Bill Text: TX HB899 | 2015-2016 | 84th Legislature | Introduced

---

Bill Title: Relating to the application of foreign laws and foreign forum selection in certain family law proceedings.

Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Republican 1)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2015-04-14 - No action taken in committee [HB899 Detail]

Download: Texas-2015-HB899-Introduced.html

---

84R1332 KSD-F
By: Fallon H.B. No. 899

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to the application of foreign laws and foreign forum
selection in certain family law proceedings.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Subtitle A, Title 1, Family Code, is amended by
adding Chapter 1A to read as follows:
CHAPTER 1A. APPLICATION OF FOREIGN LAW
Sec. 1A.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Arbitrator" means an arbitrator or arbitration
panel.
(2) "Foreign law" means a substantive or procedural
law, rule, or legal code of a jurisdiction outside of the states and
territories of the United States. The term does not include a law
of a Native American tribe of a state or territory of the United
States.
(3) "Foreign tribunal" means any tribunal outside the
states and territories of the United States. The term does not
include a tribunal of a Native American tribe of a state or
territory of the United States.
(4) "Tribunal" means any court or administrative
adjudicator.
Sec. 1A.002. DECISION BASED ON FOREIGN LAW. A tribunal of
this state may not apply foreign law to adjudicate a suit for
dissolution of a marriage if the application of that law would not
guarantee the same fundamental rights guaranteed by the United
States Constitution.
Sec. 1A.003. CHOICE OF LAW IN CONTRACT. A contract
provision requiring the application of foreign law to adjudicate a
suit for dissolution of a marriage is void to the extent that the
application of foreign law would not guarantee the same fundamental
rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
Sec. 1A.004. ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT BASED ON FOREIGN LAW.
A tribunal of this state may not enforce or grant comity to a
finding, ruling, order, or judgment in a suit for dissolution of a
marriage issued by an arbitrator or foreign tribunal based on
foreign law if the foreign law, as applied, would not guarantee the
same fundamental rights guaranteed by the United States
Constitution.
Sec. 1A.005. CHOICE OF FORUM IN CONTRACT. Any contract
provision requiring that a foreign tribunal or arbitrator
adjudicate a suit for dissolution of a marriage is void if the
foreign law that would be applied to the dispute by that tribunal or
arbitrator would, as applied, not guarantee the same fundamental
rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
Sec. 1A.006. FORUM NON CONVENIENS. A tribunal of this state
that has jurisdiction to adjudicate a suit for dissolution of a
marriage may not decline jurisdiction because a foreign tribunal is
a more convenient forum if the foreign tribunal would apply foreign
law that would not guarantee the same fundamental rights guaranteed
by the United States Constitution.
Sec. 1A.007. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER. (a) This chapter does
not apply to:
(1) a corporation or other legal entity that contracts
to subject the entity to foreign law before a foreign tribunal or
arbitrator;
(2) any transaction that is primarily for business,
commercial, investment, agricultural, or similar purposes; or
(3) any transaction, issue, agreement, or provision of
an agreement governed by Chapter 271, Business & Commerce Code.
(b) This chapter is inapplicable to the extent a statute or
treaty of the United States requires the application of foreign law
or the enforcement of a judgment rendered by a foreign tribunal.
SECTION 2. Subtitle A, Title 5, Family Code, is amended by
adding Chapter 112 to read as follows:
CHAPTER 112. APPLICATION OF FOREIGN LAW
Sec. 112.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Arbitrator" means an arbitrator or arbitration
panel.
(2) "Foreign law" means a law, rule, or legal code of a
jurisdiction outside of the states and territories of the United
States. The term does not include a law of a Native American tribe
of a state or territory of the United States.
(3) "Foreign tribunal" means any tribunal outside the
states and territories of the United States. The term does not
include a tribunal of a Native American tribe of a state or
territory of the United States.
(4) "Tribunal" means any court or administrative
adjudicator.
Sec. 112.002. DECISION BASED ON FOREIGN LAW. A tribunal of
this state may not apply foreign law to adjudicate a suit affecting
the parent-child relationship if the application of that law would
not guarantee the same fundamental rights guaranteed by the United
States Constitution.
Sec. 112.003. CHOICE OF LAW IN CONTRACT. A contract
provision requiring the application of foreign law to adjudicate a
suit affecting the parent-child relationship is void to the extent
that the application of foreign law would not guarantee the same
fundamental rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
Sec. 112.004. ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT BASED ON FOREIGN LAW.
A tribunal of this state may not enforce or grant comity to a
finding, ruling, order, or judgment in a suit affecting the
parent-child relationship issued by an arbitrator or foreign
tribunal based on foreign law if the foreign law, as applied, would
not guarantee the same fundamental rights guaranteed by the United
States Constitution.
Sec. 112.005. CHOICE OF FORUM IN CONTRACT. Any contract
provision requiring that a foreign tribunal or arbitrator
adjudicate a suit affecting the parent-child relationship is void
if the foreign law that would be applied to the dispute by that
tribunal or arbitrator would, as applied, not guarantee the same
fundamental rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
Sec. 112.006. FORUM NON CONVENIENS. A tribunal of this
state that has jurisdiction to adjudicate a suit affecting the
parent-child relationship may not decline jurisdiction because a
foreign tribunal is a more convenient forum if the foreign tribunal
would apply foreign law that would not guarantee the same
fundamental rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
Sec. 112.007. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER. (a) This chapter
does not apply to:
(1) a corporation or other legal entity that contracts
to subject the entity to foreign law before a foreign tribunal or
arbitrator;
(2) any transaction that is primarily for business,
commercial, investment, agricultural, or similar purposes; or
(3) any transaction, issue, agreement, or provision of
an agreement governed by Chapter 271, Business & Commerce Code.
(b) This chapter is inapplicable to the extent a statute or
treaty of the United States requires the application of foreign law
or the enforcement of a judgment rendered by a foreign tribunal.
SECTION 3. Chapter 271, Business & Commerce Code, is
amended by adding Section 271.012 to read as follows:
Sec. 271.012. APPLICATION OF CERTAIN FAMILY LAW PROVISIONS.
Chapters 1A and 112, Family Code, do not apply to this chapter.
SECTION 4. Chapters 1A and 112, Family Code, as added by
this Act, apply to a suit for dissolution of a marriage or a suit
affecting the parent-child relationship pending in a trial court on
or filed on or after the effective date of this Act.
SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2015.