Bill Text: MI SB1190 | 2009-2010 | 95th Legislature | Introduced


Bill Title: Appropriations; judiciary; judiciary budget; provide for fiscal year 2010-2011. Creates appropriation act.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2010-03-03 - Referred To Committee On Appropriations [SB1190 Detail]

Download: Michigan-2009-SB1190-Introduced.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SENATE BILL No. 1190

 

 

EXECUTIVE BUDGET BILL

 

 

March 3, 2010, Introduced by Senators BRATER and SWITALSKI and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

 

 

 

     A bill to make appropriations for the judicial branch for the

 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2011; to provide for the

 

expenditure of these appropriations; to place certain restrictions

 

on the expenditure of these appropriations; to prescribe the powers

 

and duties of certain state and local departments, officials, and

 

employees; to require certain reports; and to provide for the

 

disposition of fees and other income received by the judicial

 

branch.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

PART 1

 

LINE-ITEM APPROPRIATIONS

 

     Sec. 101. Subject to the conditions set forth in this bill,

 

the amounts listed in this part are appropriated for the judicial

 


branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, from the

 

funds indicated in this part. The following is a summary of the

 

appropriations in this part:

 

JUDICIARY

 

APPROPRIATION SUMMARY:

 

   Full-time equated exempted positions............ 491.0

 

GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $    258,823,800

 

   Interdepartmental grant revenues:

 

Total interdepartmental grants and intradepartmental

 

   transfers............................................         3,553,500

 

ADJUSTED GROSS APPROPRIATION........................... $    255,270,300

 

   Federal revenues:

 

Total federal revenues.................................         5,376,500

 

   Special revenue funds:

 

Total local revenues...................................         6,340,400

 

Total private revenues.................................           842,500

 

Total other state restricted revenues..................        89,979,800

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $    152,731,100

 

   Sec. 102. SUPREME COURT

 

   Full-time equated exempted positions............ 243.0

 

Supreme court administration--97.0 FTE positions....... $     10,648,900

 

Judicial institute--13.0 FTE positions.................         2,537,700

 

State court administrative office--60.0 FTE positions..        11,048,200

 

Judicial information systems--22.0 FTE positions.......         3,075,500

 

Direct trial court automation support--36.0 FTE

 

   positions............................................         6,340,400

 

Foster care review board--12.0 FTE positions...........         1,258,700

 


Community dispute resolution--3.0 FTE positions........         2,322,500

 

Other federal grants...................................           275,100

 

Drug treatment courts..................................        5,103,100

 

   GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................. $     42,610,100

 

    Appropriated from:

 

   Interdepartmental grant revenues:

 

IDG from Michigan state police.........................         1,800,000

 

IDG from department of corrections.....................         1,030,000

 

IDG from state police - Michigan justice training fund.           300,000

 

   Federal revenues:

 

DOJ, victims assistance programs.......................            50,000

 

DOJ, drug court training and evaluation................           300,000

 

DOT, national highway traffic safety administration....         1,300,000

 

HHS, access and visitation grant.......................           387,000

 

HHS, children's justice grant..........................           206,300

 

HHS, court improvement project.........................         1,160,000

 

HHS, title IV-D child support program..................           907,700

 

HHS, title IV-E foster care program....................           540,400

 

Other federal grant revenues...........................           275,100

 

   Special revenue funds:

 

Local - user fees......................................         6,340,400

 

Private................................................           169,000

 

Private - interest on lawyers trust accounts...........           232,700

 

Private - state justice institute......................           370,800

 

Community dispute resolution fund......................         2,322,500

 

Law exam fees..........................................           536,200

 

Drug court fund........................................         1,920,500

 


Miscellaneous revenue..................................           227,900

 

Justice system fund....................................           700,000

 

State court fund.......................................           339,000

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $     21,194,600

 

   Sec. 103. COURT OF APPEALS

 

   Full-time equated exempted positions............ 190.0

 

Court of appeals operations--190.0 FTE positions....... $     18,515,100

 

GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $     18,515,100

 

    Appropriated from:

 

   Special revenue funds:

 

Court filing/motion fees...............................         1,958,500

 

Miscellaneous revenue..................................            77,800

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $     16,478,800

 

   Sec. 104. BRANCHWIDE APPROPRIATIONS

 

   Full-time equated exempted positions.............. 4.0

 

Branchwide appropriations--4.0 FTE positions........... $      8,147,200

 

GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $      8,147,200

 

    Appropriated from:

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $      8,147,200

 

   Sec. 105. JUSTICES' AND JUDGES' COMPENSATION

 

   Full-time judges positions...................... 615.0

 

Supreme court justices' salaries--7.0 judges........... $      1,152,300

 

Court of appeals judges' salaries--28.0 judges.........         4,240,300

 

District court judges' state base salaries--258.0

 

   judges...............................................        23,877,200

 

District court judicial salary standardization.........        11,796,800

 

Probate court judges' state base salaries--103.0

 


   judges...............................................         9,627,900

 

Probate court judicial salary standardization..........         4,669,700

 

Circuit court judges' state base salaries--219.0

 

   judges...............................................        20,675,900

 

Circuit court judicial salary standardization..........        10,036,400

 

Judges' retirement system defined contributions........         3,837,600

 

OASI, social security..................................        5,375,900

 

GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $     95,290,000

 

    Appropriated from:

 

   Special revenue funds:

 

Court fee fund.........................................         7,090,200

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $     88,199,800

 

   Sec. 106. JUDICIAL AGENCIES

 

   Full-time equated exempted positions.............. 7.0

 

Judicial tenure commission--7.0 FTE positions.......... $        974,700

 

GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $        974,700

 

    Appropriated from:

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $        974,700

 

   Sec. 107. INDIGENT DEFENSE - CRIMINAL

 

   Full-time equated exempted positions............. 47.0

 

Appellate public defender program--39.0 FTE positions.. $      5,192,000

 

Appellate assigned counsel administration--8.0 FTE

 

   positions............................................          918,000

 

GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $      6,110,000

 

    Appropriated from:

 

   Interdepartmental grant revenues:

 

IDG from state police - Michigan justice training fund.           423,500

 


   Federal revenues:

 

Other federal grant revenues...........................           250,000

 

   Special revenue funds:

 

Private - interest on lawyers trust accounts...........            70,000

 

Miscellaneous revenue..................................           113,100

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $      5,253,400

 

   Sec. 108. INDIGENT CIVIL LEGAL ASSISTANCE

 

Indigent civil legal assistance........................ $      7,937,000

 

GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $      7,937,000

 

    Appropriated from:

 

   Special revenue funds:

 

State court fund.......................................         7,937,000

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $              0

 

   Sec. 109. TRIAL COURT OPERATIONS

 

Court equity fund reimbursements....................... $     64,274,700

 

Judicial technology improvement........................        4,815,000

 

GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $     69,089,700

 

    Appropriated from:

 

   Special revenue funds:

 

Court equity fund......................................        51,792,100

 

Judicial technology improvement fund...................         4,815,000

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $     12,482,600

 

   Sec. 110. GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT

 

Drug case-flow program................................. $        250,000

 

Drunk driving case-flow program........................         3,300,000

 

Juror compensation reimbursement.......................        6,600,000

 

GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $     10,150,000

 


    Appropriated from:

 

   Special revenue funds:

 

Drug fund..............................................           250,000

 

Drunk driving fund.....................................         3,300,000

 

Juror compensation fund................................         6,600,000

 

State general fund/general purpose..................... $              0

 

 

 

 

 

PART 2

 

PROVISIONS CONCERNING APPROPRIATIONS

 

GENERAL SECTIONS

 

     Sec. 201. Pursuant to section 30 of article IX of the state

 

constitution of 1963, total state spending from state resources

 

under part 1 for fiscal year 2010-2011 is $242,710,900.00 and state

 

spending from state resources to be paid to local units of

 

government for fiscal year 2010-2011 is $121,582,400. The itemized

 

statement below identifies appropriations from which spending to

 

local units of government will occur:

 

JUDICIARY

 

SUPREME COURT

 

State court administrative office...................... $        511,900

 

Drug treatment courts..................................         4,803,100

 

TRIAL COURT OPERATIONS

 

Court equity fund reimbursements....................... $     64,274,700

 

Judicial technology improvement fund...................         4,815,000

 

JUSTICES' AND JUDGES' COMPENSATION

 

District court judicial salary standardization......... $     11,796,800

 


Probate court judges' state base salaries..............         9,627,900

 

Probate court judicial salary standardization..........         4,669,700

 

Circuit court judicial salary standardization..........        10,036,400

 

Grant to OASI contribution fund, employers share,

 

   social security......................................           896,900

 

GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT

 

Drunk driving case-flow program........................ $      3,300,000

 

Drug case-flow program.................................           250,000

 

Juror compensation reimbursement.......................       6,600,000

 

TOTAL.................................................. $    121,582,400

 

     Sec. 202. (1) The appropriations authorized under this bill

 

are subject to the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL

 

18.1101 to 18.1594.

 

     (2) Funds appropriated in part 1 to an entity within the

 

judicial branch shall not be expended or transferred to another

 

account without written approval of the authorized agent of the

 

judicial entity. If the authorized agent of the judicial entity

 

notifies the state budget director of its approval of an

 

expenditure or transfer, the state budget director shall

 

immediately make the expenditure or transfer. The authorized

 

judicial entity agent shall be designated by the chief justice of

 

the supreme court.

 

     Sec. 203. As used in this bill:

 

     (a) "DOJ" means the United States department of justice.

 

     (b) "DOT" means the United States department of

 

transportation.

 

     (c) "FTE" means full-time equated.

 


     (d) "HHS" means the United States department of health and

 

human services.

 

     (e) "IDG" means interdepartmental grant.

 

     (f) "OASI" means old age survivor's insurance.

 

     Sec. 208. The reporting requirements of this bill shall be

 

completed with the approval of, and at the direction of, the

 

supreme court. The judicial branch shall use the Internet to

 

fulfill the reporting requirements of this bill. This may include

 

transmission of reports via electronic mail to the recipients

 

identified for each reporting requirement, or it may include

 

placement of reports on an Internet or Intranet site.

 

     Sec. 214. Funds appropriated in part 1 shall not be used for

 

the purchase of foreign goods or services, or both, if

 

competitively priced and of comparable quality American goods or

 

services, or both, are available. Preference shall be given to

 

goods or services, or both, manufactured or provided by Michigan

 

businesses, if they are competitively priced and of comparable

 

quality. In addition, preference shall be given to goods or

 

services, or both, that are manufactured or provided by Michigan

 

businesses owned and operated by veterans, if they are

 

competitively priced and of comparable quality.

 

     Sec. 215. (1) Due to the current budgetary problems in this

 

state, out-of-state travel shall be limited to situations in which

 

1 or more of the following conditions apply:

 

     (a) The travel is required by legal mandate or court order or

 

for law enforcement purposes.

 

     (b) The travel is necessary to protect the health or safety of

 


Michigan citizens or visitors or to assist other states in similar

 

circumstances.

 

     (c) The travel is necessary to produce budgetary savings or to

 

increase state revenues, including protecting existing federal

 

funds or securing additional federal funds.

 

     (d) The travel is necessary to comply with federal

 

requirements.

 

     (e) The travel is necessary to secure specialized training for

 

staff that is not available within this state.

 

     (f) The travel is financed entirely by federal or nonstate

 

funds.

 

     (2) Not later than January 1 of each year, the state court

 

administrative office shall prepare a travel report listing all

 

travel by judicial branch employees outside this state in the

 

immediately preceding fiscal year that was funded in whole or in

 

part with funds appropriated in the budget for the judicial branch.

 

The report shall be submitted to the senate and house of

 

representatives standing committees on appropriations, the senate

 

and house fiscal agencies, and the state budget director. The

 

report shall include the following information:

 

     (a) The name of each person receiving reimbursement for travel

 

outside this state or whose travel costs were paid by this state.

 

     (b) The destination of each travel occurrence.

 

     (c) The dates of each travel occurrence.

 

     (d) A brief statement of the reason for each travel

 

occurrence.

 

     (e) The transportation and related costs of each travel

 


occurrence, including the proportion funded with state general

 

fund/general purpose revenues, the proportion funded with state

 

restricted revenues, the proportion funded with federal revenues,

 

and the proportion funded with other revenues.

 

     (f) A total of all out-of-state travel funded for the

 

immediately preceding fiscal year.

 

JUDICIAL BRANCH

 

     Sec. 301. (1) Pursuant to appropriation in Part 1, the direct

 

trial court automation support program of the state court

 

administrative office shall recover direct and overhead costs from

 

trial courts by charging for services rendered. The fee shall cover

 

the actual costs incurred to the direct trial court automation

 

support program in providing the service, including development of

 

future versions of case management systems. A report of amounts

 

collected in excess of funds identified as user service charges in

 

part 1 shall be submitted to the state budget director and to the

 

house and senate appropriations subcommittees on judiciary 30 days

 

before expenditure by the direct trial court automation support

 

program.

 

     (2) From funds appropriated in part 1, the direct trial court

 

automation support program of the state court administrative office

 

shall provide to the state budget director, the senate and house

 

appropriations committees, and the senate and house fiscal agencies

 

before January 1 of each year a detailed list of user service

 

charges collected during the immediately preceding state fiscal

 

year.

 

     Sec. 302. Funds appropriated within the judicial branch shall

 


not be expended by any component within the judicial branch without

 

the approval of the supreme court.

 

     Sec. 303. Of the amount appropriated in part 1 for the

 

judicial branch, $325,000.00 is allocated for circuit court

 

reimbursement under section 3 of 1978 PA 16, MCL 800.453, and

 

$186,900.00 is allocated for court of claims reimbursement under

 

section 6413 of the revised judicature act of 1961, 1961 PA 236,

 

MCL 600.6413.

 

     Sec. 306. The supreme court and the state court administrative

 

office shall continue to maintain, as a priority, the assisting of

 

local trial courts in improving the collection of judgments.

 

     Sec. 308. If sufficient funds are not available from the court

 

fee fund to pay judges' compensation, the difference between the

 

appropriated amount from that fund for judges' compensation and the

 

actual amount available after the amount appropriated for trial

 

court reimbursement is made shall be appropriated from the state

 

general fund for judges' compensation.

 

     Sec. 310. From the funds appropriated in part 1 for drug

 

treatment court programs, with the approval of and at the

 

discretion of the supreme court, the state court administrative

 

office shall evaluate and collect data on the performance of drug

 

treatment court programs. The state court administrative office

 

shall provide an annual review of the performance of drug courts as

 

prescribed in section 1078(6) of the revised judicature act of

 

1961, 1961 PA 236, MCL 600.1078. All of the following apply to that

 

annual review:

 

     (a) It shall include measures of the impact of drug court

 


programs in changing offender criminal involvement (recidivism) and

 

substance abuse and in reducing prison admissions.

 

     (b) It shall be completed no later than April 1 of each year

 

and shall also be provided to the senate and house appropriations

 

subcommittees on the judiciary, the senate and house fiscal

 

agencies, and the state budget director.

 

     (c) The evaluation of a program funded with federal Byrne

 

funds shall be consistent with the requirements contained in the

 

federal Byrne grant for that program.

 

     Sec. 311. (1) The funds appropriated in part 1 for drug

 

treatment courts shall be administered by the state court

 

administrative office to operate drug treatment court programs. A

 

drug treatment court shall be responsible for handling cases

 

involving substance abusing nonviolent offenders through

 

comprehensive supervision, testing, treatment services, and

 

immediate sanctions and incentives. A drug treatment court shall

 

use all available county and state personnel involved in the

 

disposition of cases including, but not limited to, parole and

 

probation agents, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, and

 

community corrections providers. The funds may be used in

 

connection with other federal, state, and local funding sources.

 

     (2) From the funds appropriated in part 1, the chief justice

 

shall allocate sufficient funds for the judicial institute to

 

provide in-state training for those identified in subsection (1),

 

including training for new drug treatment court judges.

 

     (3) For drug treatment court grants, consideration for

 

priority may be given to those courts where higher instances of

 


substance abuse cases are filed.

 

     (4) The judiciary shall receive $1,800,000.00 in Byrne formula

 

grant funding as an interdepartmental grant from the department of

 

Michigan State Police to be used for drug treatment courts, to

 

assist in avoiding prison bed space growth for nonviolent offenders

 

in collaboration with the department of corrections.

 

     Sec. 317. Funds appropriated in part 1 shall not be used for

 

the permanent assignment of state-owned vehicles to justices or

 

judges or any other judicial branch employee. This section does not

 

preclude the use of state-owned motor pool vehicles for state

 

business in accordance with approved guidelines.

 

     Sec. 318. (1) The funds received by the judiciary from the

 

department of corrections, pursuant to the part 1 appropriation,

 

shall be utilized by the state court administrative office to

 

administer a pilot program to target high-risk offenders through

 

assessment, treatment, and accountability, with the goal of

 

reducing future criminal behavior. All funds shall be spent on

 

fulfilling the requirements of this section and treatment,

 

monitoring, and testing of offenders in the pilot program

 

administered by the state court administrative office.

 

     (2) The pilot program shall adhere to the following criteria:

 

     (a) A minimum of 3 pilot sites shall be selected by the state

 

court administrative office, at least 1 to be located in a major

 

metropolitan area.

 

     (b) The pilot programs shall incorporate the principles and

 

practices of problem-solving courts developed by the national

 

association of drug court professionals, and they shall operate

 


pursuant to a written memorandum of understanding developed by the

 

stakeholders in the jurisdiction.

 

     (c) Each pilot court team shall include, at a minimum, a

 

district and circuit judge, prosecutor, defense lawyer, treatment

 

provider, circuit court probation officer, district court probation

 

officer, community corrections representative, community mental

 

health representative, court administration, and community

 

representative.

 

     (d) Before being enrolled in the pilot program, each

 

participant shall be administered a comprehensive and valid risk

 

and needs assessment. The assessment shall measure criminogenic and

 

psychosocial factors to determine which participants are at

 

significant risk of/for committing further crimes and are in need

 

of services.

 

     (e) The pilot projects shall employ evidence-based practices

 

to develop a treatment plan in response to the assessment results.

 

     (f) Each pilot project shall employ a case manager whose

 

duties shall include referral and linkage to community resources,

 

monitoring treatment plan requirements, data reporting, and other

 

responsibilities as assigned.

 

     (3) The Michigan judicial institute shall provide appropriate

 

training for all personnel involved in the pilot program.

 

     (4) The state court administrative office shall conduct a

 

process and outcome evaluation and a cost-benefit analysis of the

 

pilot programs and shall submit that analysis to the senate and

 

house appropriations subcommittees on the judiciary, the senate and

 

house fiscal agencies, and the state budget director by September

 


30, 2011.

feedback