Bill Text: FL S1184 | 2013 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Punitive Damages
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Failed) 2013-05-03 - Died in Judiciary [S1184 Detail]
Download: Florida-2013-S1184-Introduced.html
Florida Senate - 2013 SB 1184 By Senator Richter 23-01008-13 20131184__ 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to punitive damages; amending s. 3 768.73, F.S.; providing that, in making its 4 determination as to the appropriate limits of an award 5 of punitive damages, the court is not subject to an 6 implied presumption about the amount of punitive 7 damages the court may award; providing an effective 8 date. 9 10 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 11 12 Section 1. Subsection (1) of section 768.73, Florida 13 Statutes, is amended to read: 14 768.73 Punitive damages; limitation.— 15 (1)(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c), an 16 award of punitive damages may not exceed the greater of: 17 1. Three times the amount of compensatory damages awarded 18 to each claimant entitled thereto, consistent with the remaining 19 provisions of this section; or 20 2. The sum of $500,000. 21 (b) Where the fact finder determines that the wrongful 22 conduct proven under this section was motivated solely by 23 unreasonable financial gain and determines that the unreasonably 24 dangerous nature of the conduct, together with the high 25 likelihood of injury resulting from the conduct, was actually 26 known by the managing agent, director, officer, or other person 27 responsible for making policy decisions on behalf of the 28 defendant, it may award an amount of punitive damages not to 29 exceed the greater of: 30 1. Four times the amount of compensatory damages awarded to 31 each claimant entitled thereto, consistent with the remaining 32 provisions of this section; or 33 2. The sum of $2 million. 34 (c) Where the fact finder determines that at the time of 35 injury the defendant had a specific intent to harm the claimant 36 and determines that the defendant’s conduct did in fact harm the 37 claimant, there shall be no cap on punitive damages. 38 (d) This subsection is not intended to prohibit an 39 appropriate court from exercising its jurisdiction under s. 40 768.74 in determining the reasonableness of an award of punitive 41 damages that is less than three times the amount of compensatory 42 damages. In making such determination, there is no implied 43 presumption about the appropriate level of punitive damages to 44 be drawn from the limits in this subsection. 45 Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2013.