Bill Amendment: IL HB4580 | 2021-2022 | 102nd General Assembly
NOTE: For additional amemendments please see the Bill Drafting List
Bill Title: SCH CD-CHICAGO HS BOUNDARIES
Status: 2022-05-13 - Public Act . . . . . . . . . 102-0777 [HB4580 Detail]
Download: Illinois-2021-HB4580-House_Amendment_001.html
Bill Title: SCH CD-CHICAGO HS BOUNDARIES
Status: 2022-05-13 - Public Act . . . . . . . . . 102-0777 [HB4580 Detail]
Download: Illinois-2021-HB4580-House_Amendment_001.html
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | AMENDMENT TO HOUSE BILL 4580
| ||||||
| 2 | AMENDMENT NO. ______. Amend House Bill 4580 by replacing | ||||||
| 3 | everything after the enacting clause with the following:
| ||||||
| 4 | "Section 5. The School Code is amended by adding Section | ||||||
| 5 | 34-222 as follows:
| ||||||
| 6 | (105 ILCS 5/34-222 new) | ||||||
| 7 | Sec. 34-222. School attendance boundaries. | ||||||
| 8 | (a) At least once every 5 years, the Department of School | ||||||
| 9 | Demographics and Planning ("DSP") shall evaluate the | ||||||
| 10 | enrollment at existing schools in the school district to | ||||||
| 11 | determine if there is a need to revise existing boundaries. | ||||||
| 12 | (1) In reviewing the enrollment at existing schools to | ||||||
| 13 | determine if there is a need to revise existing | ||||||
| 14 | boundaries, DSP shall consider a range of factors, | ||||||
| 15 | including the following: | ||||||
| 16 | (A) capacities of the school being reviewed and | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | schools with contiguous boundaries to the school being | ||||||
| 2 | reviewed; | ||||||
| 3 | (B) current and projected racial and ethnic | ||||||
| 4 | composition of the school being reviewed and any | ||||||
| 5 | schools with contiguous boundaries to the school being | ||||||
| 6 | reviewed; | ||||||
| 7 | (C) current and projected income level composition | ||||||
| 8 | of the school being reviewed and any schools with | ||||||
| 9 | contiguous boundaries to the school being reviewed; | ||||||
| 10 | (D) geographic barriers; | ||||||
| 11 | (E) travel time and distance to the school; and | ||||||
| 12 | (F) program considerations of the school being | ||||||
| 13 | reviewed and any schools with contiguous boundaries to | ||||||
| 14 | the school being reviewed. | ||||||
| 15 | (2) DSP shall submit a written report of its findings, | ||||||
| 16 | conclusions, and recommendations to the chief executive | ||||||
| 17 | officer and the Board. The report shall document the | ||||||
| 18 | evaluation of the factors of the school being reviewed. | ||||||
| 19 | The report shall be made public on the district's website | ||||||
| 20 | within 30 days after its completion. | ||||||
| 21 | (b) If it is determined that there is a need to revise any | ||||||
| 22 | existing boundaries, DSP shall develop and recommend any | ||||||
| 23 | proposed changes to the chief executive officer prior to the | ||||||
| 24 | beginning of the school year in which the changes are to take | ||||||
| 25 | effect. In addition, DSP shall develop and recommend proposed | ||||||
| 26 | boundaries for new schools to the chief executive officer | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | prior to the beginning of the school year in which the new | ||||||
| 2 | school boundaries are to take effect. | ||||||
| 3 | (1) In developing proposed changes to boundaries for | ||||||
| 4 | existing schools and proposing attendance boundaries for | ||||||
| 5 | new schools, DSP shall consider a range of factors, | ||||||
| 6 | including the following: | ||||||
| 7 | (A) DSP shall consider the capacities of each of | ||||||
| 8 | the schools involved in the proposed boundary | ||||||
| 9 | revisions, including the extent
to which a school is | ||||||
| 10 | overcrowded or underutilized. Where feasible, the goal | ||||||
| 11 | is for elementary schools to
be utilized at not more | ||||||
| 12 | than 80% of design capacity and for high schools at not | ||||||
| 13 | more than 100% of program capacity. Schools shall be | ||||||
| 14 | considered severely overcrowded if they are
operating | ||||||
| 15 | in excess of 100% utilization and significantly | ||||||
| 16 | underutilized if they are operating at less than 30% | ||||||
| 17 | utilization. DSP shall consider these utilization | ||||||
| 18 | rates when proposing revisions to attendance | ||||||
| 19 | boundaries for
existing schools and when proposing | ||||||
| 20 | attendance boundaries for new schools. | ||||||
| 21 | (B) DSP shall consider the current and projected | ||||||
| 22 | racial and ethnic composition of the schools affected. | ||||||
| 23 | Where feasible, DSP shall propose establishing or | ||||||
| 24 | revising attendance boundaries to maintain or promote
| ||||||
| 25 | stably desegregated enrollments in each of the | ||||||
| 26 | affected schools and to avoid the creation of one-race
| ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | schools. | ||||||
| 2 | (C) DSP shall consider geographic barriers so as | ||||||
| 3 | to promote safety and minimize transportation burdens, | ||||||
| 4 | to the extent feasible. | ||||||
| 5 | (D) DSP shall consider travel time and distance | ||||||
| 6 | and, to the extent feasible, seek to minimize travel | ||||||
| 7 | time and distance. | ||||||
| 8 | (E) DSP shall consider the placement of programs | ||||||
| 9 | in each of the schools
involved, such as programs for | ||||||
| 10 | English learners and for special education students. | ||||||
| 11 | In addition, DSP shall consider the impact of magnet | ||||||
| 12 | schools and programs and the requirements of the | ||||||
| 13 | federal Every Student Succeeds Act and the Illinois | ||||||
| 14 | Balanced Accountability Measures. | ||||||
| 15 | (2) For each proposed attendance boundary, DSP shall | ||||||
| 16 | develop at least 2 alternatives. For each alternative, DSP | ||||||
| 17 | shall prepare a report showing 3-year enrollment | ||||||
| 18 | projections by racial and ethnic groups for all schools | ||||||
| 19 | affected by the proposed change pursuant to each | ||||||
| 20 | alternative. The report shall document for each | ||||||
| 21 | alternative the impact on the affected schools for the | ||||||
| 22 | factors of capacity, geographic barriers, travel time and | ||||||
| 23 | distance, and program considerations. In developing | ||||||
| 24 | alternatives, DSP shall consider whether any feasible | ||||||
| 25 | alternatives would better maintain or promote stably | ||||||
| 26 | desegregated enrollments in each of the affected schools | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | or better avoid the creation of one-race schools. The | ||||||
| 2 | report shall be made public on the district's website | ||||||
| 3 | within 30 days after its completion. | ||||||
| 4 | (c) The chief executive officer shall review the report | ||||||
| 5 | from DSP and may suggest additional alternatives. The chief | ||||||
| 6 | executive officer shall report to the Board if he or she | ||||||
| 7 | recommends any changes to existing boundaries or establishing | ||||||
| 8 | boundaries for new schools. If the chief executive officer is | ||||||
| 9 | recommending any changes to existing boundaries or | ||||||
| 10 | establishing any boundaries for new schools, the chief | ||||||
| 11 | executive officer shall provide the Board with a report of the | ||||||
| 12 | alternatives considered, including data on the factors of | ||||||
| 13 | capacity, current and projected racial and ethnic | ||||||
| 14 | considerations, geographic barriers, travel time and distance, | ||||||
| 15 | and program considerations. The chief executive officer shall | ||||||
| 16 | inform the Board of the alternative that is being recommended. | ||||||
| 17 | The report shall be made public on the district's website | ||||||
| 18 | within 30 days after its completion. | ||||||
| 19 | (d) Prior to taking action on the establishment or | ||||||
| 20 | revision of any attendance boundaries, the Board shall conduct | ||||||
| 21 | public hearings on the proposed establishment or revision of | ||||||
| 22 | attendance boundaries and the chief executive officer's | ||||||
| 23 | recommendation. Prior to the public hearing, the Board shall | ||||||
| 24 | make available reports and data on the factors of capacity, | ||||||
| 25 | current and projected racial and ethnic considerations, | ||||||
| 26 | geographic barriers, travel time and distance, and program | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | considerations. In making its decision, the Board shall | ||||||
| 2 | consider the factors of capacity, current and projected racial | ||||||
| 3 | and ethnic considerations,
geographic barriers, travel time | ||||||
| 4 | and distance, and program considerations.".
| ||||||
