Bill Text: MN SF2201 | 2011-2012 | 87th Legislature | Engrossed


Bill Title: Education site achievement contracts focused on individualized learning goals terms provisions clarification and modifications

Sponsorship: Bipartisan Bill

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2012-04-03 - Second reading [SF2201 Detail]

Download: Minnesota-2011-SF2201-Engrossed.html

1.1A bill for an act
1.2relating to education; clarifying terms for an education site achievement contract
1.3focused on individualized learning goals for each student; directing districts with
1.4successful contracts to enter into similar achievement contracts with other school
1.5sites;amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 123B.04.
1.6BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

1.7    Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 123B.04, is amended to read:
1.8123B.04 SITE DECISION-MAKING; INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING
1.9AGREEMENT; OTHER AGREEMENTS.
1.10    Subdivision 1. Definition. "Education site" means a separate facility. A program
1.11within a facility or within a district is an education site if the school board recognizes it
1.12as a site.
1.13    Subd. 1a. Individualized learning and instruction; improved student
1.14achievement. To promote individualized learning and instruction and improve student
1.15achievement under subdivisions 4 and 4a, a participating school board under this section
1.16must consider how to:
1.17(1) assist a school site to adapt instruction to the needs and aptitudes of individual
1.18students, and establish goals and standards for individual students in addition to the state
1.19academic standards applicable to all students;
1.20(2) coordinate the pace of instruction and learning with the needs and aptitudes of
1.21individual students at a school site;
1.22(3) provide useful data and assist with research in developing and improving
1.23innovative, cost-effective, research-based individualized learning, instruction, and
1.24assessment under this section and section 124D.10;
2.1(4) demonstrate and help evaluate instructional alternatives to age-based grade
2.2progression;
2.3(5) more effectively motivate students and teachers; and
2.4(6) expand use of learning technology to support individualized learning, instruction,
2.5assessment, and achievement.
2.6    Subd. 2. Agreement. (a) The school board and a school site may enter into an
2.7agreement under this section solely to develop and implement an individualized learning
2.8and achievement contract under subdivision 4.
2.9(b) Upon the request of 60 percent of the licensed employees of a site or a school
2.10site decision-making team, the school board shall enter into discussions to reach an
2.11agreement concerning the governance, management, or control of the school. A school
2.12site decision-making team may include the school principal, teachers in the school or
2.13their designee, other employees in the school, representatives of pupils in the school, or
2.14other members in the community. A school site decision-making team must include at
2.15least one parent of a pupil in the school. For purposes of formation of a new site, a school
2.16site decision-making team may be a team of teachers that is recognized by the board as
2.17a site. The school site decision-making team shall include the school principal or other
2.18person having general control and supervision of the school. The site decision-making
2.19team must reflect the diversity of the education site. At least one-half of the members
2.20shall be employees of the district, unless an employee is the parent of a student enrolled
2.21in the school site, in which case the employee may elect to serve as a parent member of
2.22the site team.
2.23(b) (c) School site decision-making agreements must delegate powers, duties, and
2.24broad management responsibilities to site teams and involve staff members, students as
2.25appropriate, and parents in decision making.
2.26(c) (d) An agreement shall include a statement of powers, duties, responsibilities,
2.27and authority to be delegated to and within the site.
2.28(d) (e) An agreement may include:
2.29(1) an achievement contract according to subdivision 4;
2.30(2) a mechanism to allow principals, a site leadership team, or other persons having
2.31general control and supervision of the school, to make decisions regarding how financial
2.32and personnel resources are best allocated at the site and from whom goods or services
2.33are purchased;
2.34(3) a mechanism to implement parental involvement programs under section
2.35124D.895 and to provide for effective parental communication and feedback on this
2.36involvement at the site level;
3.1(4) a provision that would allow the team to determine who is hired into licensed
3.2and nonlicensed positions;
3.3(5) a provision that would allow teachers to choose the principal or other person
3.4having general control;
3.5(6) an amount of revenue allocated to the site under subdivision 3; and
3.6(7) any other powers and duties determined appropriate by the board.
3.7The school board of the district remains the legal employer under clauses (4) and (5).
3.8(e) (f) Any powers or duties not delegated to the school site management team in the
3.9school site management agreement shall remain with the school board.
3.10(f) (g) Approved agreements shall be filed with the commissioner. If a school board
3.11denies a request or the school site and school board fail to reach an agreement to enter
3.12into a school site management agreement, the school board shall provide a copy of the
3.13request and the reasons for its denial to the commissioner.
3.14(g) (h) A site decision-making grant program is established, consistent with this
3.15subdivision, to allow sites to implement an agreement that at least:
3.16(1) notwithstanding subdivision 3, allocates to the site all revenue that is attributable
3.17to the students at that site;
3.18(2) includes a provision, consistent with current law and the collective bargaining
3.19agreement in effect, that allows the site team to decide who is selected from within the
3.20district for licensed and nonlicensed positions at the site and to make staff assignments
3.21in the site; and
3.22(3) includes a completed performance agreement under subdivision 4.
3.23The commissioner shall establish the form and manner of the application for a grant
3.24and annually, at the end of each fiscal year, report to the house of representatives and
3.25senate committees having jurisdiction over education on the progress of the program.
3.26    Subd. 3. Revenue and cost allocation. Revenue for a fiscal year received or
3.27receivable by the district shall be allocated to education sites based on the agreement
3.28between the school board and the site decision-making team. Revenue shall remain
3.29allocated to each site until used by the site. The site teams and the board may enter an
3.30agreement that permits the district to provide services and retain the revenue required to
3.31pay for the services provided. The district remains responsible for legally entering into
3.32contracts and expending funds. For the purposes of this subdivision, "allocation" means
3.33that the determination of the use of the revenue shall be under the control of the site. The
3.34district may charge the accounts of each site the actual costs of goods and services from
3.35the general or capital funds attributable to the site.
4.1    Subd. 4. Achievement contract. A school board may enter a written education
4.2site achievement contract with each site decision-making team for the purpose of: (1)
4.3setting individualized learning performance expectations and achievement measures and
4.4short- and long-term educational goals for each student at that site, including the goals
4.5for improvement in each area of; (2) recognizing each student's educational needs and
4.6aptitudes and levels of academic attainment, whether on grade level or above or below
4.7grade level, so as to improve student performance through such means as a cost-effective,
4.8research-based formative assessment system designed to promote individualized learning
4.9and assessment; (3) using student performance data to diagnose a student's academic
4.10strengths and weaknesses and indicate to the student's teachers the specific skills and
4.11concepts that need to be introduced to the student and developed through academic
4.12instruction or applied learning, organized by strands within subject areas and linked to
4.13state and local academic standards during the next year, a plan to assist consistent with
4.14the student's short- and long-term educational goals; and (4) assisting the education site
4.15if their progress in achieving student or contract goals are not achieved, and or other
4.16performance expectations and or measures determined agreed to by the board and the site
4.17decision-making team are not realized or implemented.
4.18    Subd. 4a. Additional site agreements premised on successful achievement
4.19contracts. A school board that enters into a written education achievement contract
4.20with a school site under subdivision 4 where the student performance data at the site
4.21demonstrate at least three consecutive school years of improved student achievement
4.22consistent with the terms of the achievement contract must seek to establish a similar
4.23achievement contract with other school sites in the district.
4.24    Subd. 5. Commissioner's role. The commissioner of education, in consultation
4.25with appropriate educational organizations, shall:
4.26(1) upon request, provide technical support for districts and sites with agreements
4.27under this section;
4.28(2) conduct and compile research on the effectiveness of site decision making; and
4.29(3) periodically report on and evaluate the effectiveness of site management
4.30agreements on a statewide basis.
4.31EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.
feedback