US HB1935 | 2015-2016 | 114th Congress
Status
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 9-0)
Status: Introduced on April 22 2015 - 25% progression, died in committee
Action: 2015-05-15 - Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Pending: House Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law Committee
Text: Latest bill text (Introduced) [PDF]
Status: Introduced on April 22 2015 - 25% progression, died in committee
Action: 2015-05-15 - Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Pending: House Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law Committee
Text: Latest bill text (Introduced) [PDF]
Summary
Restoring the 10th Amendment Act Authorizes a designated state official to submit to the head of a federal agency proposing a rule, during the period when the proposed rule is open for public comment, a legal brief challenging the constitutionality of the rule under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. Directs the agency head: (1) to notify the designated official of each state within 15 days after such a brief was submitted; (2) to post prominently on the front page of the agency's website a link to the brief; and (3) within 15 days after posting such link, to certify in writing that such rulemaking does not violate the Tenth Amendment and post the certification prominently on the agency's website next to the briefs pertaining to the rule, unless the agency determines not to finalize such proposed rule. Authorizes a designated state official, at any time after an agency head posts such a certification, to commence a civil action against the agency on the grounds that the rule violates the Tenth Amendment. Permits such state official, in addition to any other venue or jurisdiction provided by law, to bring such action in the U.S. district court for the district in which the official's place of business is located. Directs the appropriate U.S. court of appeals, upon the filing of a notice by a designated state official, to grant expedited review of a decision by the district court in such an action.
Title
Restoring the 10th Amendment Act
Sponsors
Rep. John Culberson [R-TX] | Rep. Tom McClintock [R-CA] | Rep. Cresent Hardy [R-NV] | Rep. Rob Bishop [R-UT] |
Rep. Joe Wilson [R-SC] | Rep. Mike Bishop [R-MI] | Rep. Steven Palazzo [R-MS] | Rep. Jason Smith [R-MO] |
Rep. Dave Brat [R-VA] |
History
Date | Chamber | Action |
---|---|---|
2015-05-15 | House | Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. |
2015-04-22 | House | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
2015-04-22 | House | Introduced in House |
Same As/Similar To
SB1045 (Same As) 2015-04-22 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Subjects
Administrative law and regulatory procedures
Administrative remedies
Civil actions and liability
Constitution and constitutional amendments
Federal district courts
Government information and archives
Intergovernmental relations
Judicial review and appeals
Jurisdiction and venue
Law
State and local government operations
Administrative remedies
Civil actions and liability
Constitution and constitutional amendments
Federal district courts
Government information and archives
Intergovernmental relations
Judicial review and appeals
Jurisdiction and venue
Law
State and local government operations
US Congress State Sources
Type | Source |
---|---|
Summary | https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1935/all-info |
Text | https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/hr1935/BILLS-114hr1935ih.pdf |