Bill Text: MI SCR0050 | 2009-2010 | 95th Legislature | Introduced


Bill Title: A concurrent resolution to memorialize Congress to adopt and present to the states for ratification an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to establish fundamental parental rights.

Spectrum: Moderate Partisan Bill (Republican 12-3)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2010-07-21 - Referred To Committee On Education [SCR0050 Detail]

Download: Michigan-2009-SCR0050-Introduced.html

            Senators Hardiman, Hunter, Kuipers, Barcia, McManus, Cropsey, Jansen, Garcia, Van Woerkom, Gleason, Stamas, Gilbert, Sanborn and Nofs offered the following concurrent resolution:

            Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 50.

            A concurrent resolution to memorialize Congress to adopt and present to the states for ratification an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to establish fundamental parental rights.

            Whereas, The rights of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children is a fundamental right that must be protected by the Constitution of the United States and the Michigan Constitution; and

            Whereas, Our nation has historically relied first and foremost on parents to meet the real and constant needs of children; and

            Whereas, The interests of children are best served when parents are free to make childrearing decisions about education, religion, and other areas of a child's life without state interference; and

            Whereas, The United States Supreme Court in Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) has held that "This primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition"; and

            Whereas, However, the United States Supreme Court in Troxel v. Granville (2000) produced six different opinions on the nature and enforceability of parental rights under the Constitution of the United States; and

            Whereas, This decision has created confusion and ambiguity about the fundamental nature of parental rights in the laws and society of several states; and

            Whereas, Senator James DeMint of South Carolina and Representative Peter Hoekstra of Michigan have introduced in the United States Congress a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States (Senate Joint Resolution 16 and House Joint Resolution 42) that would prevent erosion of the enduring American tradition of treating parental rights as fundamental rights:

"Section 1. The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children is a fundamental right.

Section 2. Neither the United States nor any State shall infringe upon this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.

Section 3. No treaty may be adopted nor shall any source of international law be employed to supersede, modify, interpret, or apply to the rights guaranteed by this article."

; and

            Whereas, This amendment will add explicit text to the Constitution of the United States to protect in perpetuity the rights of parents as they are now enjoyed, without substantive change to current state or federal laws respecting these rights; and

            Whereas, Such enumeration of these rights in the text of our nation's constitution will preserve them from being infringed upon by the shifting ideologies and interpretations of the United States Supreme Court; now, therefore, be it

            Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That we memorialize Congress to adopt and present to the states for ratification an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to establish fundamental parental rights; and be it further

            Resolved, That copies of this resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and the members of the Michigan congressional delegation.

feedback