Bill Text: CA AB2489 | 2025-2026 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Controlled substances: research.
Sponsorship: Bipartisan Bill
Status: (Introduced) 2026-05-14 - In committee: Held under submission. [AB2489 Detail]
Download: California-2025-AB2489-Amended.html
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 09, 2026 |
| Introduced by Assembly Member Lowenthal (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Jeff Gonzalez) |
February 20, 2026 |
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NOBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(k)In order to facilitate urgently needed clinical research with veteran participants, and facilitate clinical research with readily available, nonproprietary botanical forms of breakthrough treatments, and thereby provide veterans with debilitating or life-threatening mental health indications with timely, lawful, and medically supervised access to FDA-designated breakthrough therapies, it is necessary to provide the state’s public hospitals and research institutions with the ability to conduct that research in compliance with state law. In order to provide this critical ability, the Legislature finds it is necessary to pass this act to amend Sections 11213 and 11392 of the Health and Safety Code, and add Article 1.5 (commencing with Section 11214) to Chapter 5 of Division 10 of the Health and Safety Code.
(a)Persons who, pursuant to any law, are lawfully entitled to use Schedule I, Schedule II, or both, controlled substances for the purpose of research, instruction, or analysis, may lawfully obtain and use those substances, as defined in this division, for those purposes upon approval for use of those controlled substances in bona fide research, instruction, or analysis by the Research Advisory Panel established pursuant to Section 11480.
(b)Such research, instruction, or analysis shall be carried on only under the auspices of the
head of a research project that has been approved by the Research Advisory Panel pursuant to Section 11480.1. Complete records of receipts, stocks at hand, and use of these controlled substances shall be kept.
SEC. 3.SEC. 2.
Article 1.5 (commencing with Section 11214) is added to Chapter 5 of Division 10 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:Article 1.5. California Veterans’ Right to Try Act
11214.
This article shall be known, and may be cited, as the California Veterans’ Right to Try Act.(a)In order to facilitate urgently needed human clinical research to address the statewide veteran mental health emergency declared by the Legislature, the state authorizes the
11214.1.
The Research Advisory Panel(b)For the purposes of this
article, those applications shall be held by the panel on behalf of the state, and are referred to throughout this article as RAP-C IND.
(a)Notwithstanding any other law, and only upon the failure of the United States Food and Drug Administration to timely approve a RAP-C IND submitted pursuant to Section 11214.1, the panel may approve research projects investigating the safety and efficacy of the Schedule I or Schedule II controlled substance administered to human subjects.
(b)In order to qualify for the project, the bona fide clinical research on the safety and efficacy of those Schedule I or Schedule II controlled substances when provided to subjects shall meet both of the following requirements:
(1)Provided to veterans diagnosed with two or more severe or life-threatening mental health conditions.
(2)The veterans were deemed ineligible to participate in United States Food and Drug Administration-approved trials.
(c)The Research Advisory Panel shall review applications for research projects, using the process set forth in subdivision (d), provided that those applications include both of the following:
(1)Proof of independent peer review of the study for scientific merit and rigor by the National Institutes of Health, the United States Department of Defense, the Heffter Research Institute, the United States National Science Foundation, or a comparable group within an institutional setting that has previous experience with research or grant review.
(2)An approval letter from an institutional review board established in accordance with federal law, including, but not limited to, Part 46 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, demonstrating that the board’s evaluation of the underlying research protocol has considered relevant federal and state laws regarding the use of human subjects, including, but not limited to, the Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation Act (Chapter 1.3 (commencing with Section 24170) of Division 20) and laws governing research involving inmates, as described in Title 2.1 (commencing with Section 3500) of Part 3 of the Penal Code, the Information Practices Act of 1977 (Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1798) of Title 1.8 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code), and laws governing birth and death certificates, as described in Part 1 (commencing with Section 102100) of Division 102, Applicants who propose to conduct their research at a municipal or county public health facility may obtain and submit an approval letter from the State Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects, or an independent third-party institutional review board applying state law. A letter submitted pursuant to this paragraph may indicate approval by the board conditioned upon the approval of the panel.
(d)Upon receiving a research project application that satisfies the criteria in subdivision (c), the panel chairperson, in consultation with the panel’s executive officer, may assign two or more individual panel members to conduct an expedited review of eligible research applications and deputize those panel members to approve those applications on behalf of the panel without the need for a full panel vote at a regularly scheduled meeting. Assigned panel members may approve eligible research project applications. Individual panel members also may communicate and consult asynchronously with other individual panel members with complementary core competencies outside of panel meetings in order to conduct their individual reviews. Panel members assigned to conduct a
review pursuant to this subdivision are not a state body under the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act. Panel members shall notify the panel’s chairperson and executive officer of their decision to approve or withhold approval of the eligible research applications assigned for their review.
