Bill Text: PA SB443 | 2011-2012 | Regular Session | Introduced


Bill Title: Prohibiting the administration of certain antimicrobial agents in agriculture; providing for inspection and testing of agricultural operations, for enforcement, for reporting by agricultural operations and for alternatives to administration of antimicrobial agents to animals; and making related repeals.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2011-02-07 - Referred to AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS [SB443 Detail]

Download: Pennsylvania-2011-SB443-Introduced.html

  

 

    

PRINTER'S NO.  428

  

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA

  

SENATE BILL

 

No.

443

Session of

2011

  

  

INTRODUCED BY LEACH AND FONTANA, FEBRUARY 7, 2011

  

  

REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS, FEBRUARY 7, 2011  

  

  

  

AN ACT

  

1

Prohibiting the administration of certain antimicrobial agents

2

in agriculture; providing for inspection and testing of

3

agricultural operations, for enforcement, for reporting by

4

agricultural operations and for alternatives to

5

administration of antimicrobial agents to animals; and making

6

related repeals.

7

The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

8

hereby enacts as follows:

9

Section 1.  Short title.

10

This act shall be known and may be cited as the Safe Food and

11

Safe Families Act.

12

Section 2.  Findings and purpose.

13

The General Assembly finds and declares as follows:

14

(1)  Several antimicrobial agents, including, but not

15

limited to, penicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin,

16

lincomycin, bacitracin and virginiamycin are used in, or are

17

related to, antimicrobial agents used for the treatment of

18

infectious diseases in humans and are also used in animal

19

feed or otherwise administered to animals for nontherapeutic

20

purposes, such as the promotion of animal growth.

 


1

(2)  Mounting expert opinion and government actions show

2

that using antimicrobial agents in animal feed contributes to

3

the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant

4

pathogenic bacteria, such as campylobacter, enterococci,

5

staphylococci and salmonella, that can cause hard-to-treat

6

infections in humans. Populations that are especially

7

vulnerable to antimicrobial resistance include children,

8

senior citizens, persons with cancer, persons with HIV/AIDS,

9

persons with diabetes and persons who are otherwise receiving

10

immunosuppressive therapy, including therapy after organ

11

transplants. Moreover, farmers and their families have been

12

shown to be at very high risk of exposure to antimicrobial-

13

resistant pathogens through the use of these drugs in animal

14

feeds.

15

(3)  The Swann Committee, formed in the United Kingdom in

16

1969 to examine the public health effects of the use of

17

antimicrobial agents in food-producing animals, recommended

18

that antimicrobial agents be divided into "feed" and

19

"therapeutic" classes of drugs and that drugs used

20

therapeutically in humans or animals not be included in the

21

"feed" class.

22

(4)  The United States Food and Drug Administration

23

proposed in 1977 to ban the subtherapeutic use of penicillin

24

and tetracycline, but the ban was never put into effect.

25

(5)  The World Health Organization recommended in 1997

26

that antimicrobial agents that are used to treat humans

27

should not be used to promote animal growth.

28

(6)  The National Academy of Sciences, in a July 1998

29

report prepared at the request of the United States

30

Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug

- 2 -

 


1

Administration, concluded that "there is a link between the

2

use of antibiotics in food animals, the development of

3

bacterial resistance to these drugs and human disease."

4

(7)  Individual European countries, including the United

5

Kingdom, Denmark, Finland and Sweden, banned the use of

6

certain antimicrobial agents in animal feed. Subsequently, in

7

December 1998, health ministers for the European Union

8

countries voted to ban the four remaining human-use

9

antimicrobial agents that were still being administered in

10

the European Union to promote animal growth. The ban by the

11

European Union on using virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin

12

and bacitracin in animal feed became effective for the 15

13

member states on July 1, 1999.

14

(8)  An April 1999 study by the United States General

15

Accounting Office concluded that resistant strains of

16

salmonella, campylobacter and E. coli cause illness or

17

disease in humans and are linked to the use of antimicrobial

18

agents in animals.

19

(9)  The American Medical Association passed a resolution

20

in June 2001 opposing the use of antimicrobial agents in

21

livestock except when needed to treat an animal's illness.

22

(10)  Recent scientific medical studies from the

23

Netherlands and Canada suggest that animal agriculture,

24

specifically swine facilities, may be a source of

25

methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains

26

that are entering the human population via workers at those

27

facilities.

28

(11)  More than 350 other medical, public health,

29

environmental and sustainable agriculture organizations have

30

publicly opposed the subtherapeutic use of antimicrobial

- 3 -

 


1

agents in livestock, including the American College of

2

Preventive Medicine, the American Nurses Association, the

3

Pennsylvania State Nurses Association, the American Public

4

Health Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the

5

Ambulatory Pediatric Association, the National Association of

6

County and City Health Officials, the American Academy of

7

Family Physicians, the American Geriatrics Society, the

8

Breast Cancer Fund, the Catholic Health Association of the

9

United States, the Infectious Diseases Society of America,

10

the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, the National Alliance of

11

State and Territorial AIDS Directors, the Physicians for

12

Social Responsibility, the Center for Science in the Public

13

Interest, The Center for Food Safety, the National Campaign

14

for Sustainable Agriculture, American Rivers, the Chesapeake

15

Bay Foundation, Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future, Clean

16

Water Action, the Environmental Defense Fund, the National

17

Environmental Trust, the Natural Resources Defense Council

18

and the Sierra Club.

19

(12)  The Food and Drug Administration in July 2005

20

withdrew its approval for the use of fluoroquinoline

21

antimicrobial agents for nontherapeutic administration to

22

poultry because of concerns over the development of

23

antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

24

(13)  States have the right to enact laws more

25

restrictive than Federal laws concerning antimicrobial

26

agents.

27

(14)  A Federal court of appeals in 1978 held that a

28

municipality could inspect meat delivery vehicles for

29

violation of its public health ordinances even though the

30

United States Department of Agriculture has the sole

- 4 -

 


1

responsibility for the inspection of meat plants.

2

(15)  The United States Supreme Court in 1985 unanimously

3

upheld local regulations of blood plasma centers that were

4

stricter than the Food and Drug Administration's regulations

5

governing the safety of blood plasma.

6

(16)  Because a Federal district court in 1986 held that

7

regulations issued by the Food and Drug Administration and

8

the United States Department of Agriculture prevented the

9

court from requiring that a veal producer label that its

10

calves had been fed subtherapeutic levels of antibiotic

11

drugs, consumers in this Commonwealth do not now have a

12

reliable way of knowing whether the food they buy contains

13

bacteria that is resistant to antimicrobial agents.

14

(b)  Purpose.--The purpose of this act is to protect the

15

health and safety of the citizens of this Commonwealth by

16

prohibiting the use of certain antimicrobial agents in

17

agriculture in nontherapeutic amounts or as growth promoters.

18

Section 3.  Definitions.

19

The following words and phrases when used in this act shall

20

have the meanings given to them in this section unless the

21

context clearly indicates otherwise:

22

"Administer."  To give an antimicrobial agent to an animal by

23

implantation, ingestion or injection or by addition to feed.

24

"Agricultural operation."  The management and use of farming

25

resources for the production of livestock, poultry or fish.

26

"Animal."  Any livestock, poultry or fish.

27

"Antimicrobial agent."  Any drug, chemical or other substance

28

that either kills or slows the growth of a microbe. The term

29

includes, but is not limited to, antimicrobial drugs that kill

30

bacteria, antiviral agents that kill viruses, antifungal agents

- 5 -

 


1

that kill fungi and antiparasitic drugs that kill parasites. The

2

term includes both naturally occurring substances, such as

3

penicillins, and synthetic agents designed for the same purpose.

4

"Antimicrobial resistance."  The ability of a microbe to

5

survive treatment by antimicrobial agents resulting from changes

6

that reduce or eliminate the effectiveness of drugs, chemicals

7

or other agents to cure or prevent infections in animals or

8

humans.

9

"Department."  The Department of Health of the Commonwealth.

10

"Land grant institution."  An educational institution located

11

within this Commonwealth that has received a grant of public

12

land made by the Congress of the United States for the support

13

of education under the Morrill Act (12 Stat. 503, 7 U.S.C. § 301 

14

et seq.).

15

"Microbe."  A unicellular organism or virus that is so small

16

that it can be seen only by use of a microscope.

17

"Nontherapeutic amount."  An amount of an antimicrobial agent

18

that constitutes a dose below that necessary to kill a pathogen.

19

"Organism."  Any living thing. The term includes humans,

20

animals, plants, bacteria, protozoa, fungi and viruses.

21

Section 4.  Administration of certain antimicrobial agents

22

prohibited.

23

(a)  General rule.--Beginning one year from the effective

24

date of this section, a person shall not:

25

(1)  Administer to an animal a nontherapeutic amount of

26

penicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin, lincomycin,

27

bacitracin or virginiamycin.

28

(2)  Administer to an animal a nontherapeutic amount of

29

any other antimicrobial agent designated by the department.

30

(3)  Administer to an animal any antimicrobial agent for

- 6 -

 


1

growth promotion.

2

(b)  Affidavit required.--A person or legal entity owning or

3

operating an agricultural operation shall file annually with the

4

department an affidavit stating that the animals produced by

5

that agricultural operation have not been administered an

6

antimicrobial agent, in violation of subsection (a).

7

(c)  Designation of antimicrobial agents.--The department may

8

designate antimicrobial agents that shall not be administered to

9

an animal in a nontherapeutic amount. Before making a

10

designation, the department shall request the views of the

11

Department of Agriculture, the Physician General and the Animal

12

Health and Diagnostic Commission. The department shall annually

13

publish in the Pennsylvania Bulletin a report of the designated

14

antimicrobial agents, if any, and the rationale for the

15

designations. A designation of an antimicrobial agent shall be

16

deemed an adjudication under 2 Pa.C.S. § 101 (relating to

17

definitions) and shall be made and be subject to review in

18

accordance with 2 Pa.C.S. (relating to administrative law and

19

procedure).

20

Section 5.  Inspection and testing of agricultural operations.

21

(a)  Regular inspection and testing.--The department shall

22

regularly perform such investigations, inspections and tests and

23

take such other actions as are necessary to enforce the

24

provisions of this act or any order, rule or regulation

25

promulgated under this act and may enter, at reasonable times,

26

any agricultural operation for those purposes. A person owning

27

or operating an agricultural operation shall grant access to the

28

department and shall not hinder, obstruct, prevent or interfere

29

with the department in the performance of its duties.

30

(b)  Cooperation with other agencies.--In performing the

- 7 -

 


1

inspections and testing under subsection (a), the department may

2

request the assistance of the Department of Agriculture, the

3

Department of Environmental Protection, the Pennsylvania Fish

4

and Boat Commission, the Physician General, the Animal Health

5

and Diagnostic Commission, the State Board of Veterinary

6

Medicine, the State Board of Medicine and the State Board of

7

Osteopathic Medicine, which assistance shall reasonably be

8

provided.

9

Section 6.  Enforcement.

10

(a)  Equitable relief.--

11

(1)  A mandatory preliminary injunction, special

12

injunction or temporary restraining order may be issued upon

13

the terms prescribed by the court of common pleas of the

14

county that is the site of an agricultural operation, if the

15

court finds:

16

(i)  that a person is administering an antimicrobial

17

agent in violation of section 4; or

18

(ii)  that a person is denying access or otherwise

19

hindering, obstructing, preventing or interfering with

20

the department in the performance of its duties under

21

this act.

22

(2)  Notice of the application for a mandatory

23

preliminary injunction, special injunction or temporary

24

restraining order shall be given in accordance with the rules

25

of equity practice. In any such proceeding, the department

26

shall not be required to post a bond.

27

(b)  Civil penalties.--In addition to any other relief

28

ordered by a court in accordance with subsection (a), the court

29

may impose civil penalties on any person who knowingly

30

administers an antimicrobial agent in violation of section 4 or

- 8 -

 


1

who denies access or otherwise hinders, obstructs, prevents or

2

interferes with the department in the performance of its duties

3

in violation of section 5. The civil penalties shall be in the

4

amount of not more than $1,000 for each day of each violation.

5

(c)  Other relief.--Any microbial agent administered in

6

violation of section 4 shall be deemed a "hazardous substance"

7

under 3 Pa.C.S. § 2303 (relating to definitions) and shall be

8

subject to regulation as a "hazardous substance" under 3 Pa.C.S.

9

Ch. 23 (relating to domestic animals) notwithstanding any

10

provision of that title to the contrary.

11

Section 7.  Reporting.

12

The department, in consultation with the Department of

13

Agriculture, shall promulgate regulations requiring annual

14

reporting by agricultural operations on the use of antimicrobial

15

agents in animals, including a list of the antimicrobial agents

16

used and the approximate volume administered. The department

17

shall compile the information into an annual report that

18

includes statistics on antimicrobial agent use Statewide and in

19

each of the counties. The information shall be published and

20

maintained on the department's Internet website.

21

Section 8.  Alternatives to administration of antimicrobial

22

agents to animals.

23

In the allocation of any funds appropriated by the General

24

Assembly to the Department of Agriculture, the Animal Health and

25

Diagnostic Commission or a land grant institution for

26

agricultural research, priority shall be given to research and

27

development of alternatives to the administration of

28

antimicrobial agents to animals, including improved animal

29

husbandry and hygiene.

30

Section 9.  Rules and regulations.

- 9 -

 


1

The department may promulgate rules and regulations to

2

administer and enforce this act.

3

Section 10.  Repeals.

4

All acts and parts of acts are repealed insofar as they are

5

inconsistent with this act.

6

Section 11.  Effective date.

7

This act shall take effect in 60 days.

- 10 -

 


feedback