Bill Text: CA AB1287 | 2021-2022 | Regular Session | Amended
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Price discrimination: gender.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 13-0)
Status: (Passed) 2022-09-27 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 555, Statutes of 2022. [AB1287 Detail]
Download: California-2021-AB1287-Amended.html
Bill Title: Price discrimination: gender.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 13-0)
Status: (Passed) 2022-09-27 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 555, Statutes of 2022. [AB1287 Detail]
Download: California-2021-AB1287-Amended.html
|
Amended
IN
Senate
June 13, 2022 |
|
Amended
IN
Senate
May 23, 2022 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 21, 2021 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
March 25, 2021 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2021–2022 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 1287
| Introduced by Assembly Members Bauer-Kahan, and Cristina Garcia (Coauthors: Assembly Members Boerner Horvath, Calderon, Cervantes, Grayson, Levine, Low, Nazarian, and Luz Rivas) (Coauthors: Senators Hueso, Leyva, and Wiener) |
February 19, 2021 |
An act to add Section 51.14 to the Civil Code, relating to civil rights.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1287, as amended, Bauer-Kahan.
Price discrimination: gender.
Existing law prohibits a business establishment from discriminating against a person because of the person’s gender with respect to the price charged for services of similar or like kind. Existing law also requires specified business establishments to disclose in writing the pricing for each standard service, as defined, to display, in a specified manner, a sign stating that it is illegal to base pricing on gender and that a complete price list is available upon request, and to display, in a specified manner, a price list, and to provide the customer with a copy of the complete price list upon request.
This bill would prohibit a person, firm, partnership, company, corporation, or business from charging a different price for any 2 goods that are substantially similar, as defined, if those goods are priced differently based on the gender of the
individuals for whom the goods are marketed and intended. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to seek an injunction to enjoin and restrain the continuance of those violations, and would authorize the court, in addition to granting the injunction, to impose a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NOBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 51.14 is added to the Civil Code, to read:51.14.
(a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings:(1) “Business” means any business acting within the State of California that sells goods to any individual or entity, including, but not limited to, retailers, suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors.
(2) “Goods” means any consumer products used, bought, or rendered primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(3) “Location” means a store or website.
(4) (A) “Substantially similar” means two goods that exhibit all of the following characteristics:
(i) No substantial differences in the materials used in production.
(ii) The intended use is similar.
(iii) The functional design and features are similar.
(iv) The brand is the same. same or both brands are owned by the same individual or entity.
(B) A difference in coloring among any of the goods shall not be construed as a substantial difference for the purposes of this subdivision.
(b) No person, firm, partnership, company, corporation, or business shall charge a different price for any two goods that are substantially similar if those goods are priced differently based on the gender of the individuals for whom the goods are marketed and intended.
(c) This section does not prohibit price differences in goods or services based specifically upon any of the following:
(1) The amount of time it took to manufacture those goods.
(2) The difficulty in manufacturing those goods.
(3) The cost incurred in manufacturing those goods.
(4) The labor used in manufacturing those goods.
(5) The materials used in manufacturing those goods.
(6) Any other gender-neutral reason for charging a different price for those goods.
(d) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, whenever there is a violation of this section, the Attorney General may seek an injunction, and upon notice to the
defendant of not less than five days, to enjoin and restrain the continuance of those violations.
(2) If a court finds that the defendant has violated this section, an injunction may be issued by the court enjoining or restraining any violation, without requiring proof that any person has, in fact, been injured or damaged thereby. The court may make direct restitution, if applicable. In connection with the proposed application for an injunction, the Attorney General is authorized to take proof and make a determination of the relevant facts and to issue subpoenas in accordance with the civil practice law and rules.
(3) Whenever the court determines that a violation of this section has occurred, the court may impose a civil penalty not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). For the purposes of this section, each instance of charging a different price for two goods that are substantially similar, as specified in subdivision (b), in a single location, shall constitute a single violation.
(e) This section does not limit liability under the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Section 51).
