Bill Text: IN SB0533 | 2011 | Regular Session | Enrolled
Bill Title: Design-build public works projects.
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 3-1)
Status: (Passed) 2011-05-18 - Effective 07/01/2011 [SB0533 Detail]
Download: Indiana-2011-SB0533-Enrolled.html
PRINTING CODE. Amendments: Whenever an existing statute (or a section of the Indiana Constitution) is being amended, the text of the existing provision will appear in this style type, additions will appear in this style type, and deletions will appear in
Additions: Whenever a new statutory provision is being enacted (or a new constitutional provision adopted), the text of the new provision will appear in this style type. Also, the word NEW will appear in that style type in the introductory clause of each SECTION that adds a new provision to the Indiana Code or the Indiana Constitution.
Conflict reconciliation: Text in a statute in this style type or
AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning state and local administration.
(1) a state agency (as defined in IC 4-13-1-1);
(2) a state educational institution;
(3) a unit (as defined in IC 36-1-2-23);
(4) a body corporate and politic created by state statute;
(5) a school corporation (as defined in IC 20-26-2-4); or
(6) a conservancy district established for a purpose described in IC 14-33-1-1(a)(4) or IC 14-33-1-1(a)(5).
(b) The term does not include the Indiana department of transportation.
(1) a public fund; or
(2) a special assessment.
(b) The term includes either of the following:
(1) A process described in subsection (a) relating to a building or
structure leased by a public agency under a lease containing an
option to purchase.
(2) A public improvement to real property owned by a public
agency.
(c) The term does not include the process of designing, constructing,
altering, or repairing a public highway (as defined in IC 9-25-2-4).
(b) The members of the technical review committee must include the following:
(1) A representative of the public agency.
(2) At least two (2) of the following, but not more than one (1) under each clause:
(A) An architect registered under IC 25-4.
(B) A professional engineer registered under IC 25-31.
(C) A qualified contractor under IC 4-13.6 or an individual employed by the qualified contractor.
(c) A member of the technical review committee who is an architect or a professional engineer may be:
(1) an employee of the public agency; or
(2) an outside consultant retained by the public agency for the specific purpose of evaluating proposals submitted under this article.
(d) The design criteria developer may serve as:
(1) a full member; or
(2) a nonvoting adviser;
of the committee.
(1) Qualify potential design-builders as provided in IC 5-30-5.
(2) Rate and score qualitative proposals as provided in IC 5-30-6 and IC 5-30-7.
(b) The technical review committee may interview persons
submitting proposals and conduct other business necessary to fulfill the
purposes of this article. However, a public agency may not require
an offeror to attend more than three (3) interviews in person with
the technical review committee for a design-build contract.
(b) A meeting of a technical review committee convened for the purpose of interviewing persons submitting qualifications or proposals is not open to the public.
(c) If each member of a technical review committee for a public project is an employee of the public agency that is undertaking the public project, the technical review committee's meetings are not open to the public.
(b) Subsection (c) applies to a public project for which a public agency uses design-build contracting if:
(1) the public agency is a state educational institution; or
(2) the public agency is not a state educational institution and the preliminary estimated cost of the public project does not exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000).
(c) A public agency that undertakes a public project to which this subsection applies may publish a notice of a combined request for qualifications and proposals under IC 5-3-1 that includes:
(1) the information otherwise required by this chapter; and
(2) a request for proposals as otherwise provided under IC 5-30-6.
The notice must allow at least thirty (30) days for potential design-builders to respond to the combined request for qualifications and proposals.
2011]: Sec. 1. (a) If a separate notice of request for qualifications
is issued under IC 5-30-5-1(a), the public agency shall issue a request
for proposals to the potential design-builders selected under
IC 5-30-5-6.
(b) Each request for proposals must contain a design criteria
package.
(c) If a public project is a controlled project (as defined in
IC 6-1.1-20-1.1) for which a referendum is to be held, a request for
proposals may not be issued until after the public agency proposing
the controlled project has completed the procedures described in
IC 6-1.1-20-3.6.
(1) All information requested in the design criteria package.
(2) A conceptual site plan.
(3) Conceptual building, systems, and equipment plans.
(4) Conceptual elevations.
(5) A project description narrative.
(6) A project schedule.
(1) The qualitative proposal and the price proposal must be submitted simultaneously in separately sealed and identified packages. The price proposal must remain sealed until opened in public under section 5 of this chapter.
(2) A proposal must identify each person with whom the offeror proposes to enter into subcontracts for primary design services and primary construction services, including any subcontractors, under the design-build contract. The public agency may determine requirements under this section.
(3) The price proposal must:
(A) contain one (1) lump sum cost of all design, construction engineering, inspection, and construction costs of the proposed project; or
(B) establish a maximum cost of the design-build contract that will not be exceeded if the proposal is accepted without
change.
(4) The qualitative proposal must include all documents,
information, and data requested the deliverables required for
the qualitative proposal in the request for proposals.
(b) The technical review committee shall give a written
(c) A written comprehensive score for a qualitative proposal must include the following:
(1) An explanation of the scoring methodology adopted by the technical review committee that is sufficiently detailed to enable an independent observer to calculate the composite score for the qualitative proposal from the scores described in subdivision (2).
(2) For each factor used in calculating the composite score of the qualitative proposal, the following:
(A) The unweighted score awarded by each member of the technical review committee for the factor.
(B) The unweighted score of the technical review committee as a whole for the factor, calculated from the individual scores described in clause (A).
(C) The weight for the factor, if all factors are not given equal weight in calculating the composite score for the qualitative proposal.
(D) The weighted score for the factor, if a weight specified under clause (C) is used to adjust the unweighted score determined under clause (B) for the factor.
(3) The composite score for the qualitative proposal, calculated from the scores described in subdivision (2) in accordance with the scoring methodology adopted by the technical review committee.
Graphic file number 0 named seal1001.pcx with height 58 p and width 72 p Left aligned