Bill Text: CA AB1950 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Introduced

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: City of Los Angeles: former Chavez Ravine property: eminent domain: compensation.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Engrossed) 2024-05-29 - Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and JUD. [AB1950 Detail]

Download: California-2023-AB1950-Introduced.html


CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION

Assembly Bill
No. 1950


Introduced by Assembly Member Wendy Carrillo

January 29, 2024


An act to amend Section 12928.7 of the Insurance Code, relating to insurance.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 1950, as introduced, Wendy Carrillo. Insurance: restitution.
Existing law generally regulates insurance and creates the Department of Insurance, headed by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to bring a superior court action to enjoin a person who is violating or about to violate the Insurance Code. Existing law also authorizes the commissioner to apply to the clerk of the superior court for a judgment to enforce an order requiring a person to pay a monetary penalty or reimburse the department for costs incurred by the department in prosecuting the matter.
Existing law authorizes the commissioner to order a respondent, if certain requirements are met, to provide restitution, as defined, for a loss arising from the respondent’s conduct. With a restitution order, and if facts and equity permit, existing law also authorizes the commissioner to issue an order of rescission enforceable on any person subject to the commissioner’s jurisdiction.
This bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change to these provisions.
Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: NO   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 Section 12928.7 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:

12928.7.
 (a) The commissioner may order a respondent to provide restitution for a loss arising from the respondent’s conduct. If the facts and equity permit, with a restitution order, the commissioner may issue an order of rescission enforceable on any person subject to the commissioner’s jurisdiction.
(b) A restitution order under this section shall meet all of the following requirements:
(1) The respondent shall be subject to the commissioner’s jurisdiction.
(2) The restitution order shall be ancillary to another proceeding authorized by this code in which the commissioner does both of the following:
(A) Determines the respondent violated this code or the standards of conduct applicable to persons acting in the capacity the respondent was acting in or purporting to act in when the loss occurred.
(B) Issues an order imposing a cease and desist order, an order for a monetary penalty, or another sanction with respect to the respondent’s conduct.
(3) The restitution order shall cite the factual basis for the restitution order.
(4) The restitution order shall state the persons, or classes of persons, who suffered a loss.
(5) The restitution order shall state the amount to be paid or property to be returned as restitution.
(c) A rescission or restitution order shall be subject to judicial review in the same manner and at the same time as the order to which it is ancillary.
(d) A rescission or restitution order may be judicially enforced in an action brought by the commissioner, the Attorney General, a district attorney, a city attorney, or any person owed restitution pursuant to the order. In that action, the court may award attorney’s fees and court costs to a prevailing plaintiff.
(e) This section does not apply to an insurer authorized to transact business in this state or to a placement of insurance with an insurer that was in compliance with Section 1765.1 or 1765.2 at the time of the placement. This section does not apply to a person with respect to acts within the scope of a license issued under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 1621), Chapter 5A (commencing with Section 1759), or Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 1760) of Part 2 if the person holds that license at the time of those acts or at the time an initial pleading seeking restitution is issued.
(f) The commissioner may order a respondent who is ordered to provide restitution pursuant to this section to reimburse the commissioner for the commissioner’s costs of implementing and enforcing this section, including attorney’s fees. The commissioner shall not credit any funds received from a respondent towards payment of a monetary penalty until restitution has been tendered to all persons to whom restitution is owed, or to the commissioner on their behalf, as required by a restitution order.
(g) This section does not limit or restrict actions, remedies, or procedures otherwise available to the commissioner, the department, or any person pursuant to an administrative or civil action to enforce any law. It is not a defense in an administrative or civil action that the commissioner did not order a person to pay restitution.
(h) This section does not expand, limit, or otherwise affect the commissioner’s authority to seek or to have sought restitution, refunds, or penalties against insurers, except as expressly provided.
(i) As used in this section, “restitution” means the full amount that will compensate each person for their direct and indirect financial and nonfinancial losses proximately caused by the respondent’s violations.
(j) Money received by the commissioner for distribution to persons as restitution pursuant to this section or Section 12928.6 or 12976 shall be deposited into the Insurance Fund.

feedback