Bill Text: VA HB72 | 2018 | Regular Session | Prefiled


Bill Title: Statewide prioritization process project selection; cost of project to be considered.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 2-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2017-12-04 - Committee Referral Pending [HB72 Detail]

Download: Virginia-2018-HB72-Prefiled.html
18102019D
HOUSE BILL NO. 72
Offered January 10, 2018
Prefiled December 4, 2017
A BILL to amend and reenact §§33.2-214.1 and 33.2-370 of the Code of Virginia, relating to the statewide prioritization process project selection.
----------
Patron-- Thomas
----------
Committee Referral Pending
----------

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

1. That §§33.2-214.1 and 33.2-370 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted as follows:

§33.2-214.1. Statewide prioritization process for project selection.

A. The General Assembly declares it to be in the public interest that a prioritization process for projects funded by the Commonwealth Transportation Board be developed and implemented to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the state's transportation system, transportation safety, transportation accessibility for people and freight, environmental quality, and economic development in the Commonwealth.

B. Subject to the limitations in subsection C, the Commonwealth Transportation Board shall develop, in accordance with federal transportation requirements, and in cooperation with metropolitan planning organizations wholly within the Commonwealth and with the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority, a statewide prioritization process for the use of funds allocated pursuant to §§33.2-358, 33.2-370, and 33.2-371 or apportioned pursuant to 23 U.S.C. §104. Such prioritization process shall be used for the development of the Six-Year Improvement Program pursuant to §33.2-214 and shall consider, at a minimum, highway, transit, rail, roadway, technology operational improvements, and transportation demand management strategies.

1. The prioritization process shall be based on an objective and quantifiable analysis that considers, at a minimum, the following factors relative to the total cost of the project or strategy: congestion mitigation, economic development, accessibility, safety, and environmental quality. In evaluating congestion mitigation, the Board shall assess person throughput and person hours of delay on the basis of number of users during all times of the week and not only for weekday times.

2. Prior to the analysis in subdivision 1, candidate projects and strategies shall be screened by the Commonwealth Transportation Board to determine whether they are consistent with the assessment of capacity needs for all for corridors of statewide significance, regional networks, and improvements to promote urban development areas established pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1, undertaken in the Statewide Transportation Plan in accordance with §33.2-353.

3. The Commonwealth Transportation Board shall weight the factors used in subdivision 1 for each of the state's highway construction districts. The Commonwealth Transportation Board may assign different weights to the factors, within each highway construction district, based on the unique needs and qualities of each highway construction district.

4. The Commonwealth Transportation Board shall solicit input from localities, metropolitan planning organizations, transit authorities, transportation authorities, and other stakeholders in its development of the prioritization process pursuant to this section. Further, the Board shall explicitly consider input provided by an applicable metropolitan planning organization or the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority when developing the weighting of factors pursuant to subdivision 3 for a metropolitan planning area with a population over 200,000 individuals.

C. The prioritization process developed under subsection B shall not apply to the following: projects or activities undertaken pursuant to §33.2-352; projects funded by the Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funds apportioned to the state pursuant to 23 U.S.C. §104(b)(4) and state matching funds; projects funded by the Highway Safety Improvement Program funds apportioned to the state pursuant to 23 U.S.C. §104(b)(3) and state matching funds; projects funded by the Transportation Alternatives funds set-aside pursuant to 23 U.S.C. §213 and state matching funds; projects funded by the revenue-sharing program pursuant to §33.2-357; and projects funded by federal programs established by the federal government after June 30, 2014, with specific rules that restrict the types of projects that may be funded, excluding restrictions on the location of projects with regard to highway functional classification. The Commonwealth Transportation Board may, at its discretion, develop a prioritization process for any of the funds covered by this subsection, subject to planning and funding requirements of federal law.

§33.2-370. High-priority projects program.

A. As used in this section, "high-priority projects" means those projects of regional or statewide significance, such as projects that reduce congestion or increase safety, accessibility, environmental quality, or economic development.

B. The Board shall establish a high-priority projects program and shall use funds allocated in §33.2-358 to the program for projects and strategies that address a transportation need identified for a corridor of statewide significance or a regional network in the Statewide Transportation Plan pursuant to § 33.2-353. From funds allocated to this program, the Board shall allocate funds to the Innovation and Technology Transportation Fund, provided that the allocation shall not exceed $25 million annually.

C. No project or strategy shall be selected for funding under this program that (i) has as its sole component adding bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure or improvements, (ii) is not in a corridor of statewide significance, or (iii) has a cost estimated to be less than $10 million.

In selecting projects and strategies for funding under this program, the Board shall screen, evaluate, and select candidate projects and strategies according to the process established pursuant to subsection B of § 33.2-214.1.

feedback