Bill Text: CA SB882 | 2025-2026 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Remote court appearances.
Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1)
Status: (Introduced) 2026-04-13 - April 21 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author. [SB882 Detail]
Download: California-2025-SB882-Amended.html
|
Amended
IN
Senate
March 25, 2026 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION
Senate Bill
No. 882
| Introduced by Senator Rubio |
January 13, 2026 |
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 882, as amended, Rubio.
Remote court appearances.
Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2027, a party to appear remotely and a court to conduct conferences, hearings, proceedings, and trials in civil cases, in whole or in part, through the use of remote technology.
This bill would extend the operation of these provisions to January 31, 2029. The bill would additionally authorize any non-party witness to appear remotely pursuant to these provisions.
Existing law establishes specified procedures and requirements for remote appearances for court proceedings in civil and criminal actions.
This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to require courts to allow any party or witness to appear remotely at a civil or criminal state court hearing, trial, or conference, except as specified, until January 31, 2029.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee:Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
This act shall be known, and may be cited as, the Keep Courts Safe from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Act.SEC. 2.
(a) The Legislature finds and declares the following:(1) Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, California courts have acquired over five years of experience utilizing technology to allow for remote court appearances. According to a 2025 report by the Judicial Council of California, over 6,500 remote hearings take place every day and 90 percent of participants had an overall positive experience. Vulnerable court users, such as victims of domestic violence and elder abuse, have reported reduced anxiety and stress by not having to appear in court with the perpetrator.
(2) Since January, 2025, there has been a dramatic increase in federal immigration
enforcement operations across the state. California residents have been consistently targeted and their rights have been indiscriminately violated by federal immigration enforcement agents conducting operations at state courthouses.
(3) All California residents should have the opportunity to safely and effectively exercise their legal rights and participate in the justice system.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would require courts to allow any party or witness to appear remotely at a civil or criminal state court hearing, trial, or conference, except as specified, until January 31, 2029.
SEC. 3.
Section 367.75 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:367.75.
(a) (1) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) and (d), in civil cases, when a party or witness has provided notice to the court and all other parties that it intends to appear remotely, a party or witness may appear remotely and the court may conduct conferences, hearings, and proceedings, in whole or in part, through the use of remote technology.(2) This section does not apply to any of the following type of proceedings:
(A) Any proceeding in matters identified in
paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 367.76.
(B) A juvenile justice proceeding covered by Section 679.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(b) Except as otherwise provided by law, the court may require a party or witness to appear in person at a conference, hearing, or proceeding described in subdivision (a), or under subdivisions (e) and (h), if any of the following conditions are present:
(1) The court with jurisdiction over the case does not have the technology necessary to conduct the conference, hearing, or proceeding remotely.
(2) Although the court has the requisite technology, the quality of the technology or audibility at a conference, hearing, or proceeding prevents the effective management or resolution of the conference, hearing,
or proceeding.
(3)The court determines on a hearing-by-hearing basis that an in-person appearance would materially assist in the determination of the conference, hearing, or proceeding or in the effective management or resolution of the particular case.
(4)
(3) The quality of the technology or audibility at a conference, hearing, or proceeding inhibits the court reporter’s ability to accurately prepare a transcript of the conference, hearing, or proceeding.
(5)
(4) The quality of the technology or audibility at a conference, hearing, or proceeding prevents an attorney from being able to provide effective representation to the attorney’s client.
(6)
(5) The quality of the technology or audibility at a conference, hearing, or proceeding inhibits a court interpreter’s ability to provide language access to a court user or authorized individual.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), an An
expert witness may appear remotely absent good cause to compel in-person testimony.
(d) (1) Except as otherwise provided by law and subject to the limitations of subdivision (b), upon its own motion or the motion of any party, the court may conduct a trial or evidentiary hearing, in whole or in part, through the use of remote technology, absent a showing by the opposing party as to why a remote appearance or testimony should not be allowed.
(2) (A) Except as provided in Section 269 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 69957 of the Government Code, if the court conducts a trial, in whole or in part, through the use of remote technology, the official reporter or official reporter pro tempore shall be physically present in the courtroom.
(B) If
the court conducts a trial, in whole or in part, through the use of remote technology, upon request, the court interpreter shall be physically present in the courtroom.
(e) (1) Before the court with jurisdiction over the case may proceed with a remote conference, hearing, proceeding, or trial, the court shall have a process for a party, witness, official reporter, official reporter pro tempore, court interpreter, or other court personnel to alert the judicial officer of technology or audibility issues that arise during the conference, hearing, proceeding, or trial.
(2) The court shall require that a remote appearance by a party or witness have the necessary privacy and security appropriate for the conference, hearing, proceeding, or trial.
(3) The court shall inform all parties, particularly
parties without legal representation, about the potential technological or audibility issues that could arise when using remote technology, which may require a delay of or halt the conference, hearing, proceeding, or trial. The court shall make information available to self-represented parties regarding the options for appearing in person and through the use of remote technology.
(f) The court shall not require a party to appear through the use of remote technology. If the court permits an appearance through remote technology, the court must ensure that technology in the courtroom enables all parties, whether appearing remotely or in person, to fully participate in the conference, hearing, or proceeding.
(g) A self-represented party may appear remotely in a conference, hearing, or proceeding conducted through the use of remote technology only if they agree to do so.
(h) Any juvenile dependency proceeding may be conducted in whole or in part through the use of remote technology subject to the following:
(1) Any person authorized to be present may request to appear remotely.
(2) (A) Any party to the proceeding may request that the court compel the physical presence of a witness or party. A witness, including a party providing testimony, may appear through remote technology only with the consent of all parties, except as provided in subparagraph (B), and if the witness has access to the appropriate technology.
(B) A parent, child, nonminor dependent, or Indian tribe as defined in Section 224.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, may utilize remote technology for the appearance of an expert witness
without the consent of all parties.
(3) A court shall not require a party to appear through the use of remote technology.
(4) The confidentiality requirements that apply to an in-person juvenile dependency proceeding shall apply to a juvenile dependency proceeding conducted through the use of remote technology.
(i) (1) Notwithstanding Section 8613.5 of the Family Code, in an adoption proceeding under Division 13 (commencing with Section 8500) of the Family Code, the court may conduct an adoption finalization hearing, in whole or in part, through the use of remote technology, without the court finding that it is impossible or impracticable for either prospective adoptive parent to make the appearance in person.
(2) A court shall not
require a party to appear through the use of remote technology.
(3) The confidentiality and privacy requirements that apply to an in-person adoption finalization hearing, including, but not limited to, the requirements in Section 8611 of the Family Code, apply to an adoption finalization hearing conducted through the use of remote technology.
(j) For purposes of this section, a party includes a nonparty subject to Chapter 6 of Title 4 of Part 4 (commencing with Section 2020.010).
(k) Subject to the limitations in subdivision (b), this section is not intended to prohibit the use of appearances through the use of remote technology when stipulated by attorneys for represented parties.
(l) Consistent with its constitutional rulemaking authority, the
Judicial Council shall adopt rules to implement the policies and provisions in this section to promote statewide consistency, including, but not limited to, the following procedures:
(1) A deadline by which a party must notify the court and the other parties of their request to appear remotely.
(2) Procedures and standards for a judicial officer to determine when a conference, hearing, or proceeding may be conducted through the use of remote technology. The procedures and standards shall require that a judicial officer give consideration to the limited access to technology or transportation that a party or witness might have.
(m) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027,
31, 2029, and as of that date is repealed.
