Bill Text: FL S0744 | 2010 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Negligence/Products Liability Action [SPSC]
Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Republican 4)
Status: (Failed) 2010-04-30 - Died in Committee on Judiciary [S0744 Detail]
Download: Florida-2010-S0744-Introduced.html
Florida Senate - 2010 SB 744 By Senators Richter and Fasano 37-00632B-10 2010744__ 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to negligence; amending s. 768.81, 3 F.S.; defining the terms “negligence action” and 4 “products liability action”; requiring the trier of 5 fact to consider the fault of all parties to an 6 accident when apportioning damages in a products 7 liability action alleging an additional or enhanced 8 injury; providing an effective date. 9 10 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 11 12 Section 1. Section 768.81, Florida Statutes, is amended to 13 read: 14 768.81 Comparative fault.— 15 (1) DEFINITIONSDEFINITION.—As used in this section, the 16 term: 17 (a) “Economic damages” means past lost income and future 18 lost income reduced to present value; medical and funeral 19 expenses; lost support and services; replacement value of lost 20 personal property; loss of appraised fair market value of real 21 property; costs of construction repairs, including labor, 22 overhead, and profit; and any other economic loss thatwhich23 would not have occurred but for the injury giving rise to the 24 cause of action. 25 (b) “Negligence action” means, without limitation, a civil 26 action for damages based upon a theory of negligence; strict 27 liability; products liability; or professional malpractice, 28 whether couched in terms of contract, tort, or breach of 29 warranty and like theories. The substance of an action, not 30 conclusory terms used by a party, determines whether an action 31 is a negligence action. 32 (c) “Products liability action” means a civil action based 33 upon a theory of strict liability, negligence, breach of 34 warranty, nuisance, or similar theories for damages caused by 35 the manufacture, construction, design, formulation, 36 installation, preparation, or assembly of a product. The term 37 includes an action alleging that injuries received by a claimant 38 in an accident were greater than the injuries the claimant would 39 have received but for a defective product. The substance of an 40 action, not the conclusory terms used by a party, determines 41 whether an action is a products liability action. 42 (2) EFFECT OF CONTRIBUTORY FAULT.—In a negligenceanaction 43to which this section applies,anycontributory fault chargeable 44 to the claimant diminishes proportionately the amount awarded as 45 economic and noneconomic damages for an injury attributable to 46 the claimant’s contributory fault, but does not bar recovery. 47 (3) APPORTIONMENT OF DAMAGES.—In a negligence actioncases48to which this section applies, the court shall enter judgment 49 against each party liable on the basis of such party’s 50 percentage of fault and not on the basis of the doctrine of 51 joint and several liability. 52 (a)1. In order to allocate any or all fault to a nonparty, 53 a defendant must affirmatively plead the fault of a nonparty 54 and, absent a showing of good cause, identify the nonparty, if 55 known, or describe the nonparty as specifically as practicable, 56 either by motion or in the initial responsive pleading when 57 defenses are first presented, subject to amendment any time 58 before trial in accordance with the Florida Rules of Civil 59 Procedure. 60 2.(b)In order to allocate any or all fault to a nonparty 61 and include the named or unnamed nonparty on the verdict form 62 for purposes of apportioning damages, a defendant must prove at 63 trial, by a preponderance of the evidence, the fault of the 64 nonparty in causing the plaintiff’s injuries. 65 (b) In a products liability action alleging that injuries 66 received by a claimant in an accident were greater than the 67 injuries the claimant would have received but for a defective 68 product, the trier of fact shall consider the fault of all 69 entities who contributed to the accident when apportioning fault 70 between or among the parties and nonparties included on the 71 verdict form. 72 (4) APPLICABILITY.— 73(a)This section applies to negligence cases. For purposes74of this section, “negligence cases” includes, but is not limited75to, civil actions for damages based upon theories of negligence,76strict liability, products liability, professional malpractice77whether couched in terms of contract or tort, or breach of78warranty and like theories. In determining whether a case falls79within the term “negligence cases,” the court shall look to the80substance of the action and not the conclusory terms used by the81parties.82(b)This section does not apply to any action brought by 83 any person to recover actual economic damages resulting from 84 pollution, to any action based upon an intentional tort, or to 85 any cause of action as to which application of the doctrine of 86 joint and several liability is specifically provided by chapter 87 403 or,chapter 498, chapter 517, chapter 542, or chapter 895. 88 (5) MEDICAL MALPRACTICE.—Notwithstanding anything in law to 89 the contrary, in an action for damages for personal injury or 90 wrongful death arising out of medical malpractice, whether in 91 contract or tort, ifwhenan apportionment of damages pursuant 92 to this section is attributed to a teaching hospital as defined 93 in s. 408.07, the court shall enter judgment against the 94 teaching hospital on the basis of such party’s percentage of 95 fault and not on the basis of the doctrine of joint and several 96 liability. 97 Section 2. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.
