Bill Text: CA AB2652 | 2017-2018 | Regular Session | Enrolled
Bill Title: Telecommunications: universal service.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Vetoed) 2018-09-28 - Vetoed by Governor. [AB2652 Detail]
Download: California-2017-AB2652-Enrolled.html
|
Enrolled
August 29, 2018 |
|
Passed
IN
Senate
August 22, 2018 |
|
Passed
IN
Assembly
August 27, 2018 |
|
Amended
IN
Senate
August 17, 2018 |
|
Amended
IN
Senate
July 03, 2018 |
|
Amended
IN
Senate
June 14, 2018 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
May 25, 2018 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 30, 2018 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 16, 2018 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2017–2018 REGULAR SESSION
| Assembly Bill | No. 2652 |
| Introduced by Assembly Member Quirk |
February 15, 2018 |
An act to amend Section 878.5 of, and to add Section 878.7 to, the Public Utilities Code, relating to telecommunications.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 2652, Quirk.
Telecommunications: universal service.
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations. The Moore Universal Telephone Service Act establishes the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service program in order to provide low-income households with access to affordable basic residential telephone service. Existing law requires the commission, by January 15, 2017, to adopt a portability freeze rule for the lifeline program, and requires the commission to consider including in the rule a period of time during which the subscriber would be able to terminate lifeline service without penalty and a requirement that the administrator of the lifeline program provide a telephone corporation providing lifeline service with specified subscriber information.
This bill would require the commission, on or before June 30, 2019,
to adopt a rule to improve the cost-effectiveness of the delivery of the lifeline program. The bill would repeal the requirement that the commission consider including in its portability freeze rule the features described above, and would instead require the commission to include, at minimum, those and certain other features in this lifeline program cost-effectiveness rule.
Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.
Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order, decision, or rule of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain
costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YESBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 878.5 of the Public Utilities Code is amended to read:878.5.
The commission shall adopt a portability freeze rule for the lifeline program by January 15, 2017. The commission shall consider including a 60-day duration of the portability freeze in the rule.SEC. 2.
Section 878.7 is added to the Public Utilities Code, to read:878.7.
On or before June 30, 2019, the commission shall adopt a rule to improve the cost-effectiveness of the delivery of the lifeline program. The commission shall include, at minimum, all of the following in the rule:(a) A modified recertification process that minimizes barriers to recertification faced by a subscriber, reduces the burden and cost of recertification on the lifeline program, and provides for all of the following:
(1) When a subscriber transfers his or her benefit from one lifeline provider to another, the anniversary date for that subscriber shall be one calendar year from the approval date of the benefit transfer.
(2) Allowing
each lifeline subscriber to complete his or her annual recertification of eligibility online using an electronic signature and verifying his or her identity using personally identifiable information on file with the third-party administrator, without using a commission-issued personal identification number (PIN).
(3) Allowing lifeline subscribers the option to complete annual recertification of eligibility through an interactive voice response system.
(b) Allowing direct consumer enrollment with an electronic signature through an online platform to expand participation in the program.
(c) A means to encourage lifeline service providers to work with community-based organizations, and other approved nonprofit organizations, to increase participation in the lifeline program by assisting those providers with outreach,
marketing, and enrollment.
(d) A period of time when a subscriber would be able to terminate lifeline service without penalty, similar to provisions established in Section 4.13.5 of commission Decision 14-01-036 (January 16, 2014), Decision Adopting Revisions to Modernize and Expand the California Lifeline Program.
(e) A requirement that the administrator of the lifeline program provide a telephone corporation providing lifeline service with real-time information concerning whether a subscriber has enrolled with another telephone corporation during the period of the portability freeze adopted by the commission pursuant to Section 878.5 and, if the subscriber enrolled during this period, the date of enrollment.
