Bill Text: TX HB2401 | 2021-2022 | 87th Legislature | Introduced


Bill Title: Preserving religious liberty from nativist jurisprudence.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 2-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2021-03-16 - Referred to State Affairs [HB2401 Detail]

Download: Texas-2021-HB2401-Introduced.html
 
 
  By: Middleton H.B. No. 2401
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  preserving religious liberty from nativist jurisprudence.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  This Act shall be known as the Protection of
  Religious Liberty from Nativist Jurisprudence Act.
         SECTION 2.  Chapter 110, Civil Practice and Remedies Code,
  is amended by adding Subchapter B to read as follows:
  SUBCHAPTER B. PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
         Sec. 110.020.  DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:
         (1)  "state officer or employee" includes any state or local
  officer or employee of this State, including any member of the board
  of trustees of any school district in this state, and any teacher,
  principal, administrator, or other person employed by any school
  district in this state;
         (2)  "court" includes any court of this State (other than an
  administrative or agency tribunal) or any Article III court of the
  United States;
         (3)  "Blaine amendments" refers to: (a) the provision
  codified at article I, section 7 of the Texas Constitution, which
  reads: "No money shall be appropriated, or drawn from the Treasury
  for the benefit of any sect, or religious society, theological or
  religious seminary; nor shall property belonging to the State be
  appropriated for any such purposes"; and (b) the third sentence of
  article VII, section 5(c) of the Texas Constitution, which reads:
  "The permanent school fund and the available school fund may not be
  appropriated to or used for the support of any sectarian school";
         (4)  "the Separation of Church and State doctrine" means (a)
  any restriction, or denial of a benefit, that purports to be
  justified on grounds of Separation of Church and State or any
  element of the Supreme Court's decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman; or (b)
  any restriction, or denial of a benefit, that purports to be
  justified by the Blaine amendments.
         Sec. 110.021.  BLAINE AMENDMENTS. No state officer or
  employee may enforce the Blaine Amendments unless and until the
  Supreme Court of the United States overrules Espinoza v. Montana
  Dept. Of Revenue, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (2020).
         Sec. 110.022.  SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. Except as
  provided in section 110.024, no state officer or employee may
  enforce the Separation of Church and State doctrine against any
  person or entity in this state.
         Sec. 110.023.  INCORPORATION. Except as provided in section
  110.024, no state officer or employee may enforce the Establishment
  Clause of the First Amendment against any person or entity other
  than the federal government, its officers, or its
  instrumentalities.
         Sec. 110.024.  EXCEPTIONS. Notwithstanding the
  requirements of sections 110.022 and 110.023, a state officer or
  employee may enforce the Separation of Church and State doctrine or
  the Establishment Clause as necessary to comply with:
         (a)  a judgment or decree entered by a court against that
  specific officer or employee, his superiors, or the entity for whom
  he works; or
         (b)  a directly-on-point ruling from the Supreme Court of the
  United States or the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit,
  when there is no reasonable grounds for distinguishing that ruling
  factually or legally.
         Sec. 110.025.  CHURCH SPEECH. No state or local officer may
  enforce any restrictions on speech or expression, whether in the
  form of direct duties or conditions, that single out churches or
  other religious organizations; nor shall any state or local officer
  chill the speech of any person, or other entity, in this state by
  publishing any such restrictions as law or required by law.
         Sec. 110.026.  REMEDIES. (a) Any person or other entity
  residing, praying, preaching, or doing business in this State may
  bring a civil action in any court of this State against any state or
  local officer who violates this subchapter, and upon finding that
  the defendant has violated or is violating that person or entity's
  rights under this statute, the Court shall award:
               (1)  Declaratory relief;
               (2)  Injunctive relief; and
               (3)  Costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
         (b)  The plaintiff in any action brought under this section
  shall have the right to a jury trial.
         Sec. 110.027.  AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES IN ESTABLISHMENT
  CLAUSE LAWSUITS. (a) Any person, entity, lawyer, or law firm that
  sues to enforce the Blaine Amendments, the Separation of Church and
  State Doctrine, or the Establishment Clause against any person or
  entity in the State of Texas, in any state or federal court, or that
  represents any litigant seeking such relief in any state or federal
  court, shall be jointly and severally liable to pay the costs and
  attorneys' fees of the prevailing party or parties, notwithstanding
  any other provision of law.
         (b)  A litigant shall be deemed a "prevailing party" under
  this section if a state or federal court dismisses any claim or
  cause of action brought against it that seeks the relief described
  in subsection (a), regardless of the reason for such dismissal, or
  if a state or federal court enters judgment in its favor on any such
  claim or cause of action.
         (c)  A prevailing party under this section may bring a civil
  action to recover costs and attorneys' fees against a person,
  entity, lawyer, or law firm that sought declaratory or injunctive
  relief described in subsection (a) within three (3) years of the
  date on which the dismissal or judgment described in subsection (b)
  becomes final upon the conclusion of appellate review, or within
  three (3) years of the date on which the time for seeking appellate
  review expires, regardless of whether the prevailing party sought
  to recover costs or attorneys' fees in the underlying action. It
  shall not be a defense that the prevailing party failed to seek
  recovery of costs or attorneys' fees in the underlying action, and
  it shall not be a defense that the court in the underlying action
  declined to recognize or enforce the requirements of this section.
         (d)  An award of costs and attorneys' fees under this section
  shall include interest.
         Sec. 110.027.  SEVERABILITY. Every provision, section,
  subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this subchapter,
  and every application of the provisions in this subchapter to every
  person, groups of persons, or circumstances, are severable from
  each other. If any application of any provision in this subchapter
  to any person, group of persons, or circumstances is found by a
  court to be unconstitutional or invalid, on any ground for any
  reason whatsoever, then the remaining applications of that
  provision to all other persons and circumstances shall be severed
  and may not be affected. All constitutional applications of this
  subchapter shall be severed from any applications that a court
  finds to be unconstitutional, leaving the constitutional
  applications in force, because it is the Legislature's intent and
  priority that the constitutional applications be allowed to stand
  alone. The Legislature further declares that it would have passed
  this subchapter, and each provision, section, subsection,
  sentence, clause, phrase, or word, and all constitutional
  applications of this subchapter, irrespective of the fact that any
  provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word,
  or applications of this subchapter, were to be declared
  unconstitutional by any court.
         SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2021.
feedback