, television or otherwise whether
it be a broadcast or recorded for the purpose of later
broadcasts of any function where the public is in attendance
and the conversations are overheard incidental to the main
purpose for which such broadcasts are then being made;
(d) Recording or listening with the aid of any device to
any emergency communication made in the normal course of
operations by any federal, state or local law enforcement

HB0802 Enrolled - 2 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
agency or institutions dealing in emergency services,
including, but not limited to, hospitals, clinics, ambulance
services, fire fighting agencies, any public utility,
emergency repair facility, civilian defense establishment or
military installation;
(e) Recording the proceedings of any meeting required to be
open by the Open Meetings Act, as amended;
(f) Recording or listening with the aid of any device to
incoming telephone calls of phone lines publicly listed or
advertised as consumer "hotlines" by manufacturers or
retailers of food and drug products. Such recordings must be
destroyed, erased or turned over to local law enforcement
authorities within 24 hours from the time of such recording and
shall not be otherwise disseminated. Failure on the part of the
individual or business operating any such recording or
listening device to comply with the requirements of this
subsection shall eliminate any civil or criminal immunity
conferred upon that individual or business by the operation of
this Section;
(g) With prior notification to the State's Attorney of the
county in which it is to occur, recording or listening with the
aid of any device to any conversation where a law enforcement
officer, or any person acting at the direction of law
enforcement, is a party to the conversation and has consented
to it being intercepted or recorded under circumstances where
the use of the device is necessary for the protection of the

HB0802 Enrolled - 3 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
law enforcement officer or any person acting at the direction
of law enforcement, in the course of an investigation of a
forcible felony, a felony offense of involuntary servitude,
involuntary sexual servitude of a minor, or trafficking in
persons under Section 10-9 of this Code, an offense involving
prostitution, solicitation of a sexual act, or pandering, a
felony violation of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, a
felony violation of the Cannabis Control Act, a felony
violation of the Methamphetamine Control and Community
Protection Act, any "streetgang related" or "gang-related"
felony as those terms are defined in the Illinois Streetgang
Terrorism Omnibus Prevention Act, or any felony offense
involving any weapon listed in paragraphs (1) through (11) of
subsection (a) of Section 24-1 of this Code. Any recording or
evidence derived as the result of this exemption shall be
inadmissible in any proceeding, criminal, civil or
administrative, except (i) where a party to the conversation
suffers great bodily injury or is killed during such
conversation, or (ii) when used as direct impeachment of a
witness concerning matters contained in the interception or
recording. The Director of the Department of State Police shall
issue regulations as are necessary concerning the use of
devices, retention of tape recordings, and reports regarding
their use;
(g-5) With approval of the State's Attorney of the county
in which it is to occur, recording or listening with the aid of

HB0802 Enrolled - 4 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
any device to any conversation where a law enforcement officer,
or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, is a
party to the conversation and has consented to it being
intercepted or recorded in the course of an investigation of
any offense defined in Article 29D of this Code. In all such
cases, an application for an order approving the previous or
continuing use of an eavesdropping device must be made within
48 hours of the commencement of such use. In the absence of
such an order, or upon its denial, any continuing use shall
immediately terminate. The Director of State Police shall issue
rules as are necessary concerning the use of devices, retention
of tape recordings, and reports regarding their use.
Any recording or evidence obtained or derived in the course
of an investigation of any offense defined in Article 29D of
this Code shall, upon motion of the State's Attorney or
Attorney General prosecuting any violation of Article 29D, be
reviewed in camera with notice to all parties present by the
court presiding over the criminal case, and, if ruled by the
court to be relevant and otherwise admissible, it shall be
admissible at the trial of the criminal case.
This subsection (g-5) is inoperative on and after January
1, 2005. No conversations recorded or monitored pursuant to
this subsection (g-5) shall be inadmissible in a court of law
by virtue of the repeal of this subsection (g-5) on January 1,
2005;
(g-6) With approval of the State's Attorney of the county

HB0802 Enrolled - 5 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
in which it is to occur, recording or listening with the aid of
any device to any conversation where a law enforcement officer,
or any person acting at the direction of law enforcement, is a
party to the conversation and has consented to it being
intercepted or recorded in the course of an investigation of
involuntary servitude, involuntary sexual servitude of a
minor, trafficking in persons, child pornography, aggravated
child pornography, indecent solicitation of a child, child
abduction, luring of a minor, sexual exploitation of a child,
predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, aggravated
criminal sexual abuse in which the victim of the offense was at
the time of the commission of the offense under 18 years of
age, criminal sexual abuse by force or threat of force in which
the victim of the offense was at the time of the commission of
the offense under 18 years of age, or aggravated criminal
sexual assault in which the victim of the offense was at the
time of the commission of the offense under 18 years of age. In
all such cases, an application for an order approving the
previous or continuing use of an eavesdropping device must be
made within 48 hours of the commencement of such use. In the
absence of such an order, or upon its denial, any continuing
use shall immediately terminate. The Director of State Police
shall issue rules as are necessary concerning the use of
devices, retention of recordings, and reports regarding their
use. Any recording or evidence obtained or derived in the
course of an investigation of involuntary servitude,

HB0802 Enrolled - 6 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
involuntary sexual servitude of a minor, trafficking in
persons, child pornography, aggravated child pornography,
indecent solicitation of a child, child abduction, luring of a
minor, sexual exploitation of a child, predatory criminal
sexual assault of a child, aggravated criminal sexual abuse in
which the victim of the offense was at the time of the
commission of the offense under 18 years of age, criminal
sexual abuse by force or threat of force in which the victim of
the offense was at the time of the commission of the offense
under 18 years of age, or aggravated criminal sexual assault in
which the victim of the offense was at the time of the
commission of the offense under 18 years of age shall, upon
motion of the State's Attorney or Attorney General prosecuting
any case involving involuntary servitude, involuntary sexual
servitude of a minor, trafficking in persons, child
pornography, aggravated child pornography, indecent
solicitation of a child, child abduction, luring of a minor,
sexual exploitation of a child, predatory criminal sexual
assault of a child, aggravated criminal sexual abuse in which
the victim of the offense was at the time of the commission of
the offense under 18 years of age, criminal sexual abuse by
force or threat of force in which the victim of the offense was
at the time of the commission of the offense under 18 years of
age, or aggravated criminal sexual assault in which the victim
of the offense was at the time of the commission of the offense
under 18 years of age, be reviewed in camera with notice to all

HB0802 Enrolled - 7 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
parties present by the court presiding over the criminal case,
and, if ruled by the court to be relevant and otherwise
admissible, it shall be admissible at the trial of the criminal
case. Absent such a ruling, any such recording or evidence
shall not be admissible at the trial of the criminal case;
(h) Recordings made simultaneously with the use of an
in-car video camera recording of an oral conversation between a
uniformed peace officer, who has identified his or her office,
and a person in the presence of the peace officer whenever (i)
an officer assigned a patrol vehicle is conducting an
enforcement stop; or (ii) patrol vehicle emergency lights are
activated or would otherwise be activated if not for the need
to conceal the presence of law enforcement.
For the purposes of this subsection (h), "enforcement stop"
means an action by a law enforcement officer in relation to
enforcement and investigation duties, including but not
limited to, traffic stops, pedestrian stops, abandoned vehicle
contacts, motorist assists, commercial motor vehicle stops,
roadside safety checks, requests for identification, or
responses to requests for emergency assistance;
(h-5) Recordings of utterances made by a person while in
the presence of a uniformed peace officer and while an occupant
of a police vehicle including, but not limited to, (i)
recordings made simultaneously with the use of an in-car video
camera and (ii) recordings made in the presence of the peace
officer utilizing video or audio systems, or both, authorized

HB0802 Enrolled - 8 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
by the law enforcement agency;
(h-10) Recordings made simultaneously with a video camera
recording during the use of a taser or similar weapon or device
by a peace officer if the weapon or device is equipped with
such camera;
(h-15) Recordings made under subsection (h), (h-5), or
(h-10) shall be retained by the law enforcement agency that
employs the peace officer who made the recordings for a storage
period of 90 days, unless the recordings are made as a part of
an arrest or the recordings are deemed evidence in any
criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding and then the
recordings must only be destroyed upon a final disposition and
an order from the court. Under no circumstances shall any
recording be altered or erased prior to the expiration of the
designated storage period. Upon completion of the storage
period, the recording medium may be erased and reissued for
operational use;
(i) Recording of a conversation made by or at the request
of a person, not a law enforcement officer or agent of a law
enforcement officer, who is a party to the conversation, under
reasonable suspicion that another party to the conversation is
committing, is about to commit, or has committed a criminal
offense against the person or a member of his or her immediate
household, and there is reason to believe that evidence of the
criminal offense may be obtained by the recording;
(j) The use of a telephone monitoring device by either (1)

HB0802 Enrolled - 9 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
a corporation or other business entity engaged in marketing or
opinion research or (2) a corporation or other business entity
engaged in telephone solicitation, as defined in this
subsection, to record or listen to oral telephone solicitation
conversations or marketing or opinion research conversations
by an employee of the corporation or other business entity
when:
(i) the monitoring is used for the purpose of service
quality control of marketing or opinion research or
telephone solicitation, the education or training of
employees or contractors engaged in marketing or opinion
research or telephone solicitation, or internal research
related to marketing or opinion research or telephone
solicitation; and
(ii) the monitoring is used with the consent of at
least one person who is an active party to the marketing or
opinion research conversation or telephone solicitation
conversation being monitored.
No communication or conversation or any part, portion, or
aspect of the communication or conversation made, acquired, or
obtained, directly or indirectly, under this exemption (j), may
be, directly or indirectly, furnished to any law enforcement
officer, agency, or official for any purpose or used in any
inquiry or investigation, or used, directly or indirectly, in
any administrative, judicial, or other proceeding, or divulged
to any third party.

HB0802 Enrolled - 10 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
When recording or listening authorized by this subsection
(j) on telephone lines used for marketing or opinion research
or telephone solicitation purposes results in recording or
listening to a conversation that does not relate to marketing
or opinion research or telephone solicitation; the person
recording or listening shall, immediately upon determining
that the conversation does not relate to marketing or opinion
research or telephone solicitation, terminate the recording or
listening and destroy any such recording as soon as is
practicable.
Business entities that use a telephone monitoring or
telephone recording system pursuant to this exemption (j) shall
provide current and prospective employees with notice that the
monitoring or recordings may occur during the course of their
employment. The notice shall include prominent signage
notification within the workplace.
Business entities that use a telephone monitoring or
telephone recording system pursuant to this exemption (j) shall
provide their employees or agents with access to personal-only
telephone lines which may be pay telephones, that are not
subject to telephone monitoring or telephone recording.
For the purposes of this subsection (j), "telephone
solicitation" means a communication through the use of a
telephone by live operators:
(i) soliciting the sale of goods or services;
(ii) receiving orders for the sale of goods or

HB0802 Enrolled - 11 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
services;
(iii) assisting in the use of goods or services; or
(iv) engaging in the solicitation, administration, or
collection of bank or retail credit accounts.
For the purposes of this subsection (j), "marketing or
opinion research" means a marketing or opinion research
interview conducted by a live telephone interviewer engaged by
a corporation or other business entity whose principal business
is the design, conduct, and analysis of polls and surveys
measuring the opinions, attitudes, and responses of
respondents toward products and services, or social or
political issues, or both;
(k) Electronic recordings, including but not limited to, a
motion picture, videotape, digital, or other visual or audio
recording, made of a custodial interrogation of an individual
at a police station or other place of detention by a law
enforcement officer under Section 5-401.5 of the Juvenile Court
Act of 1987 or Section 103-2.1 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure of 1963;
(l) Recording the interview or statement of any person when
the person knows that the interview is being conducted by a law
enforcement officer or prosecutor and the interview takes place
at a police station that is currently participating in the
Custodial Interview Pilot Program established under the
Illinois Criminal Justice Information Act;
(m) An electronic recording, including but not limited to,

HB0802 Enrolled - 12 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
a motion picture, videotape, digital, or other visual or audio
recording, made of the interior of a school bus while the
school bus is being used in the transportation of students to
and from school and school-sponsored activities, when the
school board has adopted a policy authorizing such recording,
notice of such recording policy is included in student
handbooks and other documents including the policies of the
school, notice of the policy regarding recording is provided to
parents of students, and notice of such recording is clearly
posted on the door of and inside the school bus.
Recordings made pursuant to this subsection (m) shall be
confidential records and may only be used by school officials
(or their designees) and law enforcement personnel for
investigations, school disciplinary actions and hearings,
proceedings under the Juvenile Court Act of 1987, and criminal
prosecutions, related to incidents occurring in or around the
school bus;
(n) Recording or listening to an audio transmission from a
microphone placed by a person under the authority of a law
enforcement agency inside a bait car surveillance vehicle while
simultaneously capturing a photographic or video image;
(o) The use of an eavesdropping camera or audio device
during an ongoing hostage or barricade situation by a law
enforcement officer or individual acting on behalf of a law
enforcement officer when the use of such device is necessary to
protect the safety of the general public, hostages, or law

HB0802 Enrolled - 13 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
enforcement officers or anyone acting on their behalf;
(p) Recording or listening with the aid of any device to
incoming telephone calls of phone lines publicly listed or
advertised as the "CPS Violence Prevention Hotline", but only
where the notice of recording is given at the beginning of each
call as required by Section 34-21.8 of the School Code. The
recordings may be retained only by the Chicago Police
Department or other law enforcement authorities, and shall not
be otherwise retained or disseminated; and
(q)(1) With prior request to and verbal approval of the
State's Attorney of the county in which the conversation is
anticipated to occur, recording or listening with the aid of an
eavesdropping device to a conversation in which a law
enforcement officer, or any person acting at the direction of a
law enforcement officer, is a party to the conversation and has
consented to the conversation being intercepted or recorded in
the course of an investigation of a drug offense. The State's
Attorney may grant this verbal approval only after determining
that reasonable cause exists to believe that a drug offense
will be committed by a specified individual or individuals
within a designated period of time.
(2) Request for approval. To invoke the exception contained
in this subsection (q), a law enforcement officer shall make a
written or verbal request for approval to the appropriate
State's Attorney. This request for approval shall include
whatever information is deemed necessary by the State's

HB0802 Enrolled - 14 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
Attorney but shall include, at a minimum, the following
information about each specified individual whom the law
enforcement officer believes will commit a drug offense:
(A) his or her full or partial name, nickname or alias;
(B) a physical description; or
(C) failing either (A) or (B) of this paragraph (2),
any other supporting information known to the law
enforcement officer at the time of the request that gives
rise to reasonable cause to believe the individual will
commit a drug offense.
(3) Limitations on verbal approval. Each verbal approval by
the State's Attorney under this subsection (q) shall be limited
to:
(A) a recording or interception conducted by a
specified law enforcement officer or person acting at the
direction of a law enforcement officer;
(B) recording or intercepting conversations with the
individuals specified in the request for approval,
provided that the verbal approval shall be deemed to
include the recording or intercepting of conversations
with other individuals, unknown to the law enforcement
officer at the time of the request for approval, who are
acting in conjunction with or as co-conspirators with the
individuals specified in the request for approval in the
commission of a drug offense;
(C) a reasonable period of time but in no event longer

HB0802 Enrolled - 15 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
than 24 consecutive hours.
(4) Admissibility of evidence. No part of the contents of
any wire, electronic, or oral communication that has been
recorded or intercepted as a result of this exception may be
received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding
in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer,
agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other
authority of this State, or a political subdivision of the
State, other than in a prosecution of:
(A) a drug offense;
(B) a forcible felony committed directly in the course
of the investigation of a drug offense for which verbal
approval was given to record or intercept a conversation
under this subsection (q); or
(C) any other forcible felony committed while the
recording or interception was approved in accordance with
this Section (q), but for this specific category of
prosecutions, only if the law enforcement officer or person
acting at the direction of a law enforcement officer who
has consented to the conversation being intercepted or
recorded suffers great bodily injury or is killed during
the commission of the charged forcible felony.
(5) Compliance with the provisions of this subsection is a
prerequisite to the admissibility in evidence of any part of
the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication that
has been intercepted as a result of this exception, but nothing

HB0802 Enrolled - 16 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
in this subsection shall be deemed to prevent a court from
otherwise excluding the evidence on any other ground, nor shall
anything in this subsection be deemed to prevent a court from
independently reviewing the admissibility of the evidence for
compliance with the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
or with Article I, Section 6 of the Illinois Constitution.
(6) Use of recordings or intercepts unrelated to drug
offenses. Whenever any wire, electronic, or oral communication
has been recorded or intercepted as a result of this exception
that is not related to a drug offense or a forcible felony
committed in the course of a drug offense, no part of the
contents of the communication and evidence derived from the
communication may be received in evidence in any trial,
hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand
jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body,
legislative committee, or other authority of this State, or a
political subdivision of the State, nor may it be publicly
disclosed in any way.
(7) Definitions. For the purposes of this subsection (q)
only:
"Drug offense" includes and is limited to a felony
violation of one of the following: (A) the Illinois
Controlled Substances Act, (B) the Cannabis Control Act,
and (C) the Methamphetamine Control and Community
Protection Act.
"Forcible felony" includes and is limited to those

HB0802 Enrolled - 17 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
offenses contained in Section 2-8 of the Criminal Code of
1961 as of the effective date of this amendatory Act of the
97th General Assembly, and only as those offenses have been
defined by law or judicial interpretation as of that date.
"State's Attorney" includes and is limited to the
State's Attorney or an assistant State's Attorney
designated by the State's Attorney to provide verbal
approval to record or intercept conversations under this
subsection (q).
(8) Sunset. This subsection (q) is inoperative on and after
January 1, 2015. No conversations intercepted pursuant to this
subsection (q), while operative, shall be inadmissible in a
court of law by virtue of the inoperability of this subsection
(q) on January 1, 2015; and .
(r) Electronic recordings, including but not limited to,
motion picture, videotape, digital, or other visual or audio
recording, made of a lineup under Section 107A-2 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure of 1963.
(Source: P.A. 97-333, eff. 8-12-11; 97-846, eff. 1-1-13;
97-897, eff. 1-1-13; 98-463, eff. 8-16-13.)
Section 10. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
amended by adding Sections 107A-0.1 and 107A-2 as follows:
(725 ILCS 5/107A-0.1 new)
Sec. 107A-0.1. Definitions.

HB0802 Enrolled - 18 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
For the purposes of this Article:
"Eyewitness" means a person viewing the lineup whose
identification by sight of another person may be relevant
in a criminal proceeding.
"Filler" means a person or a photograph of a person who
is not suspected of an offense and is included in a lineup.
"Independent administrator" means a lineup
administrator who is not participating in the
investigation of the criminal offense and is unaware of
which person in the lineup is the suspected perpetrator.
"Lineup" includes a photo lineup or live lineup.
"Lineup administrator" means the person who conducts a
lineup.
"Live lineup" means a procedure in which a group of
persons is displayed to an eyewitness for the purpose of
determining if the eyewitness is able to identify the
perpetrator of a crime, but does not include a showup.
"Photo lineup" means a procedure in which photographs
are displayed to an eyewitness for the purpose of
determining if the eyewitness is able to identify the
perpetrator of a crime.
"Sequential lineup" means a live or photo lineup in
which each person or photograph is presented to an
eyewitness separately, in a previously determined order,
and removed from the eyewitness's view before the next
person or photograph is presented, in order to determine if

HB0802 Enrolled - 19 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
the eyewitness is able to identify the perpetrator of a
crime.
"Showup" means a procedure in which a suspected
perpetrator is presented to the eyewitness at, or near, a
crime scene for the purpose of obtaining an immediate
identification.
"Simultaneous lineup" means a live or photo lineup in
which a group of persons or array of photographs is
presented simultaneously to an eyewitness for the purpose
of determining if the eyewitness is able to identify the
perpetrator of a crime.
(725 ILCS 5/107A-2 new)
Sec. 107A-2. Lineup procedure.
(a) All lineups shall be conducted using one of the
following methods:
(1) An independent administrator, unless it is not
practical.
(2) An automated computer program or other device that
can automatically display a photo lineup to an eyewitness
in a manner that prevents the lineup administrator from
seeing which photograph or photographs the eyewitness is
viewing until after the lineup is completed. The automated
computer program may present the photographs to the
eyewitness simultaneously or sequentially, consistent with
the law enforcement agency guidelines required under

HB0802 Enrolled - 20 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
subsection (b) of this Section.
(3) A procedure in which photographs are placed in
folders, randomly numbered, and shuffled and then
presented to an eyewitness such that the lineup
administrator cannot see or know which photograph or
photographs are being presented to the eyewitness until
after the procedure is completed. The photographs may be
presented to the eyewitness simultaneously or
sequentially, consistent with the law enforcement agency
guidelines required under subsection (b) of this Section.
(4) Any other procedure that prevents the lineup
administrator from knowing the identity of the suspected
perpetrator or seeing or knowing the persons or photographs
being presented to the eyewitness until after the procedure
is completed.
(b) Each law enforcement agency shall adopt written
guidelines setting forth when, if at all, simultaneous lineups
shall be conducted and when, if at all, sequential lineups
shall be conducted. This subsection does not establish a
preference for whether a law enforcement agency should conduct
simultaneous lineups or sequential lineups. Whether and when to
conduct simultaneous lineups or sequential lineups is at the
discretion of each law enforcement agency. If, after the
effective date of this amendatory Act of the 98th General
Assembly, a method of conducting a lineup different from a
simultaneous or sequential lineup is determined by the Illinois

HB0802 Enrolled - 21 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
Supreme Court to be sufficiently established to have gained
general acceptance as a reliable method for eyewitness
identifications and provides more accurate results than
simultaneous or sequential lineups, a law enforcement agency
may adopt written guidelines setting forth when, if at all,
this different method of conducting lineups shall be used and,
when feasible, the provisions of subsection (d) of this Section
shall apply to the use of these methods.
(c) On and after the effective date of this amendatory Act
of the 98th General Assembly, there is no preference as to
whether a law enforcement agency conducts a live lineup or a
photo lineup and to the extent that the common law directs
otherwise, this direction is abrogated.
(d) If a lineup administrator conducts a sequential lineup,
the following shall apply:
(1) Solely at the eyewitness's request, the lineup
administrator may present a person or photograph to the
eyewitness an additional time but only after the eyewitness
has first viewed each person or photograph one time.
(2) If the eyewitness identifies a person as a
perpetrator, the lineup administrator shall continue to
sequentially present the remaining persons or photographs
to the eyewitness until the eyewitness has viewed each
person or photograph.
(e) Before a lineup is conducted:
(1) The eyewitness shall be instructed that:

HB0802 Enrolled - 22 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
(A) if recording the lineup is practical, an audio
and video recording of the lineup will be made for the
purpose of accurately documenting all statements made
by the eyewitness, unless the eyewitness refuses to the
recording of the lineup, and that if a recording is
made it will be of the persons in the lineup and the
eyewitness;
(B) the perpetrator may or may not be presented in
the lineup;
(C) if an independent administrator is conducting
the lineup, the independent administrator does not
know the suspected perpetrator's identity or if the
administrator conducting the lineup is not an
independent administrator, the eyewitness should not
assume that the lineup administrator knows which
person in the lineup is the suspect;
(D) the eyewitness should not feel compelled to
make an identification;
(E) it is as important to exclude innocent persons
as it is to identify a perpetrator; and
(F) the investigation will continue whether or not
an identification is made.
(2) The eyewitness shall acknowledge in writing the
receipt of the instructions required under this subsection
and, if applicable, the refusal to be recorded. If the
eyewitness refuses to sign the acknowledgement, the lineup

HB0802 Enrolled - 23 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
administrator shall note the refusal of the eyewitness to
sign the acknowledgement and shall also sign the
acknowledgement.
(f) In conducting a lineup:
(1) When practicable, the lineup administrator shall
separate all eyewitnesses in order to prevent the
eyewitnesses from conferring with one another before and
during the lineup procedure. If separating the
eyewitnesses is not practicable, the lineup administrator
shall ensure that all eyewitnesses are monitored and that
they do not confer with one another while waiting to view
the lineup and during the lineup.
(2) Each eyewitness shall perform the identification
procedures without any other eyewitness present. Each
eyewitness shall be given instructions regarding the
identification procedures without other eyewitnesses
present.
(3) The lineup shall be composed to ensure that the
suspected perpetrator does not unduly stand out from the
fillers. In addition:
(A) Only one suspected perpetrator shall be
included in a lineup.
(B) The suspected perpetrator shall not be
substantially different in appearance from the fillers
based on the eyewitness's previous description of the
perpetrator or based on other factors that would draw

HB0802 Enrolled - 24 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
attention to the suspected perpetrator.
(C) At least 5 fillers shall be included in a photo
lineup, in addition to the suspected perpetrator.
(D) When practicable, at least 5 fillers shall be
included in a live lineup, in addition to the suspected
perpetrator, but in no event shall there be less than 3
fillers in addition to the suspected perpetrator.
(E) If the eyewitness has previously viewed a photo
lineup or live lineup in connection with the
identification of another person suspected of
involvement in the offense, the fillers in the lineup
in which the current suspected perpetrator
participates shall be different from the fillers used
in the prior lineups.
(4) If there are multiple eyewitnesses, subject to the
requirements in subsection (a) of this Section and to the
extent possible, the suspected perpetrator shall be placed
in a different position in the lineup or photo array for
each eyewitness.
(5) Nothing shall be communicated to the eyewitness
regarding the suspected perpetrator's position in the
lineup or regarding anything that may influence the
eyewitness's identification.
(6) No writings or information concerning any previous
arrest, indictment, or conviction of the suspected
perpetrator shall be visible or made known to the

HB0802 Enrolled - 25 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
eyewitness.
(7) If a photo lineup, the photograph of the suspected
perpetrator shall be contemporary in relation to the
photographs of the fillers and, to the extent practicable,
shall resemble the suspected perpetrator's appearance at
the time of the offense.
(8) If a live lineup, any identifying actions, such as
speech, gestures, or other movements, shall be performed by
all lineup participants.
(9) If a live lineup, all lineup participants must be
out of view of the eyewitness prior to the lineup.
(10) The lineup administrator shall obtain and
document any and all statements made by the eyewitness
during the lineup as to the perpetrator's identity. When
practicable, an audio or video recording of the statements
shall be made.
(11) If the eyewitness identifies a person as the
perpetrator, the eyewitness shall not be provided any
information concerning the person until after the lineup is
completed.
(12) Unless otherwise allowed under subsection (a) of
this Section, there shall not be anyone present during a
lineup who knows the suspected perpetrator's identity,
except the eyewitness and suspected perpetrator's counsel
if required by law.
(g) The lineup administrator shall make an official report

HB0802 Enrolled - 26 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
of all lineups, which shall include all of the following
information:
(1) All identification and non-identification results
obtained during the lineup, signed by the eyewitness,
including any and all statements made by the eyewitness
during the lineup as to the perpetrator's identity as
required under paragraph (10) of subsection (f) of this
Section. If the eyewitness refuses to sign, the lineup
administrator shall note the refusal of the eyewitness to
sign the results and shall also sign the notation.
(2) The names of all persons who viewed the lineup.
(3) The names of all law enforcement officers and
counsel present during the lineup.
(4) The date, time, and location of the lineup.
(5) Whether it was a photo lineup or live lineup and
how many persons or photographs were presented in the
lineup.
(6) The sources of all persons or photographs used as
fillers in the lineup.
(7) In a photo lineup, the actual photographs shown to
the eyewitness.
(8) In a live lineup, a photograph or other visual
recording of the lineup that includes all persons who
participated in the lineup.
(9) If applicable, the eyewitness's refusal to be
recorded.

HB0802 Enrolled - 27 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
(10) If applicable, the reason for any
impracticability in strict compliance with this Section.
(h) Unless it is not practical or the eyewitness refuses, a
video record of all lineup procedures shall be made.
(1) If a video record is not practical or the
eyewitness refuses to allow a video record to be made:
(A) the reasons or the refusal shall be documented
in the official report required under subsection (g) of
this Section;
(B) an audio record shall be made, if practical;
and
(C) if a live lineup, the lineup shall be
photographed.
(2) If an audio record is not practical, the reasons
shall be documented in the official report required under
subsection (g) of this Section.
(i) The photographs, recordings, and the official report of
the lineup required by this Section shall be disclosed to
counsel for the accused as provided by the Illinois Supreme
Court Rules regarding discovery. All photographs of suspected
perpetrators shown to an eyewitness during a lineup shall be
disclosed to counsel for the accused as provided by the
Illinois Supreme Court Rules regarding discovery. To protect
the identity of the eyewitness and the identities of law
enforcement officers used as fillers in the lineup from being
disclosed to third parties, the State's Attorney shall petition

HB0802 Enrolled - 28 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
the court for a protective order under Supreme Court Rule 415
upon disclosure of the photographs or recordings to the counsel
of the accused.
(j) All of the following shall be available as consequences
of compliance or noncompliance with the requirements of this
Section:
(1) Failure to comply with any of the requirements of
this Section shall be a factor to be considered by the
court in adjudicating a motion to suppress an eyewitness
identification or any other motion to bar an eyewitness
identification. These motions shall be in writing and state
facts showing how the identification procedure was
improper. This paragraph (1) makes no change to existing
applicable common law or statutory standards or burdens of
proof.
(2) When warranted by the evidence presented at trial,
the jury shall be instructed that it may consider all the
facts and circumstances including compliance or
noncompliance with this Section to assist in its weighing
of the identification testimony of an eyewitness.
(k) Any electronic recording made during a lineup that is
compiled by any law enforcement agency as required by this
Section for the purposes of fulfilling the requirements of this
Section shall be confidential and exempt from public inspection
and copying, as provided under Section 7 of the Freedom of
Information Act, and the recording shall not be transmitted to

HB0802 Enrolled - 29 - LRB098 03640 RLC 33656 b
any person except as necessary to comply with this Section.
(725 ILCS 5/107A-5 rep.)
(725 ILCS 5/107A-10 rep.)
Section 15. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
amended by repealing Sections 107A-5 and 107A-10.