Bill Text: NY A04457 | 2019-2020 | General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: Provides a four percent across the board increase to funding allocated to school districts in New York state.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 5-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2020-07-14 - held for consideration in education [A04457 Detail]
Download: New_York-2019-A04457-Introduced.html
STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 4457 2019-2020 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY February 4, 2019 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. B. MILLER, FINCH -- read once and referred to the Committee on Education AN ACT to amend chapter 57 of the laws of 2012, relating to school district eligibility for an increase in apportionment of school aid and implementation of new standards for conducting annual professional performance reviews to determine teacher and principal effectiveness, in relation to providing a four percent across the board increase to funding allocated to school districts in New York state The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Section 1 of part A of chapter 57 of the laws of 2012, 2 relating to school district eligibility for an increase in apportionment 3 of school aid and implementation of new standards for conducting annual 4 professional performance reviews to determine teacher and principal 5 effectiveness, is amended to read as follows: 6 Section 1. Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of law, [no] all 7 school [district] districts shall be eligible for an apportionment of 8 general support for public schools from the funds appropriated for the 9 2012-13 school year in excess of the amount apportioned to such district 10 for the same time period during the base year [unless such school11district has submitted documentation that has been approved by the12commissioner of education by January 17, 2013 demonstrating that it has13fully implemented new standards and procedures for conducting annual14professional performance reviews of classroom teachers and building15principals to determine teacher and principal effectiveness including16but not limited to providing for (i) state assessments and other compa-17rable measures which shall comprise twenty or twenty-five percent of the18evaluation; (ii) locally selected measures of the student achievement19subcomponent which shall comprise twenty or fifteen percent of the eval-20uation; (iii) subjective measures of effectiveness that have been21approved by the commissioner with the majority of such points based onEXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD06601-01-9A. 4457 2 1multiple observations by an administrator or principal with at least one2unannounced observation which shall comprise 60 percent of the evalu-3ation; and (iv) a scoring rubric which ensures that it is possible to4receive any one of four ratings limited to highly effective, effective,5developing and ineffective; provided however that if any such payments6in excess of the amount apportioned to such district for the same time7period during the base year were made, and the school district has not8submitted documentation that it has fully implemented new standards and9procedures as set forth above that has been approved by the commissioner10of education by January 17, 2013, the total amount of such payments11shall be deducted by the commissioner from future payments to the school12district; provided further that, for the 2012-13 school year if such13deduction is greater than the sum of the amounts available for such14deductions, the remainder of the deduction shall be withheld from15payments scheduled to be made to the school district pursuant to section163609-a of the education law for the 2013-14 school year; provided17further that notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of law to the18contrary such documentation shall include a plan adopted by the govern-19ing board of the school district for conducting annual professional20performance reviews of classroom teachers and building principals that21has been approved by the commissioner, and in order to be approvable22such plan shall conform with the requirements for conducting annual23professional performance reviews of classroom teachers and building24principals, including but not limited to (i) state assessments and other25comparable measures which shall comprise twenty or twenty-five percent26of the evaluation; (ii) locally selected measures of the student27achievement subcomponent which shall comprise twenty or fifteen percent28of the evaluation; (iii) subjective measures of effectiveness that have29been approved by the commissioner with the majority of such points based30on multiple observations by an administrator or principal with at least31one unannounced observation which shall comprise 60 percent of the eval-32uation; and (iv) a scoring rubric which ensures that it is possible to33receive any one of four ratings limited to highly effective, effective,34developing and ineffective; consistent with and conforms to a chapter of35the laws of 2012 amending the education law relating to annual profes-36sional performance review of classroom teachers and building principals37and the teacher evaluation appeal process in the city of New York, as38proposed in legislative bill numbers S.6732 and A.9554, and provided39further that for a school district in a city with a population of one40million or more, notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of law, no41such school district shall be eligible for an apportionment of general42support for public schools from the funds appropriated for the 2012-1343school year in excess of the amount appropriated to such district for44the same time period during the base year unless such school district45has submitted documentation that has been approved by the commissioner46by January 17, 2013 demonstrating that it has adopted an expeditious47appeals process pertaining to the annual professional performance review48of classroom teachers and building principals that is consistent with49and conforms to a chapter of the laws of 2012 amending the education law50relating to annual professional performance review of classroom teachers51and building principals and the teacher evaluation appeal process in the52city of New York, as proposed in legislative bill numbers S.6732 and53A.9554, and if any such payments in excess of the amount apportioned to54such district for the same time period during the base year were made,55and the school district has not submitted documentation that has been56approved by the commissioner by January 17, 2013 that it has adopted anA. 4457 3 1expeditious appeals process pertaining to the annual professional2performance review of classroom teachers and building principals that is3consistent with and conforms to a chapter of the laws of 2012 amending4the education law relating to annual professional performance review of5classroom teachers and building principals and the teacher evaluation6appeal process in the city of New York, as proposed in legislative bill7numbers S.6732 and A.9554, the total amount of such payments shall be8deducted by the commissioner from future payments to the school9district; and provided further that, for the 2012-13 school year if such10deduction is greater than the sum of the amounts available for such11deductions, the remainder of the deduction shall be withheld from12payments scheduled to be made to the school district pursuant to section133609-a of the education law for the 2013-14 school year]. 14 § 2. Allocated aid provided pursuant to chapter 57 of the laws of 2012 15 relating to school district eligibility for an increase in apportionment 16 of school aid and implementation of new standards for conducting annual 17 professional performance reviews to determine teacher and principal 18 effectiveness, shall be distributed equally amongst all school districts 19 without regard to any formula established for the distribution of school 20 aid under the education law. 21 § 3. This act shall take effect immediately and shall be deemed to 22 have been in full force and effect on the same date and in the same 23 manner as section 1 of part A of chapter 57 of the laws of 2012, took 24 effect.