Bill Text: CA AB1118 | 2015-2016 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Police officer standards and training: procedural justice.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Failed) 2016-02-01 - From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. [AB1118 Detail]
Download: California-2015-AB1118-Amended.html
BILL NUMBER: AB 1118 AMENDED
BILL TEXT
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 16, 2015
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 26, 2015
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Bonta
FEBRUARY 27, 2015
An act to add Section 13515.56 to the Penal Code, relating to
public safety and law enforcement.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1118, as amended, Bonta. Police officer standards and training:
procedural justice.
Existing law establishes the Commission on Peace Officer Standards
and Training, to adopt rules establishing minimum standards relating
to physical, mental, and moral fitness that govern the recruitment
of specified peace officers. Existing law requires the commission to
establish a certification program for those officers.
Existing law establishes the Board of State and Community
Corrections to collect and maintain available information and data
about state and community correctional policies, practices,
capacities, and needs, as specified.
This bill would require every city police officer or
deputy sheriff at a supervisory level or below who is assigned field
or investigative duties to complete a procedural justice training
course certified by the commission within 18 months after the
commission determines that the training curriculum is sufficient. The
bill would require the training to address specified objectives and
core principles, and would require the commission to periodically
update the training course and establish retraining schedule to
incorporate updated course content. establish the
Procedural Justice Task Force, which would be administered by the
board. The task force would provide for grant funding, to be awarded
to local law enforcement departments for the purpose of implementing
and enhancing procedural justice training, as well as a matching
grant program to award funds invested by philanthropic organizations.
This bill would require the task force to manage these programs,
monitor their implementation, and serve in an advisory capacity to
sites leading implementation. The bill would set forth additional
powers and authority relating to the operation of the task force.
The task force would be composed of 12 members, including the
Attorney General, or his or her designee, the chair of the board,
representatives of law enforcement, nonprofit civil rights
organizations, and academia, as prescribed. The bill would specify
the minimum requirements for a procedural justice training program of
a local law enforcement agency applying for a grant. It would
require the commission to develop a model procedural justice training
curriculum, within an unspecified period.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all
of the following:
(a) Procedural justice and police legitimacy training builds the
public's confidence in police departments, acceptance of police
authority, and the belief that officers are fair, based on the
application of the following four key principles:
(1) Treating people with dignity and respect.
(2) Making decisions fairly, based on facts, not illegitimate
factors such as race.
(3) Giving people a voice - a chance to tell their side of the
story.
(4) Acting in a way that encourages community members to believe
that they will be treated with goodwill in the future.
(b) Law enforcement departments that employ such principles -
supported by a wealth of research - experience higher levels of
public cooperation with police efforts to address crime, increased
compliance with the law, stronger public support for police, and
greater deference to police in interactions with community members.
(c) Procedural justice and police legitimacy university experts
have developed a proven curriculum that draws on research in
legitimacy, procedural justice, leadership and adult learning theory,
and has been successfully implemented in cities throughout the
nation, including in Chicago, Oakland, Stockton, and Salinas.
(d) The City of Oakland has advanced the field of procedural
justice and police legitimacy by having community partners lead
modules on the intersection of race and policing, including the
historical and generational effects of policing, and community
perspectives on policing.
(e) The community training partnership was well received by police
officers in Oakland, who actively engage with the community
trainers, and fostered a set of community leaders that act as
critical champions who, for example, serve as bridges to the
community while continuing to press for institutional change.
(f) The cities of Oakland, Salinas, and Stockton are all
considering ongoing procedural justice and police legitimacy
training, including a combination of scenario-based training and
advanced procedural justice training tailored to particular
situations or roles in a department.
(g) Several police departments that have implemented procedural
justice and police legitimacy training are planning on incorporating
content on implicit racial bias into future training.
(h) In Oakland and Stockton, the departments' embrace of
procedural justice principles has provided a set of unifying values
and guiding principles that a group of diverse partners regularly
invoke as they implement evidence-based violence reduction
strategies.
SECTION 1. SEC. 2. Section 13515.56
is added to the Penal Code, to read:
13515.56. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of
the following:
(1) Police training that addresses culture, diversity, mental
illness, youth development, and emphasizes mediation skills, improves
how police relate to the communities that they serve and help
minimize the use of force. The Legislature acknowledges that
procedural justice training has emerged as a best practice for police
departments to build trust with community members and reduce
confrontation. Research suggests that when citizens see the police as
more objective, they are more likely to comply with police
directives.
(2) Procedural justice emphasizes treating community residents
with respect, and has gained traction as an evidence-based and
cost-effective way to reduce crime. As a result, several law
enforcement agencies throughout the country have implemented
procedural justice training into their academies along with field
training. Procedural justice is based on the following core
principles:
(A) Fairness and consistency of rule application.
(B) Impartiality and unbiased decisionmaker neutrality.
(C) Citizen voice in decisionmaking.
(D) Transparency and openness in process.
(3) Police training programs should include content for mitigating
the impact of bias, identifying and properly responding to people
with mental illness, and instill the principles and practices of
procedural justice.
(b) Every city police officer or deputy sheriff at a supervisory
level or below who is assigned field or investigative duties shall
complete a procedural justice training course certified by the
commission, within 18 months after the commission determines that the
training curriculum is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of
this section. This training shall be offered to all city police
officers and deputy sheriffs as part of continuing professional
training. The training shall address, at a minimum, the objectives
and core principles described in paragraphs (2) and (3) of
subdivision (a).
(c) The commission shall periodically update the procedural
justice training course required under this section, and shall
establish a retraining schedule to incorporate the updated course
content.
(b) (1) The Procedural Justice Task Force is hereby created and
shall be administered by the Board of State and Community
Corrections. The purpose of the task force is to do both of the
following:
(A) To provide for grant funding, to be awarded to local law
enforcement departments for the purpose of implementing and enhancing
procedural justice training.
(B) To provide for a matching grant program, whereby philanthropic
organizations may invest directly in procedural justice training.
(2) The task force shall manage the grant programs, monitor
implementation, and serve in an advisory capacity to sites leading
implementation.
(3) The task force shall bring together police departments that
are implementing procedural justice training, as well as support the
implementation and monitor the effectiveness of a community of
practice plan to assist police departments that have adopted
procedural justice training.
(c) The task force shall have the powers and authority necessary
to carry out the duties imposed upon it by this section, including,
but not limited to, all of the following:
(1) To employ any administrative, technical, or other personnel
necessary for the performance of its powers and duties.
(2) To hold hearings, make and sign any agreements, and to do or
perform any acts that may be necessary, desirable, or proper to carry
out the purposes of this section.
(3) To cooperate with, and secure the cooperation of, any
department, division, board, bureau, commission, or other agency of
the state to facilitate the task force properly to carry out its
powers and duties.
(4) To appoint advisers or advisory committees from time to time
when the task force determines that the experience or expertise of
the advisers or advisory committees is needed for projects of the
task force. Section 11009 of the Government Code shall apply to these
advisers or advisory committees.
(5) To accept any federal funds granted, by act of Congress or by
executive order, for all or any of the purposes of this section.
(6) To accept any gift, donation, grant, or bequest for all or any
of the purposes of this section.
(d) The task force shall be composed of 12 members. The members
shall elect one member to chair the task force. The members of the
task force shall include individuals representing a cross-section of
disciplines and entities, as follows:
(1) The Attorney General, or his or her designee.
(2) The President of the Peace Officers Research Association of
California, or his or her designee.
(3) The President of the California Police Chiefs Association, or
his or her designee.
(4) The President of the California State Sheriffs' Association,
or his or her designee.
(5) The Executive Director of the Commission on Peace Officers
Standards and Training, or his or her designee.
(6) The Chair of the Board of State and Community Corrections, or
his or her designee.
(7) Two representatives from each of the following categories, one
of whom shall be appointed by the President Pro Tempore of the
Senate and one of whom shall be appointed by the Speaker of the
Assembly:
(A) A university researcher or professor who specializes in
procedural justice, community-police relations, implicit bias, or a
similar law enforcement subject.
(B) A representative of a nonprofit civil rights organization that
specializes in civil or human rights and criminal justice.
(C) A community organizer who specializes in civil or human rights
and criminal justice.
(e) The task force shall award grants to local law enforcement
agency applicants with a procedural justice training program that
meets, at a minimum, the following requirements:
(1) Establishes authentic partnerships with community-based
organizations, incorporates community partners in leading a portion
of the training and development of local law enforcement policies and
practices.
(2) Apportions funding for community partners to facilitate
training modules.
(3) Addresses implicit bias.
(4) Includes a contextualized module that addresses the historical
and generational effects of policing with particular emphasis on
communities of color.
(5) Is implemented in multiple phases, including in the academy,
field training, and as ongoing standalone training, particularly for
mid-level officers and captains.
(6) Includes performance reviews to test police officers'
competency in procedural justice, including evaluations from
supervising officers, peer evaluations, and community surveys.
(7) Includes the development of tools to continuously assess
course quality and determine whether the training is changing
officers' attitudes and practices.
(8) Is tailored or customized to reflect community priorities and
departmental needs.
(f) In consultation with the task force, the commission shall
develop a model procedural justice training curriculum, no later
than____. The task force and commission shall work together to
determine the appropriate length and content of the course.
