Bill Text: TX SB262 | 2013-2014 | 83rd Legislature | Engrossed
Bill Title: Relating to the reporting of criminal disposition completeness percentage data.
Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Republican 1)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2013-04-16 - Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence [SB262 Detail]
Download: Texas-2013-SB262-Engrossed.html
| By: Huffman | S.B. No. 262 | |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| relating to the reporting of criminal disposition completeness | ||
| percentage data. | ||
| BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
| SECTION 1. Article 60.10, Code of Criminal Procedure, is | ||
| amended by amending Subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) and adding | ||
| Subsection (e-1) to read as follows: | ||
| (b) This article applies only to a county that has an | ||
| average disposition completeness percentage, including | ||
| individualized determinations for both juvenile and adult | ||
| dispositions, of less than 90 percent, as reflected in the most | ||
| recent [ |
||
| [ |
||
| (c) The commissioners court of a county described by | ||
| Subsection (b) shall establish a local data advisory board as | ||
| described by Article 60.09 not later than the 120th day after the | ||
| date this article becomes applicable to the county based on the | ||
| report under Article 60.21(b)(2) [ |
||
| A local data advisory board established under this article may | ||
| include any person described by Article 60.09(b) and must include: | ||
| (1) the sheriff of the county, or the sheriff's | ||
| designee; | ||
| (2) an attorney who represents the state in the | ||
| district courts of the county; | ||
| (3) an attorney who represents the state in the county | ||
| courts of the county; | ||
| (4) the clerk for the district courts of the county, or | ||
| the clerk's designee; | ||
| (5) the clerk for the county courts of the county, or | ||
| the clerk's designee; | ||
| (6) the police chief of the municipality with the | ||
| greatest population located in the county, or the chief's designee; | ||
| (7) a representative of the county's automated data | ||
| processing services, if the county performs those services; and | ||
| (8) a representative of an entity with whom the county | ||
| contracts for automated data processing services, if the county | ||
| contracts for those services. | ||
| (d) In addition to the duties described by Article 60.09(a), | ||
| a local data advisory board for a county that is subject to the | ||
| requirements of [ |
||
| data reporting improvement plan. The data reporting improvement | ||
| plan must: | ||
| (1) describe the manner in which the county intends to | ||
| improve the county's disposition completeness percentage; | ||
| (2) ensure that the county takes the steps necessary | ||
| for the county's average disposition completeness percentage to be | ||
| equal to or greater than 90 percent not later than the first | ||
| anniversary of the date this article becomes applicable to that | ||
| county based on the [ |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| (3) include a comprehensive strategy by which the | ||
| county will permanently maintain the county's disposition | ||
| completeness percentage at or above 90 percent. | ||
| (e) Not later than June 1 of each year[ |
||
| advisory board for a county that is subject to the requirements of | ||
| [ |
||
| Public Safety the data reporting improvement plan prepared for the | ||
| county. On receipt of a data reporting improvement plan under this | ||
| article, the department shall post the plan on the Internet website | ||
| maintained by the department. | ||
| (e-1) A county is released from its duties under this | ||
| article on the date the Department of Public Safety submits a report | ||
| under Article 60.21(b)(2) stating that the county has attained an | ||
| average disposition completeness percentage that is equal to or | ||
| greater than 90 percent. However, the county again becomes subject | ||
| to the requirements of this article if its average disposition | ||
| completeness percentage declines to a level that is less than 90 | ||
| percent as reflected in the department's report. | ||
| SECTION 2. Subsection (b), Article 60.21, Code of Criminal | ||
| Procedure, is amended to read as follows: | ||
| (b) The Department of Public Safety shall: | ||
| (1) monitor the submission of arrest and disposition | ||
| information by local jurisdictions; | ||
| (2) annually submit to the Legislative Budget Board, | ||
| the governor, the lieutenant governor, the speaker of the house of | ||
| representatives, the state auditor, and the standing committees in | ||
| the senate and house of representatives that have primary | ||
| jurisdiction over criminal justice and the Department of Public | ||
| Safety a report regarding the level of reporting by local | ||
| jurisdictions; | ||
| (3) identify local jurisdictions that do not report | ||
| arrest or disposition information or that partially report | ||
| information; and | ||
| (4) for use in determining the status of outstanding | ||
| dispositions, publish monthly on the Department of Public Safety's | ||
| Internet website or on another electronic publication a report | ||
| listing each arrest by local jurisdiction for which there is no | ||
| corresponding final court disposition. | ||
| SECTION 3. Subsection (g), Article 60.10, Code of Criminal | ||
| Procedure, is repealed. | ||
| SECTION 4. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives | ||
| a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as | ||
| provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this | ||
| Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this | ||
| Act takes effect September 1, 2013. | ||
