Bill Text: CA SB936 | 2011-2012 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Public social services.
Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2011-05-16 - Referred to Com. on HUM. S. [SB936 Detail]
Download: California-2011-SB936-Introduced.html
BILL NUMBER: SB 936 INTRODUCED
BILL TEXT
INTRODUCED BY Committee on Human Services (Senators Liu (Chair),
Berryhill, Emmerson, Hancock, Strickland, Wright, and Yee)
MARCH 15, 2011
An act to amend Sections 10072, 10544.317, 11453, and 11462 of,
and to repeal Sections 11521 and 11521.7 of, the Welfare and
Institutions Code, relating to public social services.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 936, as introduced, Committee on Human Services. Public social
services.
Existing law provides for public social services programs, such as
the CalWORKs program, the Medi-Cal program, and Aid to Families with
Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC).
This bill would delete various obsolete reporting requirements,
and would make other corrections and technical changes to provisions
relating to public social services.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no.
State-mandated local program: no.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 10072 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
10072. The electronic benefits transfer system required by this
chapter shall be designed to do, but not be limited to, all of the
following:
(a) To the extent permitted by federal law and the rules of the
program providing the benefits, recipients who are required to
receive their benefits using an electronic benefits transfer system
shall be permitted to gain access to the benefits in any part of the
state where electronic benefits transfers are accepted. All
electronic benefits transfer systems in this state shall be designed
to allow recipients to gain access to their benefits by using every
other electronic benefits transfer system.
(b) To the maximum extent feasible, electronic benefits transfer
systems shall be designed to be compatible with the electronic
benefits transfer systems in other states.
(c) All reasonable measures shall be taken in order to ensure that
recipients have access to electronically issued benefits through
systems such as automated teller machines, point-of-sale devices, or
other devices that accept electronic benefits transfer transactions.
Benefits provided under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 11200) of
Part 3 shall be staggered over a period of three calendar days,
unless a county requests a waiver from the department and the waiver
is approved, or in cases of hardship pursuant to subdivision ( l
).
(d) The system shall provide for reasonable access to benefits to
recipients who demonstrate an inability to use, an electronic
benefits transfer card or other aspect of the system because of
disability, language, lack of access, or other barrier. These
alternative methods shall conform to the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101, et seq.),
including reasonable accommodations for recipients who, because of
physical or mental disabilities, are unable to operate or otherwise
make effective use of the electronic benefits transfer system.
(e) The system shall permit a recipient the option to choose a
personal identification number, also known as a "pin" number, to
assist the recipient to remember his or her number in order to allow
access to benefits. Whenever an institution, authorized
representative, or other third party not part of the recipient
household or assistance unit has been issued an electronic benefits
transfer card, either in lieu of, or in addition to, the recipient,
the third party shall have a separate card and personal
identification number. At the option of the recipient, he or she may
designate whether restrictions apply to the third party's access to
the recipient's benefits. At the option of the recipient head of
household or assistance unit, the county shall provide one electronic
benefits transfer card to each adult member to enable them to access
benefits.
(f) The system shall have a 24-hour-per-day toll-free telephone
hotline for the reporting of lost or stolen cards and that will
provide recipients with information on how to have the card and
personal identification number replaced.
(g) A recipient shall not incur any loss of electronic benefits
after reporting his or her electronic benefits transfer card or
personal identification number has been lost or stolen. The system
shall provide for the prompt replacement of lost or stolen electronic
benefits transfer cards and personal identification numbers.
Electronic benefits for which the case was determined eligible and
that were not withdrawn by transactions using an authorized personal
identification number for the account shall also be promptly
replaced.
(h) Electronic benefits transfer system consumers shall be
informed on how to use electronic benefits transfer cards and how to
protect them from misuse.
(i) Procedures shall be developed for error resolution.
(j) No fee shall be charged by the state, a county, or an
electronic benefits processor certified by the state to retailers
participating in the electronic benefits transfer system.
(k) Except for food stamp CalFresh
transactions, a recipient may be charged a fee, not to exceed the
amount allowed by applicable state and federal law and customarily
charged to other customers, for cash withdrawal transactions that
exceed four per month.
( l ) A county shall exempt an individual from the
three-day staggering requirement under subdivision (c) on a
case-by-case basis for hardship. Hardship includes, but is not
limited to, the incurrence of late charges on an individual's housing
payments.
(m) No later than May 1, 2000, the department shall prepare and
submit a report to the Senate Health and Human Services Committee and
the Assembly Committee on Human Services. The report shall contain
estimates of the number of counties that may opt to issue cash
benefits provided under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 11200) of
Part 3 by electronics benefits transfer and the amount of interest
payments that would accrue to the counties pursuant to the three-day
staggering requirement of subdivision (c).
SEC. 2. Section 10544.317 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
10544.317. (a) There is hereby created a welfare reform steering
committee comprised of a representative of the California
Health and Welfare Human Services
Agency, who shall chair the committee, the Department of Finance, the
State Department of Social Services, the California State
Association of Counties, the County Welfare Directors Association of
California, representatives of the Legislature appointed by the
Speaker of the Assembly, the President pro Tempore of the Senate, the
minority leader of the Assembly, and the minority leader of the
Senate, and two public members appointed by the Secretary of
the California Health and Welfare
Agency Human Services .
(b) The steering committee shall:
(1) Provide advice and consultation on implementation issues
related to welfare reform.
(2) Review alternative ways to budget for, and allocate funds for,
the administration of the program and report its findings to the
appropriate committees of the Legislature in a timely manner that
will enable the Legislature to incorporate the recommended changes in
the Budget Act of 1998 and related statutes.
(3)
(2) Perform other duties as described elsewhere in this
division.
SEC. 3. Section 11453 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
11453. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (c), the amounts set
forth in Section 11452 and subdivision (a) of Section 11450 shall be
adjusted annually by the department to reflect any increases or
decreases in the cost of living. These adjustments shall become
effective July 1 of each year, unless otherwise specified by the
Legislature. For the 2000-01 fiscal year to the 2003-04 fiscal year,
inclusive, these adjustments shall become effective October 1 of each
year. The cost-of-living adjustment shall be calculated by the
Department of Finance based on the changes in the California
Necessities Index, which as used in this section means the weighted
average changes for food, clothing, fuel, utilities, rent, and
transportation for low-income consumers. The computation of annual
adjustments in the California Necessities Index shall be made in
accordance with the following steps:
(1) The base period expenditure amounts for each expenditure
category within the California Necessities Index used to compute the
annual grant adjustment are:
Food............................... $ 3,027
Clothing (apparel and upkeep)...... 406
Fuel and other utilities........... 529
Rent, residential.................. 4,883
Transportation..................... 1,757
Total............................ $10,602
(2) Based on the appropriate components of the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers, as published by the United States
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, the percentage
change shall be determined for the 12-month period ending with the
December preceding the year for which the cost-of-living adjustment
will take effect, for each expenditure category specified in
subdivision (a) within the following geographical areas: Los
Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, San Francisco-Oakland, San Diego, and, to
the extent statistically valid information is available from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, additional geographical areas within the
state which include not less than 80 percent of recipients of aid
under this chapter.
(3) Calculate a weighted percentage change for each of the
expenditure categories specified in subdivision (a) using the
applicable weighting factors for each area used by the State
Department of Industrial Relations to calculate the California
Consumer Price Index (CCPI).
(4) Calculate a category adjustment factor for each expenditure
category in subdivision (a) by (1) adding 100 to the applicable
weighted percentage change as determined in paragraph (2) and (2)
dividing the sum by 100.
(5) Determine the expenditure amounts for the current year by
multiplying each expenditure amount determined for the prior year by
the applicable category adjustment factor determined in paragraph
(4).
(6) Determine the overall adjustment factor by dividing (1) the
sum of the expenditure amounts as determined in paragraph (4) for the
current year by (2) the sum of the expenditure amounts as determined
in subdivision (d) for the prior year.
(b) The overall adjustment factor determined by the preceding
computation steps shall be multiplied by the schedules established
pursuant to Section 11452 and subdivision (a) of Section 11450 as are
in effect during the month of June preceding the fiscal year in
which the adjustments are to occur and the product rounded to the
nearest dollar. The resultant amounts shall constitute the new
schedules which shall be filed with the Secretary of State.
(c) (1) No adjustment to the maximum aid payment set forth in
subdivision (a) of Section 11450 shall be made under this section for
the purpose of increasing the benefits under this chapter for the
1990-91, 1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-96, 1996-97, and
1997-98 fiscal years, and through October 31, 1998, to reflect any
change in the cost of living. For the 1998-99 fiscal year, the cost
of living adjustment that would have been provided on July 1, 1998,
pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be made on November 1, 1998. No
adjustment to the maximum aid payment set forth in subdivision (a) of
Section 11450 shall be made under this section for the purpose of
increasing the benefits under this chapter for the 2005-06 and
2006-07 fiscal years to reflect any change in the cost-of-living.
Elimination of the cost-of-living adjustment pursuant to this
paragraph shall satisfy the requirements of Section 11453.05, and no
further reduction shall be made pursuant to that section.
(2) No adjustment to the minimum basic standard of adequate care
set forth in Section 11452 shall be made under this section for the
purpose of increasing the benefits under this chapter for the 1990-91
and 1991-92 fiscal years to reflect any change in the cost of
living.
(3) In any fiscal year commencing with the 2000-01 fiscal year to
the 2003-04 fiscal year, inclusive, when there is any increase in tax
relief pursuant to the applicable paragraph of subdivision (a) of
Section 10754 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, then the increase
pursuant to subdivision (a) of this section shall occur. In any
fiscal year commencing with the 2000-01 fiscal year to the 2003-04
fiscal year, inclusive, when there is no increase in tax relief
pursuant to the applicable paragraph of subdivision (a) of Section
10754 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, then any increase pursuant to
subdivision (a) of this section shall be suspended.
(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (3), an adjustment to the maximum
aid payments set forth in subdivision (a) of Section 11450 shall be
made under this section for the 2002-03 fiscal year, but the
adjustment shall become effective June 1, 2003.
(5) No adjustment to the maximum aid payment set forth in
subdivision (a) of Section 11450 shall be made under this section for
the purpose of increasing benefits under this chapter for the
2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 fiscal years.
(6) For the 2010-11 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter,
no adjustment to the maximum aid payment set forth in subdivision (a)
of Section 11450 shall be made under this section unless otherwise
specified by statute.
(d) For the 2004-05 fiscal year, the adjustment to the maximum aid
payment set forth in subdivision (a) shall be suspended for three
months commencing on the first day of the first month following the
effective date of the act adding this subdivision.
(e)
(d) Adjustments for subsequent fiscal years pursuant to
this section shall not include any adjustments for any fiscal year
in which the cost of living was suspended pursuant to subdivision
(c).
SEC. 4. Section 11462 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
11462. (a) (1) Effective July 1, 1990, foster care providers
licensed as group homes, as defined in departmental regulations,
including public child care institutions, as defined in Section
11402.5, shall have rates established by classifying each group home
program and applying the standardized schedule of rates. The
department shall collect information from group providers beginning
January 1, 1990, in order to classify each group home program.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), foster care providers licensed
as group homes shall have rates established only if the group home is
organized and operated on a nonprofit basis as required under
subdivision (h) of Section 11400. The department shall terminate the
rate effective January 1, 1993, of any group home not organized and
operated on a nonprofit basis as required under subdivision (h) of
Section 11400.
(3) (A) The department shall determine, consistent with the
requirements of this chapter and other relevant requirements under
law, the rate classification level (RCL) for each group home program
on a biennial basis. Submission of the biennial rate application
shall be made according to a schedule determined by the department.
(B) The department shall adopt regulations to implement this
paragraph. The adoption, amendment, repeal, or readoption of a
regulation authorized by this paragraph is deemed to be necessary for
the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety,
or general welfare, for purposes of Sections 11346.1 and 11349.6 of
the Government Code, and the department is hereby exempted from the
requirement to describe specific facts showing the need for immediate
action.
(b) A group home program shall be initially classified, for
purposes of emergency regulations, according to the level of care and
services to be provided using a point system developed by the
department and described in the report, "The Classification of Group
Home Programs under the Standardized Schedule of Rates System,"
prepared by the State Department of Social Services, August 30, 1989.
(c) The rate for each RCL has been determined by the department
with data from the AFDC-FC Group Home Rate Classification Pilot
Study. The rates effective July 1, 1990, were developed using 1985
calendar year costs and reflect adjustments to the costs for each
fiscal year, starting with the 1986-87 fiscal year, by the amount of
the California Necessities Index computed pursuant to the methodology
described in Section 11453. The data obtained by the department
using 1985 calendar year costs shall be updated and revised by
January 1, 1993.
(d) As used in this section, "standardized schedule of rates"
means a listing of the 14 rate classification levels, and the single
rate established for each RCL.
(e) Except as specified in paragraph (1), the department shall
determine the RCL for each group home program on a prospective basis,
according to the level of care and services that the group home
operator projects will be provided during the period of time for
which the rate is being established.
(1) (A) For new and existing providers requesting the
establishment of an RCL, and for existing group home programs
requesting an RCL increase, the department shall determine the RCL no
later than 13 months after the effective date of the provisional
rate. The determination of the RCL shall be based on a program audit
of documentation and other information that verifies the level of
care and supervision provided by the group home program during a
period of the two full calendar months or 60 consecutive days,
whichever is longer, preceding the date of the program audit, unless
the group home program requests a lower RCL. The program audit shall
not cover the first six months of operation under the provisional
rate. Pending the department's issuance of the program audit report
that determines the RCL for the group home program, the group home
program shall be eligible to receive a provisional rate that shall be
based on the level of care and service that the group home program
proposes it will provide. The group home program shall be eligible to
receive only the RCL determined by the department during the
pendency of any appeal of the department's RCL determination.
(B) A group home program may apply for an increase in its RCL no
earlier than two years from the date the department has determined
the group home program's rate, unless the host county, the primary
placing county, or a regional consortium of counties submits to the
department in writing that the program is needed in that county, that
the provider is capable of effectively and efficiently operating the
proposed program, and that the provider is willing and able to
accept AFDC-FC children for placement who are determined by the
placing agency to need the level of care and services that will be
provided by the program.
(C) To ensure efficient administration of the department's audit
responsibilities, and to avoid the fraudulent creation of records,
group home programs shall make records that are relevant to the RCL
determination available to the department in a timely manner. Except
as provided in this section, the department may refuse to consider,
for purposes of determining the rate, any documents that are relevant
to the determination of the RCL that are not made available by the
group home provider by the date the group home provider requests a
hearing on the department's RCL determination. The department may
refuse to consider, for purposes of determining the rate, the
following records, unless the group home provider makes the records
available to the department during the fieldwork portion of the
department's program audit:
(i) Records of each employee's full name, home address,
occupation, and social security number.
(ii) Time records showing when the employee begins and ends each
work period, meal periods, split shift intervals, and total daily
hours worked.
(iii) Total wages paid each payroll period.
(iv) Records required to be maintained by licensed group home
providers under Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations that
are relevant to the RCL determination.
(D) To minimize financial abuse in the startup of group home
programs, when the department's RCL determination is more than three
levels lower than the RCL level proposed by the group home provider,
and the group home provider does not appeal the department's RCL
determination, the department shall terminate the rate of a group
home program 45 days after issuance of its program audit report. When
the group home provider requests a hearing on the department's RCL
determination, and the RCL determined by the director under
subparagraph (E) is more than three levels lower than the RCL level
proposed by the group home provider, the department shall terminate
the rate of a group home program within 30 days of issuance of the
director's decision. Notwithstanding the reapplication provisions in
subparagraph (B), the department shall deny any request for a new or
increased RCL from a group home provider whose RCL is terminated
pursuant to this subparagraph, for a period of no greater than two
years from the effective date of the RCL termination.
(E) A group home provider may request a hearing of the department'
s RCL determination under subparagraph (A) no later than 30 days
after the date the department issues its RCL determination. The
department's RCL determination shall be final if the group home
provider does not request a hearing within the prescribed time.
Within 60 days of receipt of the request for hearing, the department
shall conduct a hearing on the RCL determination. The standard of
proof shall be the preponderance of the evidence and the burden of
proof shall be on the department. The hearing officer shall issue the
proposed decision within 45 days of the close of the evidentiary
record. The director shall adopt, reject, or modify the proposed
decision, or refer the matter back to the hearing officer for
additional evidence or findings within 100 days of issuance of the
proposed decision. If the director takes no action on the proposed
decision within the prescribed time, the proposed decision shall take
effect by operation of law.
(2) Group home programs that fail to maintain at least the level
of care and services associated with the RCL upon which their rate
was established shall inform the department. The department shall
develop regulations specifying procedures to be applied when a group
home fails to maintain the level of services projected, including,
but not limited to, rate reduction and recovery of overpayments.
(3) The department shall not reduce the rate, establish an
overpayment, or take other actions pursuant to paragraph (2) for any
period that a group home program maintains the level of care and
services associated with the RCL for children actually residing in
the facility. Determinations of levels of care and services shall be
made in the same way as modifications of overpayments are made
pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 11466.2.
(4) A group home program that substantially changes its staffing
pattern from that reported in the group home program statement shall
provide notification of this change to all counties that have placed
children currently in care. This notification shall be provided
whether or not the RCL for the program may change as a result of the
change in staffing pattern.
(f) (1) The standardized schedule of rates for the 2002-03,
2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08 fiscal years is:
FY 2002-03, 2003-
Rate Point Ranges 04,
2004-05, 2005-
06, 2006-07, and
Classification 2007-08
Level Standard Rate
1 Under 60 $1,454
2 60- 89 1,835
3 90-119 2,210
4 120-149 2,589
5 150-179 2,966
6 180-209 3,344
7 210-239 3,723
8 240-269 4,102
9 270-299 4,479
10 300-329 4,858
11 330-359 5,234
12 360-389 5,613
13 390-419 5,994
14 420 & Up 6,371
(2) (A) For group home programs that receive AFDC-FC payments for
services performed during the 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06,
2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 fiscal years, the adjusted RCL
point ranges below shall be used for establishing the biennial rates
for existing programs, pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a)
and in performing program audits and in determining any resulting
rate reduction, overpayment assessment, or other actions pursuant to
paragraph (2) of subdivision (e):
Adjusted Point
Rate Ranges
for the 2002-
Classification 03, 2003-04,
2004-05, 2005-06,
2006-07, 2007-08,
2008-09, and 2009-
Level 10 Fiscal Years
1 Under 54
2 54- 81
3 82-110
4 111-138
5 139-167
6 168-195
7 196-224
8 225-253
9 254-281
10 282-310
11 311-338
12 339-367
13 368-395
14 396 & Up
(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), foster care providers
operating group homes during the 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06,
2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 fiscal years shall remain
responsible for ensuring the health and safety of the children placed
in their programs in accordance with existing applicable provisions
of the Health and Safety Code and community care licensing
regulations, as contained in Title 22 of the Code of California
Regulations.
(C) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to program audits of group
home programs with provisional rates established pursuant to
paragraph (1) of subdivision (e). For those program audits, the RCL
point ranges in paragraph (1) shall be used.
(D) Rates applicable for the 2009-10 fiscal year pursuant to the
act that adds this subparagraph shall be effective October 1, 2009.
(3) (A) For group home programs that receive AFDC-FC payments for
services performed during the 2009-10 fiscal year the adjusted RCL
point ranges below shall be used for establishing the biennial rates
for existing programs, pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a)
and in performing program audits and in determining any resulting
rate reduction, overpayment assessment, or other actions pursuant to
paragraph (2) of subdivision (e):
Rate Adjusted Point Ranges
Classification for the 2009-10
Level Fiscal Year
1 Under 39
2 39-64
3 65-90
4 91-115
5 116-141
6 142-167
7 168-192
8 193-218
9 219-244
10 245-270
11 271-295
12 296-321
13 322-347
14 348 & Up
(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), foster care providers
operating group homes during the 2009-10 fiscal year shall remain
responsible for ensuring the health and safety of the children placed
in their programs in accordance with existing applicable provisions
of the Health and Safety Code and community care licensing
regulations as contained in Title 22 of the California Code of
Regulations.
(C) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to program audits of group
home programs with provisional rates established pursuant to
paragraph (1) of subdivision (e). For those program audits, the RCL
point ranges in paragraph (1) shall be used.
(g) (1) (A) For the 1999-2000 fiscal year, the standardized rate
for each RCL shall be adjusted by an amount equal to the California
Necessities Index computed pursuant to the methodology described in
Section 11453. The resultant amounts shall constitute the new
standardized schedule of rates, subject to further adjustment
pursuant to subparagraph (B).
(B) In addition to the adjustment in subparagraph (A), commencing
January 1, 2000, the standardized rate for each RCL shall be
increased by 2.36 percent, rounded to the nearest dollar. The
resultant amounts shall constitute the new standardized schedule of
rates.
(2) Beginning with the 2000-01 fiscal year, the standardized
schedule of rates shall be adjusted annually by an amount equal to
the CNI computed pursuant to Section 11453, subject to the
availability of funds. The resultant amounts shall constitute the new
standardized schedule of rates.
(3) Effective January 1, 2001, the amount included in the standard
rate for each Rate Classification Level (RCL) for the salaries,
wages, and benefits for staff providing child care and supervision or
performing social work activities, or both, shall be increased by 10
percent. This additional funding shall be used by group home
programs solely to supplement staffing, salaries, wages, and benefit
levels of staff specified in this paragraph. The standard rate for
each RCL shall be recomputed using this adjusted amount and the
resultant rates shall constitute the new standardized schedule of
rates. The department may require a group home receiving this
additional funding to certify that the funding was utilized in
accordance with the provisions of this section.
(4) Effective January 1, 2008, the amount included in the standard
rate for each RCL for the wages for staff providing child care and
supervision or performing social work activities, or both, shall be
increased by 5 percent, and the amount included for the payroll taxes
and other employer-paid benefits for these staff shall be increased
from 20.325 percent to 24 percent. The standard rate for each RCL
shall be recomputed using these adjusted amounts, and the resulting
rates shall constitute the new standardized schedule of rates.
(5) The new standardized schedule of rates as provided for in
paragraph (4) shall be reduced by 10 percent, effective October 1,
2009, and the resulting rates shall constitute the new standardized
schedule of rates.
(6) The rates of licensed group home providers, whose rates are
not established under the standardized schedule of rates, shall be
reduced by 10 percent, effective October 1, 2009.
(h) The standardized schedule of rates pursuant to subdivisions
(f) and (g) shall be implemented as follows:
(1) Any group home program that received an AFDC-FC rate in the
prior fiscal year at or above the standard rate for the RCL in the
current fiscal year shall continue to receive that rate.
(2) Any group home program that received an AFDC-FC rate in the
prior fiscal year below the standard rate for the RCL in the current
fiscal year shall receive the RCL rate for the current year.
(i) (1) The department shall not establish a rate for a new
program of a new or existing provider, or for an existing program at
a new location of an existing provider, unless the provider submits a
letter of recommendation from the host county, the primary placing
county, or a regional consortium of counties that includes all of the
following:
(A) That the program is needed by that county.
(B) That the provider is capable of effectively and efficiently
operating the program.
(C) That the provider is willing and able to accept AFDC-FC
children for placement who are determined by the placing agency to
need the level of care and services that will be provided by the
program.
(D) That, if the letter of recommendation is not being issued by
the host county, the primary placing county has notified the host
county of its intention to issue the letter and the host county was
given the opportunity 30 days to respond to this notification and to
discuss options with the primary placing county.
(2) The department shall encourage the establishment of consortia
of county placing agencies on a regional basis for the purpose of
making decisions and recommendations about the need for, and use of,
group home programs and other foster care providers within the
regions.
(3) The department shall annually conduct a county-by-county
survey to determine the unmet placement needs of children placed
pursuant to Section 300 and Section 601 or 602, and shall publish its
findings by November 1 of each year.
(j) The department shall develop regulations specifying
ratesetting procedures for program expansions, reductions, or
modifications, including increases or decreases in licensed capacity,
or increases or decreases in level of care or services.
(k) (1) For the purpose of
this subdivision, "program change" means any alteration to an
existing group home program planned by a provider that will increase
the RCL or AFDC-FC rate. An increase in the licensed capacity or
other alteration to an existing group home program that does not
increase the RCL or AFDC-FC rate shall not constitute a program
change.
(2) For the 1998-99, 1999-2000, and 2000-01 fiscal years, the rate
for a group home program shall not increase, as the result of a
program change, from the rate established for the program effective
July 1, 2000, and as adjusted pursuant to subparagraph (B) of
paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), except as provided in paragraph
(3).
(3) (A) For the 1998-99, 1999-2000, and 2000-01 fiscal years, the
department shall not establish a rate for a new program of a new or
existing provider or approve a program change for an existing
provider that either increases the program's RCL or AFDC-FC rate, or
increases the licensed capacity of the program as a result of
decreases in another program with a lower RCL or lower AFDC-FC rate
that is operated by that provider, unless both of the following
conditions are met:
(i) The licensee obtains a letter of recommendation from the host
county, primary placing county, or regional consortium of counties
regarding the proposed program change or new program.
(ii) The county determines that there is no increased cost to the
General Fund.
(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the department may grant a
request for a new program or program change, not to exceed 25 beds,
statewide, if both of the following conditions are met:
(i) The licensee obtains a letter of recommendation from the host
county, primary placing county, or regional consortium of counties
regarding the proposed program change or new program.
(ii) The department determines that the new program or program
change will result in a reduction of referrals to state hospitals
during the 1998-99 fiscal year.
(l) General unrestricted or undesignated private charitable
donations and contributions made to charitable or nonprofit
organizations shall not be deducted from the cost of providing
services pursuant to this section. The donations and contributions
shall not be considered in any determination of maximum expenditures
made by the department.
(m) The department shall, by October 1 of each year, commencing
October 1, 1992, provide the Joint Legislative Budget Committee with
a list of any new departmental requirements established during the
previous fiscal year concerning the operation of group homes, and of
any unusual, industrywide increase in costs associated with the
provision of group care that may have significant fiscal impact on
providers of group homes care. The committee may, in fiscal year
1993-94 and beyond, use the list to determine whether an
appropriation for rate adjustments is needed in the subsequent fiscal
year.
SEC. 5. Section 11521 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
repealed.
11521. By July 1, 1998, the department shall revise data
collection procedures used for quality control and caseload
characteristic studies in order to respond to the data collection
requirements of Public Law 104-193 and state law. The department
shall develop common data definitions to be used by the counties,
design common identifiers, and, to the extent possible, standardize
state and county data collection infrastructure. The department shall
accomplish the requirements of this section in consultation with
experts in monitoring and research, representatives of counties, the
Legislature, and appropriate state agencies.
SEC. 6. Section 11521.7 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
repealed.
11521.7. The department shall continue the evaluation of
Cal-Learn and issue a final report to the Legislature by July 1,
2000.
