Bill Text: CA SB1010 | 2019-2020 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Privacy: biometric surveillance systems.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2020-03-25 - From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. [SB1010 Detail]
Download: California-2019-SB1010-Amended.html
|
Amended
IN
Senate
March 25, 2020 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2019–2020 REGULAR SESSION
Senate Bill
No. 1010
| Introduced by Senator Jackson |
February 14, 2020 |
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 1010, as amended, Jackson.
Privacy. Privacy: biometric surveillance systems.
Existing law, the Information Practices Act of 1977, declares that the right to privacy is a personal and fundamental right protected by the California Constitution and by the United States Constitution and that all individuals have a right of privacy in information pertaining to them. The act requires an agency, defined as every state office, officer, department, division, bureau, board, commission, or other state agency, except as provided, to maintain in its records only personal information that is relevant and necessary for a required or authorized purpose.
This bill would, until January 1, 2025, require a government entity, defined as a department or
agency of the state or its political subdivision, or any person acting for or on behalf of, or at the request of, the state or its political subdivision, to submit to the Legislature a written report that includes specified information, including whether, in the past 3 years, the government entity has developed, acquired, possessed, accessed, used, or shared any facial recognition or other biometric surveillance system or commercial biometric database. The bill would also prohibit a government entity from sharing images, recordings, or biometric information with any other person or entity for use in a facial recognition or other biometric surveillance system or commercial biometric database.
Existing law, until January 1, 2023, prohibits a law enforcement agency or law enforcement officer from installing, activating, or using any biometric surveillance system
in connection with an officer camera or data collected by an officer camera. Under existing law, a person is authorized to bring an action for equitable or declaratory relief against a law enforcement agency or officer who violates that prohibition.
This bill would, until January 1, 2026, prohibit a law enforcement agency or law enforcement officer from developing, acquiring, possessing, accessing, using, or sharing any facial recognition or other biometric surveillance system. The bill would also prohibit a law enforcement agency or law enforcement officer from acquiring, accessing, or using any facial recognition or other biometric surveillance system that is developed from or makes use of biometric information that was collected without the express consent of each individual whose biometric information is contained therein to use
their biometric information for biometric surveillance.
This bill would authorize an individual, upon a violation of the prohibitions described above, to bring a lawsuit in a court of competent jurisdiction and to obtain specified remedies, including recovery of damages in an amount not less than $100 and not more than $750 per individual per violation or actual damages, whichever is greater.
This bill would require the California Research Bureau to conduct a study examining the civil liberties and civil rights impacts of facial recognition and other biometric surveillance systems on Californians, as specified, and to submit the study to the Legislature on or before December 31, 2023.
This bill would define terms for its purposes.
Existing law, the Information Practices Act of 1977, declares that the right to privacy is a personal and fundamental right protected by the California Constitution and by the United States Constitution and that all individuals have a right of privacy in information pertaining to them.
This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to that provision.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee:Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Title 1.81.8 (commencing with Section 1798.500) is added to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:TITLE 1.81.8. Safety, Accountability, Freedom, and Economic Opportunity Act (SAFE Act)
1798.500.
As used in this title, the following terms have the following meanings:(a) “Biometric information” means a physiological, biological, or behavioral characteristic that can be used, singly or in combination with each other or with other information, to establish identity. Biometric information does not include a physical or digital photograph, unless used or stored for the purpose of facial recognition or other biometric surveillance.
(b) “Biometric surveillance system” means any computer software or application that performs facial recognition or other biometric surveillance.
(c) “Commercial biometric database” means a collection of biometric information that an entity other than a government entity possesses, controls, or shares alone or as part of a biometric surveillance system.
(d) “Collects,” “collected,” or “collection” means buying, renting, gathering, obtaining, receiving, or accessing any personal information pertaining to an individual by any means.
(e) (1) “Facial recognition or other biometric surveillance” means either of the following, alone or in combination:
(A) An automated or semiautomated process that captures or analyzes biometric information of an individual to identify or assist in identifying an individual.
(B) An automated or semiautomated process that generates, or assists in generating, surveillance information about an individual based on biometric data.
(2) “Facial recognition or other biometric surveillance” does not include either of the following:
(A) The use of an automated or semiautomated process for the purpose of redacting a recording for release or disclosure outside the law enforcement agency to protect the privacy of a subject depicted in the recording, if the process does not generate or result in the retention of any biometric information or surveillance information.
(B) The use of a mobile fingerprint scanning
device during a lawful detention to identify a person who does not have proof of identification if this use is lawful and does not generate or result in the retention of any biometric information or surveillance information.
(f) “Government entity” means a department or agency of the state or its political subdivision, or any person acting for or on behalf of, or at the request of, the state or its political subdivision.
(g) “Law enforcement agency” means any police department, sheriff’s department, district attorney, county probation department, transit agency police department, school district police department, highway patrol, the police department of any campus of the University of California, the California State University, or a community college, the Department of the California Highway Patrol, and the
Department of Justice.
(h) “Law enforcement officer” means an officer, deputy, employee, or agent of a law enforcement agency or any person acting for or on behalf of, or at the request of, any law enforcement agency.
(i) “Share” means selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or any other means.
(j) “Surveillance information” means either of the following, alone or in combination:
(1) Any information about a known or unknown individual, including, but not limited to, a person’s name, date of birth, gender, or criminal
background.
(2) Any information derived from biometric data, including, but not limited to, assessments about an individual’s sentiment, state of mind, or level of dangerousness.
1798.505.
(a) On or before March 31, 2021, a government entity shall submit to the Legislature a written report that includes all of the following:(1) Whether, in the past three years, the government entity has developed, acquired, possessed, accessed, used, or shared any facial recognition or other biometric surveillance system or commercial biometric database.
(2) The purpose of the system or database.
(3) The source of the system or database.
(4) The date of acquisition of the system or database.
(5) The policies and procedures governing the system or database.
(b) (1) A report to be submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(2) Pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, this section is repealed on January 1, 2025.
1798.510.
(a) A law enforcement agency or law enforcement officer shall not develop, acquire, possess, access, use, or share any facial recognition or other biometric surveillance system.(b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2026, and as of that date is repealed.
1798.515.
(a) A law enforcement agency or law enforcement officer shall not acquire, access, or use any facial recognition or other biometric surveillance system that is developed from or makes use of biometric information that was collected without the express consent of each individual whose biometric information is contained therein to use their biometric information for biometric surveillance.(b) A government entity shall not share images, recordings, or biometric information with any other person or entity for use in a facial recognition or other biometric surveillance system or commercial biometric database.
1798.520.
(a) The California Research Bureau shall conduct a study examining the civil liberties and civil rights impacts of facial recognition and other biometric surveillance systems on Californians. As part of the study, the bureau shall contact, and incorporate the experiences of, women, those with disabilities, Black people, Latinos, people of Asian American and Asian Pacific Island descent, immigrants, LGBTQI people, youth, indigenous people, residents of rural and urban communities, religious minorities, people from varied socioeconomic classes, and other Californians from diverse communities across the state.(b) Any information collected pursuant to this section shall not be used for any purpose other than conducting the study required by
this section.
(c) On or before December 31, 2023, the California Research Bureau shall submit the study described in subdivision (a) to the Legislature.
(d) (1) A report to be submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(2) Pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, this section is repealed on January 1, 2025.
1798.525.
A city, county, city and county, municipality, or local agency may adopt any rules, regulations, codes, or ordinances that impose additional limits on the development, acquisition, possession, access, or use of facial recognition or other biometric surveillance by any person or government entity.1798.530.
(a) A violation of Section 1798.510 or 1798.515 constitutes an injury in fact, and an individual may bring a lawsuit in a court of competent jurisdiction.(b) An individual who prevails in a lawsuit shall obtain any or all of the following remedies:
(1) Recovery of damages in an amount not less than one hundred dollars ($100) and not more than seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) per individual per violation or actual damages, whichever is greater.
(2) Reasonable attorney fees and costs.
(3) Injunctive and declaratory relief, as appropriate.
(4) Any other relief the court deems appropriate.
(c) In assessing the amount of statutory damages, the court shall consider any one or more of the relevant circumstances presented by any of the parties to the case, including, but not limited to, the nature and seriousness of the misconduct, the number of violations, the persistence of the misconduct, the length of time over which the misconduct occurred, the willfulness of the defendant’s misconduct, and the defendant’s assets, liabilities, and net worth.
The Legislature declares that the right to privacy is a personal and fundamental right protected by Section 1 of Article I of the California Constitution and by the United States Constitution and that all individuals have a right of privacy in information pertaining to them. The Legislature further makes the following findings:
(a)The right to privacy is being threatened by the indiscriminate collection, maintenance, and dissemination of personal information and the lack of effective laws and legal remedies.
(b)The increasing use of computers and other sophisticated information technology has greatly magnified the potential risk to individual privacy that can occur from the maintenance of personal information.
(c)In order to protect the privacy of individuals, it is necessary that the maintenance and dissemination of personal information be subject to strict limits.
