Bill Text: IA SF588 | 2019-2020 | 88th General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: A bill for an act creating a capital murder offense by establishing the penalty of death for murder in the first degree offenses involving kidnapping and sexual abuse offenses against the same victim who is a minor, and including effective date and applicability provisions. (Formerly SF 296.)
Spectrum: Committee Bill
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2020-01-15 - Subcommittee: Schultz, Bisignano, Chapman, Garrett, and Hogg. S.J. 88. [SF588 Detail]
Download: Iowa-2019-SF588-Introduced.html
Senate
File
588
-
Introduced
SENATE
FILE
588
BY
COMMITTEE
ON
JUDICIARY
(SUCCESSOR
TO
SF
296)
A
BILL
FOR
An
Act
creating
a
capital
murder
offense
by
establishing
the
1
penalty
of
death
for
murder
in
the
first
degree
offenses
2
involving
kidnapping
and
sexual
abuse
offenses
against
the
3
same
victim
who
is
a
minor,
and
including
effective
date
and
4
applicability
provisions.
5
BE
IT
ENACTED
BY
THE
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
OF
THE
STATE
OF
IOWA:
6
TLSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
S.F.
588
Section
1.
Section
13B.4,
Code
2019,
is
amended
by
adding
1
the
following
new
subsection:
2
NEW
SUBSECTION
.
6A.
The
state
public
defender
shall
perform
3
all
of
the
following
duties
with
respect
to
the
appointment
of
4
counsel
for
indigent
persons
in
cases
in
which
a
sentence
of
5
death
may
be
or
is
to
be
imposed:
6
a.
Provide
or
contract
with
attorneys
for
appointment
as
7
lead
counsel
and
co-counsel
to
provide
legal
services
in
cases
8
where
a
person
is
charged
with
capital
murder
under
section
9
902.15,
and
the
state
has
given
notice
of
intent
to
seek
the
10
death
penalty
or
in
cases
in
which
a
sentence
of
death
is
to
be
11
imposed.
12
b.
Conduct
or
sponsor
specialized
training
programs
for
13
attorneys
representing
persons
who
may
be
executed.
14
Sec.
2.
NEW
SECTION
.
602.10112
Qualifications
of
counsel
15
in
capital
murder
cases.
16
The
supreme
court
shall
prescribe
rules
which
establish
17
minimum
standards
and
procedures
by
which
attorneys
may
become
18
qualified
to
provide
legal
services
as
lead
counsel
in
cases
in
19
which
a
sentence
of
death
may
be
or
is
to
be
imposed.
20
Sec.
3.
NEW
SECTION
.
812A.1
Procedure
to
determine
sanity
21
of
condemned
inmate.
22
1.
At
any
time
prior
to
execution
of
an
inmate
under
section
23
902.1A,
if
the
director
of
the
department
of
corrections
or
24
the
counsel
for
a
person
who
is
under
a
sentence
of
execution
25
has
cause
to
believe
that
the
inmate
is
suffering
from
such
26
a
diseased
or
deranged
condition
of
the
mind
as
to
prevent
27
the
defendant
from
knowing
the
nature
and
quality
of
the
act
28
the
defendant
has
been
convicted
of,
or
from
understanding
29
that
trial
on
the
offense
has
taken
place
and
that
execution
30
proceedings
are
about
to
take
place,
or
to
otherwise
cause
the
31
defendant
to
lack
the
capacity
to
understand
the
sentence
which
32
has
been
imposed
and
to
participate
in
any
legal
proceedings
33
relating
to
the
sentence,
the
director
or
counsel
may
file
a
34
request
with
the
court
that
issued
the
warrant
for
execution
35
-1-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
1/
17
S.F.
588
for
a
determination
of
the
inmate’s
sanity.
If
the
court
1
determines
that
there
is
not
sufficient
reason
to
believe
2
that
the
inmate
is
insane,
the
court
shall
enter
an
order
3
denying
the
request
and
shall
state
the
grounds
for
denying
the
4
request.
If
the
court
believes
that
there
is
sufficient
reason
5
to
believe
that
the
inmate
is
insane,
the
court
shall
suspend
6
the
execution
and
conduct
a
hearing
to
determine
the
sanity
of
7
the
inmate.
8
2.
At
the
hearing,
the
court
shall
determine
the
issue
of
9
the
inmate’s
sanity.
Prior
to
the
hearing,
the
court
shall
10
appoint
two
licensed
physicians
or
licensed
psychologists,
or
11
one
licensed
physician
and
one
licensed
psychologist,
who
are
12
qualified
by
training
and
practice,
for
purposes
of
conducting
13
a
psychiatric
or
psychological
examination
of
the
inmate.
The
14
physicians
or
psychologists
shall
examine
the
inmate
and
report
15
any
findings
in
writing
to
the
court
within
ten
days
after
16
the
order
of
examination
is
issued.
The
inmate
shall
have
17
the
right
to
present
evidence
and
cross-examine
any
witnesses
18
at
the
hearing.
Any
statement
made
by
the
inmate
during
the
19
course
of
any
examination
provided
for
in
this
section,
whether
20
or
not
the
inmate
consents
to
the
examination,
shall
not
be
21
admitted
into
evidence
against
the
inmate
in
any
criminal
22
proceeding
for
purposes
other
than
a
determination
of
the
23
inmate’s
sanity.
24
3.
If,
at
the
conclusion
of
a
hearing
held
pursuant
to
25
this
section,
the
court
determines
that
the
inmate
is
sane,
26
the
court
shall
enter
an
order
setting
a
date
for
the
inmate’s
27
execution,
which
shall
be
carried
into
effect
in
the
same
28
manner
as
provided
in
the
original
sentence.
A
copy
of
the
29
order
shall
be
sent
to
the
director
of
the
department
of
30
corrections
and
the
governor.
31
4.
If,
at
the
conclusion
of
a
hearing
held
pursuant
to
this
32
section,
the
court
determines
that
the
inmate
is
insane,
the
33
court
shall
suspend
the
execution
until
further
order.
At
any
34
time
after
issuance
of
the
order,
if
the
court
has
sufficient
35
-2-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
2/
17
S.F.
588
reason
to
believe
that
the
inmate
has
become
sane,
the
court
1
shall
again
determine
the
sanity
of
the
inmate
as
provided
2
by
this
section.
Proceedings
pursuant
to
this
section
may
3
continue
to
be
held
at
such
times
as
the
court
orders
until
4
it
is
either
determined
that
the
inmate
is
sane
or
incurably
5
insane.
6
Sec.
4.
NEW
SECTION
.
814.28
Review
of
capital
murder
death
7
sentence.
8
1.
In
a
case
in
which
a
sentence
of
death
is
imposed,
the
9
supreme
court
shall
automatically
review
the
judgment
and
10
sentence.
The
court’s
review
of
the
case
shall
be
de
novo.
The
11
case
shall
not
be
transferred
to
the
court
of
appeals.
12
2.
A
review
by
the
supreme
court
of
a
judgment
and
sentence
13
imposing
the
punishment
of
death
has
priority
over
all
other
14
criminal
and
other
actions
pending
before
the
supreme
court.
15
3.
The
supreme
court
shall
review
the
trial
and
judgment,
16
and
shall
separately
review
the
sentencing
proceeding.
Upon
17
determining
that
errors
did
not
occur
at
the
trial
requiring
18
reversal
or
modification
of
the
judgment,
the
supreme
court
19
shall
proceed
to
determine
if
the
sentence
of
death
is
lawfully
20
imposed.
In
its
review
of
the
sentencing
proceeding,
the
21
supreme
court
shall
determine
all
of
the
following:
22
a.
Whether
the
sentence
of
death
was
imposed
capriciously
or
23
under
the
influence
of
prejudice
or
other
arbitrary
factor.
24
b.
Whether
the
special
verdicts
returned
under
section
25
901E.1
are
supported
by
the
evidence.
26
c.
Whether
the
sentence
of
death
is
excessive
or
27
disproportionate
to
the
penalty
imposed
in
similar
cases,
28
considering
both
the
crime
and
the
defendant.
29
4.
If
the
supreme
court
determines
that
the
sentence
of
30
death
was
not
lawfully
imposed,
the
supreme
court
shall
set
31
aside
the
sentence
and
shall
remand
the
case
to
the
trial
32
court
for
a
second
sentencing
proceeding
to
determine
if
the
33
imposition
of
death
is
warranted.
34
5.
If
the
supreme
court
affirms
the
judgment
and
sentence
35
-3-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
3/
17
S.F.
588
of
death,
the
clerk
of
the
supreme
court
shall
certify
the
1
judgment
of
the
supreme
court
under
the
seal
of
the
supreme
2
court
to
the
clerk
of
the
trial
court.
3
Sec.
5.
Section
815.10,
Code
2019,
is
amended
by
adding
the
4
following
new
subsection:
5
NEW
SUBSECTION
.
1A.
If
two
attorneys
have
not
already
been
6
appointed
pursuant
to
section
13B.4
or
13B.9,
the
court
shall
7
appoint,
for
each
indigent
person
who
is
charged
with
capital
8
murder
under
section
902.15,
and
in
which
a
notice
of
intent
9
to
seek
the
death
penalty
has
been
filed,
two
attorneys
who
10
are
qualified
under
section
602.10112
to
represent
the
person
11
in
the
proceedings
and
in
all
state
legal
proceedings
which
12
take
place
from
the
time
the
person
is
indicted
or
arraigned
13
until
the
person
is
sentenced
on
the
charge.
In
addition,
if
14
at
any
point
in
federal
postconviction
proceedings
an
indigent
15
person
is
not
afforded
court-appointed
counsel,
the
state
shall
16
provide
counsel
to
the
person
to
present
any
claims
determined
17
meritorious
by
the
federal
court
if
the
person
is
not
otherwise
18
represented
by
legal
counsel.
Only
private
attorneys
and
19
public
defenders
who
are
qualified
to
provide
representation
in
20
cases
in
which
the
death
penalty
may
be
imposed
are
eligible
21
for
appointment
or
assignment
to
a
case
in
which
the
death
22
penalty
may
be
imposed.
23
Sec.
6.
NEW
SECTION
.
901E.1
Capital
murder
proceedings
——
24
request
for
death
penalty
——
penalty
proceedings.
25
1.
As
used
in
this
section:
26
a.
“Intellectually
disabled”
means
the
same
as
defined
in
27
section
902.15.
28
b.
“Mentally
ill”
or
“mental
illness”
means
the
same
as
29
defined
in
section
902.15.
30
2.
If
a
notice
of
intent
to
seek
the
death
penalty
has
31
been
filed,
objections
to
the
imposition
of
the
death
penalty
32
based
upon
allegations
that
a
defendant
was
intellectually
33
disabled
or
mentally
ill
at
the
time
of
the
commission
of
34
the
offense
shall
be
raised
within
the
time
provided
for
the
35
-4-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
4/
17
S.F.
588
filing
of
pretrial
motions
under
rule
of
criminal
procedure
1
2.11,
Iowa
court
rules.
The
court
may,
for
good
cause
shown,
2
allow
late
filing
of
the
motion.
Hearing
on
the
motion
shall
3
be
held
prior
to
trial
and
the
burden
of
proof
shall
be
on
the
4
defendant
to
prove
intellectual
disability
or
mental
illness
5
by
a
preponderance
of
the
evidence.
If
the
court
finds
that
6
the
defendant
is
intellectually
disabled,
the
defendant,
if
7
convicted
of
capital
murder
under
section
902.15,
shall
not
be
8
sentenced
to
death
but
shall
be
sentenced
to
life
imprisonment
9
in
the
manner
provided
in
section
902.1.
A
finding
by
the
10
court
that
the
evidence
presented
by
the
defendant
at
the
11
hearing
does
not
preclude
the
imposition
of
the
death
penalty
12
under
this
section
and
section
902.15
shall
not
preclude
the
13
introduction
of
evidence
of
intellectual
disability
or
mental
14
illness
during
the
penalty
proceeding.
If
the
court
finds
15
that
evidence
of
intellectual
disability
or
mental
illness
16
does
not
preclude
imposition
of
the
death
penalty,
evidence
of
17
intellectual
disability
or
mental
illness
may
be
reviewed
by
18
the
jury
in
the
penalty
proceeding
and
the
jury
shall
not
be
19
informed
of
the
finding
in
the
initial
proceeding
at
any
time
20
during
the
penalty
proceeding.
21
3.
If
at
the
trial
on
a
charge
of
capital
murder
under
22
section
902.15,
the
state
intends
to
request
that
the
death
23
penalty
be
imposed
under
section
902.1A,
the
prosecutor
shall
24
file
a
notice
of
intent
to
seek
the
death
penalty,
at
the
time
25
of
and
as
part
of
the
information
or
indictment
filed
in
the
26
case.
27
4.
If
a
notice
of
intent
to
seek
the
death
penalty
has
been
28
filed,
the
trial
shall
be
conducted
in
bifurcated
proceedings
29
before
the
same
trier
of
fact.
During
the
initial
proceeding,
30
the
jury,
or
the
court
if
the
defendant
waives
the
right
to
a
31
jury
trial,
shall
decide
only
whether
the
defendant
is
guilty
32
or
not
guilty
of
capital
murder
under
section
902.15.
33
a.
If,
in
the
initial
proceeding,
the
court
or
jury
finds
34
the
defendant
guilty
of,
or
the
defendant
pleads
guilty
to,
35
-5-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
5/
17
S.F.
588
an
offense
other
than
capital
murder
under
section
902.15,
1
the
court
shall
sentence
the
defendant
in
accordance
with
the
2
sentencing
procedures
set
forth
in
rule
of
criminal
procedure
3
2.23,
Iowa
court
rules,
and
chapters
901
through
909,
which
are
4
applicable
to
the
offense.
5
b.
If
the
court
or
jury
finds
the
defendant
guilty
of,
or
6
the
defendant
pleads
guilty
to,
capital
murder
under
section
7
902.15,
but
the
prosecuting
attorney
waives
the
death
penalty,
8
the
court
shall
sentence
the
defendant
to
life
imprisonment
in
9
accordance
with
the
sentencing
procedures
set
forth
in
rule
of
10
criminal
procedure
2.23,
Iowa
court
rules,
and
chapters
901
11
through
909,
which
are
otherwise
applicable
to
convictions
of
12
murder
in
the
first
degree.
13
c.
If
the
court
or
jury
finds
the
defendant
guilty
of
14
capital
murder
under
section
902.15,
or
a
defendant
enters
a
15
plea
of
guilty
in
the
initial
proceeding,
and
the
prosecuting
16
attorney
does
not
waive
imposition
of
the
death
penalty,
a
17
penalty
proceeding
shall
be
held
in
the
manner
provided
in
18
subsections
5
through
13.
19
5.
No
sooner
than
twenty-four
hours
after
a
verdict
of
20
guilty
or
a
plea
of
guilty
to
capital
murder
under
section
21
902.15
is
returned
in
the
initial
proceeding,
a
penalty
22
proceeding
shall
be
held
to
determine
whether
the
defendant
23
shall
be
sentenced
to
death
or
to
life
imprisonment.
The
24
proceeding
shall
be
conducted
in
the
trial
court
before
the
25
trial
jury,
or
before
the
court
if
the
defendant
has
waived
26
the
right
to
a
jury
trial
or
has
waived
the
right
for
the
27
proceeding
to
be
before
the
trial
jury.
Both
the
state
and
the
28
defendant
shall
have
the
right
to
present
opening
statements
29
at
the
commencement
of
the
proceeding.
In
the
proceeding,
30
evidence
relevant
to
the
existence
of
any
aggravating
or
31
mitigating
circumstances
may
be
presented
as
follows:
32
a.
The
state
or
the
defendant
may
present
evidence
relevant
33
to
the
conviction
of
capital
murder
under
section
902.15
and
34
any
aggravating
circumstances
other
than
juvenile
delinquency
35
-6-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
6/
17
S.F.
588
adjudications
for
offenses
which
carry
penalties
equivalent
to
1
the
penalties
imposed
for
simple
or
serious
misdemeanors.
The
2
state
may
introduce
evidence
of
the
actual
harm
caused
by
the
3
commission
of
the
capital
murder
offense
under
section
902.15,
4
including
but
not
limited
to
evidence
relating
to
the
life
of
5
the
victim
and
the
impact
of
the
loss
of
the
victim
to
the
6
victim’s
family
and
society.
7
b.
The
defendant
may
present
evidence
that
the
defendant
8
was
intellectually
disabled
or
mentally
ill
at
the
time
of
the
9
commission
of
the
offense.
The
burden
of
proof
shall
be
on
the
10
defendant
to
prove
intellectual
disability
or
mental
illness
by
11
a
preponderance
of
the
evidence.
12
c.
The
state
or
the
defendant
may
present
evidence
relevant
13
to
any
mitigating
circumstances
which
may
exist.
Mitigating
14
circumstances
may
include
the
following
circumstances:
15
(1)
The
defendant
was
under
the
influence
of
an
extreme
16
mental
or
emotional
disturbance
insufficient
to
constitute
a
17
defense.
18
(2)
The
age
of
the
defendant
at
the
time
of
the
offense.
19
(3)
The
defendant’s
capacity
to
appreciate
the
wrongfulness
20
of
the
defendant’s
conduct
and
to
conform
that
conduct
to
the
21
requirements
of
law
was
significantly
impaired
as
a
result
of
a
22
mental
disease
or
defect
or
intellectual
disability,
but
not
to
23
a
degree
sufficient
to
constitute
a
defense.
24
(4)
The
defendant
has
no
significant
history
of
prior
adult
25
criminal
activity.
26
(5)
The
defendant
acted
under
extreme
duress
or
under
the
27
substantial
domination
of
another
person.
28
(6)
The
defendant
did
not
directly
commit
the
capital
murder
29
offense
and
the
defendant
did
not
intend
to
kill
or
anticipate
30
that
lethal
force
would
be
used.
31
(7)
Any
other
factor
which
is
relevant
to
the
defendant’s
32
character
or
record
or
to
the
circumstances
of
the
offense.
33
d.
The
state
and
the
defendant
or
the
defendant’s
counsel
34
shall
be
permitted
to
present
and
cross-examine
witnesses
and
35
-7-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
7/
17
S.F.
588
present
arguments
for
or
against
a
sentence
of
death.
Evidence
1
regarding
aggravating
and
mitigating
circumstances
shall
not
2
be
governed
by
the
rules
governing
admissibility
of
evidence,
3
except
that
introduction
of
evidence
secured
in
violation
of
4
the
Constitution
of
the
United
States
or
of
the
Constitution
of
5
the
State
of
Iowa
shall
not
be
permitted.
6
6.
At
the
conclusion
of
presentation
of
evidence
in
7
the
penalty
proceeding,
the
state
and
the
defendant
or
the
8
defendant’s
counsel
shall
be
permitted
to
make
closing
9
arguments,
including
any
rebuttal
arguments,
in
the
same
manner
10
as
in
the
initial
proceeding
and
the
following
issues
shall
be
11
determined
by
the
jury
or
by
the
court
if
there
is
no
jury:
12
a.
Whether
the
aggravating
circumstance
or
circumstances
13
have
been
established
beyond
a
reasonable
doubt
and
outweigh
14
any
one
or
more
mitigating
circumstances.
15
b.
Whether
the
defendant
shall
be
sentenced
to
death.
16
7.
A
recommendation
for
a
sentence
of
death
shall
not
be
17
permitted
if
the
recommendation
is
based
on
the
race,
color,
18
religious
beliefs,
national
origin,
or
sex
of
the
defendant
19
or
of
any
victim,
or
based
on
any
other
protected
class
under
20
chapter
216.
After
submission
of
the
issues,
but
prior
to
the
21
return
of
a
finding
in
the
penalty
proceeding,
if
the
matter
22
is
tried
before
a
jury,
the
court
shall
instruct
the
jury
23
that
in
considering
whether
a
sentence
of
death
is
justified,
24
the
jury
shall
not
consider
race,
color,
religious
beliefs,
25
national
origin,
or
sex
of
the
defendant
or
of
any
victim,
or
26
consider
any
other
protected
class
under
chapter
216.
The
27
court
shall
further
instruct
the
jury
that
the
jury
shall
not
28
return
a
sentence
of
death
unless
the
jury
concludes
that
such
29
a
sentence
would
be
recommended
no
matter
what
the
race,
color,
30
religious
beliefs,
national
origin,
sex,
or
other
protected
31
class
of
the
defendant
or
of
any
victim
may
be.
32
8.
After
submission
of
the
issues,
but
prior
to
the
33
commencement
of
the
jury
deliberations
in
the
penalty
34
proceeding,
the
court
shall
instruct
the
jury
that
if
the
35
-8-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
8/
17
S.F.
588
defendant
is
not
sentenced
to
death,
the
court
is
required
by
1
law
to
impose
a
sentence
of
imprisonment
until
death
without
2
parole.
The
court
shall
further
instruct
the
jury
that
3
the
sentence
of
imprisonment
until
death
without
parole
is
4
required
by
law
if
the
jury
fails
to
reach
a
unanimous
verdict
5
recommending
a
sentence
of
death.
6
9.
Concurrently
with
the
return
of
the
findings
on
the
7
issues
submitted
under
subsection
6,
the
jury,
or
the
court
if
8
there
is
no
jury,
shall
return
special
verdicts
as
follows:
9
a.
Which
aggravating
circumstances
were
established
beyond
a
10
reasonable
doubt
and
were
considered
in
reaching
the
verdict.
11
b.
Which
mitigating
circumstances
were
established
and
12
were
considered
in
reaching
the
verdict
returned
on
the
issue
13
specified
in
subsection
6,
paragraph
“a”
.
14
10.
If
the
jury,
or
the
court
if
there
is
no
jury,
15
returns
a
unanimous
affirmative
finding
on
each
of
the
issues
16
submitted
under
subsection
6,
the
court
shall
enter
a
judgment
17
of
conviction
and
shall
sentence
the
defendant
to
death
as
18
provided
in
section
902.1A.
19
11.
However,
if
evidence
that
the
defendant
was
not
a
20
major
participant
in
the
commission
of
the
capital
murder
21
under
section
902.15,
and
that
the
defendant’s
conduct
did
not
22
manifest
a
reckless
indifference
to
human
life
is
presented
23
to
the
jury,
or
to
the
court
if
there
is
no
jury,
the
jury
or
24
the
court
shall
also
return
a
special
verdict
on
the
issue.
25
If
the
jury
unanimously
determines,
or
the
court
if
there
is
26
no
jury,
determines
that
a
preponderance
of
evidence
exists
27
that
shows
that
the
defendant
was
not
a
major
participant
in
28
the
commission
of
the
capital
murder
under
section
902.15,
29
and
that
the
defendant’s
conduct
did
not
manifest
a
reckless
30
indifference
to
human
life,
the
court
shall
enter
a
judgment
31
of
conviction
and
shall
sentence
the
defendant
to
life
32
imprisonment
as
provided
in
section
902.1,
even
if
the
jury
or
33
the
court
returns
unanimous
affirmative
findings
on
each
of
the
34
issues
submitted
under
subsection
6.
35
-9-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
9/
17
S.F.
588
12.
If
the
jury,
or
the
court
if
there
is
no
jury,
returns
1
a
negative
finding
on
any
of
the
issues
submitted
under
2
subsection
6,
the
court
shall
enter
a
judgment
of
conviction
3
and
shall
sentence
the
defendant
to
life
imprisonment
as
4
provided
in
section
902.1.
5
13.
After
a
verdict
has
been
rendered
it
shall
be
recorded
6
on
the
jury
verdict
form
and
shall
be
read
and
recorded
in
open
7
court.
The
jurors
shall
be
collectively
asked
by
the
court
8
whether
the
verdict
returned
is
their
true
and
correct
verdict.
9
Even
though
no
juror
makes
any
declaration
to
the
contrary,
the
10
jury
shall,
if
either
party
so
requests,
be
polled
and
each
11
juror
shall
be
separately
asked
whether
the
verdict
rendered
by
12
the
jury
foreperson
is
the
juror’s
true
and
correct
verdict.
13
If,
upon
either
the
collective
or
the
separate
inquiry,
any
14
juror
denies
that
the
verdict
is
the
juror’s
verdict,
the
court
15
shall
refuse
to
accept
the
verdict.
The
court
may
direct
16
inquiry
or
permit
inquiry
by
counsel
to
ascertain
whether
any
17
juror
has
been
subjected
to
coercion
or
has
become
confused
18
during
the
jury
deliberation
process.
The
court
may,
as
19
appropriate,
direct
the
jury
to
resume
deliberation
in
the
20
case.
If
no
disagreement
on
the
verdict
is
expressed
by
any
of
21
the
jurors,
the
court
shall
discharge
the
jury.
22
Sec.
7.
Section
902.1,
subsection
1,
Code
2019,
is
amended
23
to
read
as
follows:
24
1.
Upon
Except
as
provided
in
section
902.1A,
a
plea
of
25
guilty,
a
verdict
of
guilty,
or
a
special
verdict
upon
which
a
26
judgment
of
conviction
of
a
class
“A”
felony
may
be
rendered,
27
the
court
shall
enter
a
judgment
of
conviction
and
shall
commit
28
the
defendant
into
the
custody
of
the
director
of
the
Iowa
29
department
of
corrections
for
the
rest
of
the
defendant’s
30
life.
Nothing
in
the
Iowa
corrections
code
pertaining
to
31
deferred
judgment,
deferred
sentence,
suspended
sentence,
or
32
reconsideration
of
sentence
applies
to
a
class
“A”
felony,
and
33
a
person
convicted
of
a
class
“A”
felony
shall
not
be
released
34
on
parole
unless
the
governor
commutes
the
sentence
to
a
term
35
-10-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
10/
17
S.F.
588
of
years.
1
Sec.
8.
NEW
SECTION
.
902.1A
Capital
murder
——
death
2
penalty.
3
1.
For
the
purposes
of
this
section,
“lethal
injection”
4
means
a
continuous
intravenous
injection
of
a
lethal
substance
5
sufficient
to
cause
death.
6
2.
Notwithstanding
section
902.1,
upon
return
of
a
plea
7
or
verdict
of
guilty
to
capital
murder
under
section
902.15,
8
and
a
return
of
a
verdict
in
favor
of
a
sentence
of
death
in
9
a
penalty
proceeding
conducted
as
provided
in
section
901E.1,
10
the
court
shall
enter
a
judgment
of
conviction
and
shall
commit
11
the
defendant
into
the
custody
of
the
director
of
the
Iowa
12
department
of
corrections.
The
sentence
shall
be
carried
out
13
by
the
administration
of
a
lethal
injection
pursuant
to
rules
14
adopted
by
the
board
of
corrections.
If
a
defendant,
for
whom
15
a
warrant
of
execution
is
issued,
is
pregnant,
the
execution
16
shall
not
take
place
until
after
the
defendant
is
no
longer
17
pregnant.
If
a
defendant,
for
whom
a
warrant
of
execution
is
18
issued,
is
suffering
from
such
a
diseased
or
deranged
condition
19
of
the
mind
as
to
prevent
the
defendant
from
knowing
the
nature
20
and
quality
of
the
act
the
defendant
has
been
convicted
of,
21
or
from
understanding
that
trial
on
the
offense
has
taken
22
place
and
that
execution
proceedings
are
about
to
take
place,
23
or
to
otherwise
cause
the
defendant
to
lack
the
capacity
24
to
understand
the
sentence
which
has
been
imposed
and
to
25
participate
in
any
legal
proceedings
relating
to
the
sentence,
26
the
execution
shall
not
take
place
until
after
the
defendant’s
27
capacity
is
restored.
If
the
director
of
the
department
of
28
corrections
or
the
defendant’s
counsel
files
a
request
with
the
29
court
which
issued
the
warrant
of
execution,
alleging
that
the
30
defendant
suffers
from
such
a
diseased
or
deranged
condition,
a
31
hearing
on
the
matter
shall
be
held
in
the
manner
provided
in
32
section
812A.1.
33
Sec.
9.
NEW
SECTION
.
902.15
Capital
murder.
34
1.
As
used
in
this
section:
35
-11-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
11/
17
S.F.
588
a.
“Capital
murder”
means
any
murder
that
makes
a
person
1
eligible
for
the
death
penalty.
2
b.
“Eligible
for
the
death
penalty”
means
when
a
person
3
is
convicted
of
the
multiple
offenses
of
murder
in
the
first
4
degree
in
violation
of
section
707.2,
kidnapping
in
violation
5
of
section
710.2,
710.3,
or
710.4,
and
sexual
abuse
in
6
violation
of
section
709.2,
709.3,
or
709.4
with
respect
to
the
7
same
victim,
and
the
victim
is
a
minor.
8
c.
“Intellectually
disabled”
means
significant
subaverage
9
general
intellectual
functioning
accompanied
by
significant
10
deficits
or
impairments
in
adaptive
functioning
manifested
in
11
the
developmental
period,
but
no
later
than
the
age
of
eighteen
12
years,
and
accompanied
by
deficits
in
adaptive
behavior.
13
d.
“Mentally
ill”
means
the
condition
of
a
person
who
14
is
suffering
from
a
chronic
and
persistent
serious
mental
15
disease
or
disorder
and
who,
by
reason
of
that
condition,
lacks
16
sufficient
judgment
to
make
responsible
decisions
regarding
17
treatment
and
is
reasonably
likely
to
injure
the
person’s
self
18
or
others
who
may
come
into
contact
with
the
person
if
the
19
person
is
allowed
to
remain
at
liberty
without
treatment.
20
2.
A
person
who
commits
capital
murder,
who
is
eligible
21
for
the
death
penalty,
who
is
not
intellectually
disabled
or
22
mentally
ill,
and
who
is
age
eighteen
or
older
at
the
time
of
23
the
capital
murder,
shall
be
subject
to
a
sentence
of
death
24
under
section
902.1A.
25
Sec.
10.
NEW
SECTION
.
902.16
Data
collection
for
capital
26
murder
——
death
penalty.
27
1.
The
supreme
court
shall
collect
data
on
all
capital
28
murder
charges
in
which
the
death
penalty
is
or
was
not
waived,
29
which
are
filed
and
processed
in
the
courts
in
this
state.
30
This
data
may
be
used
by
the
supreme
court
to
determine
whether
31
death
sentences
imposed
are
excessive
or
disproportionate,
or
32
under
the
influence
of
prejudice
under
section
814.28.
The
33
court
shall
make
this
data
available
to
litigants
in
death
34
penalty
cases.
35
-12-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
12/
17
S.F.
588
2.
Data
collected
by
public
officials
concerning
factors
1
relevant
to
the
imposition
of
the
death
sentence
shall
be
made
2
publicly
available.
3
Sec.
11.
NEW
SECTION
.
903C.1
Executions
——
refusal
to
4
perform.
5
An
employee
of
the
state
who
may
lawfully
perform,
assist,
or
6
participate
in
the
execution
of
a
person
pursuant
to
section
7
902.1A,
and
rules
adopted
by
the
department
of
corrections,
8
shall
not
be
required
to
perform,
assist,
or
participate
in
9
the
execution.
State
employees
who
refuse
to
perform,
assist,
10
or
participate
in
the
execution
of
a
person
shall
not
be
11
discriminated
against
in
any
way,
including
but
not
limited
12
to
employment,
promotion,
advancement,
transfer,
licensing,
13
education,
training,
or
the
granting
of
any
privileges
or
14
appointments
because
of
the
refusal
to
perform,
assist,
or
15
participate
in
the
execution.
16
Sec.
12.
Section
904.105,
Code
2019,
is
amended
by
adding
17
the
following
new
subsection:
18
NEW
SUBSECTION
.
9A.
Adopt
rules
pursuant
to
chapter
17A
19
pertaining
to
executions
of
persons
convicted
of
capital
murder
20
under
section
902.15.
Rules
adopted
shall
include
but
are
not
21
limited
to
rules
permitting
the
witnessing
of
executions
by
22
members
of
the
public
and
the
victim’s
family.
Invitations
23
to
witness
an
execution
shall
at
least
be
extended
to
the
24
following
representatives
of
the
news
media:
25
a.
A
representative
from
a
wire
service
serving
Iowa.
26
b.
A
representative
from
a
broadcasting
network
serving
27
Iowa.
28
c.
A
representative
from
a
television
station
located
in
29
Iowa.
30
d.
A
representative
from
a
radio
station
located
in
Iowa.
31
e.
A
representative
from
a
daily
newspaper
published
in
32
Iowa.
33
f.
A
representative
from
a
weekly
newspaper
published
in
34
Iowa.
35
-13-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
13/
17
S.F.
588
g.
A
representative
from
the
news
media
from
the
community
1
in
which
the
condemned
person
resided,
if
that
community
is
2
located
in
Iowa.
3
Sec.
13.
IMPLEMENTATION
OF
ACT.
Section
25B.2,
subsection
4
3,
shall
not
apply
to
this
Act.
5
Sec.
14.
SEVERABILITY.
If
any
provision
of
this
Act
or
the
6
application
thereof
to
any
person
is
invalid,
the
invalidity
7
shall
not
affect
the
provisions
or
application
of
this
Act
8
which
can
be
given
effect
without
the
invalid
provisions
or
9
application
and
to
this
end,
the
provisions
of
this
Act
are
10
severable.
11
Sec.
15.
EFFECTIVE
DATE.
This
Act
takes
effect
January
1,
12
2020.
13
Sec.
16.
APPLICABILITY.
This
Act
applies
to
offenses
14
committed
on
or
after
the
effective
date
of
this
Act.
15
EXPLANATION
16
The
inclusion
of
this
explanation
does
not
constitute
agreement
with
17
the
explanation’s
substance
by
the
members
of
the
general
assembly.
18
This
bill
amends
the
Iowa
criminal
code
to
provide
for
19
punishment
by
death
for
capital
murder
committed
by
a
person
20
age
18
or
older
if
the
trial
jury,
or
the
judge
if
there
21
is
no
jury,
makes
specific
findings
and
whether
the
jury
22
believes
the
defendant
should
be
put
to
death
in
a
separate
23
penalty
proceeding
held
after
the
close
of
the
initial
trial
24
proceeding.
25
Under
the
bill,
a
death
penalty
sentence
could
be
imposed
26
if
the
person
is
convicted
of
the
multiple
offenses
of
murder
27
in
the
first
degree,
kidnapping
in
the
first,
second,
or
third
28
degree,
and
sexual
abuse
in
the
first,
second,
or
third
degree
29
with
respect
to
the
same
victim,
and
the
victim
is
a
minor.
30
The
bill
provides
that
in
order
to
receive
a
sentence
of
31
death,
the
defendant
must
be
at
least
18
years
of
age
at
the
32
time
the
murder
in
the
first
degree
was
committed,
must
not
be
33
mentally
ill
or
intellectually
disabled,
and
must
have
been
a
34
major
participant
in
the
commission
of
the
crime
or
must
have
35
-14-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
14/
17
S.F.
588
shown
a
manifest
indifference
to
human
life.
1
If
a
person
is
indigent
and
is
charged
with
capital
murder,
2
payment
of
costs
for
two
attorneys
is
authorized.
The
supreme
3
court
is
required
to
establish
standards
for
the
competency
4
of
counsel
in
death
penalty
cases.
The
state
public
defender
5
is
charged
with
establishing
teams
of
qualified
lead
and
6
co-counsel
for
death
penalty
cases,
as
well
as
conducting
7
or
sponsoring
specialized
training
programs
for
attorneys
8
representing
persons
who
may
be
executed.
9
If
a
capital
murder
case
proceeds
to
trial
and
a
notice
of
10
intent
to
seek
the
death
penalty
has
been
filed,
in
addition
to
11
any
other
defenses
which
may
be
presented
to
the
charge,
the
12
defendant
may
raise
the
issue
of
intellectual
disability
or
13
mental
illness
during
the
time
of
filing
pretrial
motions.
14
Once
the
evidence
is
submitted
to
the
jury,
the
court
15
will
instruct
the
jury,
at
the
defendant’s
request,
that
in
16
considering
whether
a
sentence
of
death
is
justified,
the
17
race,
color,
religious
beliefs,
national
origin,
sex,
or
other
18
protected
classes
under
Code
chapter
216
of
the
defendant
or
19
of
any
victim
is
not
to
be
considered.
The
supreme
court
20
shall
collect
evidence
relating
to
whether
the
death
sentences
21
imposed
are
excessive,
disproportionate,
or
imposed
under
the
22
influence
of
prejudice
at
trial
which
will
be
available
to
23
litigants.
24
The
sentence
of
death
is
imposed
only
when
the
trier
of
fact
25
(the
jury
or
the
court
if
the
defendant
has
waived
the
right
to
26
a
jury
trial)
unanimously
answers
two
questions
affirmatively:
27
(1)
whether
aggravating
circumstances
established
beyond
28
a
reasonable
doubt
outweigh
any
mitigating
circumstances
29
that
may
exist;
and
(2)
whether
the
defendant
should
be
30
sentenced
to
death.
Mitigating
factors
the
trier
of
fact
may
31
consider
include
the
following:
the
defendant
was
under
the
32
influence
of
an
extreme
mental
or
emotional
disturbance;
the
33
age
of
the
defendant;
the
defendant’s
ability
to
appreciate
34
the
wrongfulness
of
the
conduct
due
to
mental
disease
but
35
-15-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
15/
17
S.F.
588
not
to
a
degree
to
constitute
a
defense;
the
defendant
has
1
no
significant
prior
criminal
history;
the
defendant
was
2
under
extreme
duress;
the
defendant
did
not
directly
commit
3
the
murder;
and
the
defendant’s
character
or
record
or
the
4
circumstances
of
the
offense.
The
sentencing
proceeding
is
5
conducted
separately
from
the
finding
of
guilt
or
innocence
by
6
the
same
trier
of
fact.
7
For
the
sentencing
proceeding,
the
trier
of
fact
(the
jury
8
or
the
court
if
the
defendant
has
waived
the
right
to
have
9
the
jury
hear
the
proceedings)
is
to
weigh
any
aggravating
10
circumstances
established
beyond
a
reasonable
doubt
by
the
11
state
against
any
of
the
enumerated
mitigating
circumstances
12
which
may
be
presented
by
the
defendant.
Evidence
of
certain
13
juvenile
delinquency
adjudications
is
not
admissible
in
any
14
proceeding
to
determine
the
sentence.
If
the
jury
fails
to
15
agree
unanimously
on
the
required
affirmative
findings,
the
16
penalty
imposed
would
be
life
imprisonment.
17
The
death
penalty
sentence
would
be
reviewed
automatically
18
by
the
supreme
court.
The
supreme
court
shall
review
the
trial
19
and
judgment
separately
from
the
sentencing
proceeding.
If
the
20
supreme
court
finds
error
in
the
sentencing
proceeding,
the
21
supreme
court
may
remand
the
case
back
to
district
court
for
a
22
new
sentencing
hearing.
The
bill
requires
the
supreme
court
to
23
examine
whether
the
sentence
is
excessive
or
disproportionate
24
to
penalties
in
similar
cases.
If
affirmed
by
the
supreme
25
court,
the
penalty
would
be
accomplished
by
lethal
injection.
26
The
bill
requires
the
board
of
corrections
to
adopt
rules
27
pertaining
to
executions,
including
rules
pertaining
to
the
28
witnessing
of
executions.
29
A
person
who
is
sentenced
to
death,
but
who
is
pregnant
when
30
the
warrant
of
execution
is
issued,
is
not
to
be
executed
until
31
the
person
is
no
longer
pregnant.
A
procedure
is
also
provided
32
to
stay
execution
of
a
condemned
inmate
who
becomes
insane
33
after
conviction
but
before
execution.
34
An
employee
of
the
state
shall
not
be
required
to
perform
or
35
-16-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
16/
17
S.F.
588
assist
in
any
execution
and
shall
not
be
discriminated
against
1
for
refusing
to
participate.
2
The
bill
may
include
a
state
mandate
as
defined
in
Code
3
section
25B.3.
The
bill
makes
inapplicable
Code
section
25B.2,
4
subsection
3,
which
would
relieve
a
political
subdivision
from
5
complying
with
a
state
mandate
if
funding
for
the
cost
of
6
the
state
mandate
is
not
provided
or
specified.
Therefore,
7
political
subdivisions
are
required
to
comply
with
any
state
8
mandate
included
in
the
bill.
9
The
bill
contains
severability
provisions
and
takes
effect
10
January
1,
2020,
and
applies
only
to
offenses
committed
on
or
11
after
that
date.
12
-17-
LSB
1839SV
(1)
88
as/rh
17/
17