Bill Text: MN HF369 | 2011-2012 | 87th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Capital investment return determination information required.
Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Republican 3)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2011-02-07 - Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment [HF369 Detail]
Download: Minnesota-2011-HF369-Introduced.html
1.2relating to capital investment; requiring information to determine return on
1.3investment for capital requests.
1.4BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.5 Section 1. RETURN ON INVESTMENT ANALYSIS.
1.6The commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget and the state economist,
1.7with the approval of the governor, in conjunction with the committees of the legislature
1.8responsible for capital investment, shall develop before January 1, 2012, a return on
1.9investment analysis format to be required of all requests for appropriations from the state
1.10bond fund after January 1, 2012. The return on investment analysis format shall require at
1.11least the following elements for each request:
1.12(1) a comprehensive description of the statewide value of the project, including: (i)
1.13both subjective and objective benefits, (ii) measurable outcomes over a ten-year period, and
1.14(iii) the process by which the planned and actual benefits and measurable outcomes will be
1.15reported annually to the state and the public for ten years following the appropriation;
1.16(2) a ten-year total cost of ownership for all costs related to acquisition, construction,
1.17maintenance, and ongoing operations of a project including all related costs for staffing,
1.18administration, promotion, support services, and outside funding sources;
1.19(3) a ten-year total revenue projection including detailed models of usage, per-unit
1.20revenues, and unit volumes by year, including a low, expected, and high projection of
1.21revenue;
1.22(4) the projected ten-year total net financial surplus or loss for the project;
1.23(5) an optional schedule for payback of the bonding cost to the state; and
2.1(6) the net jobs impact to the state including: (i) a ten-year schedule of jobs created
2.2by the project and (ii) a ten-year schedule showing the opportunity cost of jobs not
2.3otherwise created in the broader economy due to the capital consumed by the bonding
2.4amount not being available in other areas of the economy.
2.5EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.
1.3investment for capital requests.
1.4BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.5 Section 1. RETURN ON INVESTMENT ANALYSIS.
1.6The commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget and the state economist,
1.7with the approval of the governor, in conjunction with the committees of the legislature
1.8responsible for capital investment, shall develop before January 1, 2012, a return on
1.9investment analysis format to be required of all requests for appropriations from the state
1.10bond fund after January 1, 2012. The return on investment analysis format shall require at
1.11least the following elements for each request:
1.12(1) a comprehensive description of the statewide value of the project, including: (i)
1.13both subjective and objective benefits, (ii) measurable outcomes over a ten-year period, and
1.14(iii) the process by which the planned and actual benefits and measurable outcomes will be
1.15reported annually to the state and the public for ten years following the appropriation;
1.16(2) a ten-year total cost of ownership for all costs related to acquisition, construction,
1.17maintenance, and ongoing operations of a project including all related costs for staffing,
1.18administration, promotion, support services, and outside funding sources;
1.19(3) a ten-year total revenue projection including detailed models of usage, per-unit
1.20revenues, and unit volumes by year, including a low, expected, and high projection of
1.21revenue;
1.22(4) the projected ten-year total net financial surplus or loss for the project;
1.23(5) an optional schedule for payback of the bonding cost to the state; and
2.1(6) the net jobs impact to the state including: (i) a ten-year schedule of jobs created
2.2by the project and (ii) a ten-year schedule showing the opportunity cost of jobs not
2.3otherwise created in the broader economy due to the capital consumed by the bonding
2.4amount not being available in other areas of the economy.
2.5EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.
