Bill Text: IL SB2852 | 2013-2014 | 98th General Assembly | Chaptered


Bill Title: Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Allows a search warrant upon written complaint to be issued by use of electronic mail in addition to by facsimile transmission machine. Effective immediately.

Sponsorship: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 4-2)

Status: (Passed) 2014-08-01 - Public Act . . . . . . . . . 98-0829 [SB2852 Detail]

Download: Illinois-2013-SB2852-Chaptered.html



Public Act 098-0829
SB2852 EnrolledLRB098 18181 MRW 53310 b
AN ACT concerning criminal law.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:
Section 5. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
amended by changing Section 108-4 as follows:
(725 ILCS 5/108-4) (from Ch. 38, par. 108-4)
Sec. 108-4. Issuance of search warrant.
(a) All warrants upon written complaint shall state the
time and date of issuance and be the warrants of the judge
issuing the same and not the warrants of the court in which he
is then sitting and such warrants need not bear the seal of the
court or clerk thereof. The complaint on which the warrant is
issued need not be filed with the clerk of the court nor with
the court if there is no clerk until the warrant has been
executed or has been returned "not executed".
The search warrant upon written complaint may be issued
electronically or electromagnetically by use of electronic
mail or a facsimile transmission machine and any such warrant
shall have the same validity as a written search warrant.
(b) Warrant upon oral testimony.
(1) General rule. When the offense in connection with
which a search warrant is sought constitutes terrorism or
any related offense as defined in Article 29D of the
Criminal Code of 2012, and if the circumstances make it
reasonable to dispense, in whole or in part, with a written
affidavit, a judge may issue a warrant based upon sworn
testimony communicated by telephone or other appropriate
means, including facsimile transmission.
(2) Application. The person who is requesting the
warrant shall prepare a document to be known as a duplicate
original warrant and shall read such duplicate original
warrant, verbatim, to the judge. The judge shall enter,
verbatim, what is so read to the judge on a document to be
known as the original warrant. The judge may direct that
the warrant be modified.
(3) Issuance. If the judge is satisfied that the
offense in connection with which the search warrant is
sought constitutes terrorism or any related offense as
defined in Article 29D of the Criminal Code of 2012, that
the circumstances are such as to make it reasonable to
dispense with a written affidavit, and that grounds for the
application exist or that there is probable cause to
believe that they exist, the judge shall order the issuance
of a warrant by directing the person requesting the warrant
to sign the judge's name on the duplicate original warrant.
The judge shall immediately sign the original warrant and
enter on the face of the original warrant the exact time
when the warrant was ordered to be issued. The finding of
probable cause for a warrant upon oral testimony may be
based on the same kind of evidence as is sufficient for a
warrant upon affidavit.
(4) Recording and certification of testimony. When a
caller informs the judge that the purpose of the call is to
request a warrant, the judge shall immediately place under
oath each person whose testimony forms a basis of the
application and each person applying for that warrant. If a
voice recording device is available, the judge shall record
by means of the device all of the call after the caller
informs the judge that the purpose of the call is to
request a warrant, otherwise a stenographic or longhand
verbatim record shall be made. If a voice recording device
is used or a stenographic record made, the judge shall have
the record transcribed, shall certify the accuracy of the
transcription, and shall file a copy of the original record
and the transcription with the court. If a longhand
verbatim record is made, the judge shall file a signed copy
with the court.
(5) Contents. The contents of a warrant upon oral
testimony shall be the same as the contents of a warrant
upon affidavit.
(6) Additional rule for execution. The person who
executes the warrant shall enter the exact time of
execution on the face of the duplicate original warrant.
(7) Motion to suppress based on failure to obtain a
written affidavit. Evidence obtained pursuant to a warrant
issued under this subsection (b) is not subject to a motion
to suppress on the ground that the circumstances were not
such as to make it reasonable to dispense with a written
affidavit, absent a finding of bad faith. All other grounds
to move to suppress are preserved.
(8) This subsection (b) is inoperative on and after
January 1, 2005.
(9) No evidence obtained pursuant to this subsection
(b) shall be inadmissible in a court of law by virtue of
subdivision (8).
(Source: P.A. 97-1150, eff. 1-25-13.)
Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon
becoming law.
feedback