Bill Text: NY S05316 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: Establishes a presumption of shared parenting of minor children in matrimonial and family court proceedings.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2014-01-08 - REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES [S05316 Detail]
Download: New_York-2013-S05316-Introduced.html
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 5316 2013-2014 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E May 16, 2013 ___________ Introduced by Sen. NOZZOLIO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Children and Families AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law and the family court act, in relation to establishing a presumption of shared parenting of minor children in matrimonial and family court proceedings THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings. The legislature hereby finds and 2 declares that it is the public policy of the state to assure minor chil- 3 dren have frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the 4 parents have separated or dissolved their marriage and that it is in the 5 public interest to encourage parents to share the rights and responsi- 6 bilities of child-rearing in order to effectuate this policy. At the 7 outset and thereafter, in any proceeding where there is at issue the 8 custody of a minor child, the court may, during the pendency of the 9 proceeding or at any time thereafter, make such order for the custody of 10 minor children as may seem necessary or proper. The provisions of this 11 act establish a presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that shared 12 parenting is in the best interests of minor children. 13 S 2. Subdivision (a) of section 70 of the domestic relations law, as 14 amended by chapter 457 of the laws of 1988, is amended to read as 15 follows: 16 (a) Where a minor child is residing within this state, either parent 17 may apply to the supreme court for a writ of habeas corpus to have such 18 minor child brought before such court; and on the return thereof, the 19 court, on due consideration, [may] SHALL award the natural guardianship, 20 charge and custody of such child to [either parent] BOTH PARENTS, IN THE 21 ABSENCE OF AN ALLEGATION THAT SUCH SHARED PARENTING WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL 22 TO SUCH CHILD, for such time, under such regulations and restrictions, 23 and with such provisions and directions, as the case may require, and 24 may at any time thereafter vacate or modify such order. [In all cases EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD01645-01-3 S. 5316 2 1 there shall be no prima facie right to the custody of the child in 2 either parent, but the] THE BURDEN OF PROOF THAT SUCH SHARED PARENTING 3 WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO SUCH CHILD SHALL BE UPON THE PARENT REQUESTING 4 SOLE CUSTODY. THE court shall determine solely what is for the best 5 interest of the child, and what will best promote [its] THE CHILD'S 6 welfare and happiness, and make award accordingly. 7 S 3. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 of section 240 of the domestic 8 relations law, as amended by chapter 476 of the laws of 2009, is amended 9 to read as follows: 10 (a) (I) In any action or proceeding brought (1) to annul a marriage or 11 to declare the nullity of a void marriage, or (2) for a separation, or 12 (3) for a divorce, or (4) to obtain, by a writ of habeas corpus or by 13 petition and order to show cause, the custody of or right to visitation 14 with any child of a marriage, the court shall require verification of 15 the status of any child of the marriage with respect to such child's 16 custody and support, including any prior orders, and shall enter orders 17 for custody and support as, in the court's discretion, justice requires, 18 having regard to the circumstances of the case and of the respective 19 parties and to the best interests of the child and subject to the 20 provisions of subdivision one-c of this section. Where either party to 21 an action concerning custody of or a right to visitation with a child 22 alleges in a sworn petition or complaint or sworn answer, cross-peti- 23 tion, counterclaim or other sworn responsive pleading that the other 24 party has committed an act of domestic violence against the party making 25 the allegation or a family or household member of either party, as such 26 family or household member is defined in article eight of the family 27 court act, and such allegations are proven by a preponderance of the 28 evidence, the court must consider the effect of such domestic violence 29 upon the best interests of the child, together with such other facts and 30 circumstances as the court deems relevant in making a direction pursuant 31 to this section and state on the record how such findings, facts and 32 circumstances factored into the direction. If a parent makes a good 33 faith allegation based on a reasonable belief supported by facts that 34 the child is the victim of child abuse, child neglect, or the effects of 35 domestic violence, and if that parent acts lawfully and in good faith in 36 response to that reasonable belief to protect the child or seek treat- 37 ment for the child, then that parent shall not be deprived of custody, 38 visitation or contact with the child, or restricted in custody, visita- 39 tion or contact, based solely on that belief or the reasonable actions 40 taken based on that belief. If an allegation that a child is abused is 41 supported by a preponderance of the evidence, then the court shall 42 consider such evidence of abuse in determining the visitation arrange- 43 ment that is in the best interest of the child, and the court shall not 44 place a child in the custody of a parent who presents a substantial risk 45 of harm to that child, and shall state on the record how such findings 46 were factored into the determination. An order directing the payment of 47 child support shall contain the social security numbers of the named 48 parties. [In all cases there shall be no prima facie right to the custo- 49 dy of the child in either parent. Such direction] 50 (II) CUSTODY SHALL BE AWARDED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER OF PREFERENCE, 51 ACCORDING TO THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD: 52 (1) TO BOTH PARENTS JOINTLY PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO HUNDRED FORTY-D OF 53 THIS ARTICLE. IN SUCH CASES THE COURT MUST REQUIRE THE PARENTS TO SUBMIT 54 A PARENTING PLAN AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED 55 FORTY-D OF THIS ARTICLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CUSTODY ORDER OR THE 56 PARENTS ACTING INDIVIDUALLY OR IN CONCERT MAY SUBMIT A CUSTODY IMPLEMEN- S. 5316 3 1 TATION PLAN TO THE COURT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CUSTODY DECREE. THERE 2 SHALL BE A PRESUMPTION, AFFECTING THE BURDEN OF PROOF, THAT SHARED 3 PARENTING IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF A MINOR CHILD UNLESS THE PARENTS 4 HAVE AGREED TO AN AWARD OF CUSTODY TO ONE PARENT OR SO AGREE IN OPEN 5 COURT AT A HEARING FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING CUSTODY OF A MINOR 6 CHILD OF THE MARRIAGE OR THE COURT FINDS THAT SHARED PARENTING WOULD BE 7 DETRIMENTAL TO A PARTICULAR CHILD OF A SPECIFIC MARRIAGE. FOR THE 8 PURPOSE OF ASSISTING THE COURT IN MAKING A DETERMINATION WHETHER AN 9 AWARD OF SHARED PARENTING IS APPROPRIATE, THE COURT MAY DIRECT THAT AN 10 INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED. IF THE COURT DECLINES TO ENTER AN ORDER 11 AWARDING SHARED PARENTING PURSUANT TO THIS PARAGRAPH, THE COURT SHALL 12 STATE IN ITS DECISION THE REASONS FOR DENIAL OF AN AWARD OF SHARED 13 PARENTING. IN JURISDICTIONS HAVING A PRIVATE OR PUBLICLY-SUPPORTED 14 CONCILIATION SERVICE, THE COURT OR THE PARTIES MAY, AT ANY TIME, PURSU- 15 ANT TO LOCAL RULES OF THE COURT, CONSULT WITH THE CONCILIATION SERVICE 16 FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING THE PARTIES TO FORMULATE A PLAN FOR IMPLE- 17 MENTATION OF THE CUSTODY ORDER OR TO RESOLVE ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH HAS 18 ARISEN IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PLAN FOR CUSTODY. ANY ORDER FOR SHARED 19 PARENTING MAY BE MODIFIED OR TERMINATED UPON THE PETITION OF ONE OR BOTH 20 PARENTS OR ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION IF IT IS SHOWN THAT THE BEST INTER- 21 ESTS OF THE CHILD REQUIRE MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION OF THE SHARED 22 PARENTING ORDER. ANY ORDER FOR THE CUSTODY OF A MINOR CHILD OF A 23 MARRIAGE ENTERED BY A COURT IN THIS STATE OR IN ANY OTHER STATE, SUBJECT 24 TO JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, MAY BE MODIFIED AT ANY TIME TO AN ORDER 25 OF SHARED PARENTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION. 26 (2) TO EITHER PARENT, IN WHICH CASE, THE COURT, IN MAKING AN ORDER FOR 27 CUSTODY TO EITHER PARENT SHALL CONSIDER, AMONG OTHER FACTORS, WHICH 28 PARENT IS MORE LIKELY TO ALLOW THE CHILD OR CHILDREN FREQUENT AND 29 CONTINUING CONTACT WITH THE NONCUSTODIAL PARENT, AND SHALL NOT PREFER A 30 PARENT AS CUSTODIAN BECAUSE OF THAT PARENT'S GENDER. THE BURDEN OF PROOF 31 THAT SHARED PARENTING WOULD NOT BE IN THE CHILD'S BEST INTEREST SHALL BE 32 UPON THE PARENT REQUESTING SOLE CUSTODY. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER 33 PROVISION OF LAW, ACCESS TO RECORDS AND INFORMATION PERTAINING TO A 34 MINOR CHILD, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MEDICAL, DENTAL AND SCHOOL 35 RECORDS, SHALL NOT BE DENIED TO A PARENT BECAUSE THE PARENT IS NOT THE 36 CHILD'S CUSTODIAL PARENT. 37 (3) IF TO NEITHER PARENT, TO THE PERSON OR PERSONS IN WHOSE HOME THE 38 CHILD HAS BEEN LIVING IN A NURTURING AND STABLE ENVIRONMENT. 39 (4) TO ANY OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS DEEMED BY THE COURT TO BE SUITABLE 40 AND ABLE TO PROVIDE A NURTURING AND STABLE ENVIRONMENT. 41 BEFORE THE COURT MAKES ANY ORDER AWARDING CUSTODY TO A PERSON OR 42 PERSONS OTHER THAN A PARENT WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE PARENTS, IT SHALL 43 MAKE A FINDING THAT AN AWARD OF CUSTODY TO A PARENT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL 44 TO THE CHILD AND THE AWARD TO A NON-PARENT IS REQUIRED TO SERVE THE BEST 45 INTERESTS OF THE CHILD. ALLEGATIONS THAT PARENTAL CUSTODY WOULD BE 46 DETRIMENTAL TO THE CHILD, OTHER THAN A STATEMENT OF THAT ULTIMATE FACT, 47 SHALL NOT APPEAR IN THE PLEADINGS. THE COURT MAY, IN ITS DISCRETION, 48 EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC FROM THE HEARING ON THIS ISSUE. THE COURT SHALL STATE 49 IN WRITING THE REASON FOR ITS DECISION AND WHY THE AWARD MADE WAS FOUND 50 TO BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD. ANY DIRECTION MADE PURSUANT TO 51 THIS SUBDIVISION shall make provision for child support out of the prop- 52 erty of [either or] both parents. The court shall make its award for 53 child support pursuant to subdivision one-b of this section. Such direc- 54 tion may provide for reasonable visitation rights to the maternal and/or 55 paternal grandparents of any child of the parties. Such direction as it 56 applies to rights of visitation with a child remanded or placed in the S. 5316 4 1 care of a person, official, agency or institution pursuant to article 2 ten of the family court act, or pursuant to an instrument approved under 3 section three hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law, shall be 4 enforceable pursuant to part eight of article ten of the family court 5 act and sections three hundred fifty-eight-a and three hundred eighty- 6 four-a of the social services law and other applicable provisions of law 7 against any person having care and custody, or temporary care and custo- 8 dy, of the child. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any writ- 9 ten application or motion to the court for the establishment, modifica- 10 tion or enforcement of a child support obligation for persons not in 11 receipt of public assistance and care must contain either a request for 12 child support enforcement services which would authorize the collection 13 of the support obligation by the immediate issuance of an income 14 execution for support enforcement as provided for by this chapter, 15 completed in the manner specified in section one hundred eleven-g of the 16 social services law; or a statement that the applicant has applied for 17 or is in receipt of such services; or a statement that the applicant 18 knows of the availability of such services, has declined them at this 19 time and where support enforcement services pursuant to section one 20 hundred eleven-g of the social services law have been declined that the 21 applicant understands that an income deduction order may be issued 22 pursuant to subdivision (c) of section fifty-two hundred forty-two of 23 the civil practice law and rules without other child support enforcement 24 services and that payment of an administrative fee may be required. The 25 court shall provide a copy of any such request for child support 26 enforcement services to the support collection unit of the appropriate 27 social services district any time it directs payments to be made to such 28 support collection unit. Additionally, the copy of any such request 29 shall be accompanied by the name, address and social security number of 30 the parties; the date and place of the parties' marriage; the name and 31 date of birth of the child or children; and the name and address of the 32 employers and income payors of the party from whom child support is 33 sought or from the party ordered to pay child support to the other 34 party. Such direction may require the payment of a sum or sums of money 35 either directly to the custodial parent or to third persons for goods or 36 services furnished for such child, or for both payments to the custodial 37 parent and to such third persons; provided, however, that unless the 38 party seeking or receiving child support has applied for or is receiving 39 such services, the court shall not direct such payments to be made to 40 the support collection unit, as established in section one hundred 41 eleven-h of the social services law. Every order directing the payment 42 of support shall require that if either parent currently, or at any time 43 in the future, has health insurance benefits available that may be 44 extended or obtained to cover the child, such parent is required to 45 exercise the option of additional coverage in favor of such child and 46 execute and deliver to such person any forms, notices, documents or 47 instruments necessary to assure timely payment of any health insurance 48 claims for such child. 49 S 4. The domestic relations law is amended by adding a new section 50 240-d to read as follows: 51 S 240-D. CUSTODY OF CHILDREN. 1. WHERE THE COURT CONSIDERS AWARDING 52 SHARED PARENTING PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVI- 53 SION ONE OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED FORTY OF THIS ARTICLE, "SHARED PARENT- 54 ING", SHALL MEAN AN ORDER AWARDING CUSTODY OF THE CHILD TO BOTH PARTIES 55 SO THAT BOTH PARTIES SHARE EQUALLY THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL 56 OF SUCH CHILD AND SHARE EQUALLY THE LIVING EXPERIENCE IN TIME AND PHYS- S. 5316 5 1 ICAL CARE TO ASSURE FREQUENT AND CONTINUING CONTACT WITH BOTH PARTIES, 2 AS THE COURT DEEMS TO BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD, TAKING INTO 3 CONSIDERATION THE LOCATION AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF EACH PARTY. THE TERM 4 "SHARED PARENTING" SHALL BE CONSIDERED INTERCHANGEABLE WITH "NEARLY 5 EQUAL SHARED PARENTING". AN AWARD OF JOINT PHYSICAL AND LEGAL CUSTODY 6 OBLIGATES THE PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE HEALTH, 7 EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF THE MINOR CHILD, AND UNLESS ALLOCATED, APPOR- 8 TIONED OR DECREED, THE PARENTS OR PARTIES SHALL CONFER WITH ONE ANOTHER 9 IN THE EXERCISE OF DECISION-MAKING RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORI- 10 TY. 11 2. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE A "PARENTING PLAN", REQUIRED TO BE 12 SUBMITTED TO THE COURT PURSUANT TO CLAUSE ONE OF SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF 13 PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED FORTY OF THIS 14 ARTICLE, SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: 15 (A) THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH PARENT; 16 (B) A WEEKLY PARENTING SCHEDULE; 17 (C) A HOLIDAY AND VACATION PARENTING SCHEDULE; 18 (D) A SCHEDULE FOR SPECIAL OCCASIONS, INCLUDING BIRTHDAYS; 19 (E) A DESCRIPTION OF ANY SPECIFIC DECISION MAKING AREAS FOR EACH 20 PARENT PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT BOTH PARENTS SHALL CONFER AND JOINTLY 21 DETERMINE MAJOR ISSUES AFFECTING THE WELFARE OF THE CHILD INCLUDING 22 HEALTH, EDUCATION, DISCIPLINE AND RELIGION; 23 (F) IF APPLICABLE, THE NEED FOR ANY AND ALL OF THE PARTIES TO PARTIC- 24 IPATE IN COUNSELING; 25 (G) ANY RESTRICTIONS ON EITHER PARENT WHEN IN PHYSICAL CONTROL OF THE 26 CHILD OR CHILDREN; AND 27 (H) PROVISIONS FOR MEDIATION OF DISPUTES. 28 3. ONE PARENT MAY BE DESIGNATED AS A PUBLIC WELFARE RECIPIENT IN SITU- 29 ATIONS WHERE PUBLIC WELFARE AID IS DEEMED NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE. IN 30 MAKING AN ORDER OF SHARED PARENTING, THE COURT SHALL SPECIFY THE RIGHT 31 OF EACH PARENT TO THE PHYSICAL CONTROL OF THE CHILD IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL 32 TO ENABLE A PARENT DEPRIVED OF THAT CONTROL TO ENFORCE THE COURT ORDER 33 AND TO ENABLE LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES TO IMPLEMENT LAWS FOR RELIEF 34 OF PARENTAL KIDNAPPING AND CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE. 35 S 5. The family court act is amended by adding a new section 654 to 36 read as follows: 37 S 654. ORDER OF PREFERENCE OF CUSTODY AWARDS. CUSTODY SHALL BE AWARDED 38 IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER OF PREFERENCE, ACCORDING TO THE BEST INTERESTS OF 39 THE CHILD: 40 (A) TO BOTH PARENTS JOINTLY. IN SUCH CASES THE COURT MUST REQUIRE THE 41 PARENTS TO SUBMIT A PARENTING PLAN AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION (B) OF 42 SECTION SIX HUNDRED FIFTY-FOUR-A OF THIS PART FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 43 CUSTODY ORDER OR THE PARENTS ACTING INDIVIDUALLY OR IN CONCERT MAY 44 SUBMIT A CUSTODY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO THE COURT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A 45 CUSTODY DECREE. THERE SHALL BE A PRESUMPTION, AFFECTING THE BURDEN OF 46 PROOF, THAT SHARED PARENTING IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF A MINOR CHILD 47 UNLESS THE PARENTS HAVE AGREED TO AN AWARD OF CUSTODY TO ONE PARENT OR 48 SO AGREE IN OPEN COURT AT A HEARING FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING 49 CUSTODY OF A MINOR CHILD OF THE MARRIAGE OR THE COURT FINDS THAT SHARED 50 PARENTING WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO A PARTICULAR CHILD OF A SPECIFIC 51 MARRIAGE. FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING THE COURT IN MAKING A DETERMI- 52 NATION WHETHER AN AWARD OF SHARED PARENTING IS APPROPRIATE, THE COURT 53 MAY DIRECT THAT AN INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED. IF THE COURT DECLINES TO 54 ENTER AN ORDER AWARDING SHARED PARENTING PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION, 55 THE COURT SHALL STATE IN ITS DECISION THE REASONS FOR DENIAL OF AN AWARD 56 OF SHARED PARENTING. IN JURISDICTIONS HAVING A PRIVATE OR PUBLICLY-SUP- S. 5316 6 1 PORTED CONCILIATION SERVICE, THE COURT OR THE PARTIES MAY, AT ANY TIME, 2 PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES OF COURT, CONSULT WITH THE CONCILIATION SERVICE 3 FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING THE PARTIES TO FORMULATE A PLAN FOR IMPLE- 4 MENTATION OF THE CUSTODY ORDER OR TO RESOLVE ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH HAS 5 ARISEN IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PLAN FOR CUSTODY. ANY ORDER FOR SHARED 6 PARENTING MAY BE MODIFIED OR TERMINATED UPON THE PETITION OF ONE OR BOTH 7 PARENTS OR ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION IF IT IS SHOWN THAT THE BEST INTER- 8 ESTS OF THE CHILD REQUIRE THE MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION OF THE SHARED 9 PARENTING ORDER. ANY ORDER FOR THE CUSTODY OF A MINOR CHILD OF A 10 MARRIAGE ENTERED BY A COURT IN THIS STATE OR IN ANY OTHER STATE, SUBJECT 11 TO JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, MAY BE MODIFIED AT ANY TIME TO AN ORDER 12 OF SHARED PARENTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION. 13 (B) TO EITHER PARENT, IN WHICH CASE, THE COURT, IN MAKING AN ORDER FOR 14 CUSTODY TO EITHER PARENT SHALL CONSIDER, AMONG OTHER FACTORS, WHICH 15 PARENT IS MORE LIKELY TO ALLOW THE CHILD OR CHILDREN FREQUENT AND 16 CONTINUING CONTACT WITH THE NONCUSTODIAL PARENT, AND SHALL NOT PREFER A 17 PARENT AS CUSTODIAN BECAUSE OF THAT PARENT'S GENDER. THE BURDEN OF PROOF 18 THAT SHARED PARENTING WOULD NOT BE IN THE CHILD'S BEST INTEREST SHALL BE 19 UPON THE PARENT REQUESTING SOLE CUSTODY. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER 20 PROVISION OF LAW, ACCESS TO RECORDS AND INFORMATION PERTAINING TO A 21 MINOR CHILD, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MEDICAL, DENTAL AND SCHOOL 22 RECORDS, SHALL NOT BE DENIED TO A PARENT BECAUSE THE PARENT IS NOT THE 23 CHILD'S CUSTODIAL PARENT. 24 (C) IF TO NEITHER PARENT, TO THE PERSON OR PERSONS IN WHOSE HOME THE 25 CHILD HAS BEEN LIVING IN A NURTURING AND STABLE ENVIRONMENT. 26 (D) TO ANY OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS DEEMED BY THE COURT TO BE SUITABLE 27 AND ABLE TO PROVIDE A NURTURING AND STABLE ENVIRONMENT. BEFORE THE COURT 28 MAKES ANY ORDER AWARDING CUSTODY TO A PERSON OR PERSONS OTHER THAN A 29 PARENT WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE PARENTS, IT SHALL MAKE A FINDING THAT 30 AN AWARD OF CUSTODY TO A PARENT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE CHILD AND 31 THE AWARD TO A NON-PARENT IS REQUIRED TO SERVE THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE 32 CHILD. ALLEGATIONS THAT PARENTAL CUSTODY WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE 33 CHILD, OTHER THAN A STATEMENT OF THE ULTIMATE FACT, SHALL NOT APPEAR IN 34 THE PLEADINGS. THE COURT MAY, IN ITS DISCRETION, EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC FROM 35 THE HEARING ON THIS ISSUE. THE COURT SHALL STATE IN WRITING THE REASON 36 FOR ITS DECISION AND WHY THE AWARD MADE WAS FOUND TO BE IN THE BEST 37 INTERESTS OF THE CHILD. 38 S 6. The family court act is amended by adding a new section 654-a to 39 read as follows: 40 S 654-A. CUSTODY OF CHILDREN. (A) WHERE THE COURT CONSIDERS AWARDING 41 SHARED PARENTING PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF 42 SECTION SIX HUNDRED FIFTY-FOUR OF THIS PART, "SHARED PARENTING", SHALL 43 MEAN AN ORDER AWARDING CUSTODY OF THE CHILD TO BOTH PARTIES SO THAT BOTH 44 PARTIES SHARE EQUALLY THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL OF SUCH CHILD 45 AND SHARE EQUALLY THE LIVING EXPERIENCE IN TIME AND PHYSICAL CARE TO 46 ASSURE FREQUENT AND CONTINUING CONTACT WITH BOTH PARTIES, AS THE COURT 47 DEEMS TO BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD, TAKING INTO CONSIDER- 48 ATION THE LOCATION AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF EACH PARTY. THE TERM "SHARED 49 PARENTING", SHALL BE CONSIDERED INTERCHANGEABLE WITH "NEARLY EQUAL 50 SHARED PARENTING". AN AWARD OF JOINT PHYSICAL AND LEGAL CUSTODY OBLI- 51 GATES THE PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE HEALTH, EDUCA- 52 TION AND WELFARE OF THE MINOR CHILD, AND UNLESS ALLOCATED, APPORTIONED 53 OR DECREED, THE PARENTS OR PARTIES SHALL CONFER WITH ONE ANOTHER IN THE 54 EXERCISE OF DECISION-MAKING RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITY. 55 (B) FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PART A "PARENTING PLAN", REQUIRED TO BE 56 SUBMITTED TO THE COURT, SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: S. 5316 7 1 1. THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH PARENT; 2 2. A WEEKLY PARENTING SCHEDULE; 3 3. A HOLIDAY AND VACATION PARENTING SCHEDULE; 4 4. A SCHEDULE FOR SPECIAL OCCASIONS, INCLUDING BIRTHDAYS; 5 5. A DESCRIPTION OF ANY SPECIFIC DECISION MAKING AREAS FOR EACH PARENT 6 PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT BOTH PARENTS SHALL CONFER AND JOINTLY DETERMINE 7 MAJOR ISSUES AFFECTING THE WELFARE OF THE CHILD INCLUDING HEALTH, EDUCA- 8 TION, DISCIPLINE AND RELIGION; 9 6. IF APPLICABLE, THE NEED FOR ANY AND ALL OF THE PARTIES TO PARTIC- 10 IPATE IN COUNSELING; 11 7. ANY RESTRICTIONS ON EITHER PARENT WHEN IN PHYSICAL CONTROL OF THE 12 CHILD OR CHILDREN; AND 13 8. PROVISIONS FOR MEDIATION OF DISPUTES. 14 (C) ONE PARENT MAY BE DESIGNATED AS A PUBLIC WELFARE RECIPIENT IN 15 SITUATIONS WHERE PUBLIC WELFARE AID IS DEEMED NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE. 16 IN MAKING AN ORDER OF SHARED PARENTING, THE COURT SHALL SPECIFY THE 17 RIGHT OF EACH PARENT TO THE PHYSICAL CONTROL OF THE CHILD IN SUFFICIENT 18 DETAIL TO ENABLE A PARENT DEPRIVED OF THAT CONTROL TO ENFORCE THE COURT 19 ORDER AND TO ENABLE LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES TO IMPLEMENT LAWS FOR 20 RELIEF OF PARENTAL KIDNAPPING AND CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE. 21 S 7. This act shall take effect on the first of November next succeed- 22 ing the date on which it shall have become a law and shall apply to 23 actions and proceedings commenced on and after such date.