Bill Text: MI HB5520 | 2013-2014 | 97th Legislature | Introduced


Bill Title: Insurance; no-fault; duty of an insurer to deal fairly with insureds and claimants; establish. Amends 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.100 - 500.8302) by adding sec. 3149.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 16-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2014-05-08 - Printed Bill Filed 05/07/2014 [HB5520 Detail]

Download: Michigan-2013-HB5520-Introduced.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOUSE BILL No. 5520

 

May 6, 2014, Introduced by Reps. Abed, Cochran, LaVoy, Lamonte, Brinks, Driskell, Hovey-Wright, Oakes, Hobbs, Rutledge, Slavens, Faris, Phelps, Darany, Lipton and Brown and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

 

     A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled

 

"The insurance code of 1956,"

 

(MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 3149.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 3149. (1) An insurer obligated to pay benefits or claims

 

for personal protection insurance benefits under this act has a

 

duty to deal fairly and in good faith with an injured person

 

claiming those benefits and that person's providers. An insurer

 

that breaches this duty to deal fairly and in good faith is liable

 

for compensatory, consequential, noneconomic, economic, and

 

exemplary damages proximately caused by the breach and the costs of

 

litigation, including actual attorney fees. A breach of the duty to

 

deal fairly and in good faith includes, but is not limited to, any

 

of the following:

 


     (a) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy

 

provisions concerning coverages at issue.

 

     (b) Failing to acknowledge promptly or to act reasonably and

 

promptly on communications concerning claims arising under the

 

insurance policy.

 

     (c) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for

 

the prompt investigation of claims arising under the insurance

 

policy.

 

     (d) Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable

 

investigation based on the available information.

 

     (e) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a

 

reasonable time after proof of loss statements have been completed.

 

     (f) Failing to attempt in good faith to effectuate prompt,

 

fair, and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has

 

become reasonably clear.

 

     (g) Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover

 

money due under an insurance policy by offering substantially less

 

than the amount due the insureds.

 

     (h) Attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to

 

which a reasonable person would believe the claimant was entitled,

 

by reference to written or printed advertising material

 

accompanying or made part of an application.

 

     (i) Attempting to settle claims on the basis of an application

 

that was altered without notice to, or knowledge or consent of, the

 

insured.

 

     (j) Making a claims payment to a policyholder or beneficiary

 

omitting the coverage under which each payment is being made.

 


     (k) Making known to insureds or claimants a policy of

 

appealing from arbitration awards in favor of insureds or claimants

 

for the purpose of compelling them to accept settlements or

 

compromises less than the amount awarded in arbitration.

 

     (l) Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by

 

requiring an insured, claimant, or a physician of an insured or

 

claimant to submit a preliminary claim report and then requiring

 

subsequent submission of formal proof of loss forms, seeking solely

 

the duplication of a verification.

 

     (m) Failing to promptly settle claims if liability has become

 

reasonably clear under 1 portion of the insurance policy coverage

 

in order to influence settlements under other portions of the

 

insurance policy.

 

     (n) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation of

 

the basis in the insurance policy in relation to the facts or

 

applicable law for denial of a claim or for the offer of a

 

compromise settlement.

 

     (2) Whether an insurer has breached the duty under subsection

 

(1) is a question of fact and not of law.

feedback