Bill Text: TX HB1325 | 2013-2014 | 83rd Legislature | Enrolled
Bill Title: Relating to the dismissal of certain actions arising from exposure to asbestos and silica.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 4-0)
Status: (Passed) 2013-05-24 - Effective on 9/1/13 [HB1325 Detail]
Download: Texas-2013-HB1325-Enrolled.html
H.B. No. 1325 |
|
||
relating to the dismissal of certain actions arising from exposure | ||
to asbestos and silica. | ||
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
SECTION 1. The heading to Section 90.007, Civil Practice | ||
and Remedies Code, is amended to read as follows: | ||
Sec. 90.007. MOTION TO DISMISS IN ACTION FILED ON OR AFTER | ||
SEPTEMBER 1, 2005. | ||
SECTION 2. Section 90.007(a), Civil Practice and Remedies | ||
Code, is amended to read as follows: | ||
(a) In an action filed on or after September 1, 2005 [ |
||
|
||
a report on a defendant, or serves on the defendant a report that | ||
does not comply with the requirements of Section 90.003 or 90.004, | ||
the defendant may file a motion to dismiss the claimant's | ||
asbestos-related claims or silica-related claims. The motion must | ||
be filed on or before the 30th day after the date the report is | ||
served on the defendant. If a claimant fails to serve a report on | ||
the defendant, the motion must be filed on or before the 30th day | ||
after the date the report was required to be served on the defendant | ||
under Section 90.006. If the basis of the motion is that the | ||
claimant has served on the defendant a report that does not comply | ||
with Section 90.003 or 90.004, the motion must include the reasons | ||
why the report does not comply with that section. | ||
SECTION 3. Section 90.010, Civil Practice and Remedies | ||
Code, is amended by amending Subsection (d) and adding Subsections | ||
(d-1), (l), (m), (n), and (o) to read as follows: | ||
(d) In an action that was pending on August 31, 2005, [ |
||
|
||
remains [ |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
remand such action for trial unless: | ||
(1) the claimant serves a report complying with | ||
Section 90.003 or 90.004; or | ||
(2)(A) the claimant does not serve a report that | ||
complies with Section 90.003 or 90.004; | ||
(B) the claimant serves a report complying with | ||
Subsection (f)(1); and | ||
(C) the court, on motion and hearing, makes the | ||
findings required by Subsection (f)(2). | ||
(d-1) Beginning on September 1, 2014, the MDL pretrial court | ||
shall dismiss each action for an asbestos-related injury or a | ||
silica-related injury that was pending on August 31, 2005, unless a | ||
report was served on or after September 1, 2013, that complies with | ||
Section 90.003, Section 90.004, or Subsection (f). The MDL | ||
pretrial court shall provide for the dismissal of such actions in a | ||
case management order entered for that purpose. All such actions | ||
shall be dismissed on or before August 31, 2015. | ||
(l) A dismissal under Subsection (d-1) is without prejudice | ||
to the claimant's right to file a subsequent action seeking damages | ||
arising from an asbestos-related injury or a silica-related injury. | ||
(m) This chapter and Section 16.0031 apply to a subsequent | ||
action for an asbestos-related injury or a silica-related injury | ||
filed by a claimant whose action was dismissed under Subsection | ||
(d-1) or by a claimant in an action described by Subsection (d) who | ||
voluntarily dismissed the action under Section 90.008. | ||
(n) If a claimant subsequently refiles an action for an | ||
asbestos-related injury or a silica-related injury that was | ||
dismissed under Subsection (d-1), the refiled action is treated for | ||
purposes of determining the applicable law as if that claimant's | ||
action had never been dismissed but, instead, had remained pending | ||
until the claimant served a report that complied with Section | ||
90.003, Section 90.004, or Subsection (f). | ||
(o) A claimant whose action was dismissed under Subsection | ||
(d-1) may serve the petition and citation for any subsequently | ||
filed action for an asbestos-related or silica-related injury by | ||
certified mail, return receipt requested, or other method approved | ||
by the MDL pretrial court that is likely to accomplish service in a | ||
cost-effective manner, on a person who was a defendant in the | ||
dismissed action. | ||
SECTION 4. (a) Section 90.010, Civil Practice and Remedies | ||
Code, as amended by this Act, applies to an action pending in the | ||
multidistrict litigation pretrial court on, or referred to the | ||
multidistrict litigation pretrial court on or after, the effective | ||
date of this Act. | ||
(b) Nothing in this Act is intended to be regarded as a | ||
decision on the merits of a dismissed action, to affect the rights | ||
of any party in a bankruptcy proceeding, or to affect the ability of | ||
any person to satisfy the claim criteria for compensable claims or | ||
demands under a trust established pursuant to a plan of | ||
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy | ||
Code (11 U.S.C. Section 1101 et seq.). With respect to the | ||
administrative dismissal of an action under Section 90.010(d-1), | ||
Civil Practice and Remedies Code, as added by this Act, the tort | ||
system rights of the dismissed actions are specifically preserved. | ||
SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2013. | ||
______________________________ | ______________________________ | |
President of the Senate | Speaker of the House | |
I certify that H.B. No. 1325 was passed by the House on April | ||
22, 2013, by the following vote: Yeas 145, Nays 0, 1 present, not | ||
voting. | ||
______________________________ | ||
Chief Clerk of the House | ||
I certify that H.B. No. 1325 was passed by the Senate on May | ||
8, 2013, by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 0. | ||
______________________________ | ||
Secretary of the Senate | ||
APPROVED: _____________________ | ||
Date | ||
_____________________ | ||
Governor |