Bill Text: TX HB2341 | 2017-2018 | 85th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Relating to the control of access to state highways by the Texas Department of Transportation.
Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2017-03-20 - Referred to Transportation [HB2341 Detail]
Download: Texas-2017-HB2341-Introduced.html
| 85R9070 JRR-D | ||
| By: Martinez | H.B. No. 2341 | |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| relating to the control of access to state highways by the Texas | ||
| Department of Transportation. | ||
| BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
| SECTION 1. Section 203.031(a-1), Transportation Code, is | ||
| amended to read as follows: | ||
| (a-1) In the exercise of its authority to manage access to | ||
| or from a controlled access highway under Subsection (a)(2) or (4), | ||
| the commission by rule shall: | ||
| (1) require that a decision by a department district | ||
| office denying a request for access to a specific location on a | ||
| controlled access highway be in writing and include the reasons for | ||
| the denial; | ||
| (2) provide procedures for appealing a denial under | ||
| Subdivision (1), including procedures that: | ||
| (A) allow the applicant to appeal the denial to | ||
| the department's design division before the 31st day after the date | ||
| written notice of the denial is given to the applicant; | ||
| (B) provide that if an appeal under Paragraph (A) | ||
| is not decided before the 31st [ |
||
| was filed, the access applied for must be granted; and | ||
| (C) allow the applicant to appeal the decision of | ||
| the design division to the director and, if the decision is | ||
| affirmed, to a board of variance appointed by the director and | ||
| composed of at least three persons who may not be below the level of | ||
| department division director, office director, or district | ||
| engineer and who were not involved in the original decision to deny | ||
| access; | ||
| (3) provide that properly platted access points to or | ||
| from a controlled access highway that are located on undeveloped | ||
| property are subject to the access management standards in effect | ||
| at the time the points were platted regardless of when the initial | ||
| request for access was submitted to the department, but only if: | ||
| (A) development of the property begins and the | ||
| request for access at the platted locations is submitted to the | ||
| department before the fifth anniversary of the date the plat was | ||
| recorded; and | ||
| (B) the design of the highway facility in the | ||
| vicinity of the platted access points did not materially change | ||
| after the date the plat was recorded so as to significantly impact | ||
| traffic patterns to the extent that the platted access points | ||
| present a threat to public safety; | ||
| (4) require that: | ||
| (A) owners of land adjacent to a proposed highway | ||
| construction project be provided written notice of the project at | ||
| least 60 days before the date construction begins if the project | ||
| will permanently alter permitted access to or from a controlled | ||
| access highway at the owners' existing locations; and | ||
| (B) the access described by Paragraph (A) be | ||
| reinstated to the most practicable extent possible after due | ||
| consideration of the impact on highway safety, mobility, and | ||
| efficient operation of any changed traffic patterns resulting from | ||
| the construction; | ||
| (5) adopt criteria for determining when a variance to | ||
| access management standards may be granted, including criteria | ||
| that, in addition to highway safety, mobility, and efficient | ||
| operation concerns, takes into consideration any of the following | ||
| consequences resulting from denial of the owner's request for | ||
| access to a specific location on a controlled access highway that | ||
| may impact a property owner: | ||
| (A) denial of reasonable access to the property; | ||
| and | ||
| (B) undue hardship on a business located on the | ||
| property; [ |
||
| (6) clarify that the remodeling or demolition and | ||
| rebuilding of a business does not cause new access management | ||
| standards to apply unless the department makes an affirmative | ||
| finding in writing that the remodeled or rebuilt business will | ||
| significantly impact traffic patterns to the extent that the | ||
| current access location presents a threat to public safety; | ||
| (7) ensure that the application of access management | ||
| standards does not result in inconsistent access to or from a | ||
| controlled access highway for properties used for the same or | ||
| similar purposes; and | ||
| (8) adopt access management standards that: | ||
| (A) ensure sufficient access to or from a | ||
| controlled access highway for properties that are two acres or | ||
| less; and | ||
| (B) require direct access to a controlled access | ||
| highway for properties that are adjacent to the highway and have at | ||
| least two hundred feet of frontage on the highway. | ||
| SECTION 2. Not later than January 1, 2018, the Texas | ||
| Transportation Commission shall adopt the rules required by Section | ||
| 203.031, Transportation Code, as amended by this Act. | ||
| SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives | ||
| a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as | ||
| provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this | ||
| Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this | ||
| Act takes effect September 1, 2017. | ||
