Bill Text: TX SB333 | 2019-2020 | 86th Legislature | Introduced

---

Bill Title: Relating to the appointment of an attorney ad litem for a child in the conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services.

Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2019-02-07 - Referred to Health & Human Services [SB333 Detail]

Download: Texas-2019-SB333-Introduced.html

---

86R2991 MM-D
By: West S.B. No. 333

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to the appointment of an attorney ad litem for a child in
the conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective
Services.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 107.016, Family Code, is amended to read
as follows:
Sec. 107.016. CONTINUED REPRESENTATION; DURATION OF
APPOINTMENT. In a suit filed by a governmental entity in which
termination of the parent-child relationship or appointment of the
entity as conservator of the child is requested:
(1) an order appointing the Department of Family and
Protective Services as the child's managing conservator may provide
for the continuation of the appointment of the guardian ad litem for
the child for any period during the time the child remains in the
conservatorship of the department, as set by the court;
(2) subject to Section 263.4042, an order appointing
the Department of Family and Protective Services as the child's
managing conservator shall [may] provide for the continuation of
the appointment of the attorney ad litem for the child as long as
the child remains in the conservatorship of the department; and
(3) an attorney appointed under this subchapter to
serve as an attorney ad litem for a parent or an alleged father
continues to serve in that capacity until the earliest of:
(A) the date the suit affecting the parent-child
relationship is dismissed;
(B) the date all appeals in relation to any final
order terminating parental rights are exhausted or waived; or
(C) the date the attorney is relieved of the
attorney's duties or replaced by another attorney after a finding
of good cause is rendered by the court on the record.
SECTION 2. Subchapter E, Chapter 263, Family Code, is
amended by adding Section 263.4042 to read as follows:
Sec. 263.4042. CONTINUED APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY AD LITEM
AFTER FINAL ORDER. (a) On the entry of a final order terminating
the parent-child relationship and naming the Department of Family
and Protective Services as the child's managing conservator, the
court may discharge the attorney ad litem appointed for the child if
the court finds that the child:
(1) resides in the home identified in the child's
permanency plan as the child's permanent home;
(2) has an attorney ad litem or guardian ad litem who
does not object to the child's permanency plan; and
(3) has resided in the home described by Subdivision
(1) for at least three months.
(b) If a court renders an order discharging a child's
attorney ad litem under Subsection (a), at each permanency hearing
following the final order held under Section 263.501, the court
shall make the findings required by Section 263.5031.
SECTION 3. Section 263.5031, Family Code, is amended to
read as follows:
Sec. 263.5031. PERMANENCY HEARINGS FOLLOWING FINAL
ORDER. (a) At each permanency hearing after the court renders a
final order, the court shall:
(1) identify all persons and parties present at the
hearing;
(2) review the efforts of the department or other
agency in notifying persons entitled to notice under Section
263.0021; and
(3) review the permanency progress report to
determine:
(A) the safety and well-being of the child and
whether the child's needs, including any medical or special needs,
are being adequately addressed;
(B) whether the department placed the child with
a relative or other designated caregiver and the continuing
necessity and appropriateness of the placement of the child,
including with respect to a child who has been placed outside of
this state, whether the placement continues to be in the best
interest of the child;
(C) if the child is placed in institutional care,
whether efforts have been made to ensure that the child is placed in
the least restrictive environment consistent with the child's best
interest and special needs;
(D) the appropriateness of the primary and
alternative permanency goals for the child, whether the department
has made reasonable efforts to finalize the permanency plan,
including the concurrent permanency goals, in effect for the child,
and whether:
(i) the department has exercised due
diligence in attempting to place the child for adoption if parental
rights to the child have been terminated and the child is eligible
for adoption; or
(ii) another permanent placement,
including appointing a relative as permanent managing conservator
or returning the child to a parent, is appropriate for the child;
(E) for a child whose permanency goal is another
planned permanent living arrangement:
(i) the desired permanency outcome for the
child, by asking the child;
(ii) whether, as of the date of the hearing,
another planned permanent living arrangement is the best permanency
plan for the child and, if so, provide compelling reasons why it
continues to not be in the best interest of the child to:
(a) return home;
(b) be placed for adoption;
(c) be placed with a legal guardian;
or
(d) be placed with a fit and willing
relative;
(iii) whether the department has conducted
an independent living skills assessment under Section
264.121(a-3);
(iv) whether the department has addressed
the goals identified in the child's permanency plan, including the
child's housing plan, and the results of the independent living
skills assessment;
(v) if the youth is 16 years of age or
older, whether there is evidence that the department has provided
the youth with the documents and information listed in Section
264.121(e); and
(vi) if the youth is 18 years of age or
older or has had the disabilities of minority removed, whether
there is evidence that the department has provided the youth with
the documents and information listed in Section 264.121(e-1);
(F) if the child is 14 years of age or older,
whether services that are needed to assist the child in
transitioning from substitute care to independent living are
available in the child's community;
(G) whether the child is receiving appropriate
medical care and has been provided the opportunity, in a
developmentally appropriate manner, to express the child's opinion
on any medical care provided;
(H) for a child receiving psychotropic
medication, whether the child:
(i) has been provided appropriate
nonpharmacological interventions, therapies, or strategies to meet
the child's needs; or
(ii) has been seen by the prescribing
physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice nurse at least
once every 90 days;
(I) whether an education decision-maker for the
child has been identified, the child's education needs and goals
have been identified and addressed, and there are major changes in
the child's school performance or there have been serious
disciplinary events;
(J) for a child for whom the department has been
named managing conservator in a final order that does not include
termination of parental rights, whether to order the department to
provide services to a parent for not more than six months after the
date of the permanency hearing if:
(i) the child has not been placed with a
relative or other individual, including a foster parent, who is
seeking permanent managing conservatorship of the child; and
(ii) the court determines that further
efforts at reunification with a parent are:
(a) in the best interest of the child;
and
(b) likely to result in the child's
safe return to the child's parent; and
(K) whether the department has identified a
family or other caring adult who has made a permanent commitment to
the child.
(b) At each permanency hearing after the court renders a
final order, the court:
(1) for a child who is not represented by an attorney
ad litem shall:
(A) determine whether the child requires
representation by an attorney ad litem under Section 107.016; and
(B) if the court declines to appoint an attorney
ad litem for the child, state the reason for declining to appoint an
attorney ad litem; and
(2) for a child who is represented by an attorney ad
litem:
(A) shall consider the need for continued
appointment of the attorney ad litem for the child; and
(B) may discharge the attorney ad litem appointed
for the child if the court finds that:
(i) the child is eligible for adoption and
living in the home identified in the permanency plan as the child's
permanent home;
(ii) the child's attorney ad litem or
guardian ad litem does not object to the child's permanency plan;
and
(iii) the child has resided in the home
described by Subparagraph (i) for at least three months.
SECTION 4. The changes in law made by this Act apply to a
suit affecting the parent-child relationship filed before, on, or
after the effective date of this Act.
SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2019.