Bill Text: CA SB700 | 2021-2022 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: State Contract Act: High Road Employment Program.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2022-08-11 - August 11 hearing: Held in committee and under submission. [SB700 Detail]
Download: California-2021-SB700-Amended.html
Amended
IN
Assembly
June 16, 2022 |
Amended
IN
Senate
March 10, 2021 |
Introduced by Senator Durazo |
February 19, 2021 |
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
Existing law creates, in the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, the Employment Development Department, which is vested with the duties, purposes, responsibilities, and jurisdiction with respect to job creation activities.
This bill would require the department to be bound by specified California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board decisions for all purposes related to unemployment insurance, including the determination of benefits or obligations for employees and employers and apply the appeals board’s reasoning and interpretation in all appropriate cases.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program:Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Article 11 (commencing with Section 10440) is added to Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code, to read:Article 11. High Road Employment Plan
10440.
This article shall be known, and may be cited, as the High Road Employment Plan.10441.
For the purposes of this article, the following definitions apply:10442.
There is hereby established within the Labor and Workforce Development Agency the High Road Employment Program, to assist state agencies in complying with High Road Employment Plan requirements and appropriate planning, inclusive decisionmaking, and fair disbursement of community and worker support resources.10443.
(a) Each bidder for a contract with the state, as a condition of eligibility for such a contract, shall submit a High Road Employment Plan to the department that includes certification, under penalty of perjury, that all workers are properly classified pursuant to Section 2750.5 of the Labor Code, and that includes the following information:10444.
(a) The Labor and Workforce Development Agency, the Government Operations Agency, including the Department of General Services, and the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development shall establish, and be referred to as, the Interagency High Road Team. The team shall collectively be responsible for oversight and decisionmaking, including, but not limited to, all of the following:10445.
This article shall not apply to the following:10446.
(a) The program shall be staffed by at least four full-time employees of the Labor and Workforce Development Agency.SEC. 2.
Section 14005 of the Unemployment Insurance Code is amended to read:14005.
For purposes of this division:(u)
(v)
(w)
SEC. 3.
Section 14013 of the Unemployment Insurance Code is amended to read:14013.
The board shall assist the Governor in the following:SEC. 4.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Some employers regularly avoid obligations such as payment of payroll taxes and payment of premiums for workers’ compensation, social security, unemployment insurance, and disability insurance by misclassifying workers as independent contractors or by relying on other contingent work arrangements to unlawfully shift liability to their own misclassified employees or to corporate entities whose main purpose is to serve as a liability shield for the employer. This often takes the form of an employer directing an employee to enlist additional employees in performing the employer’s
work, or a company contracting with another insolvent entity whose sole purpose is providing employees to the company in question.
(b)This subterfuge hurts the state by depriving it of the revenue that enables the state to administer and fund its various social safety net programs, and by making it difficult for the state to recover unpaid taxes and premiums from the bona fide employers who control the employees in question.
(c)To address this by correctly placing employer obligations on the responsible employer, existing state law prevents employers from shifting liability for one of their employees to a second employee even if the employer did not directly hire and does not directly pay the employee in question. Further, existing state law prevents employers from shifting
liability to sham entities by establishing explicit requirements for what constitutes a “leasing employer” or “temporary services employer.”
(d)Despite this, when processing multiple claims for drayage drivers that applied for unemployment insurance compensation benefits during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the Employment Development Department (EDD) failed to find an employment relationship between the company and the workers who provide services for that company under that company’s control. Instead, the EDD has erroneously placed the burden for failing to provide wage data or pay unemployment insurance taxes on other individuals employed by that company or on sham corporate entities that do not satisfy the requirements to be considered a leasing employer or a temporary services employer.
(e)At least two of these erroneous EDD determinations have been overturned by the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, which has correctly interpreted the law to place responsibility on the company in question, upholding decisions by administrative law judges that have correctly applied the law. Yet, the EDD continues to maintain its anomalous determinations, requiring workers to pursue lengthy and burdensome appeals. This is in conflict with existing law, and the extended appeals divert resources from the agency, expose misclassified workers to unjustified liability, and allow companies that break the law to continue to evade justice.
(f)It is the intent of the Legislature to clarify that existing law prohibiting an employing entity from shifting liability to its own employees or to sham corporate entities that do
not qualify as statutory employers also applies to the schemes employers in the drayage industry are utilizing to escape their statutory liability. This clarification is intended to ensure that the EDD makes the
correct determinations with regard to employer liability rather than expending resources supporting an incorrect reading of the law.
Notwithstanding Section 11425.60 of the Government Code and Section 409, for all purposes under this code, including the determination of benefits or obligations for employees and employers, the department shall be bound by the appeals board’s decisions in Ruben Aldrete Ruiz v. Employment Development Department, Case No. AO-445635, issued on January 22, 2021, and in Francisco J. Banales v. Employment Development Department, Case No. AO-445581, issued on December 17, 2020. These decisions correctly interpret current law, and the department shall apply the appeals board’s reasoning and interpretation in all appropriate cases.