Bill Text: IL HR1316 | 2011-2012 | 97th General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: Encourages all stakeholders in the State's unemployment insurance system to consider the best amount of time to give employers to decide whether an employee is a good fit before their experience rating is affected, in order to encourage job growth.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Failed) 2013-01-08 - Session Sine Die [HR1316 Detail]
Download: Illinois-2011-HR1316-Introduced.html
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | HOUSE RESOLUTION
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, Small businesses are the engine for job recovery | ||||||
3 | in the State of Illinois; and
| ||||||
4 | WHEREAS, Adding a new employee for a small business is one | ||||||
5 | of the most important decisions a small business owner can | ||||||
6 | make; and
| ||||||
7 | WHEREAS, Letting an employee go, either for cause or | ||||||
8 | because of a poor fit, affects the experience rating of an | ||||||
9 | employer, which determines the unemployment insurance tax rate | ||||||
10 | the employer pays; and
| ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, The experience rating calculation affects a small | ||||||
12 | business that lets a single employee go disproportionately more | ||||||
13 | than a large business that lets a single employee go, as a | ||||||
14 | single employee is a much larger percentage of the workforce of | ||||||
15 | a small business than a large business; and
| ||||||
16 | WHEREAS, Small businesses are particularly leery of a | ||||||
17 | higher experience rating, as that will lead to a higher | ||||||
18 | unemployment insurance tax rate; and
| ||||||
19 | WHEREAS, Current law only permits employers 30 working days | ||||||
20 | to review the performance of a new employee before that |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | employee impacts the experience rating of the employer; and
| ||||||
2 | WHEREAS, Many small business employers believe that 30 days | ||||||
3 | is not enough time to properly review whether a new employee is | ||||||
4 | the right fit for a company; and
| ||||||
5 | WHEREAS, The relatively short period of time before an | ||||||
6 | employer is liable for a higher experience rating to pay the | ||||||
7 | unemployment benefits of a former employee is a disincentive to | ||||||
8 | hiring; and
| ||||||
9 | WHEREAS, A more reasonable period of time, such as 90 days, | ||||||
10 | would lessen this disincentive to hiring; and
| ||||||
11 | WHEREAS, This period of time before the experience rating | ||||||
12 | of an employer is affected for an employee that does not work | ||||||
13 | out is unrelated to the question of how many weeks of benefits | ||||||
14 | an employee is entitled to; therefore, be it
| ||||||
15 | RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE | ||||||
16 | NINETY-SEVENTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that | ||||||
17 | all stakeholders in the State's unemployment insurance system | ||||||
18 | are encouraged to consider the best amount of time to give | ||||||
19 | employers to decide whether an employee is a good fit before | ||||||
20 | their experience rating is affected, in order to encourage job | ||||||
21 | growth.
|