Bill Text: CA AB1879 | 2015-2016 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Foster youth: permanency.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Failed) 2016-11-30 - From committee without further action. [AB1879 Detail]
Download: California-2015-AB1879-Amended.html
BILL NUMBER: AB 1879 AMENDED
BILL TEXT
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 13, 2016
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 28, 2016
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member McCarty
FEBRUARY 10, 2016
An act to amend Sections 361.5, 366, 366.21, 366.22, 366.25,
366.26, 366.3, 706.5, 706.6, 727.2, 727.3, 11400, 16501, and 16501.1
of, and to add Section 371 to, the Welfare and Institutions Code,
relating to foster youth.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1879, as amended, McCarty. Foster youth: permanency.
Existing law provides that a minor may be removed from the
physical custody of his or her parents if there is a substantial
danger to the physical health of the child or the child is suffering
severe emotional damage and there are no reasonable means to protect
the child without removing him or her. Additionally, a minor who is
in wardship proceedings may be removed from the physical custody of
his or her parents if the court finds that one of several facts is
present, including that the parent or guardian has failed to provide
proper maintenance, training, and education for the minor. When a
minor is removed from the physical custody of his or her parents in
dependency or wardship proceedings, existing law generally requires
that reunification services be provided to the minor and his or her
family. Existing law also provides for periodic status review
hearings, at which the court is required to return a minor to the
physical custody of his or her parents unless the court makes
specified findings.
Existing law requires, if a minor is not returned to the physical
custody of his or her parents, the juvenile court to devise a
permanency plan, including, among others things, an order that the
child be placed for adoption, an order that a legal guardian be
appointed, or an order that the child remain in another planned
permanent living arrangement if the child is 16 years of age or
older. Existing law requires, prior to ordering a dependent child to
remain in another planned permanent living arrangement as his or her
permanent plan, the court to make a finding that the child is not a
proper subject for adoption and has no one willing to accept legal
guardianship.
This bill would require the court to order the provision of
child-centered specialized permanency services, as defined, to a
child who does not have a permanent plan of adoption and who is not
placed with a fit and willing relative, or who is 16 years of age or
older and placed in another planned permanent living arrangement. The
bill would also authorize the court to order these services for a
nonminor dependent in another planned permanent living arrangement.
The bill would require the case plan for the child to identify the
child-centered specialized permanency services to be
provided, provided and would require the court
to review the child-centered specialized permanency services that
have been provided to the child, as specified.
The bill would also require, in any case in which the court has
ordered a dependent child or a ward of the juvenile court placed for
adoption or has appointed a relative or nonrelative legal guardian,
the social worker or probation officer to provide the prospective
adoptive family or the guardian or guardians specified mental health
treatment information.
By expanding the duties of social workers and probation officers
with regard to the provision of child welfare services, this bill
would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the
following:
(1) As of September 30, 2014, there were 62,545 California
children living in the foster care system, with 16,561 children, or
approximately 26 percent, in foster care for over three years, and
9,780 children, or approximately 16 percent, in foster care for over
five years. Adult outcomes are often poor for the children who
emancipate from foster care without a permanent family. Within two
years of exiting the foster care system, approximately 50 percent of
former foster youth will be homeless, in prison, victimized, or dead.
(2) Families committing to adoption or guardianship of children in
foster care may face challenges unique to the adoption or
guardianship experience that result from the trauma of the child's
adverse childhood experiences. These challenges can create stress
that puts the adoption or guardianship at risk of disruption and
potentially results in the child's reentry into the foster care
system.
(3) Provisions of the federal Preventing Sex Trafficking and
Strengthening Families Act (Public Law 113-183) address the need to
enhance efforts to improve permanency outcomes for older children in
care by eliminating the use of other planned permanent living
arrangements as a permanent plan for children under 16 years of age.
(4) The new federal law also requires documentation of intensive
and ongoing efforts to achieve permanence for youth with a case plan
for another planned permanent living arrangement, and adds additional
case plan and case plan review system requirements for children 16
years of age and older.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this act to
improve permanency outcomes and stability for older children in
foster care by doing the following:
(1) Improving the stability of adoptive and guardianship families
by requiring the State Department of Social Services, county adoption
agencies, county child welfare agencies, and licensed adoption
agencies to provide potential adoptive families and guardians
information, in writing, regarding the importance of working with
mental health providers that have specialized adoption or permanency
clinical training and experience if the family needs clinical
support, and a description of the desirable clinical expertise the
family should look for when choosing an adoption- or
permanency-competent mental health professional.
(2) Improving permanency outcomes for children in foster care by
requiring child-centered, specialized permanency services for
children whose reunification services have been terminated, who are
not placed with a fit and willing relative, and who are considered
unlikely to achieve a permanent family.
SEC. 2. Section 361.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
361.5. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), or when the
parent has voluntarily relinquished the child and the relinquishment
has been filed with the State Department of Social Services, or upon
the establishment of an order of guardianship pursuant to Section
360, or when a court adjudicates a petition under Section 329 to
modify the court's jurisdiction from delinquency jurisdiction to
dependency jurisdiction pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2)
of subdivision (b) of Section 607.2 and the parents or guardian of
the ward have had reunification services terminated under the
delinquency jurisdiction, whenever a child is removed from a parent's
or guardian's custody, the juvenile court shall order the social
worker to provide child welfare services to the child and the child's
mother and statutorily presumed father or guardians. Upon a finding
and declaration of paternity by the juvenile court or proof of a
prior declaration of paternity by any court of competent
jurisdiction, the juvenile court may order services for the child and
the biological father, if the court determines that the services
will benefit the child.
(1) Family reunification services, when provided, shall be
provided as follows:
(A) Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (C), for a child
who, on the date of initial removal from the physical custody of his
or her parent or guardian, was three years of age or older,
court-ordered services shall be provided beginning with the
dispositional hearing and ending 12 months after the date the child
entered foster care as provided in Section 361.49, unless the child
is returned to the home of the parent or guardian.
(B) For a child who, on the date of initial removal from the
physical custody of his or her parent or guardian, was under three
years of age, court-ordered services shall be provided for a period
of six months from the dispositional hearing as provided in
subdivision (e) of Section 366.21, but no longer than 12 months from
the date the child entered foster care as provided in Section 361.49
unless the child is returned to the home of the parent or guardian.
(C) For the purpose of placing and maintaining a sibling group
together in a permanent home should reunification efforts fail, for a
child in a sibling group whose members were removed from parental
custody at the same time, and in which one member of the sibling
group was under three years of age on the date of initial removal
from the physical custody of his or her parent or guardian,
court-ordered services for some or all of the sibling group may be
limited as set forth in subparagraph (B). For the purposes of this
paragraph, "a sibling group" shall mean two or more children who are
related to each other as full or half siblings.
(2) Any motion to terminate court-ordered reunification services
prior to the hearing set pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section
366.21 for a child described by subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), or
prior to the hearing set pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section
366.21 for a child described by subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph
(1), shall be made pursuant to the requirements set forth in
subdivision (c) of Section 388. A motion to terminate court-ordered
reunification services shall not be required at the hearing set
pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 366.21 if the court finds by
clear and convincing evidence one of the following:
(A) That the child was removed initially under subdivision (g) of
Section 300 and the whereabouts of the parent are still unknown.
(B) That the parent has failed to contact and visit the child.
(C) That the parent has been convicted of a felony indicating
parental unfitness.
(3) (A) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of
paragraph (1), court-ordered services may be extended up to a maximum
time period not to exceed 18 months after the date the child was
originally removed from physical custody of his or her parent or
guardian if it can be shown, at the hearing held pursuant to
subdivision (f) of Section 366.21, that the permanent plan for the
child is that he or she will be returned and safely maintained in the
home within the extended time period. The court shall extend the
time period only if it finds that there is a substantial probability
that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or guardian within the extended time period or that
reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or guardian.
In determining whether court-ordered services may be extended, the
court shall consider the special circumstances of an incarcerated or
institutionalized parent or parents, parent or parents court-ordered
to a residential substance abuse treatment program, or a parent who
has been arrested and issued an immigration hold, detained by the
United States Department of Homeland Security, or deported to his or
her country of origin, including, but not limited to, barriers to the
parent's or guardian's access to services and ability to maintain
contact with his or her child. The court shall also consider, among
other factors, good faith efforts that the parent or guardian has
made to maintain contact with the child. If the court extends the
time period, the court shall specify the factual basis for its
conclusion that there is a substantial probability that the child
will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent or
guardian within the extended time period. The court also shall make
findings pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366 and subdivision
(e) of Section 358.1.
(B) When counseling or other treatment services are ordered, the
parent or guardian shall be ordered to participate in those services,
unless the parent's or guardian's participation is deemed by the
court to be inappropriate or potentially detrimental to the child, or
unless a parent or guardian is incarcerated or detained by the
United States Department of Homeland Security and the corrections
facility in which he or she is incarcerated does not provide access
to the treatment services ordered by the court, or has been deported
to his or her country of origin and services ordered by the court are
not accessible in that country. Physical custody of the child by the
parents or guardians during the applicable time period under
subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1) shall not serve to
interrupt the running of the time period. If, at the end of the
applicable time period, a child cannot be safely returned to the care
and custody of a parent or guardian without court supervision, but
the child clearly desires contact with the parent or guardian, the
court shall take the child's desire into account in devising a
permanency plan.
(C) In cases in which the child was under three years of age on
the date of the initial removal from the physical custody of his or
her parent or guardian or is a member of a sibling group as described
in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1), the court shall inform the
parent or guardian that the failure of the parent or guardian to
participate regularly in any court-ordered treatment programs or to
cooperate or avail himself or herself of services provided as part of
the child welfare services case plan may result in a termination of
efforts to reunify the family after six months. The court shall
inform the parent or guardian of the factors used in subdivision (e)
of Section 366.21 to determine whether to limit services to six
months for some or all members of a sibling group as described in
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1).
(4) (A) Notwithstanding paragraph (3), court-ordered services may
be extended up to a maximum time period not to exceed 24 months after
the date the child was originally removed from physical custody of
his or her parent or guardian if it is shown, at the hearing held
pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 366.22, that the permanent
plan for the child is that he or she will be returned and safely
maintained in the home within the extended time period. The court
shall extend the time period only if it finds that it is in the child'
s best interest to have the time period extended and that there is a
substantial probability that the child will be returned to the
physical custody of his or her parent or guardian who is described in
subdivision (b) of Section 366.22 within the extended time period,
or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or
guardian. If the court extends the time period, the court shall
specify the factual basis for its conclusion that there is a
substantial probability that the child will be returned to the
physical custody of his or her parent or guardian within the extended
time period. The court also shall make findings pursuant to
subdivision (a) of Section 366 and subdivision (e) of Section 358.1.
(B) When counseling or other treatment services are ordered, the
parent or guardian shall be ordered to participate in those services,
in order for substantial probability to be found. Physical custody
of the child by the parents or guardians during the applicable time
period under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1) shall not
serve to interrupt the running of the time period. If, at the end of
the applicable time period, the child cannot be safely returned to
the care and custody of a parent or guardian without court
supervision, but the child clearly desires contact with the parent or
guardian, the court shall take the child's desire into account in
devising a permanency plan.
(C) Except in cases in which, pursuant to subdivision (b), the
court does not order reunification services, the court shall inform
the parent or parents of Section 366.26 and shall specify that the
parent's or parents' parental rights may be terminated.
(b) Reunification services need not be provided to a parent or
guardian described in this subdivision when the court finds, by clear
and convincing evidence, any of the following:
(1) That the whereabouts of the parent or guardian is unknown. A
finding pursuant to this paragraph shall be supported by an affidavit
or by proof that a reasonably diligent search has failed to locate
the parent or guardian. The posting or publication of notices is not
required in that search.
(2) That the parent or guardian is suffering from a mental
disability that is described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section
7820) of Part 4 of Division 12 of the Family Code and that renders
him or her incapable of utilizing those services.
(3) That the child or a sibling of the child has been previously
adjudicated a dependent pursuant to any subdivision of Section 300 as
a result of physical or sexual abuse, that following that
adjudication the child had been removed from the custody of his or
her parent or guardian pursuant to Section 361, that the child has
been returned to the custody of the parent or guardian from whom the
child had been taken originally, and that the child is being removed
pursuant to Section 361, due to additional physical or sexual abuse.
(4) That the parent or guardian of the child has caused the death
of another child through abuse or neglect.
(5) That the child was brought within the jurisdiction of the
court under subdivision (e) of Section 300 because of the conduct of
that parent or guardian.
(6) That the child has been adjudicated a dependent pursuant to
any subdivision of Section 300 as a result of severe sexual abuse or
the infliction of severe physical harm to the child, a sibling, or a
half sibling by a parent or guardian, as defined in this subdivision,
and the court makes a factual finding that it would not benefit the
child to pursue reunification services with the offending parent or
guardian.
(A) A finding of severe sexual abuse, for the purposes of this
subdivision, may be based on, but is not limited to, sexual
intercourse, or stimulation involving genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal contact, whether between the parent or
guardian and the child or a sibling or half sibling of the child, or
between the child or a sibling or half sibling of the child and
another person or animal with the actual or implied consent of the
parent or guardian; or the penetration or manipulation of the child'
s, sibling's, or half sibling's genital organs or rectum by any
animate or inanimate object for the sexual gratification of the
parent or guardian, or for the sexual gratification of another person
with the actual or implied consent of the parent or guardian.
(B) A finding of the infliction of severe physical harm, for the
purposes of this subdivision, may be based on, but is not limited to,
deliberate and serious injury inflicted to or on a child's body or
the body of a sibling or half sibling of the child by an act or
omission of the parent or guardian, or of another individual or
animal with the consent of the parent or guardian; deliberate and
torturous confinement of the child, sibling, or half sibling in a
closed space; or any other torturous act or omission that would be
reasonably understood to cause serious emotional damage.
(7) That the parent is not receiving reunification services for a
sibling or a half sibling of the child pursuant to paragraph (3),
(5), or (6).
(8) That the child was conceived by means of the commission of an
offense listed in Section 288 or 288.5 of the Penal Code, or by an
act committed outside of this state that, if committed in this state,
would constitute one of those offenses. This paragraph only applies
to the parent who committed the offense or act.
(9) That the child has been found to be a child described in
subdivision (g) of Section 300; that the parent or guardian of the
child willfully abandoned the child, and the court finds that the
abandonment itself constituted a serious danger to the child; or that
the parent or other person having custody of the child voluntarily
surrendered physical custody of the child pursuant to Section 1255.7
of the Health and Safety Code. For the purposes of this paragraph,
"serious danger" means that without the intervention of another
person or agency, the child would have sustained severe or permanent
disability, injury, illness, or death. For purposes of this
paragraph, "willful abandonment" shall not be construed as actions
taken in good faith by the parent without the intent of placing the
child in serious danger.
(10) That the court ordered termination of reunification services
for any siblings or half siblings of the child because the parent or
guardian failed to reunify with the sibling or half sibling after the
sibling or half sibling had been removed from that parent or
guardian pursuant to Section 361 and that parent or guardian is the
same parent or guardian described in subdivision (a) and that,
according to the findings of the court, this parent or guardian has
not subsequently made a reasonable effort to treat the problems that
led to removal of the sibling or half sibling of that child from that
parent or guardian.
(11) That the parental rights of a parent over any sibling or half
sibling of the child had been permanently severed, and this parent
is the same parent described in subdivision (a), and that, according
to the findings of the court, this parent has not subsequently made a
reasonable effort to treat the problems that led to removal of the
sibling or half sibling of that child from the parent.
(12) That the parent or guardian of the child has been convicted
of a violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5
of the Penal Code.
(13) That the parent or guardian of the child has a history of
extensive, abusive, and chronic use of drugs or alcohol and has
resisted prior court-ordered treatment for this problem during a
three-year period immediately prior to the filing of the petition
that brought that child to the court's attention, or has failed or
refused to comply with a program of drug or alcohol treatment
described in the case plan required by Section 358.1 on at least two
prior occasions, even though the programs identified were available
and accessible.
(14) That the parent or guardian of the child has advised the
court that he or she is not interested in receiving family
maintenance or family reunification services or having the child
returned to or placed in his or her custody and does not wish to
receive family maintenance or reunification services.
The parent or guardian shall be represented by counsel and shall
execute a waiver of services form to be adopted by the Judicial
Council. The court shall advise the parent or guardian of any right
to services and of the possible consequences of a waiver of services,
including the termination of parental rights and placement of the
child for adoption. The court shall not accept the waiver of services
unless it states on the record its finding that the parent or
guardian has knowingly and intelligently waived the right to
services.
(15) That the parent or guardian has on one or more occasions
willfully abducted the child or child's sibling or half sibling from
his or her placement and refused to disclose the child's or child's
sibling's or half sibling's whereabouts, refused to return physical
custody of the child or child's sibling or half sibling to his or her
placement, or refused to return physical custody of the child or
child's sibling or half sibling to the social worker.
(16) That the parent or guardian has been required by the court to
be registered on a sex offender registry under the federal Adam
Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 16913
(a)), as required in Section 106(b)(2)(B)(xvi)(VI) of the Child Abuse
Prevention and Treatment Act of 2006 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 5106a(2)(B)
(xvi)(VI)).
(c) In deciding whether to order reunification in any case in
which this section applies, the court shall hold a dispositional
hearing. The social worker shall prepare a report that discusses
whether reunification services shall be provided. When it is alleged,
pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), that the parent is
incapable of utilizing services due to mental disability, the court
shall order reunification services unless competent evidence from
mental health professionals establishes that, even with the provision
of services, the parent is unlikely to be capable of adequately
caring for the child within the time limits specified in subdivision
(a).
(1) The court shall not order reunification for a parent or
guardian described in paragraph (3), (4), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10),
(11), (12), (13), (14), (15), or (16) of subdivision (b) unless the
court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that reunification is
in the best interest of the child.
(2) In addition, the court shall not order reunification in any
situation described in paragraph (5) of subdivision (b) unless it
finds that, based on competent testimony, those services are likely
to prevent reabuse or continued neglect of the child or that failure
to try reunification will be detrimental to the child because the
child is closely and positively attached to that parent. The social
worker shall investigate the circumstances leading to the removal of
the child and advise the court whether there are circumstances that
indicate that reunification is likely to be successful or
unsuccessful and whether failure to order reunification is likely to
be detrimental to the child.
(3) The failure of the parent to respond to previous services,
the fact that the child was abused while the parent was under the
influence of drugs or alcohol, a past history of violent behavior, or
testimony by a competent professional that the parent's behavior is
unlikely to be changed by services are among the factors indicating
that reunification services are unlikely to be successful. The fact
that a parent or guardian is no longer living with an individual who
severely abused the child may be considered in deciding that
reunification services are likely to be successful, provided that the
court shall consider any pattern of behavior on the part of the
parent that has exposed the child to repeated abuse.
(d) If reunification services are not ordered pursuant to
paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) and the whereabouts of a parent
become known within six months of the out-of-home placement of the
child, the court shall order the social worker to provide family
reunification services in accordance with this subdivision.
(e) (1) If the parent or guardian is incarcerated,
institutionalized, or detained by the United States Department of
Homeland Security, or has been deported to his or her country of
origin, the court shall order reasonable services unless the court
determines, by clear and convincing evidence, those services would be
detrimental to the child. In determining detriment, the court shall
consider the age of the child, the degree of parent-child bonding,
the length of the sentence, the length and nature of the treatment,
the nature of the crime or illness, the degree of detriment to the
child if services are not offered and, for children 10 years of age
or older, the child's attitude toward the implementation of family
reunification services, the likelihood of the parent's discharge from
incarceration, institutionalization, or detention within the
reunification time limitations described in subdivision (a), and any
other appropriate factors. In determining the content of reasonable
services, the court shall consider the particular barriers to an
incarcerated, institutionalized, detained, or deported parent's
access to those court-mandated services and ability to maintain
contact with his or her child, and shall document this information in
the child's case plan. Reunification services are subject to the
applicable time limitations imposed in subdivision (a). Services may
include, but shall not be limited to, all of the following:
(A) Maintaining contact between the parent and child through
collect telephone calls.
(B) Transportation services, when appropriate.
(C) Visitation services, when appropriate.
(D) Reasonable services to extended family members or foster
parents providing care for the child if the services are not
detrimental to the child.
An incarcerated or detained parent may be required to attend
counseling, parenting classes, or vocational training programs as
part of the reunification service plan if actual access to these
services is provided. The social worker shall document in the child's
case plan the particular barriers to an incarcerated,
institutionalized, or detained parent's access to those
court-mandated services and ability to maintain contact with his or
her child.
(E) Reasonable efforts to assist parents who have been deported to
contact child welfare authorities in their country of origin, to
identify any available services that would substantially comply with
case plan requirements, to document the parents' participation in
those services, and to accept reports from local child welfare
authorities as to the parents' living situation, progress, and
participation in services.
(2) The presiding judge of the juvenile court of each county may
convene representatives of the county welfare department, the sheriff'
s department, and other appropriate entities for the purpose of
developing and entering into protocols for ensuring the notification,
transportation, and presence of an incarcerated or institutionalized
parent at all court hearings involving proceedings affecting the
child pursuant to Section 2625 of the Penal Code. The county welfare
department shall utilize the prisoner locator system developed by the
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to facilitate timely
and effective notice of hearings for incarcerated parents.
(3) Notwithstanding any other law, if the incarcerated parent is a
woman seeking to participate in the community treatment program
operated by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation pursuant
to Chapter 4.8 (commencing
with Section 1174) of Title 7 of Part 2 of the Penal Code or
Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 3410) of Title 2 of Part 3 of the
Penal Code, the court shall determine whether the parent's
participation in a program is in the child's best interest and
whether it is suitable to meet the needs of the parent and child.
(f) If the court, pursuant to paragraph (2), (3), (4), (5), (6),
(7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), or (16) of
subdivision (b) or paragraph (1) of subdivision (e), does not order
reunification services, it shall, at the dispositional hearing, that
shall include a permanency hearing, determine if a hearing under
Section 366.26 shall be set in order to determine whether adoption,
guardianship, or continuation in foster care, or, in the case of an
Indian child, in consultation with the child's tribe, tribal
customary adoption, is the most appropriate current plan for the
child, and shall consider in-state and out-of-state placement
options. If the court so determines, it shall conduct the hearing
pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days after the dispositional
hearing. However, the court shall not schedule a hearing so long as
the other parent is being provided reunification services pursuant to
subdivision (a). The court may continue to permit the parent to
visit the child unless it finds that visitation would be detrimental
to the child.
(g) (1) Whenever a court orders that a hearing shall be held
pursuant to Section 366.26, including, when, in consultation with the
child's tribe, tribal customary adoption is recommended, it shall
direct the agency supervising the child and the county adoption
agency, or the State Department of Social Services when it is acting
as an adoption agency, to prepare an assessment that shall include:
(A) Current search efforts for an absent parent or parents and
notification of a noncustodial parent in the manner provided for in
Section 291.
(B) A review of the amount of and nature of any contact between
the child and his or her parents and other members of his or her
extended family since the time of placement. Although the extended
family of each child shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis,
"extended family" for the purpose of this subparagraph shall include,
but not be limited to, the child's siblings, grandparents, aunts,
and uncles.
(C) An evaluation of the child's medical, developmental,
scholastic, mental, and emotional status.
(D) A preliminary assessment of the eligibility and commitment of
any identified prospective adoptive parent or guardian, including a
prospective tribal customary adoptive parent, particularly the
caretaker, to include a social history, including screening for
criminal records and prior referrals for child abuse or neglect, the
capability to meet the child's needs, and the understanding of the
legal and financial rights and responsibilities of adoption and
guardianship. If a proposed guardian is a relative of the minor, the
assessment shall also consider, but need not be limited to, all of
the factors specified in subdivision (a) of Section 361.3 and in
Section 361.4. As used in this subparagraph, "relative" means an
adult who is related to the minor by blood, adoption, or affinity
within the fifth degree of kinship, including stepparents,
stepsiblings, and all relatives whose status is preceded by the words
"great," "great-great," or "grand," or the spouse of any of those
persons even if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution.
If the proposed permanent plan is guardianship with an approved
relative caregiver for a minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP
Program, as provided for in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section
11385) of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, "relative" as used in
this section has the same meaning as "relative" as defined in
subdivision (c) of Section 11391.
(E) The relationship of the child to any identified prospective
adoptive parent or guardian, including a prospective tribal customary
parent, the duration and character of the relationship, the degree
of attachment of the child to the prospective relative guardian or
adoptive parent, the relative's or adoptive parent's strong
commitment to caring permanently for the child, the motivation for
seeking adoption or guardianship, a statement from the child
concerning placement and the adoption or guardianship, and whether
the child over 12 years of age has been consulted about the proposed
relative guardianship arrangements, unless the child's age or
physical, emotional, or other condition precludes his or her
meaningful response, and, if so, a description of the condition.
(F) An analysis of the likelihood that the child will be adopted
if parental rights are terminated.
(G) In the case of an Indian child, in addition to subparagraphs
(A) to (F), inclusive, an assessment of the likelihood that the child
will be adopted, when, in consultation with the child's tribe, a
customary adoption, as defined in Section 366.24, is recommended. If
tribal customary adoption is recommended, the assessment shall
include an analysis of both of the following:
(i) Whether tribal customary adoption would or would not be
detrimental to the Indian child and the reasons for reaching that
conclusion.
(ii) Whether the Indian child cannot or should not be returned to
the home of the Indian parent or Indian custodian and the reasons for
reaching that conclusion.
(2) (A) A relative caregiver's preference for legal guardianship
over adoption, if it is due to circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
child, shall not constitute the sole basis for recommending removal
of the child from the relative caregiver for purposes of adoptive
placement.
(B) Regardless of his or her immigration status, a relative
caregiver shall be given information regarding the permanency options
of guardianship and adoption, including the long-term benefits and
consequences of each option, prior to establishing legal guardianship
or pursuing adoption. If the proposed permanent plan is guardianship
with an approved relative caregiver for a minor eligible for aid
under the Kin-GAP Program, as provided for in Article 4.7 (commencing
with Section 11385) of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, the
relative caregiver shall be informed about the terms and conditions
of the negotiated agreement pursuant to Section 11387 and shall agree
to its execution prior to the hearing held pursuant to Section
366.26. A copy of the executed negotiated agreement shall be attached
to the assessment.
(h) If, at any hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26, a
guardianship is established for the minor with an approved relative
caregiver and juvenile court dependency is subsequently dismissed,
the minor shall be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program as
provided for in Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 11360) or
Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385) of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of
Division 9, as applicable.
(i) In determining whether reunification services will benefit the
child pursuant to paragraph (6) or (7) of subdivision (b), the court
shall consider any information it deems relevant, including the
following factors:
(1) The specific act or omission comprising the severe sexual
abuse or the severe physical harm inflicted on the child or the child'
s sibling or half sibling.
(2) The circumstances under which the abuse or harm was inflicted
on the child or the child's sibling or half sibling.
(3) The severity of the emotional trauma suffered by the child or
the child's sibling or half sibling.
(4) Any history of abuse of other children by the offending parent
or guardian.
(5) The likelihood that the child may be safely returned to the
care of the offending parent or guardian within 12 months with no
continuing supervision.
(6) Whether or not the child desires to be reunified with the
offending parent or guardian.
(j) When the court determines that reunification services will not
be ordered, it shall order that the child's caregiver receive the
child's birth certificate in accordance with Sections 16010.4 and
16010.5. Additionally, when the court determines that reunification
services will not be ordered, it shall order, when appropriate, that
a child who is 16 years of age or older receive his or her birth
certificate.
(k) The court shall read into the record the basis for a finding
of severe sexual abuse or the infliction of severe physical harm
under paragraph (6) of subdivision (b), and shall also specify the
factual findings used to determine that the provision of
reunification services to the offending parent or guardian would not
benefit the child.
SEC. 3. Section 366 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
366. (a) (1) The status of every dependent child in foster care
shall be reviewed periodically as determined by the court but no less
frequently than once every six months, as calculated from the date
of the original dispositional hearing, until the hearing described in
Section 366.26 is completed. The court shall consider the safety of
the child and shall determine all of the following:
(A) The continuing necessity for and appropriateness of the
placement.
(B) The extent of the agency's compliance with the case plan in
making reasonable efforts, or, in the case of a child 16 years of age
or older with another planned permanent living arrangement, the
ongoing and intensive efforts, including child-centered specialized
permanency services, as defined in Section 11400, or, in the case of
an Indian child, active efforts to return the child to a safe home,
as described in Section 361.7, and to complete any steps necessary to
finalize the permanent placement of the child, including efforts to
maintain relationships between a child who is 10 years of age or
older and who has been in an out-of-home placement for six months or
longer, and individuals other than the child's siblings who are
important to the child, consistent with the child's best interests.
(C) Whether there should be any limitation on the right of the
parent or guardian to make educational decisions or developmental
services decisions for the child. That limitation shall be
specifically addressed in the court order and may not exceed those
necessary to protect the child. Whenever the court specifically
limits the right of the parent or guardian to make educational
decisions or developmental services decisions for the child, the
court shall at the same time appoint a responsible adult to make
educational decisions or developmental services decisions for the
child pursuant to Section 361.
(D) (i) Whether the child has other siblings under the court's
jurisdiction, and, if any siblings exist, all of the following:
(I) The nature of the relationship between the child and his or
her siblings.
(II) The appropriateness of developing or maintaining the sibling
relationships pursuant to Section 16002.
(III) If the siblings are not placed together in the same home,
why the siblings are not placed together and what efforts are being
made to place the siblings together, or why those efforts are not
appropriate.
(IV) If the siblings are not placed together, all of the
following:
(ia) The frequency and nature of the visits between the siblings.
(ib) If there are visits between the siblings, whether the visits
are supervised or unsupervised. If the visits are supervised, a
discussion of the reasons why the visits are supervised, and what
needs to be accomplished in order for the visits to be unsupervised.
(ic) If there are visits between the siblings, a description of
the location and length of the visits.
(id) Any plan to increase visitation between the siblings.
(V) The impact of the sibling relationships on the child's
placement and planning for legal permanence.
(VI) The continuing need to suspend sibling interaction, if
applicable, pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 16002.
(ii) The factors the court may consider in making a determination
regarding the nature of the child's sibling relationships may
include, but are not limited to, whether the siblings were raised
together in the same home, whether the siblings have shared
significant common experiences or have existing close and strong
bonds, whether either sibling expresses a desire to visit or live
with his or her sibling, as applicable, and whether ongoing contact
is in the child's best emotional interests.
(E) The extent of progress that has been made toward alleviating
or mitigating the causes necessitating placement in foster care.
(F) If the review hearing is the last review hearing to be held
before the child attains 18 years of age, the court shall conduct the
hearing pursuant to Section 366.31 or 366.32.
(2) The court shall project a likely date by which the child may
be returned to and safely maintained in the home or placed for
adoption, tribal customary adoption in the case of an Indian child,
legal guardianship, placed with a fit and willing relative, or, if
the child is 16 years of age or older, in another planned permanent
living arrangement with the provision of child-centered specialized
permanency services, as defined in Section 11400.
(b) Subsequent to the hearing, periodic reviews of each child in
foster care shall be conducted pursuant to the requirements of
Sections 366.3 and 16503.
(c) If the child has been placed out of state, each review
described in subdivision (a) and any reviews conducted pursuant to
Sections 366.3 and 16503 shall also address whether the out-of-state
placement continues to be the most appropriate placement selection
and in the best interests of the child.
(d) (1) A review described in subdivision (a) and any reviews
conducted pursuant to Sections 366.3 and 16503 shall not result in a
placement of a child outside the United States prior to a judicial
finding that the placement is in the best interest of the child,
except as required by federal law or treaty.
(2) The party or agency requesting placement of the child outside
the United States shall carry the burden of proof and must show, by
clear and convincing evidence, that a placement outside the United
States is in the best interest of the child.
(3) In determining the best interest of the child, the court shall
consider, but not be limited to, the following factors:
(A) Placement with a relative.
(B) Placement of siblings in the same home.
(C) Amount and nature of any contact between the child and the
potential guardian or caretaker.
(D) Physical and medical needs of the dependent child.
(E) Psychological and emotional needs of the dependent child.
(F) Social, cultural, and educational needs of the dependent
child.
(G) Specific desires of any dependent child who is 12 years of age
or older.
(4) If the court finds that a placement outside the United States
is, by clear and convincing evidence, in the best interest of the
child, the court may issue an order authorizing the social worker or
placing agency to make a placement outside the United States. A child
subject to this subdivision shall not leave the United States prior
to the issuance of the order described in this paragraph.
(5) For purposes of this subdivision, "outside the United States"
shall not include the lands of any federally recognized American
Indian tribe or Alaskan Natives.
(6) This section shall not apply to the placement of a dependent
child with a parent.
(e) A child may not be placed in an out-of-state group home, or
remain in an out-of-state group home, unless the group home is in
compliance with Section 7911.1 of the Family Code.
(f) The status review of every nonminor dependent, as defined in
subdivision (v) of Section 11400, shall be conducted pursuant to the
requirements of Sections 366.3, 366.31, or 366.32, and 16503 until
dependency jurisdiction is terminated pursuant to Section 391.
SEC. 4. Section 366.21 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
366.21. (a) Every hearing conducted by the juvenile court
reviewing the status of a dependent child shall be placed on the
appearance calendar. The court shall advise all persons present at
the hearing of the date of the future hearing and of their right to
be present and represented by counsel.
(b) Except as provided in Sections 294 and 295, notice of the
hearing shall be provided pursuant to Section 293.
(c) At least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing, the social
worker shall file a supplemental report with the court regarding the
services provided or offered to the parent or legal guardian to
enable him or her to assume custody and the efforts made to achieve
legal permanence for the child if efforts to reunify fail, including,
but not limited to, efforts to maintain relationships between a
child who is 10 years of age or older and has been in out-of-home
placement for six months or longer and individuals who are important
to the child, consistent with the child's best interests; the
progress made; and, where relevant, the prognosis for return of the
child to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian;
and shall make his or her recommendation for disposition. If the
child is a member of a sibling group described in subparagraph (C) of
paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, the report and
recommendation may also take into account those factors described in
subdivision (e) relating to the child's sibling group. If the
recommendation is not to return the child to a parent or legal
guardian, the report shall specify why the return of the child would
be detrimental to the child. The social worker shall provide the
parent or legal guardian, counsel for the child, and any
court-appointed child advocate with a copy of the report, including
his or her recommendation for disposition, at least 10 calendar days
prior to the hearing. In the case of a child removed from the
physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian, the social
worker shall, at least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing, provide
a summary of his or her recommendation for disposition to any foster
parents, relative caregivers, and certified foster parents who have
been approved for adoption by the State Department of Social Services
when it is acting as an adoption agency or by a county adoption
agency, community care facility, or foster family agency having the
physical custody of the child. The social worker shall include a copy
of the Judicial Council Caregiver Information Form (JV-290) with the
summary of recommendations to the child's foster parents, relative
caregivers, or foster parents approved for adoption, in the caregiver'
s primary language when available, along with information on how to
file the form with the court.
(d) Prior to any hearing involving a child in the physical custody
of a community care facility or a foster family agency that may
result in the return of the child to the physical custody of his or
her parent or legal guardian, in adoption or the creation of a legal
guardianship, or, in the case of an Indian child, in consultation
with the child's tribe, tribal customary adoption, the facility or
agency shall file with the court a report, or a Judicial Council
Caregiver Information Form (JV-290), containing its recommendation
for disposition. Prior to the hearing involving a child in the
physical custody of a foster parent, a relative caregiver, or a
certified foster parent who has been approved for adoption by the
State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption
agency or by a county adoption agency, the foster parent, relative
caregiver, or the certified foster parent who has been approved for
adoption by the State Department of Social Services when it is acting
as an adoption agency or by a county adoption agency, may file with
the court a report containing his or her recommendation for
disposition. The court shall consider the report and recommendation
filed pursuant to this subdivision prior to determining any
disposition.
(e) (1) At the review hearing held six months after the initial
dispositional hearing, but no later than 12 months after the date the
child entered foster care as determined in Section 361.49, whichever
occurs earlier, after considering the admissible and relevant
evidence, the court shall order the return of the child to the
physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian unless the
court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the return of
the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a
substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical
or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker shall have
the burden of establishing that detriment. At the hearing, the court
shall consider the criminal history, obtained pursuant to paragraph
(1) of subdivision (f) of Section 16504.5, of the parent or legal
guardian subsequent to the child's removal to the extent that the
criminal record is substantially related to the welfare of the child
or the parent's or guardian's ability to exercise custody and control
regarding his or her child, provided the parent or legal guardian
agreed to submit fingerprint images to obtain criminal history
information as part of the case plan. The court shall also consider
whether the child can be returned to the custody of his or her parent
who is enrolled in a certified substance abuse treatment facility
that allows a dependent child to reside with his or her parent. The
fact that the parent is enrolled in a certified substance abuse
treatment facility shall not be, for that reason alone, prima facie
evidence of detriment. The failure of the parent or legal guardian to
participate regularly and make substantive progress in court-ordered
treatment programs shall be prima facie evidence that return would
be detrimental. In making its determination, the court shall review
and consider the social worker's report and recommendations and the
report and recommendations of any child advocate appointed pursuant
to Section 356.5; and shall consider the efforts or progress, or
both, demonstrated by the parent or legal guardian and the extent to
which he or she availed himself or herself of services provided,
taking into account the particular barriers to a minor parent or a
nonminor dependent parent, or an incarcerated, institutionalized,
detained, or deported parent's or legal guardian's access to those
court-mandated services and ability to maintain contact with his or
her child.
(2) Regardless of whether the child is returned to a parent or
legal guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its
conclusion that the return would be detrimental or would not be
detrimental. The court also shall make appropriate findings pursuant
to subdivision (a) of Section 366; and, when relevant, shall order
any additional services reasonably believed to facilitate the return
of the child to the custody of his or her parent or legal guardian.
The court shall also inform the parent or legal guardian that if the
child cannot be returned home by the 12-month permanency hearing, a
proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may be instituted. This section
does not apply in a case in which, pursuant to Section 361.5, the
court has ordered that reunification services shall not be provided.
(3) If the child was under three years of age on the date of the
initial removal, or is a member of a sibling group described in
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section
361.5, and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the
parent failed to participate regularly and make substantive progress
in a court-ordered treatment plan, the court may schedule a hearing
pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days. If, however, the court
finds there is a substantial probability that the child, who was
under three years of age on the date of initial removal or is a
member of a sibling group described in subparagraph (C) of paragraph
(1) of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, may be returned to his or
her parent or legal guardian within six months or that reasonable
services have not been provided, the court shall continue the case to
the 12-month permanency hearing.
(4) For the purpose of placing and maintaining a sibling group
together in a permanent home, the court, in making its determination
to schedule a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 for some or all
members of a sibling group, as described in subparagraph (C) of
paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, shall review and
consider the social worker's report and recommendations. Factors the
report shall address, and the court shall consider, may include, but
need not be limited to, whether the sibling group was removed from
parental care as a group, the closeness and strength of the sibling
bond, the ages of the siblings, the appropriateness of maintaining
the sibling group together, the detriment to the child if sibling
ties are not maintained, the likelihood of finding a permanent home
for the sibling group, whether the sibling group is currently placed
together in a preadoptive home or has a concurrent plan goal of legal
permanency in the same home, the wishes of each child whose age and
physical and emotional condition permits a meaningful response, and
the best interests of each child in the sibling group. The court
shall specify the factual basis for its finding that it is in the
best interests of each child to schedule a hearing pursuant to
Section 366.26 within 120 days for some or all of the members of the
sibling group.
(5) If the child was removed initially under subdivision (g) of
Section 300 and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that
the whereabouts of the parent are still unknown, or the parent has
failed to contact and visit the child, the court may schedule a
hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days. The court shall
take into account any particular barriers to a parent's ability to
maintain contact with his or her child due to the parent's
incarceration, institutionalization, detention by the United States
Department of Homeland Security, or deportation. If the court finds
by clear and convincing evidence that the parent has been convicted
of a felony indicating parental unfitness, the court may schedule a
hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days.
(6) If the child had been placed under court supervision with a
previously noncustodial parent pursuant to Section 361.2, the court
shall determine whether supervision is still necessary. The court may
terminate supervision and transfer permanent custody to that parent,
as provided for by paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section
361.2.
(7) In all other cases, the court shall direct that any
reunification services previously ordered shall continue to be
offered to the parent or legal guardian pursuant to the time periods
set forth in subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, provided that the
court may modify the terms and conditions of those services.
(8) If the child is not returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian, the court shall determine whether reasonable services that
were designed to aid the parent or legal guardian in overcoming the
problems that led to the initial removal and the continued custody of
the child have been provided or offered to the parent or legal
guardian. The court shall order that those services be initiated,
continued, or terminated.
(f) (1) The permanency hearing shall be held no later than 12
months after the date the child entered foster care, as that date is
determined pursuant to Section 361.49. At the permanency hearing, the
court shall determine the permanent plan for the child, which shall
include a determination of whether the child will be returned to the
child's home and, if so, when, within the time limits of subdivision
(a) of Section 361.5. After considering the relevant and admissible
evidence, the court shall order the return of the child to the
physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian unless the
court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the return of
the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a
substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical
or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker shall have
the burden of establishing that detriment.
(A) At the permanency hearing, the court shall consider the
criminal history, obtained pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision
(f) of Section 16504.5, of the parent or legal guardian subsequent to
the child's removal to the extent that the criminal record is
substantially related to the welfare of the child or the parent's or
legal guardian's ability to exercise custody and control regarding
his or her child, provided that the parent or legal guardian agreed
to submit fingerprint images to obtain criminal history information
as part of the case plan. The court shall also determine whether
reasonable services that were designed to aid the parent or legal
guardian to overcome the problems that led to the initial removal and
continued custody of the child have been provided or offered to the
parent or legal guardian.
(B) The court shall also consider whether the child can be
returned to the custody of his or her parent who is enrolled in a
certified substance abuse treatment facility that allows a dependent
child to reside with his or her parent. The fact that the parent is
enrolled in a certified substance abuse treatment facility shall not
be, for that reason alone, prima facie evidence of detriment. The
failure of the parent or legal guardian to participate regularly and
make substantive progress in court-ordered treatment programs shall
be prima facie evidence that return would be detrimental.
(C) In making its determination, the court shall review and
consider the social worker's report and recommendations and the
report and recommendations of any child advocate appointed pursuant
to Section 356.5, shall consider the efforts or progress, or both,
demonstrated by the parent or legal guardian and the extent to which
he or she availed himself or herself of services provided, taking
into account the particular barriers to a minor parent or a nonminor
dependent parent, or an incarcerated, institutionalized, detained, or
deported parent's or legal guardian's access to those court-mandated
services and ability to maintain contact with his or her child, and
shall make appropriate findings pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section 366.
(D) For each youth 16 years of age and older, the court shall also
determine whether services have been made available to assist him or
her in making the transition from foster care to successful
adulthood.
(2) Regardless of whether the child is returned to his or her
parent or legal guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis
for its decision. If the child is not returned to a parent or legal
guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its
conclusion that the return would be detrimental. The court also shall
make a finding pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366. If the
child is not returned to his or her parent or legal guardian, the
court shall consider, and state for the record, in-state and
out-of-state placement options. If the child is placed out of the
state, the court shall make a determination whether the out-of-state
placement continues to be appropriate and in the best interests of
the child.
(g) If the time period in which the court-ordered services were
provided has met or exceeded the time period set forth in
subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of
Section 361.5, as appropriate, and a child is not returned to the
custody of a parent or legal guardian at the permanency hearing held
pursuant to subdivision (f), the court shall do one of the following:
(1) Continue the case for up to six months for a permanency review
hearing, provided that the hearing shall occur within 18 months of
the date the child was originally taken from the physical custody of
his or her parent or legal guardian. The court shall continue the
case only if it finds that there is a substantial probability that
the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the
extended period of time or that reasonable services have not been
provided to the parent or legal guardian. For the purposes of this
section, in order to find a substantial probability that the child
will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent or
legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the extended
period of time, the court shall be required to find all of the
following:
(A) That the parent or legal guardian has consistently and
regularly contacted and visited with the child.
(B) That the parent or legal guardian has made significant
progress in resolving problems that led to the child's removal from
the home.
(C) The parent or legal guardian has demonstrated the capacity and
ability both to complete the objectives of his or her treatment plan
and to provide for the child's safety, protection, physical and
emotional well-being, and special needs.
(i) For purposes of this subdivision, the court's decision to
continue the case based on a finding or substantial probability that
the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian is a compelling reason for determining that
a hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26 is not in the best
interests of the child.
(ii) The court shall inform the parent or legal guardian that if
the child cannot be returned home by the next permanency review
hearing, a proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may be instituted.
The court shall not order that a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26
be held unless there is clear and convincing evidence that reasonable
services have been provided or offered to the parent or legal
guardian.
(2) Continue the case for up to six months for a permanency review
hearing, provided that the hearing shall occur within 18 months of
the date the child was originally taken from the physical custody of
his or her parent or legal guardian, if the parent has been arrested
and issued an immigration hold, detained by the United States
Department of Homeland Security, or deported to his or her country of
origin, and the court determines either that there is a substantial
probability that the child will be returned to the physical custody
of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the
home within the extended period of time or that reasonable services
have not been provided to the parent or legal guardian.
(3) For purposes of paragraph (2), in order to find a substantial
probability that the child will be returned to the physical custody
of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the
home within the extended period of time, the court shall find all of
the following:
(A) The parent or legal guardian has consistently and regularly
contacted and visited with the child, taking into account any
particular barriers to a parent's ability to maintain contact with
his or her child due to the parent's arrest and receipt of an
immigration hold, detention by the United States Department of
Homeland Security, or deportation.
(B) The parent or legal guardian has made significant progress in
resolving the problems that led to the child's removal from the home.
(C) The parent or legal guardian has demonstrated the capacity or
ability both to complete the objectives of his or her treatment plan
and to provide for the child's safety, protection, physical and
emotional well-being, and special needs.
(4) Order that a hearing be held within 120 days, pursuant to
Section 366.26, but only if the court does not continue the case to
the permanency planning review hearing and there is clear and
convincing evidence that reasonable services have been provided or
offered to the parents or legal guardians. On and after January 1,
2012, a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 shall not be ordered if
the child is a nonminor dependent, unless the nonminor dependent is
an Indian child and tribal customary adoption is recommended as the
permanent plan.
(5) Order that the child remain in foster care with one of the
permanent plans listed in subparagraph (A), but only if the court
finds by clear and convincing evidence, based upon the evidence
already presented to it, including a recommendation by the State
Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency
or by a county adoption agency, that there is a compelling reason
for determining that a hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26 is not
in the best interests of the child because the child is not
currently a proper subject for adoption and has no one willing to
accept legal guardianship as of the hearing date. For purposes of
this section, a recommendation by the State Department of Social
Services when it is acting as an adoption agency or by a county
adoption agency that adoption is not currently in the best interests
of the child shall constitute a compelling reason for the court's
determination. That recommendation shall be based on the present
circumstances of the child and shall not preclude a different
recommendation at a later date if the child's circumstances change.
On and after January 1, 2012, the nonminor dependent's legal status
as an adult is in and of itself a compelling reason not to hold a
hearing pursuant to Section 366.26. The court may order that a
nonminor dependent who otherwise is eligible pursuant to Section
11403 remain in a planned, permanent living arrangement.
(A) The court shall make factual findings identifying any barriers
to achieving the permanent plan as of the hearing date. When the
child is under 16 years of age, the court shall order a permanent
plan of return home, adoption, tribal customary adoption in the case
of an Indian child, legal guardianship, or placement with a fit and
willing relative, as appropriate. If the court determines that it
will not order a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26, and the child is
not currently placed with a fit and willing relative, the court
shall order the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400. When the child is 16 years of
age or older, or is a nonminor dependent, and no other permanent plan
is appropriate at the time of the hearing, the court may order
another planned permanent living arrangement, as described in
paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 16501, and
and, if such a permanent plan is ordered, shall
order that the appropriateness of the child's continuation in another
planned permanent living arrangement be assessed at the next review
hearing held pursuant to Section 366. If the court orders another
planned permanent living arrangement for a child 16 years of age or
older, the court shall order the provision of child-centered
specialized permanency services, as defined in Section 11400. If the
court orders another planned permanent living arrangement for a
nonminor dependent, the court may order the same services for the
nonminor dependent.
(B) If the court orders that a child who is 10 years of age or
older remain in foster care, the court shall determine whether the
agency has made reasonable efforts to maintain the child's
relationships with individuals other than the child's siblings who
are important to the child, consistent with the child's best
interests, and may make any appropriate order to ensure that those
relationships are maintained.
(C) If the child is not returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian, the court shall consider, and state for the record,
in-state and out-of-state options for permanent placement. If the
child is placed out of the state, the court shall make a
determination whether the out-of-state placement continues to be
appropriate and in the best interests of the child.
(h) In any case in which the court orders that a hearing pursuant
to Section 366.26 shall be held, it shall also order the termination
of reunification services to the parent or legal guardian. The court
shall continue to permit the parent or legal guardian to visit the
child pending the hearing unless it finds that visitation would be
detrimental to the child. The court shall make any other appropriate
orders to enable the child to maintain relationships with
individuals, other than the child's siblings, who are important to
the child, consistent with the child's best interests. When the court
orders a termination of reunification services to the parent or
legal guardian, it shall also order that the child's caregiver
receive the child's birth certificate in accordance with Sections
16010.4 and 16010.5. Additionally, when the court orders a
termination of reunification services to the parent or legal
guardian, it shall order, when appropriate, that a child who is 16
years of age or older receive his or her birth certificate.
(i) (1) Whenever a court orders that a hearing pursuant to Section
366.26, including, when, in consultation with the child's tribe,
tribal customary adoption is recommended, shall be held, it shall
direct the agency supervising the child and the county adoption
agency, or the State Department of Social Services when it is acting
as an adoption agency, to prepare an assessment that shall include:
(A) Current search efforts for an absent parent or parents or
legal guardians.
(B) A review of the amount of and nature of any contact between
the child and his or her parents or legal guardians and other members
of his or her extended family since the time of placement. Although
the extended family of each child shall be reviewed on a case-by-case
basis, "extended family" for the purpose of this subparagraph shall
include, but not be limited to, the child's siblings, grandparents,
aunts, and uncles.
(C) An evaluation of the child's medical, developmental,
scholastic, mental, and emotional status.
(D) A preliminary assessment of the eligibility and commitment of
any identified prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian,
including the prospective tribal customary adoptive parent,
particularly the caretaker, to include a social history including
screening for criminal records and prior referrals for child abuse or
neglect, the capability to meet the child's needs, and the
understanding of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities
of adoption and guardianship. If a proposed guardian is a relative of
the minor, the assessment shall also consider, but need not be
limited to, all of the factors specified in subdivision (a) of
Section 361.3 and in Section 361.4.
(E) The relationship of the child to any identified prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, the duration and character of the
relationship, the degree of attachment of the child to the
prospective relative guardian or adoptive parent, the relative's or
adoptive parent's strong commitment to caring permanently for the
child, the motivation for seeking adoption or guardianship, a
statement from the child concerning placement and the adoption or
guardianship, and whether the child, if over 12 years of age, has
been consulted about the proposed relative guardianship arrangements,
unless the child's age or physical, emotional, or other condition
precludes his or her meaningful response, and, if so, a description
of the condition.
(F) A description of efforts to be made to identify a prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, including, but not limited to,
child-specific recruitment and listing on an adoption exchange within
the state or out of the state.
(G) An analysis of the likelihood that the child will be adopted
if parental rights are terminated.
(H) In the case of an Indian child, in addition to subparagraphs
(A) to (G), inclusive, an assessment of the likelihood that the child
will be adopted, when, in consultation with the child's tribe, a
tribal customary adoption, as defined in Section 366.24, is
recommended. If tribal customary adoption is recommended, the
assessment shall include an analysis of both of the following:
(i) Whether tribal customary adoption would or would not be
detrimental to the Indian child and the reasons for reaching that
conclusion.
(ii) Whether the Indian child cannot or should not be returned to
the home of the Indian parent or Indian custodian and the reasons for
reaching that conclusion.
(2) (A) A relative caregiver's preference for legal guardianship
over adoption, if it is due to circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
child, shall not constitute the sole basis for recommending removal
of the child from the relative caregiver for purposes of adoptive
placement.
(B) Regardless of his or her immigration status, a relative
caregiver shall be given information regarding the permanency options
of guardianship and adoption, including the long-term benefits and
consequences of each option, prior to establishing legal guardianship
or pursuing adoption. If the proposed permanent plan is guardianship
with an approved relative caregiver for a minor eligible for aid
under the Kin-GAP Program, as provided for in Article 4.7 (commencing
with Section 11385) of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, the
relative caregiver shall be informed about the terms and conditions
of the negotiated agreement pursuant to Section 11387 and shall agree
to its execution prior to the hearing held pursuant to Section
366.26. A copy of the executed negotiated agreement shall be attached
to the assessment.
(j) If, at any hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26, a
guardianship is established for the minor with an approved relative
caregiver, and juvenile court dependency is subsequently dismissed,
the minor shall be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program, as
provided for in Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 11360) or
Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385), as applicable, of
Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9.
(k) As used in this section, "relative" means an adult who is
related to the minor by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth
degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all
relatives whose status is preceded by the words "great,"
"great-great," or "grand," or the spouse of any of those persons even
if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution. If the
proposed permanent plan is guardianship with an approved relative
caregiver for a minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program, as
provided for in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385) of
Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, "relative" as used in this section
has the same meaning as "relative" as defined in subdivision (c) of
Section 11391.
(l) For purposes of this section, evidence of any of the following
circumstances shall not, in and of itself, be deemed a failure to
provide or offer reasonable services:
(1) The child has been placed with a foster family that is
eligible to adopt a child, or has been placed in a preadoptive home.
(2) The case plan includes services to make and finalize a
permanent placement for the child if efforts to reunify fail.
(3) Services to make and finalize a permanent placement for the
child, if efforts to reunify fail, are provided concurrently with
services to reunify the family.
SEC. 5. Section 366.22 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
366.22. (a) (1) When a case has been continued pursuant to
paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 366.21, the
permanency review hearing shall occur within 18 months after the date
the child was originally removed from the physical custody of his or
her parent or legal guardian. After considering the admissible and
relevant evidence, the court shall order the return of the child to
the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian unless
the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the return
of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a
substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical
or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker shall have
the burden of establishing that detriment. At the permanency review
hearing, the court shall consider the criminal history, obtained
pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (f) of Section 16504.5, of
the parent or legal guardian subsequent to the child's removal, to
the extent that the criminal record is substantially related to the
welfare of the child or the parent's or legal guardian's ability to
exercise custody and control regarding his or her child, provided
that the parent or legal guardian agreed to submit fingerprint images
to obtain criminal history information as part of the case plan. The
court shall also consider whether the child can be returned to the
custody of his or her parent who is enrolled in a certified substance
abuse treatment facility that allows a dependent child to reside
with his or her parent. The fact that the parent is enrolled in a
certified substance abuse treatment facility shall not be, for that
reason alone, prima facie evidence of detriment. The failure of the
parent or legal guardian to participate regularly and make
substantive progress in court-ordered treatment programs shall be
prima facie evidence that return would be detrimental. In making its
determination, the court shall review and consider the social worker'
s report and recommendations and the report and recommendations of
any child advocate appointed pursuant to Section 356.5; shall
consider the efforts or progress, or both, demonstrated by the parent
or legal guardian and the extent to which he or she availed himself
or herself of services provided, taking into account the particular
barriers of a minor parent or a nonminor dependent parent, or an
incarcerated or institutionalized parent's or legal guardian's access
to those court-mandated services and ability to maintain contact
with his or her child; and shall make appropriate findings pursuant
to subdivision (a) of Section 366.
(2) Whether or not the child is returned to his or her parent or
legal guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its
decision. If the child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian,
the court shall specify the factual basis for its conclusion that
return would be detrimental. If the child is not returned to his or
her parent or legal guardian, the court shall consider, and state for
the record, in-state and out-of-state options for the child's
permanent placement. If the child is placed out of the state, the
court shall make a determination whether the out-of-state placement
continues to be appropriate and in the best interests of the child.
(3) Unless the conditions in subdivision (b) are met and the child
is not returned to a parent or legal guardian at the permanency
review hearing, the court shall order that a hearing be held pursuant
to Section 366.26 in order to determine whether adoption, or, in the
case of an Indian child, in consultation with the child's tribe,
tribal customary adoption, guardianship, or continued placement in
foster care is the most appropriate plan for the child. On and after
January 1, 2012, a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 shall not be
ordered if the child is a nonminor dependent, unless the nonminor
dependent is an Indian child, and tribal customary adoption is
recommended as the permanent plan. However, if the court finds by
clear and convincing evidence, based on the evidence already
presented to it, including a recommendation by the State Department
of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency or by a
county adoption agency, that there is a compelling reason, as
described in paragraph (5) of subdivision (g) of Section 366.21, for
determining that a hearing held under Section 366.26 is not in the
best interests of the child because the child is currently not a
proper subject for adoption and has no one willing to accept legal
guardianship as of the hearing date, the court may, only under these
circumstances, order that the child remain in foster care with a
permanent plan of return home, adoption, tribal customary adoption in
the case of an Indian child, legal guardianship, or placement with a
fit and willing relative, as appropriate. If the court determines it
will not order a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26, and the child
is not currently placed with a fit and willing relative, the court
shall order the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400. If the child is 16 years of
age or older or is a nonminor dependent, and no other permanent plan
is appropriate at the time of the hearing, the court may order
another planned permanent living arrangement, as described in
paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 16501, and order that the
appropriateness of the child's continuation in another planned
permanent living arrangement be assessed at the next review hearing
held pursuant to Section 366.3. If the court orders another planned
permanent living arrangement for a child 16 years of age or older,
the court shall order the provision of child-centered specialized
permanency services, as defined in Section 11400. The court shall
make factual findings identifying any barriers to achieving the
permanent plan as of the hearing date. On and after January 1, 2012,
the nonminor dependent's
legal status as an adult is in and of itself a compelling reason not
to hold a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26. The court may order
that a nonminor dependent who otherwise is eligible pursuant to
Section 11403 remain in a planned, permanent living arrangement and
may order the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400. If the court orders that a
child who is 10 years of age or older remain in foster care, the
court shall determine whether the agency has made reasonable efforts
to maintain the child's relationships with individuals other than the
child's siblings who are important to the child, consistent with the
child's best interests, and may make any appropriate order to ensure
that those relationships are maintained. The hearing shall be held
no later than 120 days from the date of the permanency review
hearing. The court shall also order termination of reunification
services to the parent or legal guardian. The court shall continue to
permit the parent or legal guardian to visit the child unless it
finds that visitation would be detrimental to the child. The court
shall determine whether reasonable services have been offered or
provided to the parent or legal guardian. For purposes of this
subdivision, evidence of any of the following circumstances shall
not, in and of themselves, be deemed a failure to provide or offer
reasonable services:
(A) The child has been placed with a foster family that is
eligible to adopt a child, or has been placed in a preadoptive home.
(B) The case plan includes services to make and finalize a
permanent placement for the child if efforts to reunify fail.
(C) Services to make and finalize a permanent placement for the
child, if efforts to reunify fail, are provided concurrently with
services to reunify the family.
(b) (1) If the child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian
at the permanency review hearing and the court determines by clear
and convincing evidence that the best interests of the child would be
met by the provision of additional reunification services to a
parent or legal guardian who is making significant and consistent
progress in a court-ordered residential substance abuse treatment
program, a parent who was either a minor parent or a nonminor
dependent parent at the time of the initial hearing making
significant and consistent progress in establishing a safe home for
the child's return, or a parent recently discharged from
incarceration, institutionalization, or the custody of the United
States Department of Homeland Security and making significant and
consistent progress in establishing a safe home for the child's
return, the court may continue the case for up to six months for a
subsequent permanency review hearing, provided that the hearing shall
occur within 24 months of the date the child was originally taken
from the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian. The
court shall continue the case only if it finds that there is a
substantial probability that the child will be returned to the
physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely
maintained in the home within the extended period of time or that
reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or legal
guardian. For the purposes of this section, in order to find a
substantial probability that the child will be returned to the
physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely
maintained in the home within the extended period of time, the court
shall be required to find all of the following:
(A) That the parent or legal guardian has consistently and
regularly contacted and visited with the child.
(B) That the parent or legal guardian has made significant and
consistent progress in the prior 18 months in resolving problems that
led to the child's removal from the home.
(C) The parent or legal guardian has demonstrated the capacity and
ability both to complete the objectives of his or her substance
abuse treatment plan as evidenced by reports from a substance abuse
provider as applicable, or complete a treatment plan postdischarge
from incarceration, institutionalization, or detention, or following
deportation to his or her country of origin and his or her return to
the United States, and to provide for the child's safety, protection,
physical and emotional well-being, and special needs.
(2) For purposes of this subdivision, the court's decision to
continue the case based on a finding or substantial probability that
the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian is a compelling reason for determining that
a hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26 is not in the best
interests of the child.
(3) The court shall inform the parent or legal guardian that if
the child cannot be returned home by the subsequent permanency review
hearing, a proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may be instituted.
The court shall not order that a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26
be held unless there is clear and convincing evidence that reasonable
services have been provided or offered to the parent or legal
guardian.
(c) (1) Whenever a court orders that a hearing pursuant to Section
366.26, including when a tribal customary adoption is recommended,
shall be held, it shall direct the agency supervising the child and
the county adoption agency, or the State Department of Social
Services when it is acting as an adoption agency, to prepare an
assessment that shall include:
(A) Current search efforts for an absent parent or parents.
(B) A review of the amount of and nature of any contact between
the child and his or her parents and other members of his or her
extended family since the time of placement. Although the extended
family of each child shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis,
"extended family" for the purposes of this subparagraph shall
include, but not be limited to, the child's siblings, grandparents,
aunts, and uncles.
(C) An evaluation of the child's medical, developmental,
scholastic, mental, and emotional status.
(D) A preliminary assessment of the eligibility and commitment of
any identified prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian,
particularly the caretaker, to include a social history including
screening for criminal records and prior referrals for child abuse or
neglect, the capability to meet the child's needs, and the
understanding of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities
of adoption and guardianship. If a proposed legal guardian is a
relative of the minor, the assessment shall also consider, but need
not be limited to, all of the factors specified in subdivision (a) of
Section 361.3 and Section 361.4.
(E) The relationship of the child to any identified prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, the duration and character of the
relationship, the degree of attachment of the child to the
prospective relative guardian or adoptive parent, the relative's or
adoptive parent's strong commitment to caring permanently for the
child, the motivation for seeking adoption or legal guardianship, a
statement from the child concerning placement and the adoption or
legal guardianship, and whether the child, if over 12 years of age,
has been consulted about the proposed relative guardianship
arrangements, unless the child's age or physical, emotional, or other
condition precludes his or her meaningful response, and, if so, a
description of the condition.
(F) An analysis of the likelihood that the child will be adopted
if parental rights are terminated.
(G) In the case of an Indian child, in addition to subparagraphs
(A) to (F), inclusive, an assessment of the likelihood that the child
will be adopted, when, in consultation with the child's tribe, a
tribal customary adoption, as defined in Section 366.24, is
recommended. If tribal customary adoption is recommended, the
assessment shall include an analysis of both of the following:
(i) Whether tribal customary adoption would or would not be
detrimental to the Indian child and the reasons for reaching that
conclusion.
(ii) Whether the Indian child cannot or should not be returned to
the home of the Indian parent or Indian custodian and the reasons for
reaching that conclusion.
(2) (A) A relative caregiver's preference for legal guardianship
over adoption, if it is due to circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
child, shall not constitute the sole basis for recommending removal
of the child from the relative caregiver for purposes of adoptive
placement.
(B) Regardless of his or her immigration status, a relative
caregiver shall be given information regarding the permanency options
of guardianship and adoption, including the long-term benefits and
consequences of each option, prior to establishing legal guardianship
or pursuing adoption. If the proposed permanent plan is guardianship
with an approved relative caregiver for a minor eligible for aid
under the Kin-GAP Program, as provided for in Article 4.7 (commencing
with Section 11385) of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, the
relative caregiver shall be informed about the terms and conditions
of the negotiated agreement pursuant to Section 11387 and shall agree
to its execution prior to the hearing held pursuant to Section
366.26. A copy of the executed negotiated agreement shall be attached
to the assessment.
(d) This section shall become operative January 1, 1999. If at any
hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26, a legal guardianship is
established for the minor with an approved relative caregiver, and
juvenile court dependency is subsequently dismissed, the minor shall
be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program, as provided for in
Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 11360) or Article 4.7
(commencing with Section 11385), as applicable, of Chapter 2 of Part
3 of Division 9.
(e) As used in this section, "relative" means an adult who is
related to the child by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth
degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all
relatives whose status is preceded by the words "great,"
"great-great," or "grand," or the spouse of any of those persons even
if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution. If the
proposed permanent plan is guardianship with an approved relative
caregiver for a minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program, as
provided for in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385) of
Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, "relative" as used in this section
has the same meaning as "relative" as defined in subdivision (c) of
Section 11391.
SEC. 6. Section 366.25 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
366.25. (a) (1) When a case has been continued pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 366.22, the subsequent permanency review
hearing shall occur within 24 months after the date the child was
originally removed from the physical custody of his or her parent or
legal guardian. After considering the relevant and admissible
evidence, the court shall order the return of the child to the
physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian unless the
court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the return of
the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a
substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical
or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker shall have
the burden of establishing that detriment. At the subsequent
permanency review hearing, the court shall consider the criminal
history, obtained pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (f) of
Section 16504.5, of the parent or legal guardian subsequent to the
child's removal to the extent that the criminal record is
substantially related to the welfare of the child or parent's or
legal guardian's ability to exercise custody and control regarding
his or her child provided that the parent or legal guardian agreed to
submit fingerprint images to obtain criminal history information as
part of the case plan. The court shall also consider whether the
child can be returned to the custody of a parent who is enrolled in a
certified substance abuse treatment facility that allows a dependent
child to reside with his or her parent. The fact that the parent is
enrolled in a certified substance abuse treatment facility shall not
be, for that reason alone, prima facie evidence of detriment. The
failure of the parent or legal guardian to participate regularly and
make substantive progress in court-ordered treatment programs shall
be prima facie evidence that return would be detrimental. In making
its determination, the court shall review and consider the social
worker's report and recommendations and the report and
recommendations of any child advocate appointed pursuant to Section
356.5; shall consider the efforts or progress, or both, demonstrated
by the parent or legal guardian and the extent to which he or she
availed himself or herself of services provided; and shall make
appropriate findings pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366.
(2) Whether or not the child is returned to his or her parent or
legal guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its
decision. If the child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian,
the court shall specify the factual basis for its conclusion that
return would be detrimental. If the child is not returned to his or
her parent or legal guardian, the court shall consider and state for
the record, in-state and out-of-state options for the child's
permanent placement. If the child is placed out of the state, the
court shall make a determination whether the out-of-state placement
continues to be appropriate and in the best interests of the child.
(3) If the child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian at
the subsequent permanency review hearing, the court shall order that
a hearing be held pursuant to Section 366.26 in order to determine
whether adoption, or, in the case of an Indian child, tribal
customary adoption, guardianship, or, in the case of a child 16 years
of age or older when no other permanent plan is currently
appropriate, another planned permanent living arrangement is the most
appropriate plan for the child. On and after January 1, 2012, a
hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 shall not be ordered if the child
is a nonminor dependent, unless the nonminor dependent is an Indian
child and tribal customary adoption is recommended as the permanent
plan. However, if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence,
based on the evidence already presented to it, including a
recommendation by the State Department of Social Services when it is
acting as an adoption agency or by a county adoption agency, that
there is a compelling reason, as described in paragraph (5) of
subdivision (g) of Section 366.21, for determining that a hearing
held under Section 366.26 is not in the best interest of the child
because the child is not currently a proper subject for adoption or,
in the case of an Indian child, tribal customary adoption, and has no
one willing to accept legal guardianship as of the hearing date,
then the court may, only under these circumstances, order that the
child remain in foster care with a permanent plan of return home,
adoption, tribal customary adoption in the case of an Indian child,
legal guardianship, or placement with a fit and willing relative, as
appropriate. If the court determines it will not order a hearing
pursuant to Section 366.26, and the child is not currently placed
with a fit and willing relative, the court shall order the provision
of child-centered specialized permanency services, as defined in
Section 11400. If the child is 16 years of age or older or is a
nonminor dependent, and no other permanent plan is appropriate at the
time of the hearing, the court may order another planned permanent
living arrangement, as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i)
of Section 16501, and and, if such a
permanent plan is ordered, shall order that the appropriateness
of the child's continuation in another planned permanent living
arrangement be assessed at the next review hearing held pursuant to
Section 366. If the court orders another planned permanent living
arrangement for a child 16 years of age or older, the court shall
order the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400, and that the appropriateness
of the child's continuation in another planned permanent living
arrangement be assessed at the next review hearing held pursuant to
Section 366.3. If the court orders another planned permanent living
arrangement for a nonminor dependent, the court may order the same
services for the nonminor dependent. The court shall make factual
findings identifying any barriers to achieving the permanent plan as
of the hearing date. On and after January 1, 2012, the nonminor
dependent's legal status as an adult is in and of itself a compelling
reason not to hold a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26. The court
may order that a nonminor dependent who otherwise is eligible
pursuant to Section 11403 remain in a planned, permanent living
arrangement. If the court orders that a child who is 10 years of age
or older remain in foster care, the court shall determine whether the
agency has made reasonable efforts to maintain the child's
relationships with individuals other than the child's siblings who
are important to the child, consistent with the child's best
interests, and may make any appropriate order to ensure that those
relationships are maintained. The hearing shall be held no later than
120 days from the date of the subsequent permanency review hearing.
The court shall also order termination of reunification services to
the parent or legal guardian. The court shall continue to permit the
parent or legal guardian to visit the child unless it finds that
visitation would be detrimental to the child. The court shall
determine whether reasonable services have been offered or provided
to the parent or legal guardian. For purposes of this paragraph,
evidence of any of the following circumstances shall not, in and of
themselves, be deemed a failure to provide or offer reasonable
services:
(A) The child has been placed with a foster family that is
eligible to adopt a child, or has been placed in a preadoptive home.
(B) The case plan includes services to make and finalize a
permanent placement for the child if efforts to reunify fail.
(C) Services to make and finalize a permanent placement for the
child, if efforts to reunify fail, are provided concurrently with
services to reunify the family.
(b) (1) Whenever a court orders that a hearing pursuant to Section
366.26 shall be held, it shall direct the agency supervising the
child and the county adoption agency, or the State Department of
Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency, to prepare
an assessment that shall include:
(A) Current search efforts for an absent parent or parents.
(B) A review of the amount of, and nature of, any contact between
the child and his or her parents and other members of his or her
extended family since the time of placement. Although the extended
family of each child shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis,
"extended family" for the purposes of this paragraph shall include,
but not be limited to, the child's siblings, grandparents, aunts, and
uncles.
(C) An evaluation of the child's medical, developmental,
scholastic, mental, and emotional status.
(D) A preliminary assessment of the eligibility and commitment of
any identified prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian,
including a prospective tribal customary adoptive parent,
particularly the caretaker, to include a social history including
screening for criminal records and prior referrals for child abuse or
neglect, the capability to meet the child's needs, and the
understanding of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities
of adoption and guardianship. If a proposed legal guardian is a
relative of the minor, the assessment shall also consider, but need
not be limited to, all of the factors specified in subdivision (a) of
Section 361.3 and in Section 361.4.
(E) The relationship of the child to any identified prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, including a prospective tribal
customary adoptive parent, the duration and character of the
relationship, the degree of attachment of the child to the
prospective relative guardian or adoptive parent, the relative's or
adoptive parent's strong commitment to caring permanently for the
child, the motivation for seeking adoption or legal guardianship, a
statement from the child concerning placement and the adoption or
legal guardianship, and whether the child, if over 12 years of age,
has been consulted about the proposed relative guardianship
arrangements, unless the child's age or physical, emotional, or other
condition precludes his or her meaningful response, and, if so, a
description of the condition.
(F) An analysis of the likelihood that the child will be adopted
if parental rights are terminated.
(G) In the case of an Indian child, in addition to subparagraphs
(A) to (F), inclusive, an assessment of the likelihood that the child
will be adopted, when, in consultation with the child's tribe, a
tribal customary adoption, as defined in Section 366.24, is
recommended. If tribal customary adoption is recommended, the
assessment shall include an analysis of both of the following:
(i) Whether tribal customary adoption would or would not be
detrimental to the Indian child and the reasons for reaching that
conclusion.
(ii) Whether the Indian child cannot or should not be returned to
the home of the Indian parent or Indian custodian and the reasons for
reaching that conclusion.
(2) (A) A relative caregiver's preference for legal guardianship
over adoption, if it is due to circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
child, shall not constitute the sole basis for recommending removal
of the child from the relative caregiver for purposes of adoptive
placement.
(B) Regardless of his or her immigration status, a relative
caregiver shall be given information regarding the permanency options
of guardianship and adoption, including the long-term benefits and
consequences of each option, prior to establishing legal guardianship
or pursuing adoption. If the proposed permanent plan is guardianship
with an approved relative caregiver for a minor eligible for aid
under the Kin-GAP Program, as provided for in Article 4.7 (commencing
with Section 11385) of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, the
relative caregiver shall be informed about the terms and conditions
of the negotiated agreement pursuant to Section 11387 and shall agree
to its execution prior to the hearing held pursuant to Section
366.26. A copy of the executed negotiated agreement shall be attached
to the assessment.
(c) If, at any hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26, a
guardianship is established for the minor with an approved relative
caregiver, and juvenile court dependency is subsequently dismissed,
the minor shall be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program, as
provided for in Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 11360) or
Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385), as applicable, of
Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9.
(d) As used in this section, "relative" means an adult who is
related to the minor by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth
degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all
relatives whose status is preceded by the words "great,"
"great-great," or "grand," or the spouse of any of those persons even
if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution. If the
proposed permanent plan is guardianship with an approved relative
caregiver for a minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program, as
provided in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385) of Chapter 2
of Part 3 of Division 9, "relative" as used in this section has the
same meaning as "relative" as defined in subdivision (c) of Section
11391.
SEC. 7. Section 366.26 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
366.26. (a) This section applies to children who are adjudged
dependent children of the juvenile court pursuant to subdivision (d)
of Section 360. The procedures specified herein are the exclusive
procedures for conducting these hearings; Part 2 (commencing with
Section 3020) of Division 8 of the Family Code is not applicable to
these proceedings. Section 8616.5 of the Family Code is applicable
and available to all dependent children meeting the requirements of
that section, if the postadoption contact agreement has been entered
into voluntarily. For children who are adjudged dependent children of
the juvenile court pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 360, this
section and Sections 8604, 8605, 8606, and 8700 of the Family Code
and Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 7660) of Part 3 of Division 12
of the Family Code specify the exclusive procedures for permanently
terminating parental rights with regard to, or establishing legal
guardianship of, the child while the child is a dependent child of
the juvenile court.
(b) At the hearing, which shall be held in juvenile court for all
children who are dependents of the juvenile court, the court, in
order to provide stable, permanent homes for these children, shall
review the report as specified in Section 361.5, 366.21, 366.22, or
366.25, shall indicate that the court has read and considered it,
shall receive other evidence that the parties may present, and then
shall make findings and orders in the following order of preference:
(1) Terminate the rights of the parent or parents and order that
the child be placed for adoption and, upon the filing of a petition
for adoption in the juvenile court, order that a hearing be set. The
court shall proceed with the adoption after the appellate rights of
the natural parents have been exhausted.
(2) Order, without termination of parental rights, the plan of
tribal customary adoption, as described in Section 366.24, through
tribal custom, traditions, or law of the Indian child's tribe, and
upon the court affording the tribal customary adoption order full
faith and credit at the continued selection and implementation
hearing, order that a hearing be set pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (e).
(3) Appoint a relative or relatives with whom the child is
currently residing as legal guardian or guardians for the child, and
order that letters of guardianship issue.
(4) On making a finding under paragraph (3) of subdivision (c),
identify adoption or tribal customary adoption as the permanent
placement goal and order that efforts be made to locate an
appropriate adoptive family for the
child within a period not to exceed 180 days.
(5) Appoint a nonrelative legal guardian for the child and order
that letters of guardianship issue.
(6) Order that the child be permanently placed with a fit and
willing relative, subject to the periodic review of the juvenile
court under Section 366.3.
(7) Order that the child remain in foster care, subject to the
conditions described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (c) and the
periodic review of the juvenile court under Section 366.3.
In choosing among the above alternatives the court shall proceed
pursuant to subdivision (c).
(c) (1) If the court determines, based on the assessment provided
as ordered under subdivision (i) of Section 366.21, subdivision (b)
of Section 366.22, or subdivision (b) of Section 366.25, and any
other relevant evidence, by a clear and convincing standard, that it
is likely the child will be adopted, the court shall terminate
parental rights and order the child placed for adoption. The fact
that the child is not yet placed in a preadoptive home nor with a
relative or foster family who is prepared to adopt the child, shall
not constitute a basis for the court to conclude that it is not
likely the child will be adopted. A finding under subdivision (b) or
paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 361.5 that reunification
services shall not be offered, under subdivision (e) of Section
366.21 that the whereabouts of a parent have been unknown for six
months or that the parent has failed to visit or contact the child
for six months, or that the parent has been convicted of a felony
indicating parental unfitness, or, under Section 366.21 or 366.22,
that the court has continued to remove the child from the custody of
the parent or guardian and has terminated reunification services,
shall constitute a sufficient basis for termination of parental
rights. Under these circumstances, the court shall terminate parental
rights unless either of the following applies:
(A) The child is living with a relative who is unable or unwilling
to adopt the child because of circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
child, but who is willing and capable of providing the child with a
stable and permanent environment through legal guardianship, and the
removal of the child from the custody of his or her relative would be
detrimental to the emotional well-being of the child. For purposes
of an Indian child, "relative" shall include an "extended family
member," as defined in the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978
(25 U.S.C. Sec. 1903(2)).
(B) The court finds a compelling reason for determining that
termination would be detrimental to the child due to one or more of
the following circumstances:
(i) The parents have maintained regular visitation and contact
with the child and the child would benefit from continuing the
relationship.
(ii) A child 12 years of age or older objects to termination of
parental rights.
(iii) The child is placed in a residential treatment facility,
adoption is currently unlikely or undesirable, and continuation of
parental rights will not prevent finding the child a permanent family
placement if the parents cannot resume custody when residential care
is no longer needed. If the court determines that adoption is
currently unlikely or undesirable, the court shall order
child-centered specialized permanency services, as defined in Section
11400, and assess progress towards placement in a permanent family
at the next review hearing held pursuant to Section 366.3.
(iv) The child is living with a foster parent or Indian custodian
who is unable or unwilling to adopt the child because of exceptional
circumstances, that do not include an unwillingness to accept legal
or financial responsibility for the child, but who is willing and
capable of providing the child with a stable and permanent
environment and the removal of the child from the physical custody of
his or her foster parent or Indian custodian would be detrimental to
the emotional well-being of the child. This clause does not apply to
any child who is either (I) under six years of age or (II) a member
of a sibling group where at least one child is under six years of age
and the siblings are, or should be, permanently placed together.
(v) There would be substantial interference with a child's sibling
relationship, taking into consideration the nature and extent of the
relationship, including, but not limited to, whether the child was
raised with a sibling in the same home, whether the child shared
significant common experiences or has existing close and strong bonds
with a sibling, and whether ongoing contact is in the child's best
interest, including the child's long-term emotional interest, as
compared to the benefit of legal permanence through adoption.
(vi) The child is an Indian child and there is a compelling reason
for determining that termination of parental rights would not be in
the best interest of the child, including, but not limited to:
(I) Termination of parental rights would substantially interfere
with the child's connection to his or her tribal community or the
child's tribal membership rights.
(II) The child's tribe has identified guardianship, foster care
with a fit and willing relative, tribal customary adoption, or
another planned permanent living arrangement for the child.
(III) The child is a nonminor dependent, and the nonminor and the
nonminor's tribe have identified tribal customary adoption for the
nonminor.
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B), in the case of tribal
customary adoptions, Section 366.24 shall apply.
(D) If the court finds that termination of parental rights would
be detrimental to the child pursuant to clause (i), (ii), (iii),
(iv), (v), or (vi), it shall state its reasons in writing or on the
record.
(2) The court shall not terminate parental rights if:
(A) At each hearing at which the court was required to consider
reasonable efforts or services, the court has found that reasonable
efforts were not made or that reasonable services were not offered or
provided.
(B) In the case of an Indian child:
(i) At the hearing terminating parental rights, the court has
found that active efforts were not made as required in Section 361.7.
(ii) The court does not make a determination at the hearing
terminating parental rights, supported by evidence beyond a
reasonable doubt, including testimony of one or more "qualified
expert witnesses" as defined in Section 224.6, that the continued
custody of the child by the parent is likely to result in serious
emotional or physical damage to the child.
(iii) The court has ordered tribal customary adoption pursuant to
Section 366.24.
(3) If the court finds that termination of parental rights would
not be detrimental to the child pursuant to paragraph (1) and that
the child has a probability for adoption but is difficult to place
for adoption and there is no identified or available prospective
adoptive parent, the court may identify adoption as the permanent
placement goal and without terminating parental rights, order that
efforts be made to locate an appropriate adoptive family for the
child, within the state or out of the state, within a period not to
exceed 180 days. During this 180-day period, the public agency
responsible for seeking adoptive parents for each child shall, to the
extent possible, ask each child who is 10 years of age or older to
identify any individuals, other than the child's siblings, who are
important to the child, in order to identify potential adoptive
parents. The public agency may ask any other child to provide that
information, as appropriate. During the 180-day period, the public
agency shall, to the extent possible, contact other private and
public adoption agencies regarding the availability of the child for
adoption. During the 180-day period, the public agency shall conduct
the search for adoptive parents in the same manner as prescribed for
children in Sections 8708 and 8709 of the Family Code. At the
expiration of this period, another hearing shall be held and the
court shall proceed pursuant to paragraph (1), (2), (3), (5), or (6)
of subdivision (b). For purposes of this section, a child may only be
found to be difficult to place for adoption if there is no
identified or available prospective adoptive parent for the child
because of the child's membership in a sibling group, or the presence
of a diagnosed medical, physical, or mental handicap, or the child
is seven years of age or more. If the child is found to be difficult
to place for adoption, the court shall order child-centered
specialized permanency services, as defined in Section 11400.
(4) (A) If the court finds that adoption of the child or
termination of parental rights is not in the best interest of the
child, because one of the conditions in clause (i), (ii), (iii),
(iv), (v), or (vi) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) or in
paragraph (2) applies, the court shall order that the present
caretakers or other appropriate persons shall become legal guardians
of the child, or, in the case of an Indian child, consider a tribal
customary adoption pursuant to Section 366.24. Legal guardianship
shall be considered before continuing the child in foster care under
any other permanent plan, if it is in the best interests of the child
and if a suitable guardian can be found. If the child continues in
foster care, the court shall make factual findings identifying any
barriers to achieving adoption, tribal customary adoption in the case
of an Indian child, legal guardianship, or placement with a fit and
willing relative as of the date of the hearing and shall order the
agency to begin providing child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400. A child who is 10 years of age
or older shall be asked to identify any individuals, other than the
child's siblings, who are important to the child, in order to
identify potential guardians or, in the case of an Indian child,
prospective tribal customary adoptive parents. The agency may ask any
other child to provide that information, as appropriate.
(B) (i) If the child is living with an approved relative who is
willing and capable of providing a stable and permanent environment,
but not willing to become a legal guardian as of the hearing date,
the court shall order a permanent plan of placement with a fit and
willing relative, and the child shall not be removed from the home if
the court finds the removal would be seriously detrimental to the
emotional well-being of the child because the child has substantial
psychological ties to the relative caretaker.
(ii) If the child is living with a nonrelative caregiver who is
willing and capable of providing a stable and permanent environment
but is not willing to become a legal guardian as of the hearing date,
the court shall order that the child remain in foster care with a
permanent plan of return home, adoption, legal guardianship, or
placement with a fit and willing relative, as appropriate, and shall
order the agency supervising the child and the county adoption
agency, or the State Department of Social Services when it is acting
as an adoption agency, to begin providing child-centered specialized
permanency services, as defined in Section 11400. If the child is 16
years of age or older, or a nonminor dependent, and no other
permanent plan is appropriate at the time of the hearing, the court
may order another planned permanent living arrangement, as described
in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 16501, and
and, if such a permanent plan is ordered, shall
order the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400. If the child is 16 years of
age or older, the appropriateness of the child's continuation in a
planned permanent living arrangement shall be assessed at the next
review hearing held pursuant to Section 366.3. If the order of
another planned permanent living arrangement is made for a nonminor
dependent, the court may order the provision of child-centered
specialized permanency services, as defined in Section 11400.
Regardless of the age of the child, the child shall not be removed
from the home if the court finds the removal would be seriously
detrimental to the emotional well-being of the child because the
child has substantial psychological ties to the caregiver.
(iii) If the child is living in a group home or, on or after
January 1, 2017, a short-term residential treatment center, the court
shall order that the child remain in foster care with a permanent
plan of return home, adoption, tribal customary adoption in the case
of an Indian child, legal guardianship, or placement with a fit and
willing relative, as appropriate. If the child is 16 years of age or
older, or a nonminor dependent, and no other permanent plan is
appropriate at the time of the hearing, the court may order another
planned permanent living arrangement, as described in paragraph (2)
of subdivision (i) of Section 16501. If the child is 16 years of
age or older, the court shall order the provision of
child-centered specialized permanency services, as defined in Section
11400, and order that the appropriateness of the child's
continuation in a planned permanent living arrangement be assessed
again at the next review hearing held pursuant to Section 366.3. If
the order of another planned permanent living arrangement is made for
a nonminor dependent, the court may order the provision of
child-centered specialized permanency services, as defined in Section
11400.
(C) The court shall also make an order for visitation with the
parents or guardians unless the court finds by a preponderance of the
evidence that the visitation would be detrimental to the physical or
emotional well-being of the child.
(5) (A) If the court finds that the child should not be placed for
adoption, that legal guardianship shall not be established, that
placement with a fit and willing relative is not appropriate as of
the hearing date, and that there are no suitable foster parents
except exclusive-use homes available to provide the child with a
stable and permanent environment, the court may order the care,
custody, and control of the child transferred from the county welfare
department to a licensed foster family agency. The court shall
consider the written recommendation of the county welfare director
regarding the suitability of the transfer. The transfer shall be
subject to further court orders.
(B) The licensed foster family agency shall place the child in a
suitable licensed or exclusive-use home that has been certified by
the agency as meeting licensing standards. The licensed foster family
agency shall be responsible for supporting the child and providing
appropriate services to the child, including those services ordered
by the court. Responsibility for the support of the child shall not,
in and of itself, create liability on the part of the foster family
agency to third persons injured by the child. Those children whose
care, custody, and control are transferred to a foster family agency
shall not be eligible for foster care maintenance payments or child
welfare services, except for emergency response services pursuant to
Section 16504.
(d) The proceeding for the appointment of a guardian for a child
who is a dependent of the juvenile court shall be in the juvenile
court. If the court finds pursuant to this section that legal
guardianship is the appropriate permanent plan, it shall appoint the
legal guardian and issue letters of guardianship. The assessment
prepared pursuant to subdivision (g) of Section 361.5, subdivision
(i) of Section 366.21, subdivision (b) of Section 366.22, and
subdivision (b) of Section 366.25 shall be read and considered by the
court prior to the appointment, and this shall be reflected in the
minutes of the court. The person preparing the assessment may be
called and examined by any party to the proceeding.
(e) (1) The proceeding for the adoption of a child who is a
dependent of the juvenile court shall be in the juvenile court if the
court finds pursuant to this section that adoption is the
appropriate permanent plan and the petition for adoption is filed in
the juvenile court. Upon the filing of a petition for adoption, the
juvenile court shall order that an adoption hearing be set. The court
shall proceed with the adoption after the appellate rights of the
natural parents have been exhausted. The full report required by
Section 8715 of the Family Code shall be read and considered by the
court prior to the adoption and this shall be reflected in the
minutes of the court. The person preparing the report may be called
and examined by any party to the proceeding. It is the intent of the
Legislature, pursuant to this subdivision, to give potential adoptive
parents the option of filing in the juvenile court the petition for
the adoption of a child who is a dependent of the juvenile court.
Nothing in this section is intended to prevent the filing of a
petition for adoption in any other court as permitted by law, instead
of in the juvenile court.
(2) In the case of an Indian child, if the Indian child's tribe
has elected a permanent plan of tribal customary adoption, the court,
upon receiving the tribal customary adoption order will afford the
tribal customary adoption order full faith and credit to the same
extent that the court would afford full faith and credit to the
public acts, records, judicial proceedings, and judgments of any
other entity. Upon a determination that the tribal customary adoption
order may be afforded full faith and credit, consistent with Section
224.5, the court shall thereafter order a hearing to finalize the
adoption be set upon the filing of the adoption petition. The
prospective tribal customary adoptive parents and the child who is
the subject of the tribal customary adoption petition shall appear
before the court for the finalization hearing. The court shall
thereafter issue an order of adoption pursuant to Section 366.24.
(3) If a child who is the subject of a finalized tribal customary
adoption shows evidence of a developmental disability or mental
illness as a result of conditions existing before the tribal
customary adoption to the extent that the child cannot be
relinquished to a licensed adoption agency on the grounds that the
child is considered difficult to place for adoption as pursuant to
paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) and of which condition the tribal
customary adoptive parent or parents had no knowledge or notice
before the entry of the tribal customary adoption order, a petition
setting forth those facts may be filed by the tribal customary
adoptive parent or parents with the juvenile court that granted the
tribal customary adoption petition. If these facts are proved to the
satisfaction of the juvenile court, it may make an order setting
aside the tribal customary adoption order. The set-aside petition
shall be filed within five years of the issuance of the tribal
customary adoption order. The court clerk shall immediately notify
the child's tribe and the department in Sacramento of the petition
within 60 days after the notice of filing of the petition. The
department shall file a full report with the court and shall appear
before the court for the purpose of representing the child. Whenever
a final decree of tribal customary adoption has been vacated or set
aside, the child shall be returned to the custody of the county in
which the proceeding for tribal customary adoption was finalized. The
biological parent or parents of the child may petition for return of
custody. The disposition of the child after the court has entered an
order to set aside a tribal customary adoption shall include
consultation with the child's tribe.
(f) At the beginning of any proceeding pursuant to this section,
if the child or the parents are not being represented by previously
retained or appointed counsel, the court shall proceed as follows:
(1) In accordance with subdivision (c) of Section 317, if a child
before the court is without counsel, the court shall appoint counsel
unless the court finds that the child would not benefit from the
appointment of counsel. The court shall state on the record its
reasons for that finding.
(2) If a parent appears without counsel and is unable to afford
counsel, the court shall appoint counsel for the parent, unless this
representation is knowingly and intelligently waived. The same
counsel shall not be appointed to represent both the child and his or
her parent. The public defender or private counsel may be appointed
as counsel for the parent.
(3) Private counsel appointed under this section shall receive a
reasonable sum for compensation and expenses, the amount of which
shall be determined by the court. The amount shall be paid by the
real parties in interest, other than the child, in any proportions
the court deems just. However, if the court finds that any of the
real parties in interest are unable to afford counsel, the amount
shall be paid out of the general fund of the county.
(g) The court may continue the proceeding for a period of time not
to exceed 30 days as necessary to appoint counsel, and to enable
counsel to become acquainted with the case.
(h) (1) At all proceedings under this section, the court shall
consider the wishes of the child and shall act in the best interests
of the child.
(2) In accordance with Section 349, the child shall be present in
court if the child or the child's counsel so requests or the court so
orders. If the child is 10 years of age or older and is not present
at a hearing held pursuant to this section, the court shall determine
whether the minor was properly notified of his or her right to
attend the hearing and inquire as to the reason why the child is not
present.
(3) (A) The testimony of the child may be taken in chambers and
outside the presence of the child's parent or parents, if the child's
parent or parents are represented by counsel, the counsel is
present, and any of the following circumstances exists:
(i) The court determines that testimony in chambers is necessary
to ensure truthful testimony.
(ii) The child is likely to be intimidated by a formal courtroom
setting.
(iii) The child is afraid to testify in front of his or her parent
or parents.
(B) After testimony in chambers, the parent or parents of the
child may elect to have the court reporter read back the testimony or
have the testimony summarized by counsel for the parent or parents.
(C) The testimony of a child also may be taken in chambers and
outside the presence of the guardian or guardians of a child under
the circumstances specified in this subdivision.
(i) (1) Any order of the court permanently terminating parental
rights under this section shall be conclusive and binding upon the
child, upon the parent or parents, and upon all other persons who
have been served with citation by publication or otherwise as
provided in this chapter. After making the order, the juvenile court
shall have no power to set aside, change, or modify it, except as
provided in paragraph (2), but nothing in this section shall be
construed to limit the right to appeal the order.
(2) A tribal customary adoption order evidencing that the Indian
child has been the subject of a tribal customary adoption shall be
afforded full faith and credit and shall have the same force and
effect as an order of adoption authorized by this section. The rights
and obligations of the parties as to the matters determined by the
Indian child's tribe shall be binding on all parties. A court shall
not order compliance with the order absent a finding that the party
seeking the enforcement participated, or attempted to participate, in
good faith, in family mediation services of the court or dispute
resolution through the tribe regarding the conflict, prior to the
filing of the enforcement action.
(3) A child who has not been adopted after the passage of at least
three years from the date the court terminated parental rights and
for whom the court has determined that adoption is no longer the
permanent plan may petition the juvenile court to reinstate parental
rights pursuant to the procedure prescribed by Section 388. The child
may file the petition prior to the expiration of this three-year
period if the State Department of Social Services, county adoption
agency, or licensed adoption agency that is responsible for custody
and supervision of the child as described in subdivision (j) and the
child stipulate that the child is no longer likely to be adopted. A
child over 12 years of age shall sign the petition in the absence of
a showing of good cause as to why the child could not do so. If it
appears that the best interests of the child may be promoted by
reinstatement of parental rights, the court shall order that a
hearing be held and shall give prior notice, or cause prior notice to
be given, to the social worker or probation officer and to the child'
s attorney of record, or, if there is no attorney of record for the
child, to the child, and the child's tribe, if applicable, by means
prescribed by subdivision (c) of Section 297. The court shall order
the child or the social worker or probation officer to give prior
notice of the hearing to the child's former parent or parents whose
parental rights were terminated in the manner prescribed by
subdivision (f) of Section 294 where the recommendation is adoption.
The juvenile court shall grant the petition if it finds by clear and
convincing evidence that the child is no longer likely to be adopted
and that reinstatement of parental rights is in the child's best
interest. If the court reinstates parental rights over a child who is
under 12 years of age and for whom the new permanent plan will not
be reunification with a parent or legal guardian, the court shall
specify the factual basis for its findings that it is in the best
interest of the child to reinstate parental rights. This subdivision
is intended to be retroactive and applies to any child who is under
the jurisdiction of the juvenile court at the time of the hearing
regardless of the date parental rights were terminated.
(j) If the court, by order or judgment, declares the child free
from the custody and control of both parents, or one parent if the
other does not have custody and control, or declares the child
eligible for tribal customary adoption, the court shall at the same
time order the child referred to the State Department of Social
Services, county adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency for
adoptive placement by the agency. However, except in the case of a
tribal customary adoption where there
is no termination of parental rights, a petition for
adoption may not be granted until the appellate rights of the natural
parents have been exhausted. The State Department of Social
Services, county adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency shall
be responsible for the custody and supervision of the child and shall
be entitled to the exclusive care and control of the child at all
times until a petition for adoption or tribal customary adoption is
granted, except as specified in subdivision (n). With the consent of
the agency, the court may appoint a guardian of the child, who shall
serve until the child is adopted.
(k) Notwithstanding any other law, the application of any person
who, as a relative caretaker or foster parent, has cared for a
dependent child for whom the court has approved a permanent plan for
adoption, or who has been freed for adoption, shall be given
preference with respect to that child over all other applications for
adoptive placement if the agency making the placement determines
that the child has substantial emotional ties to the relative
caretaker or foster parent and removal from the relative caretaker or
foster parent would be seriously detrimental to the child's
emotional well-being.
As used in this subdivision, "preference" means that the
application shall be processed and, if satisfactory, the family study
shall be completed before the processing of the application of any
other person for the adoptive placement of the child.
(l) (1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this
section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the
following apply:
(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely
manner.
(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be
challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record.
(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily
denied or otherwise not decided on the merits.
(2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review
within the period specified by rule, to substantively address the
specific issues challenged, or to support that challenge by an
adequate record shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the
findings and orders made pursuant to this section.
(3) The Judicial Council shall adopt rules of court, effective
January 1, 1995, to ensure all of the following:
(A) A trial court, after issuance of an order directing a hearing
pursuant to this section be held, shall advise all parties of the
requirement of filing a petition for extraordinary writ review as set
forth in this subdivision in order to preserve any right to appeal
in these issues. This notice shall be made orally to a party if the
party is present at the time of the making of the order or by
first-class mail by the clerk of the court to the last known address
of a party not present at the time of the making of the order.
(B) The prompt transmittal of the records from the trial court to
the appellate court.
(C) That adequate time requirements for counsel and court
personnel exist to implement the objective of this subdivision.
(D) That the parent or guardian, or their trial counsel or other
counsel, is charged with the responsibility of filing a petition for
extraordinary writ relief pursuant to this subdivision.
(4) The intent of this subdivision is to do both of the following:
(A) Make every reasonable attempt to achieve a substantive and
meritorious review by the appellate court within the time specified
in Sections 366.21, 366.22, and 366.25 for holding a hearing pursuant
to this section.
(B) Encourage the appellate court to determine all writ petitions
filed pursuant to this subdivision on their merits.
(5) This subdivision shall only apply to cases in which an order
to set a hearing pursuant to this section is issued on or after
January 1, 1995.
(m) Except for subdivision (j), this section shall also apply to
minors adjudged wards pursuant to Section 727.31.
(n) (1) Notwithstanding Section 8704 of the Family Code or any
other law, the court, at a hearing held pursuant to this section or
anytime thereafter, may designate a current caretaker as a
prospective adoptive parent if the child has lived with the caretaker
for at least six months, the caretaker currently expresses a
commitment to adopt the child, and the caretaker has taken at least
one step to facilitate the adoption process. In determining whether
to make that designation, the court may take into consideration
whether the caretaker is listed in the preliminary assessment
prepared by the county department in accordance with subdivision (i)
of Section 366.21 as an appropriate person to be considered as an
adoptive parent for the child and the recommendation of the State
Department of Social Services, county adoption agency, or licensed
adoption agency.
(2) For purposes of this subdivision, steps to facilitate the
adoption process include, but are not limited to, the following:
(A) Applying for an adoption home study.
(B) Cooperating with an adoption home study.
(C) Being designated by the court or the adoption agency as the
adoptive family.
(D) Requesting de facto parent status.
(E) Signing an adoptive placement agreement.
(F) Engaging in discussions regarding a postadoption contact
agreement.
(G) Working to overcome any impediments that have been identified
by the State Department of Social Services, county adoption agency,
or licensed adoption agency.
(H) Attending classes required of prospective adoptive parents.
(3) Prior to a change in placement and as soon as possible after a
decision is made to remove a child from the home of a designated
prospective adoptive parent, the agency shall notify the court, the
designated prospective adoptive parent, or the current caretaker, if
that caretaker would have met the threshold criteria to be designated
as a prospective adoptive parent pursuant to paragraph (1) on the
date of service of this notice, the child's attorney, and the child,
if the child is 10 years of age or older, of the proposal in the
manner described in Section 16010.6.
(A) Within five court days or seven calendar days, whichever is
longer, of the date of notification, the child, the child's attorney,
or the designated prospective adoptive parent may file a petition
with the court objecting to the proposal to remove the child, or the
court, upon its own motion, may set a hearing regarding the proposal.
The court may, for good cause, extend the filing period. A caretaker
who would have met the threshold criteria to be designated as a
prospective adoptive parent pursuant to paragraph (1) on the date of
service of the notice of proposed removal of the child may file,
together with the petition under this subparagraph, a petition for an
order designating the caretaker as a prospective adoptive parent for
purposes of this subdivision.
(B) A hearing ordered pursuant to this paragraph shall be held as
soon as possible and not later than five court days after the
petition is filed with the court or the court sets a hearing upon its
own motion, unless the court for good cause is unable to set the
matter for hearing five court days after the petition is filed, in
which case the court shall set the matter for hearing as soon as
possible. At the hearing, the court shall determine whether the
caretaker has met the threshold criteria to be designated as a
prospective adoptive parent pursuant to paragraph (1), and whether
the proposed removal of the child from the home of the designated
prospective adoptive parent is in the child's best interest, and the
child may not be removed from the home of the designated prospective
adoptive parent unless the court finds that removal is in the child's
best interest. If the court determines that the caretaker did not
meet the threshold criteria to be designated as a prospective
adoptive parent on the date of service of the notice of proposed
removal of the child, the petition objecting to the proposed removal
filed by the caretaker shall be dismissed. If the caretaker was
designated as a prospective adoptive parent prior to this hearing,
the court shall inquire into any progress made by the caretaker
towards the adoption of the child since the caretaker was designated
as a prospective adoptive parent.
(C) A determination by the court that the caretaker is a
designated prospective adoptive parent pursuant to paragraph (1) or
subparagraph (B) does not make the caretaker a party to the
dependency proceeding nor does it confer on the caretaker any
standing to object to any other action of the department, county
adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency, unless the caretaker
has been declared a de facto parent by the court prior to the notice
of removal served pursuant to paragraph (3).
(D) If a petition objecting to the proposal to remove the child is
not filed, and the court, upon its own motion, does not set a
hearing, the child may be removed from the home of the designated
prospective adoptive parent without a hearing.
(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (3), if the State Department of
Social Services, county adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency
determines that the child must be removed from the home of the
caretaker who is or may be a designated prospective adoptive parent
immediately, due to a risk of physical or emotional harm, the agency
may remove the child from that home and is not required to provide
notice prior to the removal. However, as soon as possible and not
longer than two court days after the removal, the agency shall notify
the court, the caretaker who is or may be a designated prospective
adoptive parent, the child's attorney, and the child, if the child is
10 years of age or older, of the removal. Within five court days or
seven calendar days, whichever is longer, of the date of notification
of the removal, the child, the child's attorney, or the caretaker
who is or may be a designated prospective adoptive parent may
petition for, or the court on its own motion may set, a noticed
hearing pursuant to paragraph (3). The court may, for good cause,
extend the filing period.
(5) Except as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 366.28, an
order by the court issued after a hearing pursuant to this
subdivision shall not be appealable.
(6) Nothing in this section shall preclude a county child
protective services agency from fully investigating and responding to
alleged abuse or neglect of a child pursuant to Section 11165.5 of
the Penal Code.
(7) The Judicial Council shall prepare forms to facilitate the
filing of the petitions described in this subdivision, which shall
become effective on January 1, 2006.
SEC. 8. Section 366.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
366.3. (a) If a juvenile court orders a permanent plan of
adoption, tribal customary adoption, adoption of a nonminor dependent
pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 366.31, or legal guardianship
pursuant to Section 360 or 366.26, the court shall retain
jurisdiction over the child or nonminor dependent until the child or
nonminor dependent is adopted or the legal guardianship is
established, except as provided for in Section 366.29 or, on and
after January 1, 2012, Section 366.32. The status of the child or
nonminor dependent shall be reviewed every six months to ensure that
the adoption or legal guardianship is completed as expeditiously as
possible. When the adoption of the child or nonminor dependent has
been granted, or in the case of a tribal customary adoption, when the
tribal customary adoption order has been afforded full faith and
credit and the petition for adoption has been granted, the court
shall terminate its jurisdiction over the child or nonminor
dependent. Following establishment of a legal guardianship, the court
may continue jurisdiction over the child as a dependent child of the
juvenile court or may terminate its dependency jurisdiction and
retain jurisdiction over the child as a ward of the legal
guardianship, as authorized by Section 366.4. If, however, a relative
of the child is appointed the legal guardian of the child and the
child has been placed with the relative for at least six months, the
court shall, except if the relative guardian objects, or upon a
finding of exceptional circumstances, terminate its dependency
jurisdiction and retain jurisdiction over the child as a ward of the
guardianship, as authorized by Section 366.4. Following a termination
of parental rights, the parent or parents shall not be a party to,
or receive notice of, any subsequent proceedings regarding the child.
(b) (1) If the court has dismissed dependency jurisdiction
following the establishment of a legal guardianship, or no dependency
jurisdiction attached because of the granting of a legal
guardianship pursuant to Section 360, and the legal guardianship is
subsequently revoked or otherwise terminated, the county department
of social services or welfare department shall notify the juvenile
court of this fact. The court may vacate its previous order
dismissing dependency jurisdiction over the child.
(2) Notwithstanding Section 1601 of the Probate Code, the
proceedings to terminate a legal guardianship that has been granted
pursuant to Section 360 or 366.26 shall be held either in the
juvenile court that retains jurisdiction over the guardianship as
authorized by Section 366.4 or the juvenile court in the county where
the guardian and child currently reside, based on the best interests
of the child, unless the termination is due to the emancipation or
adoption of the child. The juvenile court having jurisdiction over
the guardianship shall receive notice from the court in which the
petition is filed within five calendar days of the filing. Prior to
the hearing on a petition to terminate legal guardianship pursuant to
this subdivision, the court shall order the county department of
social services or welfare department having jurisdiction or jointly
with the county department where the guardian and child currently
reside to prepare a report, for the court's consideration, that shall
include an evaluation of whether the child could safely remain in,
or be returned to, the legal guardian's home, without terminating the
legal guardianship, if services were provided to the child or legal
guardian. If applicable, the report shall also identify recommended
family maintenance or reunification services to maintain the legal
guardianship and set forth a plan for providing those services. If
the petition to terminate legal guardianship is granted, either
juvenile court may resume dependency jurisdiction over the child, and
may order the county department of social services or welfare
department to develop a new permanent plan, which shall be presented
to the court within 60 days of the termination. If no dependency
jurisdiction has attached, the social worker shall make any
investigation he or she deems necessary to determine whether the
child may be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, as
provided in Section 328.
(3) Unless the parental rights of the child's parent or parents
have been terminated, they shall be notified that the legal
guardianship has been revoked or terminated and shall be entitled to
participate in the new permanency planning hearing. The court shall
try to place the child in another permanent placement. At the
hearing, the parents may be considered as custodians but the child
shall not be returned to the parent or parents unless they prove, by
a preponderance of the evidence, that reunification is the best
alternative for the child. The court may, if it is in the best
interests of the child, order that reunification services again be
provided to the parent or parents.
(c) If, following the establishment of a legal guardianship, the
county welfare department becomes aware of changed circumstances that
indicate adoption or, for an Indian child, tribal customary
adoption, may be an appropriate plan for the child, the department
shall so notify the court. The court may vacate its previous order
dismissing dependency jurisdiction over the child and order that a
hearing be held pursuant to Section 366.26 to determine whether
adoption or continued legal guardianship is the most appropriate plan
for the child. The hearing shall be held no later than 120 days from
the date of the order. If the court orders that a hearing shall be
held pursuant to Section 366.26, the court shall direct the agency
supervising the child and the county adoption agency, or the State
Department of Social Services if it is acting as an adoption agency,
to prepare an assessment under subdivision (b) of Section 366.22.
(d) If the child or, on and after January 1, 2012, nonminor
dependent is in a placement other than the home of a legal guardian
and jurisdiction has not been dismissed, the status of the child
shall be reviewed at least every six months. The review of the status
of a child for whom the court has ordered parental rights terminated
and who has been ordered placed for adoption shall be conducted by
the court. The review of the status of a child or, on and after
January 1, 2012, nonminor dependent for whom the court has not
ordered parental rights terminated and who has not been ordered
placed for adoption may be conducted by the court or an appropriate
local agency. The court shall conduct the review under the following
circumstances:
(1) Upon the request of the child's parents or legal guardians.
(2) Upon the request of the child or, on and after January 1,
2012, nonminor dependent.
(3) It has been 12 months since a hearing held pursuant to Section
366.26 or an order that the child remain in foster care pursuant to
Section 366.21, 366.22, 366.25, 366.26, or subdivision (h).
(4) It has been 12 months since a review was conducted by the
court.
The court shall determine whether or not reasonable efforts,
including the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400, to make and finalize a
permanent placement for the child have been made.
(e) Except as provided in subdivision (g), at the review held
every six months pursuant to subdivision (d), the reviewing body
shall inquire about the progress being made to provide a permanent
home for the child, shall consider the safety of the child, and shall
determine all of the following:
(1) The continuing necessity for, and appropriateness of, the
placement.
(2) The extent to which child-centered specialized permanency
services, as described Section 11400, have been provided.
(3) Identification of individuals other than the child's siblings
who are important to a child who is 10 years of age or older and has
been in out-of-home placement for six months or longer, and actions
necessary to maintain the child's relationship with those
individuals, provided that those relationships are in the best
interest of the child. The social worker shall ask every child who is
10 years of age or older and who has been in out-of-home placement
for six months or longer to identify individuals other than the child'
s siblings who are important to the child, and may ask any other
child to provide that information, as appropriate. The social worker
shall make efforts to identify other individuals who are important to
the child, consistent with the child's best interests.
(4) The continuing appropriateness and extent of compliance with
the permanent plan for the child, including efforts to maintain
relationships between a child who is 10 years of age or older and who
has been in out-of-home placement for six months or longer and
individuals who are important to the child and efforts to identify a
prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian, including, but not
limited to, child-specific recruitment efforts and listing on an
adoption exchange.
(5) The extent of the agency's compliance with the child welfare
services case plan in making reasonable efforts either to return the
child to the safe home of the parent or to complete whatever steps
are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child,
including the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400. If the reviewing body
determines that a second period of reunification services is in the
child's best interests, and that there is a significant likelihood of
the child's return to a safe home due to changed circumstances of
the parent, pursuant to subdivision (f), the specific reunification
services required to effect the child's return to a safe home shall
be described.
(6) Whether there should be any limitation on the right of the
parent or guardian to make educational decisions or developmental
services decisions for the child. That limitation shall be
specifically addressed in the court order and may not exceed what is
necessary to protect the child. If the court specifically limits the
right of the parent or guardian to make educational decisions or
developmental services decisions for the child, the court shall at
the same time appoint a responsible adult to make educational
decisions or developmental services decisions for the child pursuant
to Section 361.
(7) The adequacy of services provided to the child. The court
shall consider the progress in providing the information and
documents to the child, as described in Section 391. The court shall
also consider the need for, and progress in providing, the assistance
and services described in Section 391.
(8) The extent of progress the parents or legal guardians have
made toward alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating
placement in foster care.
(9) The likely date by which the child may be returned to, and
safely maintained in, the home, placed for adoption, legal
guardianship, placed with a fit and willing relative, or, for an
Indian child, in consultation with the child's tribe, placed for
tribal customary adoption, or, if the child is 16 years of age or
older, and no other permanent plan is appropriate at the time of the
hearing, in another planned permanent living arrangement with the
provision of child-centered specialized permanency services, as
defined in Section 11400.
(10) Whether the child has any siblings under the court's
jurisdiction, and, if any siblings exist, all of the following:
(A) The nature of the relationship between the child and his or
her siblings.
(B) The appropriateness of developing or maintaining the sibling
relationships pursuant to Section 16002.
(C) If the siblings are not placed together in the same home, why
the siblings are not placed together and what efforts are being made
to place the siblings together, or why those efforts are not
appropriate.
(D) If the siblings are not placed together, all of the following:
(i) The frequency and nature of the visits between the siblings.
(ii) If there are visits between the siblings, whether the visits
are supervised or unsupervised. If the visits are supervised, a
discussion of the reasons why the visits are supervised, and what
needs to be accomplished in order for the visits to be unsupervised.
(iii) If there are visits between the siblings, a description of
the location and length of the visits.
(iv) Any plan to increase visitation between the siblings.
(E) The impact of the sibling relationships on the child's
placement and planning for legal permanence.
The factors the court may consider as indicators of the nature of
the child's sibling relationships include, but are not limited to,
whether the siblings were raised together in the same home, whether
the siblings have shared significant common experiences or have
existing close and strong bonds, whether either sibling expresses a
desire to visit or live with his or her sibling, as applicable, and
whether ongoing contact is in the child's best emotional interests.
(11) For a child who is 14 years of age or older, and, effective
January 1, 2012, for a nonminor dependent, the services needed to
assist the child or nonminor dependent to make the transition from
foster care to successful adulthood.
The reviewing body shall determine whether or not reasonable
efforts, including the provision of child-centered specialized
permanency services, as defined in Section 11400, to make and
finalize a permanent placement for the child have been made.
Each licensed foster family agency shall submit reports for each
child in its care, custody, and control to the court concerning the
continuing appropriateness and extent of compliance with the child's
permanent plan, the extent of compliance with the case plan, and the
type and adequacy of services provided to the child.
(f) Unless their parental rights have been permanently terminated,
the parent or parents of the child are entitled to receive notice
of, and participate in, those hearings. It shall be presumed that
continued care is in the best interests of the child, unless the
parent or parents prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
further efforts at reunification are the best alternative for the
child. In those cases, the court may order that further reunification
services to return the child to a safe home environment be provided
to the parent or parents up to a period of six months, and family
maintenance services, as needed for an additional six months in order
to return the child to a safe home environment. On and after January
1, 2012, this subdivision shall not apply to the parents of a
nonminor dependent.
(g) (1) At the review conducted by the court and held at least
every six months, regarding a child for whom the court has ordered
parental rights terminated and who has been ordered placed for
adoption, or, for an Indian child for whom parental rights are not
being terminated and a tribal customary adoption is being considered,
the county welfare department shall prepare and present to the court
a report describing the following:
(A) The child's present placement.
(B) The child's current physical, mental, emotional, and
educational status.
(C) If the child has not been placed with a prospective adoptive
parent or guardian, identification of individuals, other than the
child's siblings, who are important to the child and actions
necessary to maintain the child's relationship with those
individuals, provided that those relationships are in the best
interest of the child. The agency shall ask every child who is 10
years of age or older to identify any individuals who are important
to him or her, consistent with the child's best interest, and may ask
any child who is younger than 10 years of age to provide that
information as appropriate. The agency shall make efforts to identify
other individuals who are important to the child.
(D) Whether the child has been placed with a prospective
adoptive parent or parents.
(E) Whether an adoptive placement agreement has been signed and
filed.
(F) If the child has not been placed with a prospective adoptive
parent or parents, the efforts made to identify an appropriate
prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian, including, but not
limited to, child-centered specialized permanency services, as
defined in Section 11400, child-specific recruitment efforts, and
listing on an adoption exchange.
(G) Whether the final adoption order should include provisions for
postadoptive sibling contact pursuant to Section 366.29.
(H) The progress of the search for an adoptive placement if one
has not been identified.
(I) Any impediments to the adoption or the adoptive placement.
(J) The anticipated date by which the child will be adopted or
placed in an adoptive home.
(K) The anticipated date by which an adoptive placement agreement
will be signed.
(L) Recommendations for court orders that will assist in the
placement of the child for adoption or in the finalization of the
adoption, including the provision of child-centered specialized
permanency services, as defined in Section 11400.
(2) The court shall determine whether or not reasonable efforts to
make and finalize a permanent placement for the child have been
made.
(3) The court shall make appropriate orders to protect the
stability of the child and to facilitate and expedite the permanent
placement and adoption of the child.
(h) (1) At the review held pursuant to subdivision (d) for a child
in foster care, the court shall consider all permanency planning
options for the child including whether the child should be returned
to the home of the parent, placed for adoption, or, for an Indian
child, in consultation with the child's tribe, placed for tribal
customary adoption, or appointed a legal guardian, placed with a fit
and willing relative, or, if compelling reasons exist for finding
that none of the foregoing options are in the best interest of the
child and the child is 16 years of age or older, whether the child
should be placed in another planned permanent living arrangement with
the provision of child-centered specialized permanency services, as
defined in Section 11400. The court shall order that a hearing be
held pursuant to Section 366.26, unless it determines by clear and
convincing evidence that there is a compelling reason for determining
that a hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26 is not in the best
interest of the child because the child is being returned to the home
of the parent, the child is not currently a proper subject for
adoption, or no one is willing to accept legal guardianship as of the
hearing date. If the county adoption agency, or the department when
it is acting as an adoption agency, has determined it is unlikely
that the child will be adopted or one of the conditions described in
paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 366.26 applies, that fact
shall constitute a compelling reason for purposes of this
subdivision. Only upon that determination may the court order that
the child remain in foster care, without holding a hearing pursuant
to Section 366.26. The court shall make factual findings identifying
any barriers to achieving the permanent plan as of the hearing date.
On and after January 1, 2012, the nonminor dependent's legal status
as an adult is in and of itself a compelling reason not to hold a
hearing pursuant to Section 366.26.
(2) When the child is 16 years of age or older and in another
planned permanent living arrangement, the court shall do all of the
following:
(A) Ask the child about his or her desired permanency outcome.
(B) Make a judicial determination explaining why, as of the
hearing date, another planned permanent living arrangement is the
best permanency plan for the child.
(C) State for the record the compelling reason or reasons why it
continues not to be in the best interest of the child to return home,
be placed for adoption, be placed for tribal customary adoption in
the case of an Indian child, be placed with a legal guardian, or be
placed with a fit and willing relative.
(3) When the child is 16 years of age or older and is in another
planned permanent living arrangement, the social study prepared for
the hearing shall include a description of all of the following:
(A) The intensive and ongoing efforts, including the provision of
child-centered specialized permanency services, as defined in Section
11400, to return the child to the home of the parent, place the
child for adoption, or establish a legal guardianship, as
appropriate.
(B) The steps taken to do both of the following:
(i) Ensure that the child's care provider is following the
reasonable and prudent parent standard.
(ii) Determine whether the child has regular, ongoing
opportunities to engage in age or developmentally appropriate
activities, including consulting with the child about opportunities
for the child to participate in those activities.
(4) When the child is under 16 years of age and has a permanent
plan of return home, adoption, legal guardianship, or placement with
a fit and willing relative, any barriers to achieving the permanent
plan and the efforts made by the agency address those barriers,
including the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400.
(i) If, as authorized by subdivision (h), the court orders a
hearing pursuant to Section 366.26, the court shall direct the agency
supervising the child and the county adoption agency, or the State
Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption
agency, to prepare an assessment as provided for in subdivision (i)
of Section 366.21 or subdivision (b) of Section 366.22. A hearing
held pursuant to Section 366.26 shall be held no later than 120 days
from the date of the 12-month review at which it is ordered, and at
that hearing the court shall determine whether adoption, tribal
customary adoption, legal guardianship, placement with a fit and
willing relative, or, for a child 16 years of age or older, another
planned permanent living arrangement is the most appropriate plan for
the child. On and after January 1, 2012, a hearing pursuant to
Section 366.26 shall not be ordered if the child is a nonminor
dependent, unless the nonminor dependent is an Indian child and
tribal customary adoption is recommended as the permanent plan. The
court may order that a nonminor dependent who otherwise is eligible
pursuant to Section 11403 remain in a planned, permanent living
arrangement. At the request of the nonminor dependent who has an
established relationship with an adult determined to be the nonminor
dependent's permanent connection, the court may order adoption of the
nonminor dependent pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 366.31.
(j) The reviews conducted pursuant to subdivision (a) or (d) may
be conducted earlier than every six months if the court determines
that an earlier review is in the best interests of the child or as
court rules prescribe.
SEC. 9. Section 371 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code,
to read:
371. When the court has ordered a dependent child or a ward of
the juvenile court placed for adoption or has appointed a relative or
nonrelative legal guardian, the social worker or probation officer
shall provide the prospective adoptive family or the guardian or
guardians information, in writing, regarding the importance of
working with mental health providers that have specialized adoption
or permanency clinical training and experience if the family needs
clinical support, and a description of the desirable clinical
expertise the family should look for when choosing an adoption- or
permanency-competent mental health professional.
SEC. 10. Section 706.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
706.5. (a) If placement in foster care is recommended by the
probation officer, or where the minor is already in foster care
placement or pending placement pursuant to an earlier order, the
social study prepared by the probation officer that is received into
evidence at disposition pursuant to Section 706 shall include a case
plan, as described in Section 706.6. If the court elects to hold the
first status review at the disposition hearing, the social study
shall also include, but not be limited to, the factual material
described in subdivision (c).
(b) If placement in foster care is not recommended by the
probation officer prior to disposition, but the court orders foster
care placement, the court shall order the probation officer to
prepare a case plan, as described in Section 706.6, within 30 days of
the placement order. The case plan shall be filed with the court.
(c) At each status review hearing, the social study shall include,
but not be limited to, an updated case plan as described in Section
706.6 and the following information:
(1) The continuing necessity for and appropriateness of the
placement.
(2) The extent of the probation department's compliance with the
case plan in making reasonable efforts to safely return the minor to
the minor's home or to complete whatever steps are necessary to
finalize the permanent placement of the minor.
(3) The extent of progress that has been made by the minor and
parent or guardian toward alleviating or mitigating the causes
necessitating placement in foster care.
(4) If the first permanency planning hearing has not yet occurred,
the social study shall include the likely date by which the minor
may be returned to and safely maintained in the home or placed for
adoption, appointed a legal guardian, permanently placed with a fit
and willing relative, or referred to another planned permanent living
arrangement.
(5) Whether the minor has been or will be referred to educational
services and what services the minor is receiving, including special
education and related services if the minor has exceptional needs as
described in Part 30 (commencing with Section 56000) of Division 4 of
Title 2 of the Education Code or accommodations if the child has
disabilities as described in Chapter 16 (commencing with Section 701)
of Title 29 of the United States Code Annotated. The probation
officer or child advocate shall solicit comments from the appropriate
local education agency prior to completion of the social study.
(6) If the parent or guardian is unwilling or unable to
participate in making an educational or developmental services
decision for his or her child, or if other circumstances exist that
compromise the ability of the parent or guardian to make educational
or developmental services decisions for the child, the probation
department shall consider whether the right of the parent or guardian
to make educational or developmental services decisions for the
minor should be limited. If the study makes that recommendation, it
shall identify whether there is a responsible adult available to make
educational or developmental services decisions for the minor
pursuant to Section 726.
(7) When the minor is 16 years of age or older and in another
planned permanent living arrangement, the social study shall include
a description of all of the following:
(A) The intensive and ongoing efforts, including child-centered
specialized permanency services, as defined in Section 11400, to
return the minor to the home of the parent, place the minor for
adoption, or establish a legal guardianship, as appropriate.
(B) The steps taken to do both of the following:
(i) Ensure that the minor's care provider is following the
reasonable and prudent parent standard.
(ii) Determine whether the minor has regular, ongoing
opportunities to engage in age or developmentally appropriate
activities, including consulting with the minor about opportunities
for the minor to participate in the activities.
(8) When the minor is under 16 years of age and has a permanent
plan of return home, adoption, legal guardianship, or placement with
a fit and willing relative, the social study shall include a
description of any barriers to achieving the permanent plan and the
efforts made by the agency to address those barriers.
(d) At each permanency planning hearing, the social study shall
include, but not be limited to, an updated case plan as described in
Section 706.6, the factual material described in subdivision (c) of
this section, and a recommended permanent plan for the minor.
SEC. 11. Section 706.6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
706.6. (a) Services to minors are best provided in a framework
that integrates service planning and delivery among multiple service
systems, including the mental health system, using a team-based
approach, such as a child and family team. A child and family team
brings together individuals that engage with the child or youth and
family in assessing, planning, and delivering services. Use of a team
approach increases efficiency, and thus reduces cost, by increasing
coordination of formal services and integrating the natural and
informal supports available to the child or youth and family.
(b) (1) For the purposes of this section, "child and family team"
has the same meaning as in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of
Section 16501.
(2) In its development of the case plan, the probation agency
shall consider any recommendations of the child and family team, as
defined in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 16501. The
agency shall document the rationale for any inconsistencies between
the case plan and the child and family team recommendations.
(c) A case plan prepared as required by Section 706.5 shall be
submitted to the court. It shall either be attached to the social
study or incorporated as a separate section within the social study.
The case plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following
information:
(1) A description of the circumstances that resulted in the minor
being placed under the supervision of the probation department and in
foster care.
(2) Documentation of the preplacement assessment of the minor's
and family's strengths and service needs showing that preventive
services have been provided, and that reasonable efforts to prevent
out-of-home placement have been made. The assessment shall include
the type of placement best equipped to meet those needs.
(3) (A) A description of the type of home or institution in which
the minor is to be placed, and the reasons for that placement
decision, including a discussion of the safety and appropriateness of
the placement, including the recommendations of the child and family
team, if available.
(B) An appropriate placement is a placement in the least
restrictive, most family-like environment that promotes normal
childhood experiences, in closest proximity to the minor's home, that
meets the minor's best interests and special needs.
(d) The following shall apply:
(1) The agency selecting a placement shall consider, in order of
priority:
(A) Placement with relatives, nonrelated extended family members,
and tribal members.
(B) Foster family homes and certified homes or resource families
of foster family agencies.
(C) Treatment and intensive treatment certified homes or resource
families of foster family agencies, or multidimensional treatment
foster homes or therapeutic foster care homes.
(D) Group care placements in the following order:
(i) Short-term residential treatment centers.
(ii) Group homes.
(iii) Community treatment facilities.
(iv) Out-of-state residential treatment pursuant to Part 5
(commencing with Section 7900) of Division 12 of the Family Code.
(2) Although the placement options shall be considered in the
preferential order specified in paragraph (1), the placement of a
child may be with any of these placement settings in order to ensure
the selection of a safe placement setting that is in the child's best
interests and meets the child's special needs.
(3) A minor may be placed into a community care facility licensed
as a short-term residential treatment center, as defined in
subdivision (ad) of Section 11400, provided the case plan indicates
that the placement is for the purposes of providing short-term,
specialized, and intensive treatment for the minor, the case plan
specifies the need for, nature of, and anticipated duration of this
treatment, and the case plan includes transitioning the minor to a
less restrictive environment and the projected timeline by which the
minor will be transitioned to a less restrictive environment.
(e) Effective January 1, 2010, a case plan shall ensure the
educational stability of the child while in foster care and shall
include both of the following:
(1) Assurances that the placement takes into account the
appropriateness of the current educational setting and the proximity
to the school in which the child is enrolled at the time of
placement.
(2) An assurance that the placement agency has coordinated with
appropriate local educational agencies to ensure that the child
remains in the school in which the child is enrolled at the time of
placement, or, if remaining in that school is not in the best
interests of the child, assurances by the placement agency and the
local educational agency to provide immediate and appropriate
enrollment in a new school and to provide all of the child's
educational records to the new school.
(f) Specific time-limited goals and related activities designed to
enable the safe return of the minor to his or her home, or in the
event that return to his or her home is not possible, activities
designed to result in permanent placement or emancipation. Specific
responsibility for carrying out the planned activities shall be
assigned to one or more of the following:
(1) The probation department.
(2) The minor's parent or parents or legal guardian or guardians,
as applicable.
(3) The minor.
(4) The foster parents or licensed agency providing foster care.
(g) The projected date of completion of the case plan objectives
and the date services will be terminated.
(h) (1) Scheduled visits between the minor and his or her family
and an explanation if no visits are made.
(2) Whether the child has other siblings, and, if any siblings
exist, all of the following:
(A) The nature of the relationship between the child and his or
her siblings.
(B) The appropriateness of developing or maintaining the sibling
relationships pursuant to Section 16002.
(C) If the siblings are not placed together in the same home, why
the siblings are not placed together and what efforts are being made
to place the siblings together, or why those efforts are not
appropriate.
(D) If the siblings are not placed together, all of the following:
(i) The frequency and nature of the visits between the siblings.
(ii) If there are visits between the siblings, whether the visits
are supervised or unsupervised. If the visits are supervised, a
discussion of the reasons why the visits are supervised and what
needs to be accomplished in order for the visits to be unsupervised.
(iii) If there are visits between the siblings, a description of
the location and length of the visits.
(iv) Any plan to increase visitation between the siblings.
(E) The impact of the sibling relationships on the child's
placement and planning for legal permanence.
(F) The continuing need to suspend sibling interaction, if
applicable, pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 16002.
(3) The factors the court may consider in making a determination
regarding the nature of the child's sibling relationships may
include, but are not limited to, whether the siblings were raised
together in the same home, whether the siblings have shared
significant common experiences or have existing close and strong
bonds, whether either sibling expresses a desire to visit or live
with his or her sibling, as applicable, and whether ongoing contact
is in the child's best emotional interests.
(i) (1) When placement is made in a foster family home, group
home, or other child care institution that is either a substantial
distance from the home of the minor's parent or legal guardian or out
of state, the case plan shall specify the reasons why the placement
is the most appropriate and is in the best interest of the minor.
(2) When an out-of-state group home placement is recommended or
made, the case plan shall comply with Section 727.1 of this code and
Section 7911.1 of the Family Code. In addition, documentation of the
recommendation of the multidisciplinary team and the rationale for
this particular placement shall be included. The case plan shall also
address what in-state services or facilities were used or considered
and why they were not recommended.
(j) If applicable, efforts to make it possible to place siblings
together, unless it has been determined that placement together is
not in the best interest of one or more siblings.
(k) A schedule of visits between the minor and the probation
officer, including a monthly visitation schedule for those children
placed in group homes.
(l) Health and education information about the minor, school
records, immunizations, known medical problems, and any known
medications the minor may be taking, names and addresses of the minor'
s health and educational providers; the minor's grade level
performance; assurances that the minor's placement in foster care
takes into account proximity to the school in which the minor was
enrolled at the time of placement; and other relevant health and
educational information.
(m) When out-of-home services are used and the goal is
reunification, the case plan shall describe the services that were
provided to prevent removal of the minor from the home, those
services to be provided to assist in reunification and the services
to be provided concurrently to achieve legal permanency if efforts to
reunify fail.
(n) (1) The updated case plan prepared for a permanency planning
hearing shall include a recommendation for a permanent plan for the
minor. The identified permanent plan for a minor under 16 years of
age shall be return home, adoption, legal guardianship, or placement
with a fit and willing relative. The case plan shall identify any
barriers to achieving legal permanence and the steps the agency will
take to address those barriers.
(2) If, after considering reunification, adoptive placement, legal
guardianship, or permanent placement with a fit and willing relative
the probation officer recommends placement in a planned permanent
living arrangement for a minor 16 years of age or older, the case
plan shall include documentation of a compelling reason or reasons
why termination of parental rights is not in the minor's best
interest. For purposes of this subdivision, a "compelling reason"
shall have the same meaning as in subdivision (c) of Section 727.3.
The case plan shall also identify the intensive and ongoing efforts,
including the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as described in Section 11400, to return the
minor to the home of the parent, place the minor for adoption,
establish a legal guardianship, or place the minor with a fit and
willing relative, as appropriate. Efforts shall include the use of
technology, including social media, to find biological family members
of the minor.
(o) Each updated case plan shall include a description of the
services that have been provided to the minor under the plan and an
evaluation of the appropriateness and effectiveness of those
services.
(p) A statement that the parent or legal guardian and the minor
have had an opportunity to participate in the development of the case
plan, to review the case plan, to sign the case plan, and to receive
a copy of the plan, or an explanation about why the parent, legal
guardian, or minor was not able to participate or sign the case plan.
(q) For a minor in out-of-home care who is 16 years of age or
older, a written description of the programs and services, which will
help the minor prepare for the transition from foster care to
successful adulthood.
SEC. 12. Section 727.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
727.2. The purpose of this section is to provide a means to
monitor the safety and well-being of every minor in foster care who
has been declared a ward of the juvenile court pursuant to Section
601 or 602 and to ensure that everything reasonably possible is done
to facilitate the safe and early return of the minor to his or her
home or to establish an alternative permanent plan for the minor.
(a) If the court orders the care, custody, and control of the
minor to be under the supervision of the probation officer for
placement pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 727, the juvenile
court shall order the probation department to ensure the provision of
reunification services to facilitate the safe return of the minor to
his or her home or the permanent placement of the minor, and to
address the needs of the minor while in foster care, except as
provided in subdivision (b).
(b) Reunification services need not be provided to a parent or
legal guardian if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence
that one or more of the following is true:
(1) Reunification services were previously terminated for that
parent or guardian, pursuant to Section 366.21, 366.22, or 366.25, or
not offered, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 361.5, in
reference to the same minor.
(2) The parent has been convicted of any of the following:
(A) Murder of another child of the parent.
(B) Voluntary manslaughter of another child of the parent.
(C) Aiding or abetting, attempting, conspiring, or soliciting to
commit that murder or manslaughter described in subparagraph (A) or
(B).
(D) A felony assault that results in serious bodily injury to the
minor or another child of the parent.
(3) The parental rights of the parent with respect to a sibling
have been terminated involuntarily, and it is not in the best
interest of the minor to reunify with his or her parent or legal
guardian.
If no reunification services are offered to the parent or
guardian, the permanency planning hearing, as described in Section
727.3, shall occur within 30 days of the date of the hearing at which
the decision is made not to offer services.
(c) The status of every minor declared a ward and ordered to be
placed in foster care shall be reviewed by the court no less
frequently than once every six months. The six-month time periods
shall be calculated from the date the minor entered foster care, as
defined in paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 727.4. If the
court so elects, the court may declare the
hearing at which the court orders the care,
custody, and control of the minor to be under the supervision of the
probation officer for foster care placement pursuant to subdivision
(a) of Section 727 at the first status review hearing. It shall be
the duty of the probation officer to prepare a written social study
report including an updated case plan, pursuant to subdivision (b) of
Section 706.5, and submit the report to the court prior to each
status review hearing, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 727.4.
The social study report shall include all reports the probation
officer relied upon in making his or her recommendations.
(d) Prior to any status review hearing involving a minor in the
physical custody of a community care facility or foster family
agency, the facility or agency may provide the probation officer with
a report containing its recommendations. Prior to any status review
hearing involving the physical custody of a foster parent, relative
caregiver, preadoptive parent, or legal guardian, that person may
present to the court a report containing his or her recommendations.
The court shall consider all reports and recommendations filed
pursuant to subdivision (c) and pursuant to this subdivision.
(e) At any status review hearing prior to the first permanency
planning hearing, the court shall consider the safety of the minor
and make findings and orders which determine the following:
(1) The continuing necessity for and appropriateness of the
placement.
(2) The extent of the probation department's compliance with the
case plan in making reasonable efforts, or, in the case of a child 16
years of age or older with another planned permanent living
arrangement, the ongoing and intensive efforts, including provision
of child-centered specialized permanency services, as defined in
Section 11400, to safely return the minor to the minor's home or to
complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent
placement of the minor.
(3) Whether there should be any limitation on the right of the
parent or guardian to make educational decisions for the minor. That
limitation shall be specifically addressed in the court order and may
not exceed what is necessary to protect the minor. If the court
specifically limits the right of the parent or guardian to make
educational decisions for the minor, the court shall at the same time
appoint a responsible adult to make educational decisions for the
minor pursuant to Section 726.
(4) The extent of progress that has been made by the minor and
parent or guardian toward alleviating or mitigating the causes
necessitating placement in foster care.
(5) The likely date by which the minor may be returned to and
safely maintained in the home or placed for adoption, appointed a
legal guardian, permanently placed with a fit and willing relative,
or, if the minor is 16 years of age or older, referred to another
planned permanent living arrangement with the provision of
child-centered specialized permanency services, as defined in Section
11400.
(6) In the case of a minor who has reached 16 years of age, the
court shall, in addition, determine the services needed to assist the
minor to make the transition from foster care to successful
adulthood.
The court shall make these determinations on a case-by-case basis
and reference in its written findings the probation officer's report
and any other evidence relied upon in reaching its decision.
(f) At any status review hearing prior to the first permanency
hearing, after considering the admissible and relevant evidence, the
court shall order return of the minor to the physical custody of his
or her parent or legal guardian unless the court finds, by a
preponderance of evidence, that the return of the minor to his or her
parent or legal guardian would create a substantial risk of
detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional
well-being of the minor. The probation department shall have the
burden of establishing that detriment. In making its determination,
the court shall review and consider the social study report,
recommendations, and the case plan pursuant to subdivision (b) of
Section 706.5, the report and recommendations of any child advocate
appointed for the minor in the case, and any other reports submitted
to the court pursuant to subdivision (d), and shall consider the
efforts or progress, or both, demonstrated by the minor and family
and the extent to which the minor availed himself or herself of the
services provided.
(g) At all status review hearings subsequent to the first
permanency planning hearing, the court shall consider the safety of
the minor and make the findings and orders as described in paragraphs
(1) to (4), inclusive, and (6) of subdivision (e). The court shall
either make a finding that the previously ordered permanent plan
continues to be appropriate or shall order that a new permanent plan
be adopted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 727.3. However, the
court shall not order a permanent plan of "return to the physical
custody of the parent or legal guardian after further reunification
services are offered," as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision
(b) of Section 727.3.
(h) The status review hearings required by subdivision (c) may be
heard by an administrative review panel, provided that the
administrative panel meets all of the requirements listed in
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (7) of subdivision (d) of Section
727.4.
(i) (1) On and after January 1, 2012, at any status review hearing
at which a recommendation to terminate delinquency jurisdiction is
being considered, or at the status review hearing held closest to the
ward attaining 18 years of age, but no fewer than 90 days before the
ward's 18th birthday, the court shall consider whether to modify its
jurisdiction pursuant to Section 601 or 602 and assume transition
jurisdiction over the minor pursuant to Section 450. The probation
department shall address this issue in its report to the court and
make a recommendation as to whether transition jurisdiction is
appropriate for the minor.
(2) The court shall order the probation department or the minor's
attorney to submit an application to the child welfare services
department pursuant to Section 329 to declare the minor a dependent
of the court and modify its jurisdiction from delinquency to
dependency jurisdiction if it finds both of the following:
(A) The ward does not come within the description set forth in
Section 450, but jurisdiction as a ward may no longer be required.
(B) The ward appears to come within the description of Section 300
and cannot be returned home safely.
(3) The court shall set a hearing within 20 judicial days of the
date of its order issued pursuant to paragraph (2) to review the
decision of the child welfare services department and may either
affirm the decision not to file a petition pursuant to Section 300 or
order the child welfare services department to file a petition
pursuant to Section 300.
(j) On and after January 1, 2012, if a review hearing pursuant to
this section is the last review hearing to be held before the minor
attains 18 years of age, the court shall ensure that the minor's
transitional independent living case plan includes a plan for the
minor to meet one or more of the criteria in paragraphs (1) to (5),
inclusive, of subdivision (b) of Section 11403, so that the minor can
become a nonminor dependent, and that the minor has been informed of
his or her right to decline to become a nonminor dependent and to
seek termination of the court's jurisdiction pursuant to Section
607.2.
SEC. 13. Section 727.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
727.3. The purpose of this section is to provide a means to
monitor the safety and well-being of every minor in foster care who
has been declared a ward of the juvenile court pursuant to Section
601 or 602 and to ensure that everything reasonably possible is done
to facilitate the safe and early return of the minor to his or her
own home or to establish an alternative permanent plan for the minor.
(a) (1) For every minor declared a ward and ordered to be placed
in foster care, a permanency planning hearing shall be conducted
within 12 months of the date the minor entered foster care, as
defined in paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 727.4.
Subsequent permanency planning hearings shall be conducted
periodically, but no less frequently than once every 12 months
thereafter during the period of placement. It shall be the duty of
the probation officer to prepare a written social study report
including an updated case plan and a recommendation for a permanent
plan, pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 706.5, and submit the
report to the court prior to each permanency planning hearing,
pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 727.4.
(2) Prior to any permanency planning hearing involving a minor in
the physical custody of a community care facility or foster family
agency, the facility or agency may file with the court a report
containing its recommendations, in addition to the probation officer'
s social study. Prior to any permanency planning hearing involving
the physical custody of a foster parent, relative caregiver,
preadoptive parent, or legal guardian, that person may present to the
court a report containing his or her recommendations. The court
shall consider all reports and recommendations filed pursuant to this
subdivision.
(3) If the minor has a continuing involvement with his or her
parents or legal guardians, the parents or legal guardians shall be
involved in the planning for a permanent placement. The court order
placing the minor in a permanent placement shall include a
specification of the nature and frequency of visiting arrangements
with the parents or legal guardians.
(4) At each permanency planning hearing, the court shall order a
permanent plan for the minor, as described in subdivision (b). The
court shall also make findings, as described in subdivision (e) of
Section 727.2. In the case of a minor who has reached 16 years of age
or older, the court shall, in addition, determine the services
needed to assist the minor to make the transition from foster care to
successful adulthood. The court shall make all of these
determinations on a case-by-case basis and make reference to the
probation officer's report, the case plan, or other evidence relied
upon in making its decisions.
(5) When the minor is 16 years of age or older, and is in another
planned permanent living arrangement, the court, at each permanency
planning hearing, shall do all of the following:
(A) Ask the minor about his or her desired permanency outcome.
(B) Review documentation of intensive and ongoing efforts,
including the provision of child-centered specialized permanency
services, as defined in Section 11400, to place the child in a
permanent family.
(C) Make a judicial determination explaining why, as of the
hearing date, another planned permanent living arrangement is the
best permanency plan for the minor.
(D) State for the record the compelling reason or reasons why it
continues not to be in the best interest of the minor to return home,
be placed for adoption, be placed with a legal guardian, or be
placed with a fit and willing relative.
(b) At all permanency planning hearings, the court shall determine
the permanent plan for the minor. The court shall order one of the
following permanent plans, which are, in order of priority:
(1) Return of the minor to the physical custody of the parent or
legal guardian. After considering the admissible and relevant
evidence, the court shall order the return of the minor to the
physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian unless:
(A) Reunification services were not offered, pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 727.2.
(B) The court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the
return of the minor to his or her parent or legal guardian would
create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or
physical or emotional well-being of the minor. The probation
department shall have the burden of establishing that detriment. In
making its determination, the court shall review and consider the
social study report and recommendations pursuant to Section 706.5,
the report and recommendations of any child advocate appointed for
the minor in the case, and any other reports submitted pursuant to
paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), and shall consider the efforts or
progress, or both, demonstrated by the minor and family and the
extent to which the minor availed himself or herself of the services
provided.
(2) Order that the permanent plan for the minor will be to return
the minor to the physical custody of the parent or legal guardian,
order further reunification services to be provided to the minor and
his or her parent or legal guardian for a period not to exceed six
months and continue the case for up to six months for a subsequent
permanency planning hearing, provided that the subsequent hearing
shall occur within 18 months of the date the minor was originally
taken from the physical custody of his or her parent or legal
guardian. The court shall continue the case only if it finds that
there is a substantial probability that the minor will be returned to
the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and
safely maintained in the home within the extended period of time or
that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or
guardian. For purposes of this section, in order to find that there
is a substantial probability that the minor will be returned to the
physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian, the court
shall be required to find that the minor and his or her parent or
legal guardian have demonstrated the capacity and ability to complete
the objectives of the case plan.
(A) The court shall inform the parent or legal guardian that if
the minor cannot be returned home by the next permanency planning
hearing, a proceeding pursuant to Section 727.31 may be initiated.
(B) The court shall not continue the case for further
reunification services if it has been 18 months or more since the
date the minor was originally taken from the physical custody of his
or her parent or legal guardian.
(3) Identify adoption as the permanent plan and order that a
hearing be held within 120 days, pursuant to the procedures described
in Section 727.31. The court shall only set a hearing pursuant to
Section 727.31 if there is clear and convincing evidence that
reasonable services have been provided or offered to the parents.
When the court sets a hearing pursuant to Section 727.31, it shall
order that an adoption assessment report be prepared, pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 727.31.
(4) Order a legal guardianship, pursuant to procedures described
in subdivisions (c) to (f), inclusive, of Section 728.
(5) Place the minor with a fit and willing relative. "Placement
with a fit and willing relative" means placing the minor with an
appropriate approved relative who is willing to provide a permanent
and stable home for the minor, but is unable or unwilling to become
the legal guardian. When a minor is placed with a fit and willing
relative, the court may authorize the relative to provide the same
legal consent for the minor's medical, surgical, and dental care, and
education as the custodial parent of the minor.
(6) (A) (i) If he or she is 16 years of age or older, place the
minor in another planned permanent living arrangement. For purposes
of this section, "planned permanent living arrangement" means any
permanent living arrangement described in Section 11402 that is
ordered by the court for a minor 16 years of age or older when there
is a compelling reason or reasons to determine that it is not in the
best interest of the minor to have any permanent plan listed in
paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive. These plans include, but are not
limited to, placement in a specific, identified foster family home,
program, or facility on a permanent basis, or placement in a
transitional housing placement facility. When the court places a
minor in a planned permanent living arrangement, the court shall
specify the goal of the placement, which may include, but shall not
be limited to, return home, emancipation, guardianship, or permanent
placement with a relative.
(ii) The court shall only order that the minor remain in a planned
permanent living arrangement if the court finds by clear and
convincing evidence, based upon the evidence already presented to it
that there is a compelling reason, as defined in subdivision (c), for
determining that a plan of termination of parental rights and
adoption is not in the best interest of the minor. If the court
orders that the minor remain in another planned permanent living
arrangement, the court shall order the provision of child-centered
permanency services, as defined in Section 11400, and that the
appropriateness of the child's continuation in a planned permanent
living arrangement be assessed again at the next permanency planning
hearing.
(B) If the minor is under 16 years of age and the court finds by
clear and convincing evidence, based upon the evidence already
presented to it, that there is a compelling reason, as defined in
subdivision (c), for determining that a plan of termination of
parental rights and adoption is not in the best interest of the minor
as of the hearing date, the court shall order the minor to remain in
a foster care placement with a permanent plan of return home,
adoption, legal guardianship, or placement with a fit and willing
relative, as appropriate. The court shall make factual findings
identifying any barriers to achieving the permanent plan as of the
hearing date and shall order the provision of child-centered
specialized permanency services unless the minor is currently placed
with a fit and willing relative.
(c) A compelling reason for determining that a plan of termination
of parental rights and adoption is not in the best interest of the
minor is any of the following:
(1) Documentation by the probation department that adoption is not
currently in the best interest of the minor and is not currently an
appropriate permanency goal. That documentation may include, but is
not limited to, documentation that:
(A) The minor is 12 years of age or older and objects to
termination of parental rights.
(B) The minor is 17 years of age or older and specifically
requests that transition to independent living with the
identification of a caring adult to serve as a lifelong connection be
established as his or her permanent plan. On and after January 1,
2012, this includes a minor who requests that his or her transitional
independent living case plan include modification of his or her
jurisdiction to that of dependency jurisdiction pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 607.2 or subdivision (i) of Section 727.2,
or to that of transition jurisdiction pursuant to Section 450, in
order to be eligible as a nonminor dependent for the extended
benefits pursuant to Section 11403.
(C) The parent or guardian and the minor have a significant bond,
but the parent or guardian is unable to care for the minor because of
an emotional or physical disability, and the minor's caregiver has
committed to raising the minor to the age of majority and
facilitating visitation with the disabled parent or guardian.
(D) The minor agrees to continued placement in a residential
treatment facility that provides services specifically designed to
address the minor's treatment needs, including child-centered
specialized permanency services, as defined in Section 11400, and the
minor's needs could not be served by a less restrictive placement.
The probation department's recommendation that adoption is not in
the best interest of the minor shall be based on the present family
circumstances of the minor and shall not preclude a different
recommendation at a later date if the minor's family circumstances
change.
(2) Documentation by the probation department that no grounds
exist to file for termination of parental rights.
(3) Documentation by the probation department that the minor is an
unaccompanied refugee minor, or there are international legal
obligations or foreign policy reasons that would preclude terminating
parental rights.
(4) A finding by the court that the probation department was
required to make reasonable efforts to reunify the minor with the
family pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 727.2, and did not make
those efforts.
(5) Documentation by the probation department that the minor is
living with a relative who is unable or unwilling to adopt the minor
because of exceptional circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
minor, but who is willing and capable of providing the minor with a
stable and permanent home environment, and the removal of the minor
from the physical custody of his or her relative would be detrimental
to the minor's emotional well-being.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the
ability of a parent to voluntarily relinquish his or her child to the
State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption
agency or to a county adoption agency at any time while the minor is
a ward of the juvenile court if the department or county adoption
agency is willing to accept the relinquishment.
(e) Any change in the permanent plan of a minor placed with a fit
and willing relative or in a planned permanent living arrangement
shall be made only by order of the court pursuant to a Section 778
petition or at a regularly scheduled and noticed status review
hearing or permanency planning hearing. Any change in the permanent
plan of a minor placed in a guardianship shall be made only by order
of the court pursuant to a motion filed in accordance with Section
728.
SEC. 14. Section 11400 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
11400. For purposes of this article, the following definitions
shall apply:
(a) "Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC)"
means the aid provided on behalf of needy children in foster care
under the terms of this division.
(b) "Case plan" means a written document that, at a minimum,
specifies the type of home in which the child shall be placed, the
safety of that home, and the appropriateness of that home to meet the
child's needs. It shall also include the agency's plan for ensuring
that the child receive proper care and protection in a safe
environment, and shall set forth the appropriate services to be
provided to the child, the child's family, and the foster parents, in
order to meet the child's needs while in foster care, and to reunify
the child with the child's family. In addition, the plan shall
specify the services that will be provided or steps that will be
taken to facilitate an alternate permanent plan if reunification is
not possible.
(c) "Certified family home" means a family residence certified by
a licensed foster family agency and issued a certificate of approval
by that agency as meeting licensing standards, and used only by that
foster family agency for placements.
(d) "Family home" means the family residence of a licensee in
which 24-hour care and supervision are provided for children.
(e) "Small family home" means any residential facility, in the
licensee's family residence, which provides 24-hour care for six or
fewer foster children who have mental disorders or developmental or
physical disabilities and who require special care and supervision as
a result of their disabilities.
(f) "Foster care" means the 24-hour out-of-home care provided to
children whose own families are unable or unwilling to care for them,
and who are in need of temporary or long-term substitute parenting.
(g) "Foster family agency" means a licensed community care
facility, as defined in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section
1502 of the Health and Safety Code. Private foster family agencies
shall be organized and operated on a nonprofit basis.
(h) "Group home" means a nondetention privately operated
residential home, organized and operated on a nonprofit basis only,
of any capacity, or a nondetention licensed residential care home
operated by the County of San Mateo with a capacity of up to 25 beds,
that accepts children in need of care and supervision in a group
home, as defined by paragraph (13) of subdivision (a) of Section 1502
of the Health and Safety Code.
(i) "Periodic review" means review of a child's status by the
juvenile court or by an administrative review panel, that shall
include a consideration of the safety of the child, a determination
of the continuing need for placement in foster care, evaluation of
the goals for the placement and the progress toward meeting these
goals, and development of a target date for the child's return home
or establishment of alternative permanent placement.
(j) "Permanency planning hearing" means a hearing conducted by the
juvenile court in which the child's future status, including whether
the child shall be returned home or another permanent plan shall be
developed, is determined.
(k) "Placement and care" refers to the responsibility for the
welfare of a child vested in an agency or organization by virtue of
the agency or organization having (1) been delegated care, custody,
and control of a child by the juvenile court, (2) taken
responsibility, pursuant to a relinquishment or termination of
parental rights on a child, (3) taken the responsibility of
supervising a child detained by the juvenile court pursuant to
Section 319 or 636, or (4) signed a voluntary placement agreement for
the child's placement; or to the responsibility designated to an
individual by virtue of his or her being appointed the child's legal
guardian.
(l) "Preplacement preventive services" means services that are
designed to help children remain with their families by preventing or
eliminating the need for removal.
(m) "Relative" means an adult who is related to the child by
blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth degree of kinship,
including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all relatives whose status
is preceded by the words "great," "great-great," or "grand" or the
spouse of any of these persons even if the marriage was terminated by
death or dissolution.
(n) "Nonrelative extended family member" means an adult caregiver
who has an established familial or mentoring relationship with the
child, as described in Section 362.7.
(o) "Voluntary placement" means an out-of-home placement of a
child by (1) the county welfare department, probation department, or
Indian tribe that has entered into an
agreement pursuant to Section 10553.1, after the
parents or guardians have requested the assistance of the county
welfare department and have signed a voluntary placement
agreement; agreement or (2) the county welfare
department licensed public or private adoption agency, or the
department acting as an adoption agency, after the parents have
requested the assistance of either the county welfare department, the
licensed public or private adoption agency, or the department acting
as an adoption agency for the purpose of adoption planning, and have
signed a voluntary placement agreement.
(p) "Voluntary placement agreement" means a written agreement
between either the county welfare department, probation department,
or Indian tribe that has entered into an agreement pursuant to
Section 10553.1, licensed public or private adoption agency, or the
department acting as an adoption agency, and the parents or guardians
of a child that specifies, at a minimum, the following:
(1) The legal status of the child.
(2) The rights and obligations of the parents or guardians, the
child, and the agency in which the child is placed.
(q) "Original placement date" means the most recent date on which
the court detained a child and ordered an agency to be responsible
for supervising the child or the date on which an agency assumed
responsibility for a child due to termination of parental rights,
relinquishment, or voluntary placement.
(r) (1) "Transitional housing placement provider" means an
organization licensed by the State Department of Social Services
pursuant to Section 1559.110 of the Health and Safety Code, to
provide transitional housing to foster children at least 16 years of
age and not more than 18 years of age, and nonminor dependents, as
defined in subdivision (v). A transitional housing placement provider
shall be privately operated and organized on a nonprofit basis.
(2) Prior to licensure, a provider shall obtain certification from
the applicable county, in accordance with Section 16522.1.
(s) "Transitional Housing Program-Plus" means a provider certified
by the applicable county, in accordance with subdivision (c) of
Section 16522, to provide transitional housing services to former
foster youth who have exited the foster care system on or after their
18th birthday.
(t) "Whole family foster home" means a new or existing family
home, approved relative caregiver or nonrelative extended family
member's home, the home of a nonrelated legal guardian whose
guardianship was established pursuant to Section 360 or 366.26,
certified family home, or a host family home placement of a
transitional housing placement provider, that provides foster care
for a minor or nonminor dependent parent and his or her child, and is
specifically recruited and trained to assist the minor or nonminor
dependent parent in developing the skills necessary to provide a
safe, stable, and permanent home for his or her child. The child of
the minor or nonminor dependent parent need not be the subject of a
petition filed pursuant to Section 300 to qualify for placement in a
whole family foster home.
(u) "Mutual agreement" means any of the following:
(1) A written voluntary agreement of consent for continued
placement and care in a supervised setting between a minor or, on and
after January 1, 2012, a nonminor dependent, and the county welfare
services or probation department or tribal agency responsible for the
foster care placement, that documents the nonminor's continued
willingness to remain in supervised out-of-home placement under the
placement and care of the responsible county, tribe, consortium of
tribes, or tribal organization that has entered into an agreement
with the state pursuant to Section 10553.1, remain under the
jurisdiction of the juvenile court as a nonminor dependent, and
report any change of circumstances relevant to continued eligibility
for foster care payments, and that documents the nonminor's and
social worker's or probation officer's agreement to work together to
facilitate implementation of the mutually developed supervised
placement agreement and transitional independent living case plan.
(2) An agreement, as described in paragraph (1), between a
nonminor former dependent or ward in receipt of Kin-GAP payments
under Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 11360) or Article 4.7
(commencing with Section 11385), and the agency responsible for the
Kin-GAP benefits, provided that the nonminor former dependent or ward
satisfies the conditions described in Section 11403.01, or one or
more of the conditions described in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive,
of subdivision (b) of Section 11403. For purposes of this paragraph
and paragraph (3), "nonminor former dependent or ward" has the same
meaning as described in subdivision (aa).
(3) An agreement, as described in paragraph (1), between a
nonminor former dependent or ward in receipt of AFDC-FC payments
under subdivision (e) or (f) of Section 11405 and the agency
responsible for the AFDC-FC benefits, provided that the nonminor
former dependent or ward described in subdivision (e) of Section
11405 satisfies one or more of the conditions described in paragraphs
(1) to (5), inclusive, of subdivision (b) of Section 11403, and the
nonminor described in subdivision (f) of Section 11405 satisfies the
secondary school or equivalent training or certificate program
conditions described in that subdivision.
(v) "Nonminor dependent" means, on and after January 1, 2012, a
foster child, as described in Section 675(8)(B) of Title 42 of the
United States Code under the federal Social Security Act who is a
current dependent child or ward of the juvenile court, or who is a
nonminor under the transition jurisdiction of the juvenile court, as
described in Section 450, and who satisfies all of the following
criteria:
(1) He or she has attained 18 years of age while under an order of
foster care placement by the juvenile court, and is not more than 19
years of age on or after January 1, 2012, not more than 20 years of
age on or after January 1, 2013, or not more than 21 years of age on
or after January 1, 2014, and as described in Section 10103.5.
(2) He or she is in foster care under the placement and care
responsibility of the county welfare department, county probation
department, Indian tribe, consortium of tribes, or tribal
organization that entered into an agreement pursuant to Section
10553.1.
(3) He or she has a transitional independent living case plan
pursuant to Section 475(8) of the federal Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. Sec. 675(8)), as contained in the federal Fostering
Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 (Public
Law 110-351), as described in Section 11403.
(w) "Supervised independent living placement" means, on and after
January 1, 2012, an independent supervised setting, as specified in a
nonminor dependent's transitional independent living case plan, in
which the youth is living independently, pursuant to Section 472(c)
(2) of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 672(c)(2)).
(x) "Supervised independent living setting," pursuant to Section
472(c)(2) of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 672(c)
(2)), includes both a supervised independent living placement, as
defined in subdivision (w), and a residential housing unit certified
by the transitional housing placement provider operating a
Transitional Housing Placement-Plus Foster Care program, as described
in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 16522.1.
(y) "Transitional independent living case plan" means, on or after
January 1, 2012, a child's case plan submitted for the last review
hearing held before he or she reaches 18 years of age or the nonminor
dependent's case plan, updated every six months, that describes the
goals and objectives of how the nonminor will make progress in the
transition to living independently and assume incremental
responsibility for adult decisionmaking, the collaborative efforts
between the nonminor and the social worker, probation officer, or
Indian tribal placing entity and the supportive services as described
in the transitional independent living plan (TILP) to ensure active
and meaningful participation in one or more of the eligibility
criteria described in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, of
subdivision (b) of Section 11403, the nonminor's appropriate
supervised placement setting, and the nonminor's permanent plan for
transition to living independently, which includes maintaining or
obtaining permanent connections to caring and committed adults, as
set forth in paragraphs (16) and (17) of subdivision (g) of Section
16501.1.
(z) "Voluntary reentry agreement" means a written voluntary
agreement between a former dependent child or ward or a former
nonminor dependent, who has had juvenile court jurisdiction
terminated pursuant to Section 391, 452, or 607.2, and the county
welfare or probation department or tribal placing entity that
documents the nonminor's desire and willingness to reenter foster
care, to be placed in a supervised setting under the placement and
care responsibility of the placing agency, the nonminor's desire,
willingness, and ability to immediately participate in one or more of
the conditions of paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, of subdivision
(b) of Section 11403, the nonminor's agreement to work
collaboratively with the placing agency to develop his or her
transitional independent living case plan within 60 days of reentry,
the nonminor's agreement to report any changes of circumstances
relevant to continued eligibility for foster care payments, and (1)
the nonminor's agreement to participate in the filing of a petition
for juvenile court jurisdiction as a nonminor dependent pursuant to
subdivision (e) of Section 388 within 15 judicial days of the signing
of the agreement and the placing agency's efforts and supportive
services to assist the nonminor in the reentry process, or (2) if the
nonminor meets the definition of a nonminor former dependent or
ward, as described in subdivision (aa), the nonminor's agreement to
return to the care and support of his or her former juvenile
court-appointed guardian and meet the eligibility criteria for
AFDC-FC pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 11405.
(aa) "Nonminor former dependent or ward" means, on and after
January 1, 2012, either of the following:
(1) A nonminor who reached 18 years of age while subject to an
order for foster care placement, and for whom dependency,
delinquency, or transition jurisdiction has been terminated, and who
is still under the general jurisdiction of the court.
(2) A nonminor who is over 18 years of age and, while a minor, was
a dependent child or ward of the juvenile court when the
guardianship was established pursuant to Section 360 or 366.26, or
subdivision (d) of Section 728, and the juvenile court dependency or
wardship was dismissed following the establishment of the
guardianship.
(ab) "Runaway and homeless youth shelter" means a type of group
home, as defined in paragraph (14) of subdivision (a) of Section 1502
of the Health and Safety Code, that is not an eligible placement
option under Sections 319, 361.2, 450, and 727, and that is not
eligible for AFDC-FC funding pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section
11402 or Section 11462.
(ac) "Transition dependent" is a minor between 17 years and five
months and 18 years of age who is subject to the court's transition
jurisdiction under Section 450.
(ad) "Short-term residential treatment center" means a
nondetention, licensed community care facility, as defined in
paragraph (18) of subdivision (a) of Section 1502 of the Health and
Safety Code, that provides short-term, specialized, and intensive
treatment for the child or youth, when the child's or youth's case
plan specifies the need for, nature of, and anticipated duration of
this specialized treatment.
(ae) "Resource family" means an approved caregiver, as defined in
subdivision (c) of Section 16519.5.
(af) "Core Services" mean services, made available to children,
youth, and nonminor dependents either directly or secured through
formal agreement with other agencies, which are trauma informed and
culturally relevant as specified in Sections 11462 and 11463.
(ag) "Child-centered specialized permanency services" means
services designed for, and with, the child to address the child's
history of trauma, separation, and loss. Those services shall include
mental health services, as necessary, or other services that are
needed to ameliorate impairments in significant areas of life
functioning that may reduce the likelihood of the child achieving a
permanent family. These services shall utilize family finding and
engagement, including, but not limited to, using search technology
and social media to locate family members, and child-specific
recruitment to assist the child in achieving a permanent family
through reunification, adoption, legal guardianship, or other
lifelong connections to caring adults, including at least one adult
who will provide a permanent, parent-like relationship for that
child. These services include services designed to prepare the
permanent family to meet the child's needs, set appropriate
expectations for before and after permanency, and stabilize the
placement.
SEC. 15. Section 16501 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
16501. (a) (1) As used in this chapter, "child welfare services"
means public social services that are directed toward the
accomplishment of any or all of the following purposes: protecting
and promoting the welfare of all children, including disabled,
homeless, dependent, or neglected children; preventing or remedying,
or assisting in the solution of problems which may result in, the
neglect, abuse, exploitation, or delinquency of children; preventing
the unnecessary separation of children from their families by
identifying family problems, assisting families in resolving their
problems, and preventing breakup of the family where the prevention
of child removal is desirable and possible; restoring to their
families children who have been removed, by the provision of services
to the child and the families; identifying children to be placed in
suitable adoptive homes, in cases where restoration to the biological
family is not possible or appropriate; and ensuring adequate care of
children away from their homes, in cases where the child cannot be
returned home or cannot be placed for adoption.
(2) "Child welfare services" also means services provided on
behalf of children alleged to be the victims of child abuse, neglect,
or exploitation. The child welfare services provided on behalf of
each child represent a continuum of services, including emergency
response services, family preservation services, family maintenance
services, family reunification services, and permanent placement
services, including supportive transition services. The individual
child's case plan is the guiding principle in the provision of these
services. The case plan shall be developed within a maximum of 60
days of the initial removal of the child or of the in-person response
required under subdivision (f) if the child has not been removed
from his or her home, or by the date of the dispositional hearing
pursuant to Section 358, whichever comes first.
(3) "Child welfare services" are best provided in a framework that
integrates service planning and delivery among multiple service
systems, including the mental health system, using a team-based
approach, such as a child and family team. A child and family team
brings together individuals that engage with the child or youth and
family in assessing, planning, and delivering services consistent
with paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 16501.1. Use of a
team approach increases efficiency, and thus reduces cost, by
increasing coordination of formal services and integrating the
natural and informal supports available to the child or youth and
family.
(4) "Child and family team" means a group of individuals who are
convened by the placing agency and who are engaged through a variety
of team-based processes to identify the strengths and needs of the
child or youth and his or her family, and to help achieve positive
outcomes for safety, permanency, and well-being.
(A) The activities of the team shall include, but not be limited
to, both of the following:
(i) Providing input into the development of a child and family
plan that is strengths-based, needs-driven, and culturally relevant.
(ii) Providing input into the placement decision made by the
placing agency and the services to be provided in order to support
the child or youth.
(B) The child and family team process shall engage the child or
youth, the child's family, and other people important to the family
or to the child or youth in meeting the objectives set forth in
subparagraph (A). The child and family team shall also include
representatives who provide formal supports to the child or youth and
family when appropriate, including, but not limited to, the
caregiver, the placing agency caseworker, a representative from a
foster family agency or short-term residential treatment center with
which a child or youth is placed, a county mental health
representative, a representative from the regional center when the
child is eligible for regional center service, and a representative
of the child's or youth's tribe or Indian custodian, as applicable.
As appropriate, the child and family team also may include other
formal supports, such as substance use disorder treatment
professionals and educational professionals, providing services to
the child or youth and family. For purposes of this definition, the
child and family team also may include extended family and informal
support persons, such as friends, coaches, faith-based connections,
and tribes as identified by the child or youth and family. If
placement into a short-term residential treatment center or a foster
family agency that provides treatment services has occurred or is
being considered, the mental health representative is required to be
a licensed mental health professional. Any party to the child's case
who is represented by an attorney may consult with his or her
attorney regarding this process. The child or youth and his or her
family may request specific persons to be included on the child and
family team. Nothing shall preclude another agency serving the child
or youth from convening a team in collaboration with the placing
agency.
(5) Child welfare services may include, but are not limited to, a
range of service-funded activities, including case management,
counseling, emergency shelter care, emergency in-home caretakers,
temporary in-home caretakers, respite care, therapeutic day services,
teaching and demonstrating homemakers, parenting training, substance
abuse testing, and transportation. These service-funded activities
shall be available to children and their families in all phases of
the child welfare program in accordance with the child's case plan
and departmental regulations. Funding for services is limited to the
amount appropriated in the annual Budget Act and other available
county funds.
(6) Service-funded activities to be provided may be determined by
each county, based upon individual child and family needs as
reflected in the service plan.
(7) As used in this chapter, "emergency shelter care" means
emergency shelter provided to children who have been removed pursuant
to Section 300 from their parent or parents or their guardian or
guardians. The department may establish, by regulation, the time
periods for which emergency shelter care shall be funded. For the
purposes of this paragraph, "emergency shelter care" may include
"transitional shelter care facilities" as defined in paragraph (11)
of subdivision (a) of Section 1502 of the Health and Safety Code.
(b) As used in this chapter, "respite care" means temporary care
for periods not to exceed 72 hours, and, in order to preserve the
placement, may be extended up to 14 days in any one month pending the
development of policies and regulations in consultation with county
placing agencies and stakeholders. This care may be provided to the
child's parents or guardians. This care shall not be limited by
regulation to care over 24 hours. These services shall not be
provided for the purpose of routine, ongoing child care.
(c) The county shall provide child welfare services as needed
pursuant to an approved service plan and in accordance with
regulations promulgated, in consultation with the counties, by the
department. Counties may contract for service-funded activities as
defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a). Counties shall not
contract for needs assessment, client eligibility determination, or
any other activity as specified by regulations of the State
Department of Social Services, except as specifically authorized in
Section 16100.
(d) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to affect duties
which are delegated to probation officers pursuant to Sections 601
and 654.
(e) Any county may utilize volunteer individuals to supplement
professional child welfare services by providing ancillary support
services in accordance with regulations adopted by the State
Department of Social Services.
(f) As used in this chapter, emergency response services consist
of a response system providing in-person response, 24 hours a day,
seven days a week, to reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, as
required by Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 11164) of Chapter 2
of Title 1 of Part 4 of the Penal Code for the purpose of
investigation pursuant to Section 11166 of the Penal Code and to
determine the necessity for providing initial intake services and
crisis intervention to maintain the child safely in his or her own
home or to protect the safety of the child. County welfare
departments shall respond to any report of imminent danger to a child
immediately and all other reports within 10 calendar days. An
in-person response is not required when the county welfare
department, based upon an evaluation of risk, determines that an
in-person response is not appropriate. This evaluation includes
collateral, contacts, a review of previous referrals, and other
relevant information, as indicated.
(g) As used in this chapter, family maintenance services are
activities designed to provide in-home protective services to prevent
or remedy neglect, abuse, or exploitation, for the purposes of
preventing separation of children from their families.
(h) As used in this chapter, family reunification services are
activities designed to provide time-limited foster care services to
prevent or remedy neglect, abuse, or exploitation, when the child
cannot safely remain at home, and needs temporary foster care, while
services are provided to reunite the family.
(i) (1) As used in this chapter, permanent placement services are
activities designed to provide an alternate permanent family
structure for children who because of abuse, neglect, or exploitation
cannot safely remain at home and who are unlikely to ever return
home. These services shall be provided on behalf of children for whom
there has been a judicial determination of a permanent plan for
adoption, legal guardianship, placement with a fit and willing
relative, or continued foster care placement, and, as needed to
achieve a permanent family, shall include child-centered specialized
permanency services, as defined in Section 11400. Permanent placement
services for nonminor dependents may include child-centered
specialized permanency services and shall include supportive
transition services.
(2) For purposes of this section, "another planned permanent
living arrangement" means a permanent plan ordered by the court for a
child 16 years of age or older or a nonminor dependent, when there
is a compelling reason or reasons to determine that it is not in the
best interest of the child or nonminor dependent to return home, be
placed for adoption, be placed for tribal customary adoption in the
case of an Indian child, or be placed with a fit and willing
relative. Placement in a group home, or, on and after January 1,
2017, a short-term residential treatment facility, shall not be the
identified permanent plan for any child or nonminor dependent.
(j) As used in this chapter, family preservation services include
those services specified in Section 16500.5 to avoid or limit
out-of-home placement of children, and may include those services
specified in that section to place children in the least restrictive
environment possible.
(k) (1) (A) In any county electing to implement this subdivision,
all county welfare department employees who have frequent and routine
contact with children shall, by February 1, 1997, and all welfare
department employees who are expected to have frequent and routine
contact with children and who are hired on or after January 1, 1996,
and all such employees whose duties change after January 1, 1996, to
include frequent and routine contact with children, shall, if the
employees provide services to children who are alleged victims of
abuse, neglect, or exploitation, sign a declaration under penalty of
perjury regarding any prior criminal conviction, and shall provide a
set of fingerprints to the county welfare director.
(B) The county welfare director shall secure from the Department
of Justice a criminal record to determine whether the employee has
ever been convicted of a crime other than a minor traffic violation.
The Department of Justice shall deliver the criminal record to the
county welfare director.
(C) If it is found that the employee has been convicted of a
crime, other than a minor traffic violation, the county welfare
director shall determine whether there is substantial and convincing
evidence to support a reasonable belief that the employee is of good
character so as to justify frequent and routine contact with
children.
(D) No exemption shall be granted pursuant to subparagraph (C) if
the person has been convicted of a sex offense against a minor, or
has been convicted of an offense specified in Section 220, 243.4,
264.1, 273d, 288, or 289 of the Penal Code, or in paragraph (1) of
Section 273a of, or subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 368 of, the
Penal Code, or has been convicted of an offense specified in
subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 of the Penal Code. The county
welfare director shall suspend such a person from any duties
involving frequent and routine contact with children.
(E) Notwithstanding subparagraph (D), the county welfare director
may grant an exemption if the employee or prospective employee, who
was convicted of a crime against an individual specified in paragraph
(1) or (7) of subdivision (c)
of Section 667.5 of the Penal Code, has been rehabilitated as
provided in Section 4852.03 of the Penal Code and has maintained the
conduct required in Section 4852.05 of the Penal Code for at least 10
years and has the recommendation of the district attorney
representing the employee's or prospective employee's county of
residence, or if the employee or prospective employee has received a
certificate of rehabilitation pursuant to Chapter 3.5 (commencing
with Section 4852.01) of Title 6 of Part 3 of the Penal Code. In that
case, the county welfare director may give the employee or
prospective employee an opportunity to explain the conviction and
shall consider that explanation in the evaluation of the criminal
conviction record.
(F) If no criminal record information has been recorded, the
county welfare director shall cause a statement of that fact to be
included in that person's personnel file.
(2) For purposes of this subdivision, a conviction means a plea or
verdict of guilty or a conviction following a plea of nolo
contendere. Any action that the county welfare director is permitted
to take following the establishment of a conviction may be taken when
the time for appeal has elapsed, or the judgment of conviction has
been affirmed on appeal or when an order granting probation is made
suspending the imposition of sentence, notwithstanding a subsequent
order pursuant to Sections 1203.4 and 1203.4a of the Penal Code
permitting the person to withdraw his or her plea of guilty and to
enter a plea of not guilty, or setting aside the verdict of guilty,
or dismissing the accusation, information, or indictment. For
purposes of this subdivision, the record of a conviction, or a copy
thereof certified by the clerk of the court or by a judge of the
court in which the conviction occurred, shall be conclusive evidence
of the conviction.
SEC. 16. Section 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
16501.1. (a) (1) The Legislature finds and declares that the
foundation and central unifying tool in child welfare services is the
case plan.
(2) The Legislature further finds and declares that a case plan
ensures that the child receives protection and safe and proper care
and case management, and that services are provided to the child and
parents or other caretakers, as appropriate, in order to improve
conditions in the parent's home, to facilitate the safe return of the
child to a safe home or the permanent placement of the child, and to
address the needs of the child while in foster care.
(3) The agency shall consider the recommendations of the child and
family team, as defined in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of
Section 16501, if any are available. The agency shall document the
rationale for any inconsistencies between the case plan and the child
and family team recommendations.
(b) (1) A case plan shall be based upon the principles of this
section and the input from the child and family team.
(2) The case plan shall document that a preplacement assessment of
the service needs of the child and family, and preplacement
preventive services, have been provided, and that reasonable efforts
to prevent out-of-home placement have been made. Preplacement
services may include intensive mental health services in the home or
a community setting and the reasonable efforts made to prevent
out-of-home placement.
(3) In determining the reasonable services to be offered or
provided, the child's health and safety shall be the paramount
concerns.
(4) Upon a determination pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision
(e) of Section 361.5 that reasonable services will be offered to a
parent who is incarcerated in a county jail or state prison, detained
by the United States Department of Homeland Security, or deported to
his or her country of origin, the case plan shall include
information, to the extent possible, about a parent's incarceration
in a county jail or the state prison, detention by the United States
Department of Homeland Security, or deportation during the time that
a minor child of that parent is involved in dependency care.
(5) Reasonable services shall be offered or provided to make it
possible for a child to return to a safe home environment, unless,
pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (e) of Section 361.5, the court
determines that reunification services shall not be provided.
(6) If reasonable services are not ordered, or are terminated,
reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely
manner in accordance with the permanent plan and to complete all
steps necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child.
(c) If out-of-home placement is used to attain case plan goals,
the case plan shall consider the recommendations of the child and
family team.
(d) (1) The case plan shall include a description of the type of
home or institution in which the child is to be placed, and the
reasons for that placement decision. The decision regarding choice of
placement shall be based upon selection of a safe setting that is
the least restrictive family setting that promotes normal childhood
experiences and the most appropriate setting that meets the child's
individual needs and is available, in proximity to the parent's home,
in proximity to the child's school, and consistent with the
selection of the environment best suited to meet the child's special
needs and best interests. The selection shall consider, in order of
priority, placement with relatives, nonrelated extended family
members, and tribal members; foster family homes, resource families,
and nontreatment certified homes of foster family agencies; followed
by treatment and intensive treatment certified homes of foster family
agencies; or multidimensional treatment foster care homes or
therapeutic foster care homes; group care placements in the order of
short-term residential treatment centers, group homes, community
treatment facilities, and out-of-state residential treatment pursuant
to Part 5 (commencing with Section 7900) of Division 12 of the
Family Code.
(2) If a short-term intensive treatment center placement is
selected for a child, the case plan shall indicate the needs of the
child that necessitate this placement, the plan for transitioning the
child to a less restrictive environment, and the projected timeline
by which the child will be transitioned to a less restrictive
environment. This section of the case plan shall be reviewed and
updated at least semiannually.
(A) The case plan for placements in a group home, or commencing
January 1, 2017, in a short-term residential treatment center, shall
indicate that the county has taken into consideration Section
16010.8.
(B) After January 1, 2017, a child and family team meeting as
defined in Section 16501 shall be convened by the county placing
agency for the purpose of identifying the supports and services
needed to achieve permanency and enable the child or youth to be
placed in the least restrictive family setting that promotes normal
childhood experiences.
(3) On or after January 1, 2012, for a nonminor dependent, as
defined in subdivision (v) of Section 11400, who is receiving AFDC-FC
benefits up to 21 years of age pursuant to Section 11403, in
addition to the above requirements, the selection of the placement,
including a supervised independent living placement, as described in
subdivision (w) of Section 11400, shall also be based upon the
developmental needs of young adults by providing opportunities to
have incremental responsibilities that prepare a nonminor dependent
to transition to successful adulthood. If admission to, or
continuation in, a group home or short-term residential treatment
center placement is being considered for a nonminor dependent, the
group home or short-term residential treatment center placement
approval decision shall include a youth-driven, team-based case
planning process, as defined by the department, in consultation with
stakeholders. The case plan shall consider the full range of
placement options, and shall specify why admission to, or
continuation in, a group home placement is the best alternative
available at the time to meet the special needs or well-being of the
nonminor dependent, and how the placement will contribute to the
nonminor dependent's transition to successful adulthood. The case
plan shall specify the treatment strategies that will be used to
prepare the nonminor dependent for discharge to a less restrictive
family setting that promotes normal childhood experiences, including
a target date for discharge from the group home placement. The
placement shall be reviewed and updated on a regular, periodic basis
to ensure that continuation in the group home placement remains in
the best interests of the nonminor dependent and that progress is
being made in achieving case plan goals leading to successful
adulthood. The group home placement planning process shall begin as
soon as it becomes clear to the county welfare department or
probation office that a foster child in group home placement is
likely to remain in group home placement on his or her 18th birthday,
in order to expedite the transition to a less restrictive family
setting that promotes normal childhood experiences, if he or she
becomes a nonminor dependent. The case planning process shall include
informing the youth of all of his or her options, including, but not
limited to, admission to or continuation in a group home placement
and the provision of child-centered specialized permanency services,
as defined in Section 11400. Consideration for continuation of
existing group home placement for a nonminor dependent under 19 years
of age may include the need to stay in the same placement in order
to complete high school. After a nonminor dependent either completes
high school or attains his or her 19th birthday, whichever is
earlier, continuation in or admission to a group home placement is
prohibited unless the nonminor dependent satisfies the conditions of
paragraph (5) of subdivision (b) of Section 11403, and group home
placement functions as a short-term transition to the appropriate
system of care. Treatment services provided by the group home
placement to the nonminor dependent to alleviate or ameliorate the
medical condition, as described in paragraph (5) of subdivision (b)
of Section 11403, shall not constitute the sole basis to disqualify a
nonminor dependent from the group home placement.
(4) In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (1) to (3),
inclusive, and taking into account other statutory considerations
regarding placement, the selection of the most appropriate home that
will meet the child's special needs and best interests shall also
promote educational stability by taking into consideration proximity
to the child's school of origin, and school attendance area, the
number of school transfers the child has previously experienced, and
the child's school matriculation schedule, in addition to other
indicators of educational stability that the Legislature hereby
encourages the State Department of Social Services and the State
Department of Education to develop.
(e) A written case plan shall be completed within a maximum of 60
days of the initial removal of the child or of the in-person response
required under subdivision (f) of Section 16501 if the child has not
been removed from his or her home, or by the date of the
dispositional hearing pursuant to Section 358, whichever occurs
first. The case plan shall be updated, as the service needs of the
child and family dictate. At a minimum, the case plan shall be
updated in conjunction with each status review hearing conducted
pursuant to Sections 364, 366, 366.3, and 366.31, and the hearing
conducted pursuant to Section 366.26, but no less frequently than
once every six months. Each updated case plan shall include a
description of the services that have been provided to the child
under the plan and an evaluation of the appropriateness and
effectiveness of those services.
(1) It is the intent of the Legislature that extending the maximum
time available for preparing a written case plan from 30 to 60 days
will afford caseworkers time to actively engage families, and to
solicit and integrate into the case plan the input of the child and
the child's family, as well as the input of relatives and other
interested parties.
(2) The extension of the maximum time available for preparing a
written case plan from the 30 to 60 days shall be effective 90 days
after the date that the department gives counties written notice that
necessary changes have been made to the Child Welfare Services/Case
Management System (CWS/CMS) to account for the 60-day timeframe for
preparing a written case plan.
(f) The child welfare services case plan shall be comprehensive
enough to meet the juvenile court dependency proceedings requirements
pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 300) of Chapter 2 of
Part 1 of Division 2.
(g) The case plan shall be developed considering the
recommendations of the child and family team, as follows:
(1) The case plan shall be based upon an assessment of the
circumstances that required child welfare services intervention. The
child shall be involved in developing the case plan as age and
developmentally appropriate.
(2) The case plan shall identify specific goals and the
appropriateness of the planned services in meeting those goals.
(3) The case plan shall identify the original allegations of abuse
or neglect, as defined in Article 2.5 (commencing with Section
11164) of Chapter 2 of Title 1 of Part 4 of the Penal Code, or the
conditions cited as the basis for declaring the child a dependent of
the court pursuant to Section 300, or all of these, and the other
precipitating incidents that led to child welfare services
intervention.
(4) The case plan shall include a description of the schedule of
the placement agency contacts with the child and the family or other
caretakers. The frequency of these contacts shall be in accordance
with regulations adopted by the State Department of Social Services.
If the child has been placed in foster care out of state, the county
social worker or probation officer, or a social worker or probation
officer on the staff of the agency in the state in which the child
has been placed, shall visit the child in a foster family home or the
home of a relative, consistent with federal law and in accordance
with the department's approved state plan. For children in
out-of-state group home facilities, visits shall be conducted at
least monthly, pursuant to Section 16516.5. At least once every six
months, at the time of a regularly scheduled placement agency contact
with the foster child, the child's social worker or probation
officer shall inform the child of his or her rights as a foster
child, as specified in Section 16001.9. The social worker or
probation officer shall provide the information to the child in a
manner appropriate to the age or developmental level of the child.
(5) (A) When out-of-home services are used, the frequency of
contact between the natural parents or legal guardians and the child
shall be specified in the case plan. The frequency of those contacts
shall reflect overall case goals, and consider other principles
outlined in this section.
(B) Information regarding any court-ordered visitation between the
child and the natural parents or legal guardians, and the terms and
conditions needed to facilitate the visits while protecting the
safety of the child, shall be provided to the child's out-of-home
caregiver as soon as possible after the court order is made.
(6) When out-of-home placement is made, the case plan shall
include provisions for the development and maintenance of sibling
relationships as specified in subdivisions (b), (c), and (d) of
Section 16002. If appropriate, when siblings who are dependents of
the juvenile court are not placed together, the social worker for
each child, if different, shall communicate with each of the other
social workers and ensure that the child's siblings are informed of
significant life events that occur within their extended family.
Unless it has been determined that it is inappropriate in a
particular case to keep siblings informed of significant life events
that occur within the extended family, the social worker shall
determine the appropriate means and setting for disclosure of this
information to the child commensurate with the child's age and
emotional well-being. These significant life events shall include,
but shall not be limited to, the following:
(A) The death of an immediate relative.
(B) The birth of a sibling.
(C) Significant changes regarding a dependent child, unless the
child objects to the sharing of the information with his or her
siblings, including changes in placement, major medical or mental
health diagnoses, treatments, or hospitalizations, arrests, and
changes in the permanent plan.
(7) If out-of-home placement is made in a foster family home,
group home, or other child care institution that is either a
substantial distance from the home of the child's parent or out of
state, the case plan shall specify the reasons why that placement is
in the best interest of the child. When an out-of-state group home
placement is recommended or made, the case plan shall, in addition,
specify compliance with Section 7911.1 of the Family Code.
(8) A case plan shall ensure the educational stability of the
child while in foster care and shall include both of the following:
(A) An assurance that the placement takes into account the
appropriateness of the current educational setting and the proximity
to the school in which the child is enrolled at the time of
placement.
(B) An assurance that the placement agency has coordinated with
the person holding the right to make educational decisions for the
child and appropriate local educational agencies to ensure that the
child remains in the school in which the child is enrolled at the
time of placement or, if remaining in that school is not in the best
interests of the child, assurances by the placement agency and the
local educational agency to provide immediate and appropriate
enrollment in a new school and to provide all of the child's
educational records to the new school.
(9) (A) If out-of-home services are used, or if parental rights
have been terminated and the case plan is placement for adoption, the
case plan shall include a recommendation regarding the
appropriateness of unsupervised visitation between the child and any
of the child's siblings. This recommendation shall include a
statement regarding the child's and the siblings' willingness to
participate in unsupervised visitation. If the case plan includes a
recommendation for unsupervised sibling visitation, the plan shall
also note that information necessary to accomplish this visitation
has been provided to the child or to the child's siblings.
(B) Information regarding the schedule and frequency of the visits
between the child and siblings, as well as any court-ordered terms
and conditions needed to facilitate the visits while protecting the
safety of the child, shall be provided to the child's out-of-home
caregiver as soon as possible after the court order is made.
(10) If out-of-home services are used and the goal is
reunification, the case plan shall describe the services to be
provided to assist in reunification and the services to be provided
concurrently to achieve legal permanency if efforts to reunify fail.
The plan shall also consider in-state and out-of-state placements,
the importance of developing and maintaining sibling relationships
pursuant to Section 16002, and the desire and willingness of the
caregiver to provide legal permanency for the child if reunification
is unsuccessful.
(11) If out-of-home services are used, the child has been in care
for at least 12 months, and the goal is not adoptive placement, the
case plan shall include documentation of the compelling reason or
reasons why termination of parental rights is not in the child's best
interest. A determination completed or updated within the past 12
months by the department when it is acting as an adoption agency or
by a licensed adoption agency that it is unlikely that the child will
be adopted, or that one of the conditions described in paragraph (1)
of subdivision (c) of Section 366.26 applies, shall be deemed a
compelling reason.
(12) (A) Parents and legal guardians shall have an opportunity to
review the case plan, and to sign it whenever possible, and then
shall receive a copy of the plan. In a voluntary service or placement
agreement, the parents or legal guardians shall be required to
review and sign the case plan. Whenever possible, parents and legal
guardians shall participate in the development of the case plan.
Commencing January 1, 2012, for nonminor dependents, as defined in
subdivision (v) of Section 11400, who are receiving AFDC-FC or
CalWORKs assistance up to 21 years of age pursuant to Section 11403,
the transitional independent living case plan, as set forth in
subdivision (y) of Section 11400, shall be developed with, and signed
by, the nonminor.
(B) Parents and legal guardians shall be advised that, pursuant to
Section 1228.1 of the Evidence Code, neither their signature on the
child welfare services case plan nor their acceptance of any services
prescribed in the child welfare services case plan shall constitute
an admission of guilt or be used as evidence against the parent or
legal guardian in a court of law. However, they shall also be advised
that the parent's or guardian's failure to cooperate, except for
good cause, in the provision of services specified in the child
welfare services case plan may be used in any hearing held pursuant
to Section 366.21, 366.22, or 366.25 of this code as evidence.
(13) A child shall be given a meaningful opportunity to
participate in the development of the case plan and state his or her
preference for foster care placement. A child who is 12 years of age
or older and in a permanent placement shall also be given the
opportunity to review the case plan, sign the case plan, and receive
a copy of the case plan.
(14) The case plan shall be included in the court report and shall
be considered by the court at the initial hearing and each review
hearing. Modifications to the case plan made during the period
between review hearings need not be approved by the court if the
casework supervisor for that case determines that the modifications
further the goals of the plan. If out-of-home services are used with
the goal of family reunification, the case plan shall consider and
describe the application of subdivision (b) of Section 11203.
(15) (A) If the case plan has as its goal for the child a
permanent plan of adoption or legal guardianship, it shall include a
statement of the child's wishes regarding their permanent placement
plan and an assessment of those stated wishes. The agency shall also
include documentation of the steps the agency is taking to find an
adoptive family or other permanent living arrangements for the child,
to place the child with an adoptive family, an appropriate and
willing relative, or a legal guardian, and to finalize the adoption
or legal guardianship. At a minimum, the documentation shall include
child-specific recruitment efforts, such as the use of state,
regional, and national adoption exchanges, including electronic
exchange systems, when the child has been freed for adoption. The
documentation shall also reflect the provision of child-centered
specialized permanency services, as defined in Section 11400.
Regardless of whether the child has been freed for adoption,
documentation shall include a description of any barriers to
achieving legal permanence and the steps the agency will take to
address those barriers, including the provision of child-centered
specialized permanency services, as defined in Section 11400. If the
plan is for kinship guardianship, the case plan shall document how
the child meets the kinship guardianship eligibility requirements.
(B) When the child is 16 years of age or older and is in another
planned permanent living arrangement, the case plan shall identify
the intensive and ongoing efforts, including child-centered
specialized permanency services, as defined in Section 11400, to
return the child to the home of the parent, place the child for
adoption, place the child for tribal customary adoption in the case
of an Indian child, establish a legal guardianship, or place the
child nonminor dependent with a fit and willing relative, as
appropriate. Efforts shall include the use of technology, including
social media, to find biological family members of the child.
(16) (A) (i) For a child who is 14 or 15 years of age, the case
plan shall include a written description of the programs and services
that will help the child, consistent with the child's best
interests, to prepare for the transition from foster care to
successful adulthood. The description may be included in the document
described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (18).
(ii) When appropriate, for a child who is 16 years of age or older
and, commencing January 1, 2012, for a nonminor dependent, the case
plan shall include the transitional independent living plan (TILP), a
written description of the programs and services that will help the
child, consistent with the child's best interests, to prepare for the
transition from foster care to successful adulthood, and, in
addition, whether the youth has an in-progress application pending
for Title XVI Supplemental Security Income benefits or for Special
Immigrant Juvenile Status or other applicable application for legal
residency and an active dependency case is required for that
application. When appropriate, for a nonminor dependent, the
transitional independent living case plan, as described in
subdivision (v) of Section 11400, shall include the TILP, a written
description of the programs and services that will help the nonminor
dependent, consistent with his or her best interests, to prepare for
transition from foster care and assist the youth in meeting the
eligibility criteria set forth in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive,
of subdivision (b) of Section 11403. If applicable, the case plan
shall describe the individualized supervision provided in the
supervised independent living placement as defined in subdivision (w)
of Section 11400. The case plan shall be developed with the child or
nonminor dependent and individuals identified as important to the
child or nonminor dependent, and shall include steps the agency is
taking to ensure that the child or nonminor dependent achieves
permanence, including maintaining or obtaining permanent connections
to caring and committed adults.
(B)
During the 90-day period prior to the participant attaining 18 years
of age or older as the state may elect under Section 475(8)(B)(iii)
of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 675(8)(B)(iii)),
whether during that period foster care maintenance payments are being
made on the child's behalf or the child is receiving benefits or
services under Section 477 of the federal Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. Sec. 677), a caseworker or other appropriate agency staff or
probation officer and other representatives of the participant, as
appropriate, shall provide the youth or nonminor dependent with
assistance and support in developing the written 90-day transition
plan, that is personalized at the direction of the child, information
as detailed as the participant elects that shall include, but not be
limited to, options regarding housing, health insurance, education,
local opportunities for mentors and continuing support services, and
workforce supports and employment services, a power of attorney for
health care, and information regarding the advance health care
directive form.
(C) For youth 14 years of age or older, the case plan shall
include documentation that a consumer credit report was requested
annually from each of the three major credit reporting agencies at no
charge to the youth and that any results were provided to the youth.
For nonminor dependents, the case plan shall include documentation
that the county assisted the nonminor dependent in obtaining his or
her reports. The case plan shall include documentation of barriers,
if any, to obtaining the credit reports. If the consumer credit
report reveals any accounts, the case plan shall detail how the
county ensured the youth received assistance with interpreting the
credit report and resolving any inaccuracies, including any referrals
made for the assistance.
(17) For youth 14 years of age or older and nonminor dependents,
the case plan shall be developed in consultation with the youth. At
the youth's option, the consultation may include up to two members of
the case planning team who are chosen by the youth and who are not
foster parents of, or caseworkers for, the youth. The agency, at any
time, may reject an individual selected by the youth to be a member
of the case planning team if the agency has good cause to believe
that the individual would not act in the youth's best interest. One
individual selected by the youth to be a member of the case planning
team may be designated to be the youth's adviser and advocate with
respect to the application of the reasonable and prudent parent
standard to the youth, as necessary.
(18) For youth in foster care 14 years of age and older and
nonminor dependents, the case plan shall include both of the
following:
(A) A document that describes the youth's rights with respect to
education, health, visitation, and court participation, the right to
be annually provided with copies of his or her credit reports at no
cost while in foster care pursuant to Section 10618.6, and the right
to stay safe and avoid exploitation.
(B) A signed acknowledgment by the youth that he or she has been
provided a copy of the document and that the rights described in the
document have been explained to the youth in an age-appropriate
manner.
(19) The case plan for a child or nonminor dependent who is, or
who is at risk of becoming, the victim of commercial sexual
exploitation, shall document the services provided to address that
issue.
(h) If the court finds, after considering the case plan, that
unsupervised sibling visitation is appropriate and has been consented
to, the court shall order that the child or the child's siblings,
the child's current caregiver, and the child's prospective adoptive
parents, if applicable, be provided with information necessary to
accomplish this visitation. This section does not require or prohibit
the social worker's facilitation, transportation, or supervision of
visits between the child and his or her siblings.
(i) The case plan documentation on sibling placements required
under this section shall not require modification of existing case
plan forms until the Child Welfare Service/Case Management System
(CWS/CMS) is implemented on a statewide basis.
(j) When a child is 10 years of age or older and has been in
out-of-home placement for six months or longer, the case plan shall
include an identification of individuals, other than the child's
siblings, who are important to the child and actions necessary to
maintain the child's relationship with those individuals, provided
that those relationships are in the best interest of the child. The
social worker or probation officer shall ask every child who is 10
years of age or older and who has been in out-of-home placement for
six months or longer to identify individuals other than the child's
siblings who are important to the child, and may ask any other child
to provide that information, or may seek that information from the
child and family team, as appropriate. The social worker or probation
officer shall make efforts to identify other individuals who are
important to the child, consistent with the child's best interests.
(k) The child's caregiver shall be provided a copy of a plan
outlining the child's needs and services. The nonminor dependent's
caregiver shall be provided with a copy of the nonminor's TILP.
(l) Each county shall ensure that the total number of visits made
by caseworkers on a monthly basis to children in foster care during a
federal fiscal year is not less than 95 percent of the total number
of those visits that would occur if each child were visited once
every month while in care and that the majority of the visits occur
in the residence of the child. The county child welfare and probation
departments shall comply with data reporting requirements that the
department deems necessary to comply with the federal Child and
Family Services Improvement Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-288) and the
federal Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act of
2011 (Public Law 112-34).
(m) The implementation and operation of the amendments to
subdivision (i) enacted at the 2005-06 Regular Session shall be
subject to appropriation through the budget process and by phase, as
provided in Section 366.35.
SEC. 17. To the extent that this act has an overall effect of
increasing the costs already borne by a local agency for programs or
levels of service mandated by the 2011 Realignment Legislation within
the meaning of Section 36 of Article XIII of the California
Constitution, it shall apply to local agencies only to the extent
that the state provides annual funding for the cost increase. Any new
program or higher level of service provided by a local agency
pursuant to this act above the level for which funding has been
provided shall not require a subvention of funds by the state nor
otherwise be subject to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
Constitution.
