| |
|
| |
| THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| |
| HOUSE RESOLUTION |
|
| |
| |
| INTRODUCED BY KILLION, O'NEILL, ADOLPH, CALTAGIRONE, CAUSER, CLYMER, CUTLER, EVERETT, FAIRCHILD, FARRY, GABLER, GINGRICH, GRELL, GROVE, HARPER, HENNESSEY, HESS, MARSHALL, McILVAINE SMITH, METZGAR, MICOZZIE, MILLARD, MILLER, MILNE, MURPHY, MURT, QUINN, READSHAW, REICHLEY, ROSS, SAYLOR, SCAVELLO, SIPTROTH, TALLMAN, TURZAI, VULAKOVICH AND WATSON, APRIL 14, 2010 |
| |
| |
| REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, APRIL 14, 2010 |
| |
| |
| |
| A RESOLUTION |
| |
1 | Directing the Joint State Government Commission to conduct a |
2 | study of efficiency in public school funding and urging the |
3 | State Board of Education to provide documents and assistance |
4 | to the Joint State Government Commission in its conduct of |
5 | this study. |
6 | WHEREAS, Pursuant to section 2599.3 of the act of March 10, |
7 | 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), known as the Public School Code of 1949, |
8 | the State Board of Education is directed to conduct a |
9 | comprehensive Statewide costing-out study for public education |
10 | funding, which duty was added to the Public School Code of 1949 |
11 | by the act of July 11, 2006 (P.L.1092, No.114); and |
12 | WHEREAS, The State Board of Education was conferred the |
13 | discretion in section 2599.3 of the Public School Code of 1949 |
14 | to hire a consultant to perform the study; and |
15 | WHEREAS, The State Board of Education contracted with |
16 | Augenblick, Palaich and Associates, Inc., (APA) of Denver, |
17 | Colorado, to conduct the study; and |
|
1 | WHEREAS, The legislative intent for the study was to examine |
2 | issues of adequacy and equity in public school funding and to |
3 | determine the basic cost per pupil to provide an education that |
4 | will permit a student to meet the Commonwealth's academic |
5 | standards and assessments; and |
6 | WHEREAS, Section 2599.3 of the Public School Code of 1949 |
7 | specifically requires the study to examine "exemplary school |
8 | districts that are high-performing and low-spending school |
9 | districts," but section 2599.3 does not explicitly mandate other |
10 | methodologies to be applied in the study; and |
11 | WHEREAS, The study conducted by APA subsequently used three |
12 | methodologies: a "Successful Schools" approach that was |
13 | consistent with the explicit requirements of section 2599.3 of |
14 | the Public School Code of 1949, but also two additional |
15 | methodologies referred to as "Professional Judgment" panels and |
16 | "Evidence-Based" research that were not required under law; and |
17 | WHEREAS, The final report issued to the Commonwealth by APA |
18 | used a combination of all three of these methodologies to |
19 | recommend specific dollar amounts for the basic cost per pupil, |
20 | plus additional weights and other modifications that increase |
21 | the basic cost per pupil; and |
22 | WHEREAS, The final report does not provide any indication as |
23 | to how the three methodologies were combined or compared against |
24 | one another, nor does it provide any other information detailing |
25 | how the specific recommended numbers in its findings were |
26 | actually calculated in the study; and |
27 | WHEREAS, Both the State Board of Education and APA testified |
28 | to the Education Committee of the Senate on December 8, 2009, |
29 | that the specific methodology applied to derive the final |
30 | funding recommendation cannot be disclosed to the General |
|
1 | Assembly because APA believes the methodology is proprietary |
2 | information; and |
3 | WHEREAS, The results of the study call for an additional |
4 | target of $4.61 billion annually of taxpayer funds for public |
5 | school funding, or a 26.8% increase, but APA testified that it |
6 | cannot provide the quantitative numbers used to justify this |
7 | target; and |
8 | WHEREAS, The "Successful Schools" approach used by APA in the |
9 | study was the only methodology that was explicitly authorized in |
10 | section 2599.3 of the Public School Code of 1949 because it |
11 | focused on high-performing and low-spending school districts; |
12 | and |
13 | WHEREAS, The Commonwealth should focus its attention toward |
14 | the most efficient use of the dollars already available for |
15 | public schools; and |
16 | WHEREAS, The Commonwealth should build upon the work already |
17 | conducted in the original costing-out study by examining the |
18 | schools identified in the report under the "Successful Schools" |
19 | methodology to learn their best practices and other factors that |
20 | have resulted in their identification as a high-performing, low- |
21 | spending school district; therefore be it |
22 | RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives direct the Joint |
23 | State Government Commission to conduct a study of the 82 school |
24 | districts found to be successful schools in the APA costing-out |
25 | study and to issue a report to the chairman of the Education |
26 | Committee of their best practices and other factors that are |
27 | believed to help contribute to this recognized efficiency and |
28 | success; and be it further |
29 | RESOLVED, That the State Board of Education be urged to |
30 | cooperate fully with the Joint State Government Commission in |
|
1 | providing documentation from the original costing-out study and |
2 | other assistance as the Joint State Government Commission |
3 | requests; and be it further |
4 | RESOLVED, That the report from the Joint State Government |
5 | Commission be submitted to the chairman of the Education |
6 | Committee no later than November 1, 2010; and be it further |
7 | RESOLVED, That the final report serve as the basis for future |
8 | deliberations by the House of Representatives on the |
9 | Commonwealth's basic education funding levels and components. |
|