Bill Text: NY A02182 | 2023-2024 | General Assembly | Amended
Bill Title: Permits awarding of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in court actions for unlawful discriminatory practices pursuant to the human rights law.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 6-0)
Status: (Introduced) 2024-05-02 - print number 2182a [A02182 Detail]
Download: New_York-2023-A02182-Amended.html
STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 2182--A 2023-2024 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY January 23, 2023 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. DINOWITZ, SEAWRIGHT, PAULIN, STECK, SHIMSKY -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. SIMON -- read once and referred to the Committee on Governmental Operations -- recommitted to the Committee on Governmental Operations in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to awarding attorneys' fees and costs in an action brought for an unlawful discriminatory practice The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Subdivision 9 of section 297 of the executive law, as 2 amended by chapter 140 of the laws of 2022, is amended to read as 3 follows: 4 9. Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory 5 practice shall have a cause of action in any court of appropriate juris- 6 diction for damages[, including, in cases of employment discrimination7related to private employers and housing discrimination only,] and may 8 award punitive damages, and such other remedies as may be appropriate, 9 including any civil fines and penalties provided in subdivision four of 10 this section, unless such person had filed a complaint hereunder or with 11 any local commission on human rights, or with the superintendent pursu- 12 ant to the provisions of section two hundred ninety-six-a of this arti- 13 cle, provided that, where the division has dismissed such complaint on 14 the grounds of administrative convenience, on the grounds of untimeli- 15 ness, or on the grounds that the election of remedies is annulled, such 16 person shall maintain all rights to bring suit as if no complaint had 17 been filed with the division. At any time prior to a hearing before a 18 hearing examiner, a person who has a complaint pending at the division 19 may request that the division dismiss the complaint and annul [his or20her] such person's election of remedies so that the human rights law EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD04983-02-4A. 2182--A 2 1 claim may be pursued in court, and the division may, upon such request, 2 dismiss the complaint on the grounds that such person's election of an 3 administrative remedy is annulled. Notwithstanding subdivision (a) of 4 section two hundred four of the civil practice law and rules, if a 5 complaint is so annulled by the division, upon the request of the party 6 bringing such complaint before the division, such party's rights to 7 bring such cause of action before a court of appropriate jurisdiction 8 shall be limited by the statute of limitations in effect in such court 9 at the time the complaint was initially filed with the division. Any 10 party to a housing discrimination complaint shall have the right within 11 twenty days following a determination of probable cause pursuant to 12 subdivision two of this section to elect to have an action commenced in 13 a civil court, and an attorney representing the division of human rights 14 will be appointed to present the complaint in court, or, with the 15 consent of the division, the case may be presented by complainant's 16 attorney. A complaint filed by the equal employment opportunity commis- 17 sion to comply with the requirements of 42 USC 2000e-5(c) and 42 USC 18 12117(a) and 29 USC 633(b) shall not constitute the filing of a 19 complaint within the meaning of this subdivision. No person who has 20 initiated any action in a court of competent jurisdiction or who has an 21 action pending before any administrative agency under any other law of 22 the state based upon an act which would be an unlawful discriminatory 23 practice under this article, may file a complaint with respect to the 24 same grievance under this section or under section two hundred ninety- 25 six-a of this article. In cases of housing discrimination only, a person 26 whose complaint has been dismissed by the division after investigation 27 for lack of jurisdiction or lack of probable cause may file the same 28 cause of action in a court of appropriate jurisdiction pursuant to this 29 section, unless judicial review of such dismissal has been sought pursu- 30 ant to section two hundred ninety-eight of this article. The attorney 31 general shall have the power to commence an action or proceeding in the 32 supreme court of the state of New York, if, upon information or belief, 33 the attorney general is of the opinion that an employer has been, is, or 34 is about to violate the provisions regarding unlawful discriminatory 35 retaliation pursuant to subdivision seven of section two hundred nine- 36 ty-six of this article. Nothing in this section shall in any way limit 37 rights or remedies which are otherwise available under law to the attor- 38 ney general or any other person authorized to bring an action under this 39 section. 40 § 2. Subdivision 10 of section 297 of the executive law, as amended by 41 chapter 154 of the laws of 2022, is amended to read as follows: 42 10. (a) In an action or proceeding at law under this section the 43 commissioner or the court shall award reasonable attorneys' fees and 44 costs in the action to a prevailing party claiming to be aggrieved by an 45 unlawful discriminatory practice, except that attorneys' fees shall not 46 be awarded to the division, nor shall the division be liable to a 47 prevailing or substantially prevailing party for attorneys' fees, except 48 in a case in which the division is a party to the action or the proceed- 49 ing in the division's capacity as an employer. Expert witness fees may 50 be awarded in the same manner as attorneys' fees. 51 (b) In an action or proceeding at law under this section or section 52 two hundred ninety-eight of this article, the commissioner or the court 53 may in its discretion award reasonable [attorney's] attorneys' fees to 54 any prevailing [or substantially prevailing party] respondent or defend- 55 ant; provided, however, that a prevailing respondent or defendant in 56 order to recover such reasonable [attorney's] attorneys' fees must makeA. 2182--A 3 1 a motion requesting such fees and show that the action or proceeding 2 brought was frivolous; and further provided that in a proceeding brought 3 in the division of human rights, the commissioner may only award [attor-4ney's] attorneys' fees to a prevailing respondent or defendant as part 5 of a final order after a public hearing held pursuant to subdivision 6 four of this section. [In no case shall attorney's fees be awarded to7the division, nor shall the division be liable to a prevailing or8substantially prevailing party for attorney's fees, except in a case in9which the division is a party to the action or the proceeding in the10division's capacity as an employer.] Expert witness fees may be awarded 11 in the same manner as [attorney's] attorneys' fees. [In cases of employ-12ment discrimination, a respondent shall only be liable for attorney's13fees under this subdivision if the respondent has been found liable for14having committed an unlawful discriminatory practice.] In order to find 15 the action or proceeding to be frivolous, the court or the commissioner 16 must find in writing one or more of the following: 17 [(a)] (i) the action or proceeding was commenced, used or continued in 18 bad faith, solely to delay or prolong the resolution of the litigation 19 or to harass or maliciously injure another; or 20 [(b)] (ii) the action or proceeding was commenced or continued in bad 21 faith without any reasonable basis and could not be supported by a good 22 faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing 23 law. If the action or proceeding was promptly discontinued when the 24 party or attorney learned or should have learned that the action or 25 proceeding lacked such a reasonable basis, the court may find that the 26 party or the attorney did not act in bad faith. 27 § 3. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall 28 have become a law.