Reprinted
February 25, 2010
ENGROSSED
SENATE BILL No. 221
_____
DIGEST OF SB 221
(Updated February 24, 2010 6:20 pm - DI 106)
Citations Affected: IC 9-24; IC 9-30.
Synopsis: Conditions of hardship licenses. Requires a court to impose
reasonable monitoring requirements on a person who is issued a
restricted driving permit if the person is a habitual traffic violator, and
requires a court to impose certain conditions on habitual traffic
violators. Provides that a judgment, for purposes of the habitual traffic
violator law, includes a judgment from another jurisdiction in which
the elements of the offense are substantially similar to the elements of
the offense in Indiana. Provides that it is a Class A misdemeanor if a
person operates a vehicle or motorized bicycle in violation of a
restricted license.
Effective: July 1, 2010.
Wyss, Broden
(HOUSE SPONSORS _ VAN HAAFTEN, FOLEY)
January 11, 2010, read first time and referred to Committee on Corrections, Criminal, and
Civil Matters.
January 28, 2010, amended, reported favorably _ Do Pass.
February 1, 2010, read second time, ordered engrossed. Engrossed.
February 2, 2010, read third time, passed. Yeas 50, nays 0.
HOUSE ACTION
February 8, 2010, read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary.
February 22, 2010, amended, reported _ Do Pass.
February 24, 2010, read second time, amended, ordered engrossed.
Reprinted
February 25, 2010
Second Regular Session 116th General Assembly (2010)
PRINTING CODE. Amendments: Whenever an existing statute (or a section of the Indiana
Constitution) is being amended, the text of the existing provision will appear in this style type,
additions will appear in
this style type, and deletions will appear in
this style type.
Additions: Whenever a new statutory provision is being enacted (or a new constitutional
provision adopted), the text of the new provision will appear in
this style type. Also, the
word
NEW will appear in that style type in the introductory clause of each SECTION that adds
a new provision to the Indiana Code or the Indiana Constitution.
Conflict reconciliation: Text in a statute in
this style type or
this style type reconciles conflicts
between statutes enacted by the 2009 Regular and Special Sessions of the General Assembly.
ENGROSSED
SENATE BILL No. 221
A BILL FOR AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning
motor vehicles.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana:
SOURCE: IC 9-24-15-3; (10)ES0221.2.1. -->
SECTION 1. IC 9-24-15-3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 3. The following
information must be included in a petition filed under section 2 of this
chapter:
(1) The petitioner's age, place of residence, and occupation.
(2) That the petitioner has never been convicted of a similar
offense or been suspended for a similar reason.
(3) The reason and nature of the hardship or burden upon the
petitioner's family or dependents.
(4) The nature of and the necessity of the use of a motor vehicle
in the petitioner's employment.
(5) The petitioner's place of employment, hours worked, and route
to be traveled for employment purposes.
(6) After June 30, 2005, a certified copy of the petitioner's driving
record in Indiana and other states in which the petitioner has held
driving privileges, including all states in which the petitioner has
held a commercial driver's license.
(7) After June 30, 2005, a verified statement that the petitioner
meets eligibility requirements for a restricted license as set forth
in section 6.5 of this chapter.
(8) Whether the person is a habitual violator of traffic laws
under IC 9-30-10.
SOURCE: IC 9-24-15-6; (10)ES0221.2.2. -->
SECTION 2. IC 9-24-15-6 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 6. (a) The court shall,
after hearing the evidence upon a petition filed under this chapter and
without any requests, make, sign, and file special finding of facts in
writing. Except as provided in section 6.5 of this chapter, the court may
do either of the following:
(1) Refuse to grant the petition.
(2) Make a final determination in the nature of a recommendation
to the bureau that the petitioner be granted a restricted driving
permit.
The judge of the court shall sign the recommendation and have the
recommendation entered in the order book by the clerk of the court,
with a copy sent to the bureau.
(b) If the court recommends that a person who is a habitual
traffic violator under IC 9-30-10 be granted a restricted driving
permit, the court shall require the person to submit to reasonable
monitoring requirements.
SOURCE: IC 9-24-15-6.5; (10)ES0221.2.3. -->
SECTION 3. IC 9-24-15-6.5, AS AMENDED BY P.L.2-2005,
SECTION 34, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 6.5. (a) The court shall grant a petition for a
restricted driving permit filed under this chapter if all of the following
conditions exist:
(1) The person was not convicted of one (1) or more of the
following:
(A) A Class D felony under IC 9-30-5-4 before July 1, 1996,
or a Class D felony or a Class C felony under IC 9-30-5-4 after
June 30, 1996.
(B) A Class C felony under IC 9-30-5-5 before July 1, 1996, or
a Class C felony or a Class B felony under IC 9-30-5-5 after
June 30, 1996.
(2) The person's driving privileges were suspended under
IC 9-30-6-9(c) or IC 35-48-4-15.
(3) The driving that was the basis of the suspension was not in
connection with the person's work.
(4) The person does not have a previous conviction for operating
while intoxicated.
(5) The person is participating in a rehabilitation program
certified by either the division of mental health and addiction or
the Indiana judicial center as a condition of the person's
probation.
(b) The person filing the petition for a restricted driving permit shall
include in the petition the information specified in subsection (a) in
addition to the information required by sections 3 through 4 of this
chapter.
(c) Whenever the court grants a person restricted driving privileges
under this chapter, that part of the court's order granting probationary
driving privileges shall not take effect until the person's driving
privileges have been suspended for at least thirty (30) days under
IC 9-30-6-9. In a county that provides for the installation of an ignition
interlock device under IC 9-30-8, installation of an ignition interlock
device is required as a condition of probationary driving privileges for
the entire duration of the probationary driving privileges.
(d) If a court requires installation of a certified ignition interlock
device under subsection (c), the court shall order the bureau to record
this requirement in the person's operating record in accordance with
IC 9-14-3-7. When the person is no longer required to operate only a
motor vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device, the court
shall notify the bureau that the ignition interlock use requirement has
expired and order the bureau to update its records accordingly.
(e) If the court recommends that a person who is a habitual
traffic violator under IC 9-30-10 be granted a restricted driving
permit, the court shall require the person to submit to reasonable
monitoring requirements.
SOURCE: IC 9-24-15-6.7; (10)ES0221.2.4. -->
SECTION 4. IC 9-24-15-6.7, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
SECTION 1, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 6.7. (a) If a petitioner whose driving license or
permit is suspended under IC 9-25-6-19, IC 9-25-6-20, or IC 9-25-6-21
proves to the satisfaction of the court that public transportation is
unavailable for travel by the petitioner:
(1) to and from the petitioner's regular place of employment;
(2) in the course of the petitioner's regular employment;
(3) to and from the petitioner's place of worship; or
(4) to participate in parenting time with the petitioner's children
consistent with a court order granting parenting time;
the court may grant a petition for a restricted driving permit filed under
this chapter.
(b) A restricted driving permit issued by the bureau under this
section must specify that the restricted driving permit is valid only for
purposes of driving under the conditions described in subsection (a).
(c) A restricted driving permit issued by the bureau under this
section shall be:
(1) issued in the same manner; and
(2) subject to all requirements;
as other permits under this chapter. If the court recommends that a
person who is a habitual traffic violator under IC 9-30-10 be
granted a restricted driving permit, the court shall require the
person to submit to reasonable monitoring requirements.
SOURCE: IC 9-30-10-4; (10)ES0221.2.5. -->
SECTION 5. IC 9-30-10-4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 4. (a) A person who has
accumulated at least two (2) judgments within a ten (10) year period
for any of the following violations, singularly or in combination, not
arising out of the same incident, and with at least one (1) violation
occurring after March 31, 1984, is a habitual violator:
(1) Reckless homicide resulting from the operation of a motor
vehicle.
(2) Voluntary or involuntary manslaughter resulting from the
operation of a motor vehicle.
(3) Failure of the driver of a motor vehicle involved in an accident
resulting in death or injury to any person to stop at the scene of
the accident and give the required information and assistance.
(4) Operation of a vehicle while intoxicated resulting in death.
(5) Before July 1, 1997, operation of a vehicle with at least
ten-hundredths percent (0.10%) alcohol in the blood resulting in
death.
(6) After June 30, 1997, and before July 1, 2001, operation of a
vehicle with an alcohol concentration equivalent to at least
ten-hundredths (0.10) gram of alcohol per:
(A) one hundred (100) milliliters of the blood; or
(B) two hundred ten (210) liters of the breath;
resulting in death.
(7) After June 30, 2001, operation of a vehicle with an alcohol
concentration equivalent to at least eight-hundredths (0.08) gram
of alcohol per:
(A) one hundred (100) milliliters of the blood; or
(B) two hundred ten (210) liters of the breath;
resulting in death.
(b) A person who has accumulated at least three (3) judgments
within a ten (10) year period for any of the following violations,
singularly or in combination, not arising out of the same incident, and
with at least one (1) violation occurring after March 31, 1984, is a
habitual violator:
(1) Operation of a vehicle while intoxicated.
(2) Before July 1, 1997, operation of a vehicle with at least
ten-hundredths percent (0.10%) alcohol in the blood.
(3) After June 30, 1997, and before July 1, 2001, operation of a
vehicle with an alcohol concentration equivalent to at least
ten-hundredths (0.10) gram of alcohol per:
(A) one hundred (100) milliliters of the blood; or
(B) two hundred ten (210) liters of the breath.
(4) After June 30, 2001, operation of a vehicle with an alcohol
concentration equivalent to at least eight-hundredths (0.08) gram
of alcohol per:
(A) one hundred (100) milliliters of the blood; or
(B) two hundred ten (210) liters of the breath.
(5) Operating a motor vehicle while the person's license to do so
has been suspended or revoked as a result of the person's
conviction of an offense under IC 9-1-4-52 (repealed July 1,
1991), IC 9-24-18-5(b) (repealed July 1, 2000), IC 9-24-19-3, or
IC 9-24-19-5.
(6) Operating a motor vehicle without ever having obtained a
license to do so.
(7) Reckless driving.
(8) Criminal recklessness involving the operation of a motor
vehicle.
(9) Drag racing or engaging in a speed contest in violation of law.
(10) Violating IC 9-4-1-40 (repealed July 1, 1991), IC 9-4-1-46
(repealed July 1, 1991), IC 9-26-1-1(1), IC 9-26-1-1(2),
IC 9-26-1-1(4), IC 9-26-1-2(1), IC 9-26-1-2(2), IC 9-26-1-3, or
IC 9-26-1-4.
(11) Any felony under an Indiana motor vehicle statute or any
felony in the commission of which a motor vehicle is used.
A judgment for a violation enumerated in subsection (a) shall be added
to the violations described in this subsection for the purposes of this
subsection.
(c) A person who has accumulated at least ten (10) judgments
within a ten (10) year period for any traffic violation, except a parking
or an equipment violation, of the type required to be reported to the
bureau, singularly or in combination, not arising out of the same
incident, and with at least one (1) violation occurring after March 31,
1984, is a habitual violator. However, at least one (1) of the judgments
must be for a violation enumerated in subsection (a) or (b). A judgment
for a violation enumerated in subsection (a) or (b) shall be added to the
judgments described in this subsection for the purposes of this
subsection.
(d) For purposes of this section, a judgment includes a judgment
in any other jurisdiction in which the elements of the offense for
which the conviction was entered are substantially similar to the
elements of the offenses described in subsections (a) and (b).
SOURCE: IC 9-30-10-9; (10)ES0221.2.6. -->
SECTION 6. IC 9-30-10-9 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 9. (a) After June 30,
2005, this section does not apply to a person who:
(1) holds a commercial driver's license; and
(2) has been charged with an offense involving the operation of
a motor vehicle in accordance with the federal Motor Carrier
Safety Improvement Act of 1999 (MCSIA) (Public Law
106-159.113 Stat. 1748).
(b) If a court finds that a person:
(1) is a habitual violator under section 4(c) of this chapter;
(2) has not been previously placed on probation under this section
by a court;
(3) operates a vehicle for commercial or business purposes, and
the person's mileage for commercial or business purposes:
(A) is substantially in excess of the mileage of an average
driver; and
(B) may have been a factor that contributed to the person's
poor driving record; and
(4) does not have:
(A) a judgment for a violation enumerated in section 4(a) of
this chapter; or
(B) at least three (3) judgments (singularly or in combination
and not arising out of the same incident) of the violations
enumerated in section 4(b) of this chapter;
the court may place the person on probation in accordance with
subsection (d).
(c) If a court finds that a person:
(1) is a habitual violator under section 4(b) of this chapter;
(2) has not been previously placed on probation under this section
by a court;
(3) does not have a judgment for any violation listed in section
4(a) of this chapter;
(4) has had the person's driving privileges suspended under this
chapter for at least five (5) consecutive years; and
(5) has not violated the terms of the person's suspension by
operating a vehicle;
the court may place the person on probation in accordance with
subsection (d). However, if the person has any judgments for operation
of a vehicle before July 1, 2001, while intoxicated or with an alcohol
concentration equivalent to at least ten-hundredths (0.10) gram of
alcohol per one hundred (100) milliliters of the blood or two hundred
ten (210) liters of the breath, or for the operation of a vehicle after June
30, 2001, while intoxicated or with an alcohol concentration equivalent
to at least eight-hundredths (0.08) gram of alcohol per one hundred
(100) milliliters of the blood or two hundred ten (210) liters of the
breath, the court, before the court places a person on probation under
subsection (d), must find that the person has successfully fulfilled the
requirements of a rehabilitation program certified by one (1) or both of
the following:
(A) The division of mental health and addiction.
(B) The Indiana judicial center.
(d) Whenever a court places a habitual violator on probation, the
court:
(1) shall record each of the court's findings under this section in
writing;
(2) shall obtain the person's driver's license or permit and send the
license or permit to the bureau;
(3) shall direct the person to apply to the bureau for a restricted
driver's license;
(4) shall order the bureau to issue the person an appropriate
license;
(5) shall place the person on probation for a fixed period of not
less than three (3) years and not more than ten (10) years;
(6) shall attach restrictions to the person's driving privileges,
including restrictions limiting the person's driving to:
(A) commercial or business purposes or other employment
related driving;
(B) specific purposes in exceptional circumstances; and
(C) rehabilitation programs; and
(D) specified hours during which the person may drive;
(7) shall require the person to submit to reasonable
monitoring requirements;
(7) (8) shall order the person to file proof of financial
responsibility for three (3) years following the date of being
placed on probation; and
(8) (9) may shall impose other appropriate conditions of
probation, which must include one (1) or more of the following
conditions if the person was determined to be a habitual
violator under IC 9-30-10-4(a)(4) through IC 9-30-10-4(a)(7)
or IC 9-30-10-4(b)(1) through IC 9-30-10-4(b)(4), and at least
one (1) of the offenses occurred within five (5) years prior to
the granting of the probationary or restricted license:
(A) An order prohibiting the person from operating a
motor vehicle or motorized bicycle with an alcohol
concentration equivalent to at least two-hundredths (0.02)
gram of alcohol per:
(i) one hundred (100) milliliters of the person's blood; or
(ii) two hundred ten (210) liters of the person's breath;
or while under the influence of any other intoxicating
substance.
(B) An order that the person submit to a method to
monitor the person's compliance with the prohibition
against operating a motor vehicle or motorized bicycle
with an alcohol concentration equivalent to at least
two-hundredths (0.02) gram of alcohol per:
(i) one hundred (100) milliliters of the person's blood; or
(ii) two hundred ten (210) liters of the person's breath;
or while intoxicated (as defined under IC 9-13-2-86).
(C) The court shall determine the appropriate monitoring
method, which may include one (1) or more of the
following:
(i) The person may operate only a motor vehicle
equipped with an ignition interlock device.
(ii) The person must submit to a chemical test if a law
enforcement officer lawfully stops the person while
operating a motor vehicle or motorized bicycle and the
law enforcement officer requests that the person submit
to a chemical test.
(iii) The person must wear a device that detects and
records the person's use of alcohol.
(iv) The person must submit to any other reasonable
monitoring requirement as determined by the court.
(e) If a court finds that a person:
(1) is a habitual violator under section 4(b) or 4(c) of this chapter;
(2) does not have any judgments for violations under section 4(a)
of this chapter;
(3) does not have any judgments or convictions for violations
under section 4(b) of this chapter, except for judgments or
convictions under section 4(b)(5) of this chapter that resulted
from driving on a suspended license that was suspended for:
(A) the commission of infractions only; or
(B) previously driving on a suspended license;
(4) has not been previously placed on probation under this section
by a court; and
(5) has had the person's driving privileges suspended under this
chapter for at least three (3) consecutive years and has not
violated the terms of the person's suspension by operating a
vehicle for at least three (3) consecutive years;
the court may place the person on probation under subsection (d).
SOURCE: IC 9-30-10-13; (10)ES0221.2.7. -->
SECTION 7. IC 9-30-10-13 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 13. (a) The bureau may
issue a license to operate a motor vehicle to a habitual violator whose
driving privileges are suspended under section 5(b) of this chapter if
the following conditions exist:
(1) The time specified for the person's probation or the restriction
or suspension of the person's license has elapsed.
(2) The person has met all the requirements of all applicable
statutes and rules relating to the licensing of motor vehicle
operators.
(3) The person files with the bureau and maintains for three (3)
years after filing proof of financial responsibility in accordance
with IC 9-25.
(4) The bureau places a restriction on the person's driver's
license and driving record that indicates the person is
prohibited from operating a motor vehicle or motorized
bicycle with an alcohol concentration equivalent to at least
two-hundredths (0.02) gram of alcohol per:
(A) one hundred (100) milliliters of the person's blood; or
(B) two hundred ten (210) liters of the person's breath;
or while intoxicated (as defined under IC 9-13-2-86) for three
(3) years after the bureau issues the driver's license to the
person.
(5) The person signs a bureau form by which the person
agrees that as a condition to obtaining the driver's license the
person will submit to a chemical test at any time during the
period three (3) years after the bureau issues the driver's
license to the person if a law enforcement officer lawfully
stops the person while operating a motor vehicle or motorized
bicycle and the law enforcement officer requests that the
person submit to a chemical test.
(b) The bureau may issue a license to operate a motor vehicle to a
habitual violator whose driving privileges have been suspended for life
if the following conditions exist:
(1) The bureau has received an order for rescission of suspension
and reinstatement issued under section 15 of this chapter.
(2) The person to whom the license is to be issued has never been
convicted of a violation described in section 4(a) or 17 of this
chapter.
(3) The person has not been convicted of an offense under section
16 of this chapter more than one (1) time.
(4) The person has met all the requirements of all applicable
statutes and rules relating to the licensing of motor vehicle
operators.
(5) The person files with the bureau, and maintains for three (3)
years after filing proof of financial responsibility in accordance
with IC 9-25.
(6) The bureau places a restriction on the person's driver's
license and driving record that indicates the person is
prohibited from operating a motor vehicle or motorized
bicycle with an alcohol concentration equivalent to at least
two-hundredths (0.02) gram of alcohol per:
(A) one hundred (100) milliliters of the person's blood; or
(B) two hundred ten (210) liters of the person's breath;
or while intoxicated (as defined under IC 9-13-2-86) for three
(3) years after the bureau issues the driver's license to the
person.
(7) The person signs a bureau form by which the person
agrees that as a condition to obtaining the driver's license the
person will submit to a chemical test at any time during the
period three (3) years after the bureau issues the driver's
license to the person if a law enforcement officer lawfully
stops the person while operating a motor vehicle or motorized
bicycle and the law enforcement officer requests that the
person submit to a chemical test.
(c) A habitual violator is not eligible for relief under the hardship
provisions of IC 9-24-15.
SOURCE: IC 9-30-10-15; (10)ES0221.2.8. -->
SECTION 8. IC 9-30-10-15 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 15. (a) Upon receiving
a petition filed under section 14 of this chapter, a court shall set a date
for hearing the matter and direct the clerk of the court to provide notice
of the hearing date to the following:
(1) The petitioner.
(2) The prosecuting attorney of the county where the petitioner
resides.
(3) The bureau.
(b) A court may order the rescission of the order that required the
suspension of the petitioner's driving privileges for life and may order
the bureau to reinstate the driving privileges of a petitioner whose
driving privileges have been suspended for life if, after the hearing of
the matter, the court makes the following written findings and
conclusions, based on clear and convincing evidence:
(1) That the petitioner has never been convicted of a violation
described in section 4(a) of this chapter.
(2) That the petitioner has never been convicted of an offense
under section 17 of this chapter.
(3) That the petitioner has not been convicted of an offense under
section 16 of this chapter more than one (1) time.
(4) If the person is petitioning the court under section 14(a) of this
chapter that ten (10) years have elapsed since the date on which
an order was issued that required the suspension of the petitioner's
driving privileges for life.
(5) That there has been a substantial change in the petitioner's
circumstances indicating the petitioner would no longer pose a
risk to the safety of others if the petitioner's driving privileges
were reinstated.
(6) That there has been a substantial change in the petitioner's
circumstances indicating that the suspension of the petitioner's
driving privileges for life has become unreasonable.
(7) That it is in the best interests of society for the petitioner's
driving privileges to be reinstated.
(8) If the person is petitioning the court under section 14(e) of this
chapter:
(A) that three (3) years have elapsed since the date the order
was issued that required the suspension of the petitioner's
driving privileges for life; and
(B) that the conditions listed under section 14(e) of this
chapter are satisfied.
(c) The petitioner has the burden of proof under this section and an
order issued under subsection (b) is a final order, appealable by any
party to the action.
(d) In an order for reinstatement of driving privileges issued under
this section, the court may require the bureau to issue to the prevailing
petitioner:
(1) a license to operate a motor vehicle under section 13(b) of this
chapter; or
(2) a restricted driving license for a time and subject to conditions
specified by the court,
which must include one (1) or more of
the following conditions if the person was determined to be a
habitual violator under IC 9-30-10-4(a)(4) through
IC 9-30-10-4(a)(7) or IC 9-30-10-4(b)(1) through
IC 9-30-10-4(b)(4), and at least one (1) of the offenses
occurred within five (5) years prior to the granting of the
probationary or restricted license:
(A) Specified hours during which the person may drive.
(B) An order prohibiting the person from operating a
motor vehicle or motorized bicycle with an alcohol
concentration equivalent to at least two-hundredths (0.02)
gram of alcohol per:
(i) one hundred (100) milliliters of the person's blood; or
(ii) two hundred ten (210) liters of the person's breath;
or while intoxicated (as defined under IC 9-13-2-86).
(C) An order that the person submit to a method to
monitor the person's compliance with the prohibition
against operating a motor vehicle or motorized bicycle
with an alcohol concentration equivalent to at least
two-hundredths (0.02) gram of alcohol per:
(i) one hundred (100) milliliters of the person's blood; or
(ii) two hundred ten (210) liters of the person's breath;
or while intoxicated (as defined under IC 9-13-2-86).
(D) The court shall determine the appropriate monitoring
method, which may include one (1) or more of the
following:
(i) The person may operate only a motor vehicle
equipped with an ignition interlock device.
(ii) The person must submit to a chemical test if a law
enforcement officer lawfully stops the person while
operating a motor vehicle or motorized bicycle and the
law enforcement officer requests that the person submit
to a chemical test.
(iii) The person must wear a device that detects and
records the person's use of alcohol.
(iv) The person must submit to any other reasonable
monitoring requirement as determined by the court.
(e) If a court orders the bureau to issue a restricted driving license
to a petitioner under subsection (d), the court shall specify the
conditions under which the petitioner may be issued a license to
operate a motor vehicle under section 13(b) of this chapter. After the
expiration date of the restricted license and upon:
(1) fulfillment by the petitioner of the conditions specified by the
court; and
(2) the expiration of the restricted license issued under subsection
(d)(2);
the bureau shall issue to the petitioner a license to operate a motor
vehicle under section 13(b) of this chapter.
SOURCE: IC 9-30-10-17.5; (10)ES0221.2.9. -->
SECTION 9. IC 9-30-10-17.5 IS ADDED TO THE INDIANA
CODE AS A NEW SECTION TO READ AS FOLLOWS
[EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 17.5. A person who operates a
vehicle or motorized bicycle in violation of conditions of a
restricted license ordered by a court under IC 9-30-10-9(d)(9) or
IC 9-30-10-15(d)(2) commits a Class A misdemeanor.
SOURCE: IC 9-30-10-18; (10)ES0221.2.10. -->
SECTION 10. IC 9-30-10-18 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2010]: Sec. 18. In a criminal action
brought under section 16,
or 17,
or 17.5 of this chapter, it is a defense
that the operation of a motor vehicle
or motorized bicycle was
necessary to save life or limb in an extreme emergency. The defendant
must bear the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence to
establish this defense.