Bill Text: CA AB687 | 2015-2016 | Regular Session | Amended

---

Bill Title: Contracts: liquidated damages.

Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Republican 1)

Status: (Failed) 2016-02-01 - From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. [AB687 Detail]

Download: California-2015-AB687-Amended.html

---

BILL NUMBER: AB 687	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  JANUARY 4, 2016

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Wilk

                        FEBRUARY 25, 2015

   An act to amend Section 1671 of the Civil Code, relating to
contracts.



	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 687, as amended, Wilk. Contracts: liquidated damages.
   Existing law establishes the general presumption that a
contractual provision liquidating the damages for the breach of a
contract is valid unless the party seeking to invalidate the
provision establishes that the provision was unreasonable under the
circumstances existing at the time the contract was made. Existing
law excepts from the presumption certain contracts, including those
for damages that are to be recovered from a party to a lease of a
dwelling. 
   This bill would provide that if parties to a pending action
stipulate for settlement of an action, as specified, a provision of
the stipulation liquidating damages for breach of the stipulation is
valid unless the party seeking to invalidate the liquidated damages
provision establishes that the amount of liquidated damages exceeds
the damages, interest, recoverable costs, and reasonable attorney's
fees sought in the action.  
   This bill would require a court, in entering a judgment pursuant
to a written settlement agreement between a creditor and a debtor, to
consider the amounts sought in the litigation in determining the
reasonableness of the amounts sought pursuant to the settlement
agreement. The bill would also require a party seeking to enforce a
settlement agreement to comply with specified evidentiary
requirements. 
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  SECTION 1.  Section 1671 of the Civil Code is amended to read:
   1671.  (a) This section does not apply in any case where another
statute expressly applicable to the contract prescribes the rules or
standard for determining the validity of a provision in the contract
liquidating the damages for the breach of the contract.
   (b) Except as provided in subdivision (c), a provision in a
contract liquidating the damages for the breach of the contract is
valid unless the party seeking to invalidate the provision
establishes that the provision was unreasonable under the
circumstances existing at the time the contract was made.
   (c) The validity of a liquidated damages provision shall be
determined under subdivision (d) and not under subdivision (b) where
the liquidated damages are sought to be recovered from either:
   (1) A party to a contract for the retail purchase, or rental, by
such party of personal property or services, primarily for the party'
s personal, family, or household purposes; or
   (2) A party to a lease of real property for use as a dwelling by
the party or those dependent upon the party for support.
   (d) In the cases described in subdivision (c), a provision in a
contract liquidating damages for the breach of the contract is void
except that the parties to such a contract may agree therein upon an
amount which shall be presumed to be the amount of damage sustained
by a breach thereof, when, from the nature of the case, it would be
impracticable or extremely difficult to fix the actual damage.

   (e) Notwithstanding subdivisions (c) and (d), if parties to a
pending action stipulate for settlement of an action, either in a
signed writing outside the court's presence or orally before the
court, a provision of the stipulation liquidating damages for breach
of the stipulation is valid unless the party seeking to invalidate
the liquidated damages provision establishes that the amount of
liquidated damages exceeds the damages, interest, recoverable costs,
and reasonable attorney's fees sought in the action.  
   (e) In entering a judgment pursuant to a written settlement
agreement entered into between a creditor and a debtor pursuant to
Section 664.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court shall
consider the amounts sought in the litigation in determining the
reasonableness of the amounts sought pursuant to the settlement
agreement. The party seeking to enforce the settlement agreement
shall comply with the evidentiary requirements of subdivision (a),
(b), (c), or (e) of Section 585 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as
applicable.