Bill Text: CA SB549 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Gaming: Tribal Declaratory Relief Act of 2023.
Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill
Status: (Engrossed) 2024-01-04 - Re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96. [SB549 Detail]
Download: California-2023-SB549-Amended.html
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
July 10, 2023 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
June 19, 2023 |
|
Amended
IN
Senate
March 20, 2023 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION
Senate Bill
No. 549
| Introduced by Senator Newman (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry) (Coauthors: Senators Atkins and Wilk) (Coauthors: Assembly Members Haney, Mathis, Sanchez, Waldron, Wallis, and Ward) |
February 15, 2023 |
An act to amend Section 19804 of the Business and Professions Code, and to add Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 98020) to Title 16 of the Government Code, relating to gaming.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 549, as amended, Newman.
Gaming: Tribal Declaratory Relief Act of 2023.
The existing federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution prohibits the Legislature from authorizing casinos of the type operating in Nevada and New Jersey and authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude tribal-state gaming compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts between the State of California and specified Indian tribes.
Existing law, the Gambling Control Act, provides for the regulation, oversight, and licensure of gambling establishments by the California Gambling Control Commission. Existing law prohibits a list of specified gambling games or any banking or
percentage game played with cards, dice, or any device, for money, checks, credit, or any representative of value, and provides that any person who offers for play or participates in these games is guilty of a misdemeanor and is punishable as specified. Existing law authorizes gambling establishments to operate controlled games utilizing a player-dealer position, as defined, and to contract with a third party for the provision of proposition player services subject to specified conditions and regulatory requirements.
Existing law generally specifies the persons or entities that may bring a civil action as prescribed for relief.
This bill would authorize a California Indian tribe, under certain conditions, to bring an action solely against licensed California card clubs and third-party proposition player services providers
to seek a declaration as to whether a controlled game operated by a licensed California card club and banked by a third party third-party proposition player services provider constitutes a banking card game that violates state law and tribal gaming exclusivity under Section 19 of Article IV of the California Constitution and a tribal-state gaming compact or secretarial procedures. The bill would require that any review of such a challenge be conducted de novo. The bill would prohibit a claim for money damages, penalties, or attorney’s fees and would require that actions be filed no later than April 1, 2024, as specified.
The bill would clarify that it does not intend to authorize an action against the state.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NOBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the Tribal Declaratory Relief Act of 2023.SEC. 2.
The purpose and intent of the Tribal Declaratory Relief Act of 2023 is to authorize a limited declaratory and injunctive relief action before the CaliforniaSEC. 3.
Section 19804 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:19804.
(a) In any action for declaratory or injunctive relief, or for relief by way of any extraordinary writ, other than an action initiated pursuant to Section 19932, wherein the construction, application, or enforcement of this chapter, or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto, or any order of the department or the commission issued pursuant thereto, is called into question, a court shall not grant any preliminary or permanent injunction, or any peremptory writ of mandate, certiorari, or prohibition, in connection therewith, except as follows:(1) Upon proof by clear and convincing evidence that the department or the commission is abusing or threatens to abuse its discretion.
(2) Upon proof by clear and convincing evidence that the department or the commission is exceeding or threatens to exceed its jurisdiction.
(b) No temporary injunction or other provisional order shall issue to restrain, stay, or otherwise interfere with any action by the department or the commission, except upon a finding by the court, based on clear and convincing evidence, that the public interest will not be prejudiced thereby, and, except for preliminary injunctions, no order may be effective for more than 15 calendar days, except by stipulation of the department or commission. No preliminary order may be effective for more than 45 days, except by stipulation of the department or commission.
(c) This section
does not relieve a petitioner’s obligation to exhaust administrative remedies.
(d) In an action for relief of any nature wherein the construction, application, or enforcement of this chapter, or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto, or any order of the department or commission issued pursuant thereto, is called into question, the party filing the pleading shall furnish a copy thereof to the department and to the commission. The copy shall be furnished by the party filing the pleading within 10 business days after filing.
(e) This section does not apply to an action for declaratory or injunctive relief authorized by Section 98020 of the Government Code.
SEC. 4.
Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 98020) is added to Title 16 of the Government Code, to read:CHAPTER 2. Tribal Declaratory Relief Act of 2023
98020.
(a) A California Indian tribe that is party to a current ratified tribal-state gaming compact, or that is party to current secretarial procedures pursuant to Chapter 29 of Title 25 of the United States Code, may bring an action in superior(b) The court may make a binding declaration in either affirmative or negative form and effect, which shall have the force of a final judgment, and may issue injunctive relief enjoining further operation of the controlled game or grant any other relief the court deems appropriate. No claim for money damages, penalties, or attorney’s fees shall be permitted under this section.
(c) Any review as to whether a controlled game operated by a licensed California card club and banked by a third-party proposition player services provider
constitutes a banking card game that violates state law and tribal gaming exclusivity under Section 19 of Article IV of the California Constitution and a tribal-state gaming compact or secretarial procedures shall be conducted de novo.
(c)
(d) An action under this section shall be filed no later than April 1, 2024, in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.
(d)
(e) If multiple actions are commenced under this section, they shall be consolidated for all purposes, including trial to avoid the risk of inconsistent declarations.
(e)
(f) Notwithstanding Section 387 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the state, any California Indian tribe that is party to a current ratified tribal-state gaming compact or that is party to current secretarial procedures, any licensed California card club, and any third-party proposition player services provider shall be entitled to intervene as a matter of right in an action commenced under this section.
(g) Nothing herein is intended to authorize an action for declaratory or injunctive relief against the state.
