Bill Text: CA SB251 | 2015-2016 | Regular Session | Amended
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Disability access: civil rights: income tax credit.
Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill
Status: (Vetoed) 2016-04-25 - Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5. [SB251 Detail]
Download: California-2015-SB251-Amended.html
Bill Title: Disability access: civil rights: income tax credit.
Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill
Status: (Vetoed) 2016-04-25 - Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5. [SB251 Detail]
Download: California-2015-SB251-Amended.html
BILL NUMBER: SB 251 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 20, 2015 AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 4, 2015 INTRODUCED BY Senator Roth ( Principal coauthor: Senator Galgiani ) ( Coauthors: Senators Anderson and Nielsen ) FEBRUARY 18, 2015 An act to amendSections 55.52 and 55.56Section 55.32 of, and to add Sections 55.535 and 1938.5 to, the Civil Code, to amend Sections4459.8 and4459.7, 4459.8, and 8299.06 of, to add Section 65941.6 to, and to add Article 4 (commencing with Section 65946) to Chapter 4.5 of Division 1 of Title 7 of, the Government Code, and to add and repeal Sections 17053.43 and 23643 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to disability access. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 251, as amended, Roth. Civil rights: disability access. (1) Existing law prohibits discrimination on the basis of various specified personal characteristics, including disability. The Construction-Related Accessibility Standards Compliance Act establishes standards for making new construction and existing facilities accessible to persons with disabilities and provides for construction-related accessibility claims for violations of those standards. Existing law requirescertifiedthat a demand letter alleging a violation of a construction-related accessibility standard or asserting a construction-related accessibility claim include specified information, and that copies of the demand letter be sent to the California Commission on Disability Access and the State Bar of California. Existing law repeals the requirement that a copy of a demand letter be sent to the State Bar of California on January 1, 2016. This bill would extend the above-described January 1, 2016, repeal date, to January 1, 2019. (2) Existing law requires a certified accessspecialists (CASps),specialist (CASp), upon completion of an inspection of a site, to issue a written inspection report for the site, as specified. Existing law provides, upon being served with a summons and complaint asserting a construction-related accessibility claim, that a defendant may file a request for a court stay and early evaluation conference in the proceedings, as specified. Under existing law, a defendant is liable for actual damages plus minimum statutory damages for each instance of discrimination. This bill would provide that abusinessbusiness, prior to the initiation of litigation, receipt of a demand letter, or a business that is otherwise on notice of a violation of a construction-related accessibility standard prior to a CASp inspection, is not liable for minimum statutory damages for violating a construction-related liability standard ifthe business is an inspected by a CASp site andthe violation is corrected within 90 days ofreceiving the above-described writtenthe date of an inspectionreport fromby a CASp.If the alleged violation is a minor matter, as provided, theThe bill would also provide thatthea small business is not liable fortheminimum statutory damages for an alleged violation if the violation concerns interior or exterior signage, the color and condition of parking lot paint striping, or truncated domes and is corrected within3015 days of service of a summons and complaint in a construction-related accessibility claim or receipt of a written notice, whichever is earlier.(2) Existing law establishes remedies for discrimination on the basis of personal characteristics. Under existing law, a defendant is liable for actual damages plus an additional amount, up to three times actual damages but no less than $4,000, for each offense. A defendant's liability for statutory damages for a violation of a construction-related accessibility standard may be reduced to $1,000 for each offense if the defendant demonstrates, among other things, that it has corrected the construction-related violations within 60 days of being served with the complaint. Under existing law, a person who interferes with the rights of an individual with disabilities, as provided, is liable for actual damages plus an additional amount, up to three times actual damages but no less than $1,000, for each offense.This bill would provide that a defendant is not liable for statutory damages for more than one offense if the defendant is a microbusiness, as defined, and has corrected the construction-related violation prior to the filing of the lawsuit.(3) Under existing federal law, a landlord and tenant are both responsible for compliance with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act and implementing regulations. The parties to a lease agreement may allocate responsibility by the lease or other contract. Existing law requires a commercial property owner or lessor to state on every lease form or rental agreement executed on or after July 1, 2013, whether the property has been inspected by acertified access specialistCASp and, if so, whether or not the property has been determined to meet all applicable construction-related accessibility standards. This bill would require a commercial property owner to state on every lease form or rental agreement executed on or after January 1, 2016, that the owner or lessor and the tenant are both responsible for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and that responsibility for compliance may be allocated between the parties by the terms of the lease or other contract. (4) Existing law requires the State Architect to establish and publicize a program for the voluntary certification by the state of any person who meets specified criteria as a CASp. Existing law requires the State Architect to annually publish a list of CASps. Existing law requires each applicant for CASp certification or renewal to pay certain fees, and requires the State Architect to periodically review those fees, as specified. Existing law provides for the deposit of those fees into the Certified Access Specialist Fund, which is continuously appropriated for use by the State Architect to implement the CASp program. This bill would additionally require the State Architect to publish, and periodically update, an easily accessible list of businesses which have been inspected by a CASp on or after January 1, 2016, including the date of the inspection. The bill would also require applicants for CASp certification or renewal to additionally provide to the State Architectinformation aboutthe name of the city, county, or city and county in which the applicant intends to provide or has provided services, and would require the Division of the State Architect to post that information on its Internet Web site. (5) Existing law establishes the California Commission on Disability Access for purposes of developing recommendations to enable persons with disabilities to exercise their right to full and equal access to public facilities and facilitating business compliance with applicable state and federal laws and regulations. Existing law sets forth the powers and duties of the commission, including developing educational materials and information for businesses, building owners, tenants, and building officials, posting that information on the commission's Internet Web site, and coordinating with other state agencies and local building departments to ensure that information provided to the public on disability access requirements is uniform and complete. This bill would additionally require the commission to provide a link on its Internet Web site to the Internet Web site of the Division of the State Architect's CASp certification program, and make the commission's educational materials and information available to other state agencies and local building departments. (6) The Planning and Zoning Law establishes procedures for the application, and review of an application, for a development project. Existing law requires a public agency to notify applicants for development permits of specified information, including the time limits established for the review and approval of development permits. This bill would additionally require local agencies to develop and provide to applicants materials relating to the requirements of the federal Americans with DisabilitiesAct.Act, or to instead provide similar materials developed by the California Commission on Disability Access. The bill would require a local agency to notify an applicant that approval of a permit does not signify that the applicant has complied with that act. The bill would also require local agencies to expedite review of projectsthat have received a written report from a CASp indicating that the site meets applicable CASp standards, as specified.for which the applicant provides a copy of a disability access certificate, demonstrates that the project is necessary to address an alleged violation of a construction-related access standard or a violation noted in a CASp report, and, if project plans are necessary for approval, has had a CASp review the project plans for compliance with all applicable construction-related accessibili ty standards. The bill would declare that these provisions constitute a matter of statewide concern and shall apply to charter cities and charter counties. By imposing additional duties on local agencies with respect to the receipt and review of applications for development projects, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (7) Existing federal law allows a credit against federal income taxes for eligible small businesses for eligible access expenditures, as those terms are defined, in an amount equal to 50% of eligible access expenditures for a taxable year that exceed $250 but do not exceed $10,250. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow a credit against the taxes imposed by those laws for the amount paid or incurred for eligible access expenditures in an amount equal to 50% of eligible access expenditures for a taxable year as do not exceed $250, as specified. This bill would, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2016, and before January 1, 2023, allow a credit under both the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law for eligible access expenditures in an amount equal to 50% of eligible access expenditures for a taxable year, as specified.If the taxpayer is a microbusiness, as defined, the bill would provide that the credit is the amount calculated pursuant to these provisions, plus an additional $5,000.(8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:SECTION 1.Section 55.52 of the Civil Code is amended to read: 55.52. (a) For purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: (1) "Construction-related accessibility claim" means a civil claim in a civil action with respect to a place of public accommodation, including, but not limited to, a claim brought under Section 51, 54, 54.1, or 55, based wholly or in part on an alleged violation of any construction-related accessibility standard, as defined in paragraph (6). (2) "Application for stay and early evaluation conference" means an application to be filed with the court that meets the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 55.54. (3) "Certified access specialist" or "CASp" means any person who has been certified pursuant to Section 4459.5 of the Government Code. (4) "Meets applicable standards" means the site was inspected by a CASp and determined to meet all applicable construction-related accessibility standards pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 55.53. A site that is "CASp inspected" on or before the effective date of the amendments made to this section by Chapter 383 of the Statutes of 2012 means that the site "meets applicable standards." (5) "Inspected by a CASp" means the site was inspected by a CASp and is pending a determination by the CASp that the site meets applicable construction-related accessibility standards pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 55.53. A site that is "CASp determination pending" on or before the effective date of the amendments made to this section by Chapter 383 of the Statutes of 2012 means that the site was "inspected by a CASp." (6) "Construction-related accessibility standard" means a provision, standard, or regulation under state or federal law requiring compliance with standards for making new construction and existing facilities accessible to persons with disabilities, including, but not limited to, any provision, standard, or regulation set forth in Section 51, 54, 54.1, or 55 of this code, Section 19955.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336; 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.), and the federal Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (Appendix A to Part 36 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations). (7) "Place of public accommodation" has the same meaning as defined in Section 12181(7) of Title 42 of the United States Code and the federal regulations adopted pursuant to that section. (8) "Qualified defendant" means a defendant in an action that includes a construction-related accessibility claim that is asserted against a place of public accommodation that met the requirements of "meets applicable standards" or "inspected by a CASp" prior to the date the defendant was served with the summons and complaint in that action. To be a qualified defendant, the defendant is not required to have been the party who hired any CASp, so long as the basis of the alleged liability of the defendant is a construction-related accessibility claim. To determine whether a defendant is a qualified defendant, the court need not make a finding that the place of public accommodation complies with all applicable construction-related accessibility standards as a matter of law. The court need only determine that the place of public accommodation has a status of "meets applicable standards" or "inspected by a CASp." (9) "Site" means a place of public accommodation. (10) "Microbusiness" has the same meaning as defined in Section 14837 of the Government Code. (b) Unless otherwise indicated, terms used in this part relating to civil procedure have the same meanings that those terms have in the Code of Civil Procedure.SECTION 1. Section 55.32 of the Civil Code , as added by Section 5 of Chapter 383 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read: 55.32. (a) An attorney who provides a demand letter, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 55.3, shall do all of the following: (1) Include the attorney's State Bar license number in the demand letter. (2) Contemporaneously with providing the demand letter, send a copy of the demand letter to the State Bar of California by facsimile transmission at 1-415-538-2171, or by mail to 180 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105, Attention: Professional Competence. (3) Within five business days of providing the demand letter, send a copy of the demand letter to the California Commission on Disability Access. (b) An attorney who sends or serves a complaint, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 55.3, shall send a copy of the complaint to the California Commission on Disability Access within five business days of sending or serving the complaint. (c) A violation of paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) or subdivision (b) shall constitute cause for the imposition of discipline of an attorney where a copy of the complaint or demand letter is not sent to the California Commission on Disability Access within five business days, or a copy of the demand letter is not sent to the State Bar within five business days. In the event the State Bar receives information indicating that an attorney has failed to send a copy of the complaint or demand letter to the California Commission on Disability Access within five business days, the State Bar shall investigate to determine whether paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) or subdivision (b) has been violated. (d) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), an attorney is not required to send to the State Bar of California or the California Commission on Disability Access a copy of any subsequent demand letter or amended complaint in the same dispute following the initial demand letter or complaint, unless that subsequent demand letter or amended complaint alleges a new construction-related accessibility claim. (e) A demand letter or complaint sent to the California Commission on Disability Access shall be for the informational purposes of Section 8299.08 of the Government Code. A demand letter received by the State Bar from either the sender or recipient of the demand letter shall be reviewed by the State Bar to determine whether subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 55.31 has been violated. (f) (1) Commencing July 31, 2013, and annually each July 31 thereafter, the State Bar shall report to the Legislature and the Chairs of the Senate and Assembly Committees on Judiciary, both of the following with respect to demand letters received by the State Bar: (A) The number of investigations opened to date on a suspected violation of subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 55.31. (B) Whether any disciplinary action resulted from the investigation, and the results of that disciplinary action. (2) A report to be submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code. (g) The California Commission on Disability Access shall review and report on the demand letters and complaints it receives as provided in Section 8299.08 of the Government Code. (h) Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (a) and subdivision (b) shall not apply to a demand letter or complaint sent or filed by an attorney employed or retained by a qualified legal services project or a qualified support center, as defined in Section 6213 of the Business and Professions Code, when acting within the scope of employment in asserting a construction-related accessibility claim. The Legislature finds and declares that qualified legal services projects and support centers are extensively regulated by the State Bar of California, and that there is no evidence of any abusive use of demand letters or complaints by these organizations. The Legislature further finds that, in light of the evidence of the extraordinarily small number of construction-related accessibility cases brought by regulated legal services programs, and given the resources of those programs, exempting regulated legal services programs from the requirements of this section to report to the California Commission on Disability Access will not affect the purpose of the reporting to, and tabulation by, the commission of all other construction-related accessibility claims. (i) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2013. (j) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1,2016,2019, and as of that date isrepealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2016, deletes or extends that date.repealed. SEC. 2. Section 55.32 of the Civil Code , as added by Section 6 of Chapter 383 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read: 55.32. (a) An attorney who provides a demand letter, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 55.3, shall do all of the following: (1) Include the attorney's State Bar license number in the demand letter. (2) Within five business days of providing the demand letter, send a copy of the demand letter to the California Commission on Disability Access. (b) An attorney who sends or serves a complaint, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 55.3, shall send a copy of the complaint to the California Commission on Disability Access within five business days of sending or serving the complaint. (c) A violation of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) or subdivision (b) shall constitute cause for the imposition of discipline of an attorney if a copy of the demand letter or complaint is not sent to the California Commission on Disability Access within five business days. In the event the State Bar receives information indicating that an attorney has failed to send a copy of the demand letter or complaint to the California Commission on Disability Access within five business days, the State Bar shall investigate to determine whether paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) or subdivision (b) has been violated. (d) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), an attorney is not required to send to the California Commission on Disability Access a copy of any subsequent demand letter or amended complaint in the same dispute following the initial demand letter or complaint, unless that subsequent demand letter or amended complaint alleges a new construction-related accessibility claim. (e) A demand letter sent to the California Commission on Disability Access shall be for the informational purposes of Section 8299.08 of the Government Code. A demand letter received by the State Bar from the recipient of the demand letter shall be reviewed by the State Bar to determine whether subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 55.31 has been violated. (f) (1) Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, on or before July 31,2016,2019, and annually thereafter, the State Bar shall report to the Legislature and the Chairs of the Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committees, both of the following with respect to demand letters received by the State Bar: (A) The number of investigations opened to date on a suspected violation of subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 55.31. (B) Whether any disciplinary action resulted from the investigation, and the results of that disciplinary action. (2) A report to be submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code. (g) The California Commission on Disability Access shall review and report on the demand letters and complaints it receives as provided in Section 8299.08 of the Government Code. (h) The expiration of any ground for discipline of an attorney shall not affect the imposition of discipline for any act prior to the expiration. An act or omission that constituted cause for imposition of discipline of an attorney when committed or omitted prior to January 1,2016,2019, shall continue to constitute cause for the imposition of discipline of that attorney on and after January 1,2016.2019. (i) Paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) and subdivision (b) shall not apply to a demand letter or complaint sent or filed by an attorney employed or retained by a qualified legal services project or a qualified support center, as defined in Section 6213 of the Business and Professions Code, when acting within the scope of employment in asserting a construction-related accessibility claim. The Legislature finds and declares that qualified legal services projects and support centers are extensively regulated by the State Bar of California, and that there is no evidence of any abusive use of demand letters or complaints by these organizations. The Legislature further finds that, in light of the evidence of the extraordinarily small number of construction-related accessibility cases brought by regulated legal services programs, and given the resources of those programs, exempting regulated legal services programs from the requirements of this section to report to the California Commission on Disability Access will not affect the purpose of the reporting to, and tabulation by, the commission of all other construction-related accessibility claims. (j) This section shall become operative on January 1,2016.2019.SEC. 2.SEC. 3. Section 55.535 is added to the Civil Code, immediately following Section 55.53, to read: 55.535. (a)(1)A business shall not be liableA business, prior to the initiation of litigation, receipt of a demand letter, or that is otherwise on notice of a violation of a construction-related accessibility standard prior to a CASp inspection, shall not be liable for minimum statutory damages for violating a construction-related liabilitystandardstandard, as defined in Section 55.52, that is noted in the CASp report ifthe business is an inspected by a CASp site and the allegedthe violation is corrected within 90 days of the date of thewritten inspection report required pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 55.53.CASp inspection.(2) A business(b) A small business, as that term is defined in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (f) of Section 55.56, shall not be liable for minimum statutory damages fora violation ofviolating a construction-related accessibility standard iftheboth of the following conditions are met: (1) The alleged violationis a minor matter and is corrected within 30 days of the service of a summons and complaint asserting a construction-related accessibility claim or receipt of a written notice, whichever is earlier. For the purposes of this paragraph, "minor matter" shall be limited to a violation concerningconcerns interiorandor exterior signage, the colorandor condition of parking lot paint striping,andor truncated domes.(b) For the purposes of the period provided for in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), a written notice shall be deemed received when it is delivered to the business premises.(2) The violation is corrected within 15 days of the service of a summons and complaint asserting a construction-related accessibility claim or receipt of a written notice, whichever is earlier.SEC. 3.Section 55.56 of the Civil Code is amended to read: 55.56. (a) Statutory damages under either subdivision (a) of Section 52 or subdivision (a) of Section 54.3 may be recovered in a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public accommodation only if a violation or violations of one or more construction-related accessibility standards denied the plaintiff full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on a particular occasion. (b) A plaintiff is denied full and equal access only if the plaintiff personally encountered the violation on a particular occasion, or the plaintiff was deterred from accessing a place of public accommodation on a particular occasion. (c) A violation personally encountered by a plaintiff may be sufficient to cause a denial of full and equal access if the plaintiff experienced difficulty, discomfort, or embarrassment because of the violation. (d) A plaintiff demonstrates that he or she was deterred from accessing a place of public accommodation on a particular occasion only if both of the following apply: (1) The plaintiff had actual knowledge of a violation or violations that prevented or reasonably dissuaded the plaintiff from accessing a place of public accommodation that the plaintiff intended to use on a particular occasion. (2) The violation or violations would have actually denied the plaintiff full and equal access if the plaintiff had accessed the place of public accommodation on that particular occasion. (e) Statutory damages may be assessed pursuant to subdivision (a) based on each particular occasion that the plaintiff was denied full and equal access, and not upon the number of violations of construction-related accessibility standards identified at the place of public accommodation where the denial of full and equal access occurred. If the place of public accommodation consists of distinct facilities that offer distinct services, statutory damages may be assessed based on each denial of full and equal access to the distinct facility, and not upon the number of violations of construction-related accessibility standards identified at the place of public accommodation where the denial of full and equal access occurred. (f) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a defendant's liability for statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public accommodation is reduced to a minimum of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each offense if the defendant demonstrates that it has corrected all construction-related violations that are the basis of a claim within 60 days of being served with the complaint, and the defendant demonstrates any of the following: (A) The structure or area of the alleged violation was determined to be "CASp-inspected" or "meets applicable standards" and, to the best of the defendant's knowledge, there were no modifications or alterations that impacted compliance with construction-related accessibility standards with respect to the plaintiff's claim that were completed or commenced between the date of that determination and the particular occasion on which the plaintiff was allegedly denied full and equal access. (B) The structure or area of the alleged violation was the subject of an inspection report indicating "CASp determination pending" or "Inspected by a CASp," and the defendant has either implemented reasonable measures to correct the alleged violation before the particular occasion on which the plaintiff was allegedly denied full and equal access, or the defendant was in the process of correcting the alleged violation within a reasonable time and manner before the particular occasion on which the plaintiff was allegedly denied full and equal access. (C) For a claim alleging a construction-related accessibility violation filed before January 1, 2018, the structure or area of the alleged violation was a new construction or an improvement that was approved by, and passed inspection by, the local building department permit and inspection process on or after January 1, 2008, and before January 1, 2016, and, to the best of the defendant's knowledge, there were no modifications or alterations that impacted compliance with respect to the plaintiff's claim that were completed or commenced between the completion date of the new construction or improvement and the particular occasion on which the plaintiff was allegedly denied full and equal access. (D) The structure or area of the alleged violation was new construction or an improvement that was approved by, and passed inspection by, a local building department official who is a certified access specialist, and, to the best of the defendant's knowledge, there were no modifications or alterations that affected compliance with respect to the plaintiff's claim that were completed or commenced between the completion date of the new construction or improvement and the particular occasion on which the plaintiff was allegedly denied full and equal access. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a defendant's liability for statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public accommodation is reduced to a minimum of two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each offense if the defendant demonstrates both of the following: (A) The defendant has corrected all construction-related violations that are the basis of a claim within 30 days of being served with the complaint. (B) The defendant is a small business that has employed 25 or fewer employees on average over the past three years, or for the years it has been in existence if less than three years, as evidenced by wage report forms filed with the Economic Development Department, and has average annual gross receipts of less than three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000) over the previous three years, or for the years it has been in existence if less than three years, as evidenced by federal or state income tax returns. The average annual gross receipts dollar amount shall be adjusted biannually by the Department of General Services for changes in the California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, as compiled by the Department of Industrial Relations. The Department of General Services shall post that adjusted amount on its Internet Web site. (3) This subdivision shall not be applicable to intentional violations. (4) Nothing in this subdivision affects the awarding of actual damages, or affects the awarding of treble actual damages. (5) This subdivision shall apply only to claims filed on or after the effective date of Senate Bill 1186 of the 2011-12 Regular Session of the Legislature. Nothing in this subdivision is intended to affect a complaint filed before that date. (g) Notwithstanding any other law, including, but not limited to, Sections 52 and 54.3, a defendant in a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public accommodation shall not be liable for statutory damages for more than one offense if the site is a microbusiness, as that term is defined in paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Section 55.52, and the defendant has corrected the violation prior to the filing of the lawsuit. (h) This section does not alter the applicable law for the awarding of injunctive or other equitable relief for a violation or violations of one or more construction-related accessibility standards, nor alter any legal obligation of a party to mitigate damages. (i) In assessing liability under subdivision (d), in an action alleging multiple claims for the same construction-related accessibility violation on different particular occasions, the court shall consider the reasonableness of the plaintiff's conduct in light of the plaintiff's obligation, if any, to mitigate damages.SEC. 4. Section 1938.5 is added to the Civil Code, to read: 1938.5. A commercial property owner or lessor shall state on every lease form or rental agreement executed on or after January 1, 2016, that, pursuant to Section 36.201 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the owner or lessor and the tenant are both responsible for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.) and that responsibility for compliance may be allocated between the parties by the terms of the lease or other contract. SEC. 5. Section 4459.7 of the Government Code is amended to read: 4459.7. (a) (1) No later than October 31 of each year, the State Architect shall publish and make available to the public both a list of certified access specialists who have met the requirements of Section 4459.5.This list(2) The State Architect shall publish an easily accessible list of businesses which have been inspected by a certified access specialist on or after January 1, 2016, including the date of the inspection. The State Architect shall periodically update this list. (3) The lists required pursuant to this section shall include a written disclaimer of liability as specified in subdivision (b). (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a state agency or employee of a state agency may not be held liable for any injury or damages resulting from any service provided by a certified access specialist whose name appears on the list published pursuant to subdivision (a). (c) The State Architect may perform periodic audits of work performed by a certified access specialist as deemed necessary to ensure the desired standard of performance. A certified access specialist shall provide an authorized representative of the State Architect with complete access, at any reasonable hour of the day, to all technical data, reports, records, photographs, design outlines and plans, and files used in building inspection and plan review, with the exception of proprietary and confidential information.SEC. 5.SEC. 6. Section 4459.8 of the Government Code is amended to read: 4459.8. (a) The certification authorized by Section 4459.5 is effective for three years from the date of initial certification and expires if not renewed. The State Architect, upon consideration of any factual complaints regarding the work of a certified access specialist or of other relevant information, may suspend certification or deny renewal of certification. (b) (1) The State Architect shall require each applicant for certification as a certified access specialist to do the following: (A) Pay fees, including an application and course fee and an examination fee, at a level sufficient to meet the costs of application processing, registration, publishing a list, and other activities that are reasonably necessary to implement and administer the certified access specialist program. (B) Provide to the State Architectinformation aboutthe name of the city, county, or city and county in which the applicant intends to provide services. (2) The State Architect shall require each applicant for renewal of certification to do the following: (A) Pay a fee sufficient to cover the reasonable costs of reassessing qualifications of renewal applicants. (B) Provide to the State Architectinformation aboutthe name of the city, county, or city and county in which the applicant has provided services since the last day of certification by the State Architect. (3) The State Architect shall periodically review its schedule of fees to ensure that its fees for certification are not excessive while covering the costs to administer the certified access specialist program. The application fee for a California licensed architect, landscape architect, civil engineer, or structural engineer shall not exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250). (c) All fees collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the Certified Access Specialist Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340, this fund is continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal years for use by the State Architect to implement Sections 4459.5 to 4459.8, inclusive. (d) The State Architect shall post on his or her Internet Web siteinformation aboutthe name of the city, county, or city and county in which each certified access specialist provides or intends to provide services.SEC. 6.SEC. 7. Section 8299.06 of the Government Code is amended to read: 8299.06. (a) A priority of the commission shall be the development and dissemination of educational materials and information to promote and facilitate disability access compliance. (b) The commission shall work with other state agencies, including the Division of the State Architect and the Department of Rehabilitation, to develop educational materials and information for use by businesses to understand its obligations to provide disability access and to facilitate compliance with construction-related accessibility standards. (c) The commission shall develop and make available on its Internet Web site, or make available on its Internet Web site if developed by another governmental agency, including Americans with Disabilities Act centers, toolkits or educational modules to assist a California business to understand its obligations under the law and to facilitate compliance with respect to the top 10 alleged construction-related violations, by type, as specified in subdivision (a) of Section 8299.08. Upon completion of this requirement, the commission shall develop and make available on its Internet Web site, or work with another agency to develop, other toolkits or educational modules that would educate businesses of the accessibility requirements and to facilitate compliance with that requirement. (d) The commission shall post the following on its Internet Web site: (1) Educational materials and information that will assist building owners, tenants, building officials, and building inspectors to understand the disability accessibility requirements and to facilitate compliance with disability access laws. The commission shall at least annually review the educational materials and information on disability access requirements and compliance available on the Internet Web site of other local, state, or federal agencies, including Americans with Disabilities Act centers, to augment the educational materials and information developed by the commission. (2) A link to the Internet Web site of the Division of the State Architect'sCertified Access Specialist (CASp) Programcertified access specialist (CASp) program to assist building owners and tenants in locating or hiring a CASp. (e) The commission shall, to the extent feasible, coordinate with other state agencies and local building departments to ensure that information provided to the public on disability access requirements is uniform and complete, and make its educational materials and information available to those agencies and departments.SEC. 7.SEC. 8. Section 65941.6 is added to the Government Code, to read: 65941.6. (a) Each local agency shall develop materials relating to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.). The local agency shall provide these materials to an applicant along with notice that approval of a permit does not signify that the applicant has complied with the Americans with Disabilities Act. (b) For the purposes of complying with the requirements of subdivision (a), a local agency may, in lieu of developing its own materials, provide applicants with those materials which the California Commission on Disability Access has developed and made available pursuant to Section 8299.06.SEC. 8.SEC. 9. Article 4 (commencing with Section 65946) is added to Chapter 4.5 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, to read: Article 4. Expedited Review 65946. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: (1) "Certified access specialist" or "CASp" means any person who has been certified pursuant to Section 4459.5. (2) "Construction-related accessibility standard" means a provision, standard, or regulation under state or federal law requiring compliance with standards for making new construction and existing facilities accessible to persons with disabilities, including, but not limited to, any provision, standard, or regulation set forth in Section 51, 54, 54.1, or 55 of the Civil Code, Section 19955.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336; 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.), and the federal Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (Appendix A to Part 36 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations).(3) "Meets applicable standards" means the site was inspected by a CASp and determined to meet all applicable construction-related accessibility standards pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 55.53.(4) "Place of public accommodation" has the same meaning as defined in Section 12181(7) of Title 42 of the United States Code and the federal regulations adopted pursuant to that section.(5) "Site" means a place of public accommodation.(6)(3) "Written inspection report" means the CASp report required to be provided pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 55.53 of the Civil Code. (b) A local agency shall expedite review of a project application if theapplicantproject applicant meets all of the following conditions: (1) The applicant provides awritten inspection reportcopy of a disability access inspection certificate, provided by a CASpindicating that the project is a site that meets applicable standards.pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 55.53 of the Civil Code, pertaining to the site of the proposed project. (2) The applicant demonstrates that the proposed project is necessary to address either an alleged violation of a construction-related accessibility standard or a violation noted in a written inspection report. (3) If project plans are necessary for the approval of a project, the applicant has had a CASp review the project plans for compliance with all applicable construction-related accessibility standards.SEC. 9.SEC. 10. Section 17053.43 is added to the Revenue and Taxation Code, to read: 17053.43. (a) (1) For each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2016, and before January 1, 2023, there shall be allowed to a taxpayer a credit against the "net tax," as defined in Section 17039, for the amount paid or incurred for eligible access expenditures in excess of two hundred fifty dollars ($250). (2) (A) Except as specified in subparagraph (B), the credit shall be in an amount equal to 50 percent of the difference between the total eligible access expenditures incurred by a taxpayer that do not exceed ten thousand two hundred fifty dollars ($10,250) and two hundred fifty dollars ($250). (B) For a taxpayer that is amicrobusiness,small business, the credit shall be in an amount equal tothe amount calculated pursuant to subparagraph (A), plus an additional five thousand dollars ($5,000).50 percent of the difference between the total eligible access expenditures incurred by a taxpayer that do not exceed fifteen thousand two hundred fifty dollars ($15,250) and two hundred fifty dollars ($250). (C) In the case of a partnership, the limitation under this paragraph shall apply with respect to the partnership and each partner. A similar rule shall apply in the case of an "S" corporation. (b) For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: (1) "Eligible access expenditures" has the same meaning as defined in Section4444(c) of the Internal Revenue Code except that the amounts may be paid or incurred by a taxpayer other than an eligible small business.(2) "Microbusiness" has the same meaning as defined in Section 14837 of the Government Code.(2) (A) "Small business" means a trade or business that, in the three immediately preceding taxable years, had average gross receipts, less returns and allowances reportable to this state, of less than three million five-hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000) and employed 25 or fewer full-time employees. (B) For the purposes of this paragraph, "gross receipts, less returns and allowances reportable to this state" means the sum of the gross receipts from the production of business income, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 25120, and the gross receipts from the production of nonbusiness income, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 25120. (C) For the purposes of this paragraph, "full-time employee" means an employee of the taxpayer who works at least 30 hours per week. (c) In the case where the credit allowed by this section exceeds the "net tax," the excess may be carried over to reduce the "net tax" in the following year, and the succeeding six years, if necessary, until the credit is exhausted. (d) The credit allowed by this section may be claimed only on a timely filed original return of the taxpayer. (e) In the case of a credit allowed under this section, the following shall apply: (1) A deduction or credit shall not be allowed for that amount under any other provision of this part. (2) An increase in the adjusted basis of any property shall not result from that amount.(d)(f) The Franchise Tax Board may prescribe rules, guidelines, or procedures necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of this section, including any guidelines regarding the substantiation of the credit allowed by this section. Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code does not apply to any rule, guideline, or procedure prescribed by the Franchise Tax Board pursuant to this section.(e)(g) This section shall remain in effect only until December 1, 2023, and as of that date is repealed.SEC. 10.SEC. 11. Section 23643 is added to the Revenue and Taxation Code, to read: 23643. (a) (1) For each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2016, and before January 1, 2023, there shall be allowed a credit to a taxpayer against the "tax," as defined in Section 23036, for the amount paid or incurred for eligible access expenditures in excess of two hundred fifty dollars ($250). (2) (A) Except as specified in subparagraph (B), the credit shall be in an amount equal to 50 percent of the difference between the total eligible access expenditures incurred by a taxpayer that do not exceed ten thousand two hundred fifty dollars ($10,250) and two hundred fifty dollars ($250). (B) For a taxpayer that is amicrobusiness,small business, the credit shall be in an amount equal tothe amount calculated pursuant to subparagraph (A), plus an additional five thousand dollars ($5,000).50 percent of the difference between the total eligible access expenditures incurred by a taxpayer that do not exceed fifteen thousand two hundred fifty dollars ($15,250) and two hundred fifty dollars ($250). (C) In the case of a partnership, the limitation under this paragraph shall apply with respect to the partnership and each partner. A similar rule shall apply in the case of an "S" corporation. (b) For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: (1) "Eligible access expenditures" has the same meaning as defined in Section4444(c) of the Internal Revenue Code except that the amounts may be paid or incurred by a taxpayer other than an eligible small business.(2) "Microbusiness" has the same meaning as defined in Section 14837 of the Government Code.(2) (A) "Small business" means a trade or business that, in the three immediately preceding taxable years, had average gross receipts, less returns and allowances reportable to this state, of less than three million five-hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000) and employed 25 or fewer full-time employees. (B) For the purposes of this paragraph, "gross receipts, less returns and allowances reportable to this state" means the sum of the gross receipts from the production of business income, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 25120, and the gross receipts from the production of nonbusiness income, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 25120. (C) For the purposes of this paragraph, "full-time employee" means an employee of the taxpayer who works at least 30 hours per week. (D) The dollar amount specified in paragraph (A) shall apply to the gross receipts of all taxpayers required or authorized to be included on a combined report pursuant to Section 25101 or 25101.15. (c) In the case where the credit allowed by this section exceeds the "tax," the excess may be carried over to reduce the "tax" in the following year, and the succeeding six years, if necessary, until the credit is exhausted. (d) The credit allowed by this section may be claimed only on a timely filed original return of the taxpayer. (e) In the case of a credit allowed under this section, the following shall apply: (1) A deduction or credit shall not be allowed for that amount under any other provision of this part. (2) An increase in the adjusted basis of any property shall not result from that amount.(d)(f) The Franchise Tax Board may prescribe rules, guidelines, or procedures necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of this section, including any guidelines regarding the substantiation of the credit allowed by this section. Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code does not apply to any rule, guideline, or procedure prescribed by the Franchise Tax Board pursuant to this section.(e)(g) This section shall remain in effect only until December 1, 2023, and as of that date is repealed.SEC. 11.SEC. 12. The Legislature finds and declares that Sections78 and89 of this act, pertaining to the review and approval of development permit applications, constitute matters of statewide concern, and shall apply to charter cities and charter counties. These sections shall supersede any inconsistent provisions in the charter of any city, county, or city and county.SEC. 12.SEC. 13. It is the intent of the Legislature to make the findings required by Section 41 of the Revenue and Taxation Code with respect to the tax credits allowed by Sections910 and1011 of this act.SEC. 13.SEC. 14. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.